Guest guest Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 Well this is very VERY encouraging to hear. You are very VERY lucky to have such dedicated public school professionals working with your child. That has NOT been our experience and that of many others who have battled the school district for years to get appropriat eservices and when they finally got them on paper--the mom later learned the child was getting a weird mixture of 5 minute attention as part of group therapy becuase there was just no time to fit the 80 kids that needed therapy each week in that school. So she may have done 10 minutes per session working with just this apraxic child, and maybe a month later worked with him again 1:1 as she could fit it in, but most of the time the kids were all in the room and she worked with them at the same time and my friend only learned this after a few years of not much progress, when the child was finally able to tell her and she pulled it out of the SLP who explained that this was all they could do given their caseload. The therapist's words. Other school districts flat out do not acknowledge they can work 1:1 with apraxic kids, they say their job is to work on educational aspects and group therapy is all they can offer with individual " emphasis " as needed but refuse to even admit they do not have therapists trained in motor planning and just work on articulation along with all the rest. I've heard more stories like this than I care to think of, and the successful ones are usually after many years of problems and mediation and due process where the child was not making progress and the parents hired a lawyer etc. And again, even then, there are no guarnatees that the actual implementation will be as it is on paper, if the SLPs are not trained in motor planning techniques, the apraxic child will simply not progress. So I don't know where you live and what school district has 4 apraxia trained SLPs, but in the Bay Area it is hard to even find SLPs in private practice who know how to treat apraxia, particularly in young children who cannot be made to sit down and drill- drill- drill with cards and sounds until they get it right. Theree local apraxia experts declared they could not work with my child after they saw that she refused to follow adult directed activities and did not comply and cried and went under the table whenever they pressed for her to say something. it took a very patient and experienced PROMPT SLP to finally get her to even attempt talking. the first ones were telling us she needed ABA and RDI and " a more child directed approach " they said--and mind you these were local experts who had written books on apraxia, but who just didn't know or care to see what it takes to engage a non-verbal young child. So the right fit with the SLP is another real importnat thing or young children will sometimes just not respond to therapy at all. So we've had our share of failures with privat SLPs too, and we've not worked with school SLPs yet,--but the one who evaluated my daughter said she did not have training in apraxia, barely knew what it was, said she had gone to one motor planning seminar once, and in spite of all the letters/reports from doctors and evaluators and the detailed lists I kept of my daughters communication attempts--she had less 15 words at the time and not too functional or consistent, not used at will, not understandable out of context etc. her apraxia was very severe, yet the school district kept talking about articulation remediation, and in the initial IEP report did not even mention anything about motor planning problems and her apraxia or the remediation needed-- I had to insist that she put in the ASHA definition and recommendations to educate the rest of the IEP team about apraxia --I appealed to her as a professional and requested that she present and include the ASHA definition which she then did at my request--but still provided not goals, no remediation strategy etc. . And a year later when they finally got around to offering services--but only one out of the 3 sessions was supposed to be 1:1 and as I explained I saw what the SLP in the class who was working primarily with ESL students considered 1:1--she had the kids in two different corners of the room and worked with them at the same time, focusing on each for a few minutes--and that was the 1:1 remediation she offered my daughter, in a room with many other kids who were there primarily for language /ESL issues, not speech per se.. Not exactly what I would consider appropriate remediation for an apraxic child who could barely say mama at 3.5. Anyway, our experience with the school district has been horrible, and I have accumulated more stories like this than succesful ones. So it is best that parents know both sides before they decide where to invest their efforts. Most parnets I know do both school and private speech since the school is either not enough and/or not the right kind and quite a number of them ultimately end up homeschooling and just going private all the way to not have to deal with the school frustrations and inadequacies. No, it doesn't have to be like this, and it shouldn't but the battle is uphill more often than not when school districts do not even acknowledge that the child has apraxia and refuse to consider the individual needs, citing rules and regulations they can't back up in writing, but pull out and scare parents off nevertheless whenever the parent wants their child's diagnosis to be taken seriously. Many of the parents who have battled the school districts requesting appropriate services and accommodations have regretted the time, energy and effort spent because in the end, even after winning at due process and getting even more than they wanted initially ---they realized the school was just not equipped to deliver. So this is what the parents need to assess--the school resources and willingness of school staff to accommodate the child's individual needs, even beyond what is written in the IEP. Parents cannot always be there to verify and the child in most cases cannot report back. There may be SLPs out there as you've had the good fortune to meet, but by no means is this the rule or the most common occurrence in the public school setting. I'm not trying to discourage Iveta, but if she expects 4 1:1 sessions per week with an experienced motor planning trained SLP from her school district--it just may not be that easy to come by--it's something difficult to set up even in private practice if the child goes to school and can only attend late afternoons, so the better prepared the parents the easier it ewill be to maek the best of the existing resources, be they public or private. Good luck to all! -Elena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.