Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Re: New Bill Signed

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Just Illinois - but it's a step in the right direction!  I don't know another

state that passed (or even drafted) anything like this.

From: <agirlnamedsuess@...>

Subject: [ ] Re: New Bill Signed

Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 1:41 PM

So, does this apply to ALL states?

And does this mean you will no longer have to fill out a " form " accompanied by

" a letter of medical necessity " ?

>

> This was posted on another group yesterday - thought I'd pass it along

>

> A bill passed today:

> " The Governor also signed Senate Bill 101, sponsored by Senator Crotty and

Representative Coulson (R - Glenview), which requires health insurance

policies to cover habilitative services for children under 19 years of age with

a congenital, genetic or early acquired disorder.

>

> Habilitative services include occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech

therapy and other prescribed services to treat disorders like autism and

cerebral palsy. "

> http://www.illinois .gov/PressReleas es/ShowPressRele ase.cfm?SubjectI

D=2 & RecNum= 7469

>

> (I haven't been able to find the exact legislation online anywhere)

>

> I happened to be at the signing ceremony and spoke with people involved with

creating and passing the legislation. The legislation was meant to fill in the

gap created by autism-specific legislation last year. This bill helps ALL

children who have disorders needing therapy, whether they have autism or not.

>

> So now, if your child has apraxia, insurance companies going forward from

today must provide coverage for therapy, although the extent of that coverage

was not spelled out in the legislation. The term I heard was " reasonable " . A

medical expert at the ceremony says this bill puts insurance companies in a

difficult position of denying enough coverage if a doctor says that a child

requires it.

>

> So this is a wonderful step forward, and I would encourage everyone to report

back on what their experiences are in regards to their interactions with

insurance companies.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest guest

Does anyone know if this new bill will help with the restorative in nature

clause in some policies and about it being rehabilitive?

 

From: <agirlnamedsuess@...>

Subject: [ ] Re: New Bill Signed

Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 12:41 PM

So, does this apply to ALL states?

And does this mean you will no longer have to fill out a " form " accompanied by

" a letter of medical necessity " ?

>

> This was posted on another group yesterday - thought I'd pass it along

>

> A bill passed today:

> " The Governor also signed Senate Bill 101, sponsored by Senator Crotty and

Representative Coulson (R - Glenview), which requires health insurance

policies to cover habilitative services for children under 19 years of age with

a congenital, genetic or early acquired disorder.

>

> Habilitative services include occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech

therapy and other prescribed services to treat disorders like autism and

cerebral palsy. "

> http://www.illinois .gov/PressReleas es/ShowPressRele ase.cfm?SubjectI

D=2 & RecNum= 7469

>

> (I haven't been able to find the exact legislation online anywhere)

>

> I happened to be at the signing ceremony and spoke with people involved with

creating and passing the legislation. The legislation was meant to fill in the

gap created by autism-specific legislation last year. This bill helps ALL

children who have disorders needing therapy, whether they have autism or not.

>

> So now, if your child has apraxia, insurance companies going forward from

today must provide coverage for therapy, although the extent of that coverage

was not spelled out in the legislation. The term I heard was " reasonable " . A

medical expert at the ceremony says this bill puts insurance companies in a

difficult position of denying enough coverage if a doctor says that a child

requires it.

>

> So this is a wonderful step forward, and I would encourage everyone to report

back on what their experiences are in regards to their interactions with

insurance companies.

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...