Guest guest Posted May 5, 2008 Report Share Posted May 5, 2008 hi, First of all I am sorry to hear about your situation. First I want to offer you a shoulder to lean on. Now I think your in a for a long battle. It also sounds like your district is once again stating the ongoing worldwide problem of everything comes down to funding and money. Well they are in the wrong according to IDEA (from my understanding). Your daughter deserves an appropriate education to the best of her ability. Has there been any official testing done on your daughter by the school like academic,speech, OT, ST, etc? Has your daughter had an official IQ test of some of sort? What are the basing this idea of theirs on? Is there any official information to base their ludricious statements on? Have they had an expert evaluate your daughter ? They need to provide you with specific evals, examples, have the peolpe who did the evals at your IEP meetings to explain why and where they are getting their infornation ( if in fact they any ). If I were you I would be firing all these questions at them all at once. But make sure they present written documentation of their finding to you. If they can not provide official documentation of where it states your daughter is low functioning. No one can tell or make a statement or diagnosis anyone as being low functioning without actually doing some in depth testing and evals of some sort. Sorry to on so strong school district just plain make me mad when they say such ridiculous things at IEP meetings. If they do not have any evidence of their statements. If you have not already please make the district test and get the evals done necessary on your daughter. So that you can prove them wrong. Or get them done yourself ( they may end up having to reimburse you for them if you win). I also would suggest that you go and contact your state board of Special Education and possibly the disabilities rights center in your state. Both of these might be able to help you in your fight. Also contact your superintendent of your district. Go to your school board also. Plead your case. The more people behind you the better your fight. Be prepared to bring a lawsuit if you have to. I hope i have been of some help. Best wishes, Jeanne mom21princess <mom21princess@...> wrote: Hi all, just wanted to touch base because wanted to share with all of you mine and my DD's exerience this past 6 months while my Dd is in 1st grade. WHAT A DISASTER! Where do I start? Well I believe I replied to last Spring about going with her gut feeling about her child and explained that my dd was doing so well in Kindergarten. Great reports from Teacher and classroom assistant. WELL, this year they descided to take the classroom aide away from my dd because they wanted to save this ($$$$$$$$) and they did and I let them, double UGH! I was stupid to think that her school would really be looking out for her best interest.... Well what a disaster, again 1st grade was (if you remember I explained how she went into the county pre school unit and was regressing and as soon as I put her into req Pre- K program she did nothing but flourish)! Here we go again, this time they bullied me into putting her in the 1st grade with out any supports because it was either that or go back into a county unit that they just braught in this year. I did not want that again, so I tried this and as you might all know she wasn't ready for that and dive bombed into a shell socially, emotionally but NOT accademically. I wanted to save her so I allowed her to go into this unit 1/2 day and 1/2 day in the reg ed class and can you all guess, she regressed, although I didnt see it because I was too blind by the fact that her frustration of being in with very low function CD and non verbal autistic kids lead to very bad behaviors, telling the teachers " no " sucking her thumb, hideing under the desks and just wanting to hide from this sheer torture. Well I was finally able to call an IEP meeting that took about 6 weeks to bring everyone together because I got an advocate and also another advocate from the Ohio Legal Rights Services (she was my BIG gun) and I was loaded with ammunition. I also had my MIL my DH and outside SLP with me that is only 6 people who were there to get my DD out of this unit. What was really histerical is this director of special services guy braught a total of 10 people including himself to state why my DD couldnt do this and could not function because as he stated " she is very low functioning. " THIS IS THE SAME GIRL WHO BRAUGHT HOME IN KINDERGARTEN (only 1 year ago) PAPERS IN EVERY SUBJECT THAT REFLECTED ALL GOOD WORK AND STARS, something is truley wrong here and it wasnt with my DD! Well needless to say I won but only temporarily because he is only alowing her to have a wrap-a-round for the next 5 weeks (and believe me she is going to need a wrap-a-round because she has let her behsviours become a habit and plus this unit teacher never taught her math because she did not know what she was doing accdemically). The B#$%$d even said to my advocates and me that this will be a financial burden, I heard that and went through the ROOF! I am sorry that this is so long but I felt I needed to vent to everyone out there who could relate to my story. Thanks for listening and would very much welcome all the support anyone could give me because this ride is not over yet.... Thanks again, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2008 Report Share Posted May 6, 2008 Hi Trixie, It appears that you accepted the classification of cognitive