Guest guest Posted November 19, 2009 Report Share Posted November 19, 2009 I took my son in to a geneticst about 5 or 6 weeks ago. She seemed nice enough and was very prompt in typing up our conversation notes and her recommendations and sending them to me in the mail. When I was reviewing the notes to place in my son's file she had a summary paragraph at the end where she said: " There is certainly a good chance that there is no underlying genetic etiology and he JUST HAS A MILD SPEECH DELAY that will continue to improve over time. " My son is a very friendly happy child. When we were in the office he said a total of four words to her -- Hi, mama. dada, bubba (brother for him). I was concerned by her comments about his so called " mild " delay and called her nurse requesting that this be removed from her commernts as it could impact my insurance companies willingness to pay for speech and oral function therapy. The nurse called today and said the dr refused to remove the wording because it was what she " observed " . My son just got his school system evaluation and his speech was rated as " severe " . He has a 27% gap between his receptive and expressive scores and only scored in the 2nd percentile for oral motor. How can she say he has a " mild " delay when he didn't say anything to her in the office of any substance? Would you all let this go or does anyone have suggestions for recourse for me? I'm just concerned because I finally met my deductibles and the insurance is just now having to pay for the therapy themselves and I've heard this is a battle and they look for any little reason to deny. Thanks for your help, Sue = Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.