Guest guest Posted January 8, 2011 Report Share Posted January 8, 2011 Would someone comment on the ideas below? I've read legitimate research investigating the possibility that autism is linked not to the MMR vaccine per se but to an immune system -- most specifically, IL-6 -- that goes nuclear when the child's immune defences are weakened for a series of reasons: genetic, epigenetic, environmental. Antibodies, this idea goes, lead to over-working cytokines & autoimmune problems, which in turn cause several kinds of damage sych as poor serotonin production, hypoperfusion, inadequate removal of apoptosic products, incorrect apical-dendritic pruning, inadequate development of spindle neurons, as well as metabolic drains on other body systems. In other words, Wakefield happened to find clues related to MMR vaccinations, but actually got clues showing a risk to ALL early vaccinations. Does any of the anti-Wakefield reporting refute this possibility? Or prove it's not worth OUR consideration? All the best. Tim Stearns On 1/7/11, jeannne buesser <jbmistletoe@...> wrote: > Mixed reaction after autism study termed fraud > > With the publication of new research that declares a 13-year-old study " an > elaborate fraud " for linking autism and bowel disease to the > measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, the division between medical experts and > devotees to the notion has grown deeper and sharper. > > In 1998, Dr. Wakefield published a study in The Lancet purporting an > association between the MMR vaccine and the two medical conditions. And > while never stating a direct cause and effect, Wakefield, who has since been > stripped of his British medical license, called on doctors to suspend > vaccinating children with the two-dose vaccine. He now runs a Texas-based > institute called the Thoughtful House Center for Children. > > Last year, more than a decade after publishing the medical report, The > Lancet retracted it. Now, in a series of three articles that began this week > in the British Medical Journal, a new investigation reveals the extent of > what's being called a scam behind the vaccine scare. > > The reports are written by an investigative journalist who probed the > motivations behind Wakefield's research, an effort that has consumed the > past seven years. Deer reported that Wakefield and a lawyer were > probably co-conspirators who attempted to extort compensation from vaccine > makers and that Wakefield concocted his findings to aid the lawyer's > lawsuits against the companies. Wakefield, who has spoken at autism events > on Long Island, did not return Newsday's calls Thursday. > > Heeren of Middle Island, who was key in bringing Wakefield to Long > Island to speak at a conference on autism five years ago, said she is > sickened by reports against a doctor who she says has helped thousands of > children. " To see him dragged through the mud like this is heartbreaking, " > said Heeren, the mother of an 11-year-old son with autism. > > But medical experts say Wakefield's research caused thousands of children to > go unvaccinated because of parental fears. Thousands of parents have > abandoned vaccines of all kinds based on junk science notions in Wakefield's > research, said Dr. Beth Koslap-Petraco, who chairs the legislative > affairs division of the Nurse Practitioner Association of Long Island. > > Koslap-Petraco, who has also served on the National Vaccine Advisory > Committee, which advises the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, > says there is an upsurge in the United States in cases of whooping cough, > measles, mumps and chickenpox that can be directly linked to avoiding > vaccines. > > Krakow, a Garden City lawyer who represented dozens of families in a > case three years ago that sought to link autism to vaccine, sees Wakefield > as a victim. " You wonder why this focus on him and these misleading > statements - these efforts to tar and feather him. " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 Based on my experiences with my family and 2 autistic children, I believe that autism has a HUGE genetic component. Watching videos of the kids now and understanding what it is, we could pick out autistic behaviors when they were 6 months old way before they had the MMR shot. Biggest reason for my belief-my husband. After my children were diagnosed and we found out the " symptoms " , he has aspergers syndrome but was never diagnosed (his parents thought it was so cute that he would drive around in circles all day on his hot cycle and how he was obsessed with traffic lights when he was 4). However, he has a very mild case and is very very successful in his adult life. Our children are much more severe. Also, his cousins children are showing symptoms of mild aspergers. > > Mixed reaction after autism study termed fraud > > > > With the publication of new research that declares a 13-year-old study " an > > elaborate fraud " for linking autism and bowel disease to the > > measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, the division between medical experts and > > devotees to the notion has grown deeper and sharper. > > > > In 1998, Dr. Wakefield published a study in The Lancet purporting an > > association between the MMR vaccine and the two medical conditions. And > > while never stating a direct cause and effect, Wakefield, who has since been > > stripped of his British medical license, called on doctors to suspend > > vaccinating children with the two-dose vaccine. He now runs a Texas-based > > institute called the Thoughtful House Center for Children. > > > > Last year, more than a decade after publishing the medical report, The > > Lancet retracted it. Now, in a series of three articles that began this week > > in the British Medical Journal, a new investigation reveals the extent of > > what's being called a scam behind the vaccine scare. > > > > The reports are written by an investigative journalist who probed the > > motivations behind Wakefield's research, an effort that has consumed the > > past seven years. Deer reported that Wakefield and a lawyer were > > probably co-conspirators who attempted to extort compensation from vaccine > > makers and that Wakefield concocted his findings to aid the lawyer's > > lawsuits against the companies. Wakefield, who has spoken at autism events > > on Long Island, did not return Newsday's calls Thursday. > > > > Heeren of Middle Island, who was key in bringing Wakefield to Long > > Island to speak at a conference on autism five years ago, said she is > > sickened by reports against a doctor who she says has helped thousands of > > children. " To see him dragged through the mud like this is heartbreaking, " > > said Heeren, the mother of an 11-year-old son with autism. > > > > But medical experts say Wakefield's research caused