craniosacral therapy

[Guest guest]

thebestfedbaby wrote:

>

> I would also lean towards a NUCCA practitioner for that. They will do

> xrays, but if there is something wrong there, it will be corrected and

> then you can move on to cranial sacral. If there is an issue with

> upper cervical bones/alignment, you could spend much more time

> recorrecting the symptoms but not addressing the problem with cranial

> sacral. Does that make sense?

>

No, it just means you don't understand how CST works...

>

> This is interesting:

> http://www.erinelster.com/CaseStudies.aspx?ConditionID=27

> <http://www.erinelster.com/CaseStudies.aspx?ConditionID=27>

>

> I think both have a place in healing issues such as these.

>

Unless you acknowledge the idea that active, forceful therapies such as

chiro, NUCCA, push-me-pull-you, trigger point, etc, are useless at best

and harmful at worst.

The body is a self-correcting entity. Forcing it into something is

futile and always results in more problems.

>

> I can try to explain better but I am fighting off a flu - you can call

> me at home at 1-22HEAL-KIDS (i can never remember the actual number).

>

> Summer

>

>

[Guest guest]

Would this be the pot calling the kettle black, as we are on a list that is

forcing the body to release damage done by an external force? Apparently,

assistance is sometimes needed.

Our NUCCA practitioner uses light touch. In fact, you don't feel anything until

after the appt. Not the definition of forcing. Perhaps you don't understand

what type of NUCCA we use?

For us, we used both modalities. Can CST help? Yes. Can all of them help?

Yes. Can some work better, for longer than others? Yes. It is all about

individualized treatment.

>

> The body is a self-correcting entity. Forcing it into something is

> futile and always results in more problems.

>

>

>