disability to " secure services " last year when you said in the archive (I have below) " Now I know in the primary grades K-4 they will put a more specific diagnosis, my dd was given CD (Cognative disability) which is so untrue it is scarey but they didn't know her when they gave it and now that she has been in Kindergarten for almost 8 months now the school even nows that that is not an acurate disgnosis but as long as it gets her services without that autism diagnosis, I'm happy. " A speech or language or communication disability alone qualifies a student for special services. I never accepted any classification for my son Tanner just to secure services because it negatively influences the adults that view my child (for just one reason) My suggestion is that you immediately need to secure out of district evaluations to help you fight this situation. Once you secure at least one evaluation you need to contact your school to " immediately reopen your child's IEP due to change in diagnosis " (sorry I missed your emails - if I caught your email last year I would have told you to do that ASAP then) Once you have documentation from a pediatric neurologist or developmental pediatrician or another expert you secured private that states your child isn't cognitively disabled –you can use this in another way. Talk about biggest gun - it wouldn't hurt to put a call into your local Office of Civil Rights as they help advocate for any disability. Ask a few members here who were in your situation- when the school learned that we wanted to have a class action or individual suit against the school for a violation of that child's civil rights –all of a sudden the school complied. One member here didn't care about the compliance because she felt her child's future was at stake in that they prejudged her daughter and she moved to another state where her mom- the child's grandmother, is a teacher. (the grandmother traveled in to help advocate for her grandchild in vain prior to the Office of Civil Rights getting involved) Once you get proof your child isn't cognitively disabled I have a team to help as well as we are `still' searching for a case that can be made an example of so that these type of situations don't happen again. I could post some of the archives -but this message is already so long! It's outrageous that they somehow are able to convince intelligent and loving parents that they have to sign IEPs with inappropriate classifications " to secure services " It's just crazy and no district should be able to get away with this! Doesn't anyone else see how this is destroying that child's chance at having a bright future?!! An apraxic or otherwise speech impaired or disabled child does NOT have to and should NOT be classified as autistic or cognitively disabled to secure services unless those classifications are appropriate to your child. Once you signed that IEP you in fact agreed to their classification –right now you need to fight that, because according to her IEP –your daughter `is' in appropriate placement being in a cognitively disabled placement and " you are the emotional parent who can't accept the facts yet " (which is how they'll paint you) Again a verbal/speech/language or communication impairment is a disability that is covered under Federal rights and laws for special education and for protection under the Office of Civil Rights. Stay calm and strong (don't get emotional in front of them if you can help it) –keep a paper trail and be prepared to fight. If you don't – it's clear that your district has already given up on your child and it also sounds at this point as if your child is starting to give up on herself. Typically the school gives up first –the parents give up next and then the child gives up. Self esteem is so key in these early years of development. You need to move quickly. Keep in mind according to my school district –my son " wouldn't make it " in a mainstream kindergarten class. Thank God Tanner had the chance to prove them SO wrong because we fought against our school district tooth and nail (but of course in a legal way –I stayed calm and nice- even told jokes at their expense some which are in the archives if anyone wonders where I get my sarcasim from). Tanner not only proved them wrong and " made it " but he thrived. Just in case you didn't read this –my son Tanner's story http://www.cherab.org/information/familiesrelate/letter.html Let's get your daughter a chance to prove them wrong too! ~~~~~~~~~~~~start of archives from you Your archive from earlier this year and last year including one I answered Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:42 pm Frustrated , needing some advise-Long hi, my name is Traci and my dd is 7 with a diagnosis of Apraxia of speech ,autistic charateristics,processing delays,DSI,and is farsighted with a lazy eye and wears glasses. The reason why I am writing to all of you is because she started 1st grade on a very bad note and the teacher, who was previously a special ed teacher is now teaching regular ed,was very abrupt with my dd and that threw my dd into a state of shut down. Here is a little history, in Kindergarten she was 1/2 day in afternoon and there was a teachers assistant. Life was very good and she adjusted so well. At the end of last year we all had a team meeting and they told me that they were letting go of all the aides and teachers assistants because the county was bringing in a Unit. My dd has always thrived in a regular ed setting with some support, she made some friends as well. I didnt know any better (definatley feeling guilty) but I agreed that we would try her out in the 1st grade with no teachers assistant and would go into the learning center to do her work sheets because she needs additional time to process and work. Like I said that all worked out last year beautifully with one thing different from this year, she still had the teacher assistant. What I didnt realize is that she was depending on that assistant to be there as did all the kids but she knew she needed her more and I didnt know that. The first day of first grade she was clinging to the teacher very badly and something happened that day that affected my dd for the past 2 1/2 weeks, behaviours came out that I have never seen in her especially at school. It turns out that when I went to parent orientation, the teacher told me that she is progressing (I think she was saying that to try and throw something positive in) and then she says but she has been sucking her thumb ALOT and putting her head down on her desk most of the time (I wanted to say and how is that progressing?!!) Anyway, I beat feet from there, next morning I came into see the principal and it turns out they want her to go into the Unit (which I found out only has 2 very low functioning children in there and 3 aids) not that I am singling them out from my dd but my problem is this, The one child does not talk at all and the other talks very minimal. My dd communicates at a 5 yo level and plays very well with her peers. She is at grade level with regular ed as long as she has time to process. Anyway, I then called the director of special services and pretty much told him that they were wrong what they did and that per her IEP that does not end until 10/1/07 has writen on there by me (my goals) " that communication between me and the Teacher and the Teachers aide. " He tried to work his way around the IEP but I wouldnt let up, he agreed with me that we could move my dd to the other 1st grade classroom. The reason why he agreed to this is because there was a wrap around aide with another little boy who is in a wheelchair but has no cognative diabilities and they would share her. Now my dd started in the other classroom this last Friday and the morning through lunch was very good but after recess (the new teacher told me) she told her like 5 or 6 times that she was not going to do her math paper, they took her in the learning center and it took her 20 to 25 minutes to write her name! This is a behaviour from her that i am not used too because she always did her work. now I am getting nervous because I am trying some different disciplinary things at home but she is being so stubborn that Im afraid she wont continue this at school. I am so frustrated with her and with the school because if things were just left the same as last year I know she would have done fine, I am so afraid that this last 2 1/2 weeks has set her back and it will take too long for her to regain her confidence back and it will be too late. I really needed to vent with someone who could understand. Thank you Traci Re: [ ] Re: Symptoms of Autisim/PDD- Mon Apr 9, 2007 10:34 pm , You are in the same situation I was in 3 years ago, my daughter is 7 yo and everyone of her doctors told me the same as your's are telling you, that my dd is not on the spectrum. However the pre-school I had her in at 4 told me the same thing, started with the SLP and then the special ed teacher. I refused to believe that they had any credibility to diagnose my daughter or teach them. So I got her out of there FAST! She stayed in the same Pre-school building which housed a Head Start program but this school was actually a pre- school/ pre-K school as well. The Director took her in knowing that she was definatley NOT on the same level as the other children in that special ed classroom that had various diagnosis, she was brighter and most of all had the capabilities and the drive to be social in a typical setting. She wanted to be friends with the low functioning children when she was in the special ed class and often mimicked them, which set her back because she has Apraxia and the special pre-school did not treat her for such, they were treating her as autistic (it was disasterous!) It wasn't always easy in the typical setting but my duaghter had a few things going for her and that was she caught on very fast and easily (I would not have known this unless I put her in that setting) and she was not disruptive to the class, the kids liked her and although I kept her in this pre-K program an extra year she just turned 7 at the end of March and is finishing up Kindergarten. I just want to let you know that second year in pre-K she made alot more friends and went to alot of Birthday parties and this braught her out of her shell. Kindergarten is even better she is at the top 6 in her class of 20 and she is so confident. my advise to you is go with your gut, but remember the schools (in my area at least) want that diagnosis of autism because they get more of this, ($$$$$$$$$$). Sad to say but it is a fact and if you feel he is not on the spectrum, never let the school tell you that , Apraxia is a disability and it alone requires speech, OT and PT for him through his IEP. Now I know in the primary grades K-4 they will put a more specific diagnosis, my dd was given CD (Cognative disability) which is so untrue it is scarey but they didn't know her when they gave it and now that she has been in Kindergarten for almost 8 months now the school even nows that that is not an acurate disgnosis but as long as it gets her services