Guest guest Posted February 10, 2010 Report Share Posted February 10, 2010 NOOOO!!!- it is neurological and there can be regression in some, many improve and many can completely recover---but that does not make it NOT neurological. Apparently she does NOT read the ASHA documents or does not believe in them. I'd be careful about her conclusions that he no longer has apraxia in this case as well. She could be right, and maybe he never did have apraxia. But for those who do---it is most certainly a NEUROLOGICAL condition, most often with metabolic processing underpinnings due to oxidative stress--be it chemical or physical or both. Be careful, this SLP does NOT know what she is talking about to state that apraxia is not neurological. it isn't if it isn't apraxia--but she should not make these blanket statements about a severe neurological disorder plaguing more and more children. Good luck! Elena From: kalihi76 <kaliki76@...> Subject: [ ] Once apraxic, always apraxic? Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 5:01 PM My son has speech apraxia. I always viewed it as a neurological disorder. However, after a session with his SLP the other week, she was commenting on how much progress my son has made and if she were to see him today for the first time, she'd diagnose him with " articulation disorder. " For one, I'm thrilled he's improving, but I guess I thought, if apraxia is a neurological disorder it's always with you, even though you can retrain your brain so to speak... My SLP said there is no hard evidence to say apraxia is neurological, and you can have it at one time but not forever. " We say it's neurological to get insurance to pay for it " is what she told me. Any comments? ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 You don't say your son's age but yes once apraxic always apraxic which is why the name childhood apraxia of speech is so mean and horrible. Yes the children grow and some do learn to " overcome " it...but take that individual and put them under stress -or listen to them when they are sick or having to express something complex -say in an emergency and they will still have times they will break down. Look at Radcliffe talking about his dyspraxia (which in his case is of the body but same thing) http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b24227_daniel_radcliffes_dyspraxia_diagnosis.htm\ l I find it shocking that an SLP will say that the neurologically based motor planning disorder apraxia is only called a neurological condition to get it covered by insurance. If that was the case we wouldn't call it " developmental " or " childhood " apraxia of speech which implies it's just a childhood condition! I'm not even a speech pathologist and know the schooling one needs to go through -surely she had to learn that the mouth and tongue and breath control as well as speech are controlled by...what would she say? (do I even want to know? no) My advice based on the ignorance is to find another SLP -good ones are like gold, mediocre ones are pretty much anywhere easy to find and the poor ones....they should find another job so nobody can find them! Just because one is always apraxic doesn't mean that they can't be an actress or a teacher or anything they want. One day soon I wish I can share our Hollywood TV and movie star actress who is yes a TEEN WITH APRAXIA that was first misdiagnosed as autistic ....I'm just waiting for the right moment and think it's coming. After all we need to find someone to play in the movie right? And it 'is' possible that your child was misdiagnosed and was never apraxic to begin with -and if this is the SLP that diagnosed it I wouldn't be shocked at all. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 My son is 4yrs old. I'm going to talk to the SLP some more. She has been the first SLP out of 3 we've been to, to make great strides with my son. I found her on a Kaufman link - she goes to almost every Kaufman conference she can(among others). She owns this SLP business (with another therapist). I thought I was choosing the right one b/c of her training & experience with apraxia (or so I thought). Out of 4 therapists - they've all agreed it's speech apraxia, so I don't know if this is a case of mistaken diagnosis. And he had/has all the classic signs of speech apraxia. This is now kind of frustrating. I thought we were on a great path... > > You don't say your son's age but yes once apraxic always apraxic which is why the name childhood apraxia of speech is so mean and horrible. Yes the children grow and some do learn to " overcome " it...but take that individual and put them under stress -or listen to them when they are sick or having to express something complex -say in an emergency and they will still have times they will break down. > > Look at Radcliffe talking about his dyspraxia (which in his case is of the body but same thing) > http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b24227_daniel_radcliffes_dyspraxia_diagnosis.htm\ l > > I find it shocking that an SLP will say that the neurologically based motor planning disorder apraxia is only called a neurological condition to get it covered by insurance. If that was the case we wouldn't call it " developmental " or " childhood " apraxia of speech which implies it's just a childhood condition! > > I'm not even a speech pathologist and know the schooling one needs to go through -surely she had to learn that the mouth and tongue and breath control as well as speech are controlled by...what would she say? (do I even want to know? no) > > My advice based on the ignorance is to find another SLP -good ones are like gold, mediocre ones are pretty much anywhere easy to find and the poor ones....they should find another job so nobody can find them! > > Just because one is always apraxic doesn't mean that they can't be an actress or a teacher or anything they want. One day soon I wish I can share our Hollywood TV and movie star actress who is yes a TEEN WITH APRAXIA that was first misdiagnosed as autistic ....I'm just waiting for the right moment and think it's coming. After all we need to find someone to play in the movie right? > > And it 'is' possible that your child was misdiagnosed and was never apraxic to begin with -and if this is the SLP that diagnosed it I wouldn't be shocked at all. > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2010 Report Share Posted February 11, 2010 Bottom line is that your son is progressing. The difference between a delay and a disorder is that with or without therapy a child with a delay will make progress -but with an impairment one would have the best prognosis with a good therapist. Does your child have any signs of apraxia outside of speech? Have you been for a neuroMD exam? In