Re: differences between NV -- chocolate vs. vanilla?

January 6, 2011

We have always used chocolate. Haven't tried vanilla yet. I also wondered if

the surges were the same no matter flavor. I think they have the same

essential ingredients though so shouldn't make a difference right? Who

knows! Maybe the chocolate combo is magic. J

From:

[mailto: ] On Behalf Of

Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 1:42 PM

Subject: [ ] differences between NV -- chocolate vs.

vanilla?

We were using the vanilla and then decided to use the chocolate and we are

seeing HUGE surges within days... we had a bunch of improvements with the

vanilla but WHOA! Has anyone seen any differences between the flavors with

RESULTS?

January 6, 2011

I have always wondered if there was a difference too. My one son Tanner with

dramatic surges loves the chocolate (not to start but now he does) and has never

ever liked the vanilla -hates it even -so no chance of me taking part in trying

the other flavor with Tanner.

My older son Dakota prefers the vanilla and finds the chocolate " too chocolate "

and he's had surges and growth but not as dramatic as Tanner -but then again he

maybe didn't have as much to go.

It will be interesting to see over time if the majority that have the HUGE

surges like us are the chocolate NV users? The only difference between the two

is that chocolate has cayenne pepper and vanilla has cinnamon. I have the

ingredients here (click on vanilla and chocolate labels)

wrote a bit about what exactly cayenne pepper or cinnamon are good for in

regards to this article on antivirals

they appear to both be very similar -but other than that have not looked into

those two ingredients. I will though (in my free time

I can also check the survey from this page

there -will do that too!

Just curious -how long after you switched flavors did you see the huge surges

over the less dramatic ones you saw with vanilla?

=====

Recommended Posts