Guest guest Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 The following information is extracted from Emerson Ecologics newsletter. ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ New Long-term Safety and Efficacy Data on the Long-Term use of 5,000 IU/day of Vitamin D Emerge for a Nursing Home Population Author: Steve Austin, N.D. Reference: Mocanu V, Stitt PA, Costan AR, et al. Long-term effects of giving nursing home residents bread fortified with 125 µcg (5000 IU) vitamin D3 per daily serving. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:1132- 7. Design: Unblinded intervention trial Participants: Forty-five Romanian nursing home residents aged 58 to 89 years Study Medication and Dosage: 5000 IU vitamin D3 per day provided in a fortified bun, combined with 320 mg of calcium (Ca) from 800 mg of CaCO3 Primary Outcome Measures: Serum 25(OH)D levels and serum Ca levels were measured at baseline and at three-month intervals until the completion of the trial at 12 months. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were measured at baseline, at 6 months, at 9 months, and at 12 months. Z scores for bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and hip were measured at baseline and after 12 months. Key Findings: Serum 25(OH)D levels increased 341% from baseline until the end of the trial (beginning at a mean level of 28.5 nmol/L and ending at a mean level of 125.6 nmol/L). By the trial end, more than nine out of ten subjects had 25(OH)D levels above 74 nmol/L-close to the 80 nmol/L now recommended by at least some vitamin D researchers. PTH levels were significantly lower than baseline at every subsequent measurement (P=0.001). Mean serum Ca remained unchanged and no case of hypercalcemia developed during the trial. Lumbar BMD measured in grams per cm2 increased by 4% (P<0.04). Hip BMD also increased by 23% (P<0.001). Both hip and lumbar z scores were also significantly improved by the end of the trial (P<0.001). Practice Implications: Vitamin D trials had once used doses averaging 400 IU/day. Mean levels then drifted upward to 800 IU, and then 1000 IU. More recently, trials have begun to use 2000 IU daily doses. The current trial suggests that at least for vitamin D-deprived elderly, 5000 IU/day of vitamin D provides evidence of improving vitamin D status (consistent with the lowered PTH levels) but does not appear headed toward toxicity. (Note that hypercalcemia did not occur, nor did serum Ca levels increase at all at 12 months.) The findings of this trial are also important because they reveal more robust improvements in bone density than typically reported by older trials using mostly lower doses of vitamin D. Love, Gabby. :0) http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/ " I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin. " ~ Jerry Newport Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.