the long run who really cares if what your child has is called apraxia or it's just a simple delay in speech and he was misdiagnosed. As long as he is talking -that of course is the most important. But if she really was an expert in apraxia then she would be aware that apraxia is a neurologically based motor planning impairment that can affect speech, breath control, motor planning in the body and any combination. She would also be aware that it's rare today for an apraxic child to 'just' have apraxia of speech as today in most cases it's multifaceted. Most with apraxia today have some sort of " soft signs " such as mild hypotonia, sensory issues and there is the FoxP2 gene and other genetic markers that we are still learning about. There are SPECT scans that show the differences between the right and left hemisphere of those with speech delays. Some do very well at overcoming apraxia- all the aspects of it. My son Tanner for example is now 13 and mainstreamed and doing great but he'll tell you himself that if he's tired or not feeling well he gets a bit " bumpy " (regresses a bit) He could tell this SLP himself -he'd have no problem doing so -but clearly she doesn't work with children that are apraxic and grew up with it. I mean look at http://littlemermaidmelanie.wordpress.com/about/ A speech impairment is a speech impairment. As Earl (a spokesperson for the Stuttering Foundation) is quoted to say " once a stutterer always a stutterer " http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=888 & dat=19791020 & id=Mf8NAAAAIBAJ & sjid=bXwD\ AAAAIBAJ & pg=6430,3246611 Stuttering is a much more well known motor planning disorder of speech- but is a motor planning disorder as well. Clearly Earl has overcome stuttering most of the time to be one of the greatest voices of all times in movies =but as he'll tell you even today -he still occasionally stutters. Ignorance is understandable in the general public -it's really annoying when it's from a professional in speech who claims to be well versed in apraxia because she's gone to 's conferences -and I'm an Olympic skater because I watched the winter Olympics for a few times now. I personally would find someone like that annoying but again if your child is making progress- that's the bottom line and perhaps...just perhaps -you won't need to see her and any other SLP at all much longer (I have a feeling as the Black Eyed Peas say) ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 My son was dx w/ apraxia by the EI SLP at age 23 months. Now at age 5, he prek SLP is thinking that he may have an auditory processing disorder (as well?) He has madde huge strides in his expressive language (actually my oldest daughter said this morning she liked it when he didn't talk b/c now he talks all of the time - obviously she was talked to about that, but that's a different story...). I can understand about 85-90% of what he says, and what I can't he will find a way to help me (for ex. - he said " det " when not understood, he went on to say you know the place fix animals = vet). He will repeat himself an/or elaborate on what he's trying to say. He also has some sensory issues (can not stand to have his hair washed - it's like torture; tags on shirts bother him); blowing bubbles/candles out are difficult; some loud sounds (fireworks) bother him. Bonnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2010 Report Share Posted February 13, 2010 Sounds a little SPD. It is my understanding that apraxia fits into the SPD category. Most of our kiddies have some sensory issues. My son will occasionally walk on his toes! Really they are just different labels. Some kids may have a bit of each. It sounds as if your sons sytmes are really not that bad. You should read the. OUT OF SYNC CHILD very good read. I would also take your child to a DAN doc. I know he isn't autistic but he may benefit from some bio medical intervention. Does he jave any gut issues? Anni Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Virgin Mobile. [ ] Re: Once apraxic, always apraxic? My son was dx w/ apraxia by the EI SLP at age 23 months. Now at age 5, he prek SLP is thinking that he may have an auditory processing disorder (as well?) He has madde huge strides in his expressive language (actually my oldest daughter said this morning she liked it when he didn't talk b/c now he talks all of the time - obviously she was talked to about that, but that's a different story...). I can understand about 85-90% of what he says, and what I can't he will find a way to help me (for ex. - he said " det " when not understood, he went on to say you know the place fix animals = vet). He will repeat himself an/or elaborate on what he's trying to say. He also has some sensory issues (can not stand to have his hair washed - it's like torture; tags on shirts bother him); blowing bubbles/candles out are difficult; some loud sounds (fireworks) bother him. Bonnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2010 Report Share Posted February 14, 2010 I've been thinking about this quite a bit. I've come up with an example that makes sense to me, although I don't know if it is medically sound. When an adult has a stroke, part of the brain dies. They lose the ability to walk, talk, etc. depending on the damage. With PT, ST and OT, they can regain their speech, mobility, etc. The parts of the brain that died are still gone, but the brain finds new ways to tell the body what to do. Sometimes the damage is so great, they never fully regain function, but a stroke victim can relearn so much. If the person stops trying, they will not regain anything. It takes effort. So I'm thinking that for kids with apraxia, the pathways in the brain aren't 100% and will never be 100%, but with effort and good sound nutrition (fish oil, Nutriiveda, cutting out allergenic foods) the brain learns new ways to create speech, movement, plan ahead, whatever. The new pathways probably aren't as strong which is why you stumble when tired or stressed. Liralen > > My son has speech apraxia. I always viewed it as a neurological disorder. However, after a session with his SLP the other week, she was commenting on how much progress my son has made and if she were to see him today for the first time, she'd diagnose him with " articulation disorder. " For one, I'm thrilled he's improving, but I guess I thought, if apraxia is a neurological disorder it's always with you, even though you can retrain your brain so to speak... > My SLP said there is no hard evidence to say apraxia is neurological, and you can have it at one time but not forever. " We say it's neurological to get insurance to pay for it " is what she told me. > > Any comments? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.