without that autism diagnosis, I'm happy. Good luck , you can email me off list if you need to talk further or need some more support.:-) Trixie Re:[ ] Re: Question.. " My current SLP (who did not know her from ages 4 through 7 > yo. has told me that if she truely had Apraxia it is very mild and > that now is dealing with a receptive/expressive language > delay. My question is to you does this reguarly happen to children > with Apraxia, going from moderate to mild apraxia to > Receptive/expressive language delay? " Hi Janice and Traci, Janice I do understand why you would say yes -but I say probably not. Traci the fact that you are already signing your name " Mom to ann 7yo Appraxia/DSI and processing delays " deeply saddens me -you are " mom to one princess " right? It's clear that nn just went back to school -what grade is she in? If she was deaf her verbal level of communication wouldn't affect their opinion of her receptive ability. Janice I understand why she would say what she does -she's a parent and doesn't yet know what some of us do with older kids: I say time for a new therapist for you Traci! ( " Act now and we'll throw in your child's self esteem! " ) Apraxia we all have to remember, just like autism -is not what it was 50 years ago. Today the children are presenting with mulitsensory issues so the best way to know the answers are to examine the children in this uncensored group to hear from the parents (or the children themselves) as the children/they grow up. We do know that apraxia in itself is not a cognitive disorder -and we also know many in this group like myself have children with apraxia who may have been tested low receptively by inappropriate testing -but who test average or above average by appropriate testing -I have to pull it up from the archives on what to look for when it comes to appropriate testing on receptive and cognitive ability. But it's a huge problem when misdiagnosed. Please proceed with extreme caution before lumping any other diagnosis on top of " apraxia " especially when it relates to receptive or cognitive ability since the average person on the street auto assumes anyone with even a mild impairment of speech has some type of cognitive delay. Even though apraxia is a neurologically based disorder it does create developmental delays due to the delay in developing speech. What this means is that some aspects you are seeing will self resolve with time...just like they do for " normal " kids. My son used programs such as Earobics and Fast For Word but it wasn't because he was diagnosed with something else on top of his apraxia - they were to help with his one diagnosis -and we left it at that. Nobody can say for sure whether a child who is delayed in speech for years won't take those extra years to catch up...language takes practice that they didn't have. This BTW is just another reason why it's best to start your severe communication impaired child in mainstream kindergarten at 6 vs. at 5 -to provide that extra year of developmental time. There is a ton on this topic in the archives -below is just one aspect of " stages of apraxia " that I put together years ago which shows how apraxia today could be diagnosed as other conditions -but shouldn't be: " Just like typically developing speech in a child, a child with apraxia appears from the members of our large Foundation to have stages they go through -and some children skip one or two -or pass through some of them quickly or get stuck in one or more of them. We don't know if all the member's children were properly diagnosed with apraxia or not, but this may be worth looking into. OBSERVED APRAXIA STAGES (?) THAT SHOULD BE EXPLORED FURTHER Stage 1 non verbal stage Where the child uses one or two sounds to communicate everything with gestures, and made up elaborate sign. At this stage, depending on the infant's or child's age you may not be able to diagnose verbal apraxia, but neurological soft signs should be looked for, as well as signs of oral motor problems or oral apraxia. An older apraxic child who is stuck at this stage will be using augmentative devices and could be at risk for misdiagnosis of cognitive ability if not tested appropriately. Stage 2 simple talk stage Where the child begins to just like a typically developing child learn new sounds or words, but unlike a typically developing child, most (not all) appear to forget how to say the sounds or words again, so they lose that ability to " build " their speech like most other children do. This is in most cases the only stage that is acknowledged by ASHA and described by most of the speech professionals*. Please see examples above (breaks down with longer utterances, etc.) An older apraxic child who is stuck at this stage will be using augmentative devices and could be at risk for misdiagnosis of cognitive ability if not tested appropriately. Stage 3 Dysfluency stage Where the child who seemed to be progressing so well suddenly begins to stutter. Most speech professionals do not consider classic " stuttering " only a normal developmental dysfluency. However with apraxic children this stage is especially frustrating in that if the apraxic child does go through this stage, they appear to get " stuck " here. In speaking to members from the CHERAB Foundation who's apraxic child goes through this stage, there is frequently another member of the family who is a stutterer, which may mean there is some type of genetic link. Type of therapy to provide to an apraxic child at this stage that is appropriate is not clear and depends on which expert you speak to-in some cases there are direct oppositional views. Stage 4 Baby Talk stage Where the child who is now talking and being understood continues to mix up past and present tense, as well as sentence structure, and frequently will leave out the " little words " like " the " and " a " . This may not have anything to do with SLI as discussed above, an apraxic child typically does keep sentences shorter than average, but there may be children diagnosed in the SLI area that are apraxic, and visa versa -and being there is a genetic link to both SLI as well as apraxia, a closer look needs to be taken at this stage. A five year old apraxic child who receives appropriate therapy, including some of the recent discoveries we will talk about later, may progress faster than previously stated, however just like in the previous stage, apraxic children also seems to get stuck in this stage. An example would be " Me want doe too " for " I want to go too " or " Mommy me walk store too? " for " Mommy can I walk to the store too? " Stage 5 Full language stage Where the child, teenager, or adult apraxic has learned strategies to overcome the apraxia enough that it's not noticed by the average listener. However upon closer observation you will notice that an apraxic in the full language stage will frequently use less sophisticated language. An example comes in right here. Instead of saying " an apraxic in the full language stage will frequently use less sophisticated language " they may say " an apraxic in the full langwish stage will not sound as grown up most of the time " So in other words, there will still be words that he or she can not pronounce correctly, and being aware of them, will avoid them and substitute when they can. They can be highly intelligent, but due to their lack of expressing themselves using sophisticated language at times others may not know this. This is perhaps in some ways just as frustrating a stage as any other. In some cases maybe more so because now that they are " talking " and talking fine most of the time, ASHA professionals may not consider them candidates for further services. The genetic possibilities and medical involvement needs to establish these stages, including this one, so the population can understand and accept this disability just like they do for those with poor eyes or poor hearing. This is an example of a late talker that unfortunately for all did not " just start talking " Stage 1: Most professionals don't know how to diagnose oral or global apraxia, or diagnose suspected verbal apraxia in this stage. This is the way almost all professionals as well as online sources were back in 1999 when Tanner was first diagnosed. If we knew then what we know today through CHERAB and The Late Talker -Tanner could have had early intervention from when he first regressed at 11 months old. Can't change that which is sad -but for that reason I continue to do what I do to raise awareness. Stage 2: The only stage talked about (and talked about and talked about) This is what I call the " around the corner " stage which is covered well...well for the most part -but still the soft signs -the multifaceted aspects are typically left out by most -soft signs like the hypotonia, sensory integration dysfunction (called DSI instead of SID so as not to confuse it with the sudden infant death syndrome which my oldest son Dakota was at risk for), oral apraxia and other motor impairments even just mild one in other areas of the body -and new to our attention stuff like constipation and trouble blowing their nose on command. Just today Glenn and I were driving the boys to school and Tanner needed to blow his nose. 'Most' of the time now today Tanner knows how to blow his nose due to lots of practice. But like anything with apraxia -most of the time doesn't necessarily mean all the time. I handed Tanner a tissue and he put it up to his nose and breathed out through his mouth. I said " No Tanner -use your nose to breath out silly! " I then helped him and he breathed out of his nose softly -not enough to do anything. So I said " OK you have to breath out harder so breath in and then breath out really deep OK? " Tanner breathed in really deep and when he went to breath out I took the tissue and really quick stuck it up to his nose before he could breath out -but that didn't work either because we both started laughing. Then he sneezed. Stage 3 and 4 -not all children go through -but too many do to leave them out, or the child is diagnosed with something else. As I know with Tanner through Dr. Dale -Tanner's dysfluency stage was not classic stuttering and as Dr. said " You are correct that we have done an injustice in not studying apraxia in children enough yet. For this reason we don't know what is 'normal' for an apraxic child as to how long they will stay in the developmental stage of dysfluency, but we are finding it can be quite long " And Stage 5 -that's the one where parents see their child as " cured " and even though they may leave the group at stage 3-5 -most leave at 5 not realizing there are strategies for older children/teens and adults in this stage too. EFAs speed things up a bit so children may advance quicker -but again EFAs are not a cure -or not a complete cure. I'd like to add to that neither is therapy a cure. Apraxia is an impairment that one can learn to overcome and live a successful life with. Just like a stutterer -those that don't know may not even be aware there was any type of impairment of speech. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.