thousands of children to > > go unvaccinated because of parental fears. Thousands of parents have > > abandoned vaccines of all kinds based on junk science notions in Wakefield's > > research, said Dr. Beth Koslap-Petraco, who chairs the legislative > > affairs division of the Nurse Practitioner Association of Long Island. > > > > Koslap-Petraco, who has also served on the National Vaccine Advisory > > Committee, which advises the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, > > says there is an upsurge in the United States in cases of whooping cough, > > measles, mumps and chickenpox that can be directly linked to avoiding > > vaccines. > > > > Krakow, a Garden City lawyer who represented dozens of families in a > > case three years ago that sought to link autism to vaccine, sees Wakefield > > as a victim. " You wonder why this focus on him and these misleading > > statements - these efforts to tar and feather him. " > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 11, 2011 Report Share Posted January 11, 2011 So given that we do have this 500% increase in autism over the past 15 years--could it just bbe that somethign in the environment is triggering the " genetic component " --sure genetics play a part but environmental toxins activate genes that would otherwise remain inactive in many. Ther eis NO SUCH THING as a GENETIC EPIDEMIC--genes work with the environment--they are activated--or ---remain inactive--and the field of epigenetics shows that they can even be turned off--by environmental factors. So YES--huge genetic component--but that is true for everything else---Alzheimer's, parkinson, Schizophrenia and all mental ilnesses--they all have aHUGE genetic componet--but environemtnal factors trigger them. For those who have not see this video--put out by the Environmental Working Group----- " 10 Americans " http://vimeo.com/4521502 ---it is worth watching--and then google the word " epigenetics " and read a little on that. It will explain why balming various ilnesses on genes alone is just not ver " scientific " at all--there are ALWAYS ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS--that activate these genes. And the increase in ASD cannot be denied--nor can it be denied that these kids havre a lot more wrong with them than just their neurologicla functioning--like their immune functioning and metabolic processing and so on. These all interaqct to worsen or ameliorate symptoms. For thiose still in doubt--read " Children with Starving brains " All the best, Elena From: wandre_k <wandre_k@...> Subject: [ ] Re: Mixed reaction after autism study termed fraud - But ... Date: Tuesday, January 11, 2011, 6:44 AM Based on my experiences with my family and 2 autistic children, I believe that autism has a HUGE genetic component. Watching videos of the kids now and understanding what it is, we could pick out autistic behaviors when they were 6 months old way before they had the MMR shot. Biggest reason for my belief-my husband. After my children were diagnosed and we found out the " symptoms " , he has aspergers syndrome but was never diagnosed (his parents thought it was so cute that he would drive around in circles all day on his hot cycle and how he was obsessed with traffic lights when he was 4). However, he has a very mild case and is very very successful in his adult life. Our children are much more severe. Also, his cousins children are showing symptoms of mild aspergers. > > Mixed reaction after autism study termed fraud > > > > With the publication of new research that declares a 13-year-old study " an > > elaborate fraud " for linking autism and bowel disease to the > > measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, the division between medical experts and > > devotees to the notion has grown deeper and sharper. > > > > In 1998, Dr. Wakefield published a study in The Lancet purporting an > > association between the MMR vaccine and the two medical conditions. And > > while never stating a direct cause and effect, Wakefield, who has since been > > stripped of his British medical license, called on doctors to suspend > > vaccinating children with the two-dose vaccine. He now runs a Texas-based > > institute called the Thoughtful House Center for Children. > > > > Last year, more than a decade after publishing the medical report, The > > Lancet retracted it. Now, in a series of three articles that began this week > > in the British Medical Journal, a new investigation reveals the extent of > > what's being called a scam behind the vaccine scare. > > > > The reports are written by an investigative journalist who probed the > > motivations behind Wakefield's research, an effort that has consumed the > > past seven years. Deer reported that Wakefield and a lawyer were > > probably co-conspirators who attempted to extort compensation from vaccine > > makers and that Wakefield concocted his findings to aid the lawyer's > > lawsuits against the companies. Wakefield, who has spoken at autism events > > on Long Island, did not return Newsday's calls Thursday. > > > > Heeren of Middle Island, who was key in bringing Wakefield to Long > > Island to speak at a conference on autism five years ago, said she is > > sickened by reports against a doctor who she says has helped thousands of > > children. " To see him dragged through the mud like this is heartbreaking, " > > said Heeren, the mother of an 11-year-old son with autism. > > > > But medical experts say Wakefield's research caused thousands of children to > > go unvaccinated because of parental fears. Thousands of parents have > > abandoned vaccines of all kinds based on junk science notions in Wakefield's > > research, said Dr. Beth Koslap-Petraco, who chairs the legislative > > affairs division of the Nurse Practitioner Association of Long Island. > > > > Koslap-Petraco, who has also served on the National Vaccine Advisory > > Committee, which advises the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, > > says there is an upsurge in the United States in cases of whooping cough, > > measles, mumps and chickenpox that can be directly linked to avoiding > > vaccines. > > > > Krakow, a Garden City lawyer who represented dozens of families in a > > case three years ago that sought to link autism to vaccine, sees Wakefield > > as a victim. " You wonder why this focus on him and these misleading > > statements - these efforts to tar and feather him. " > > > ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Then the next question is, is there really this much of an increase, or is it being diagnosed/identified more now by parents and professionals with more information? Is there a possibility it's being overdiagnosed - resulting in misdiagnosis for different things children may have? This has happened before with ADHD in children more recently and Bipolar D/O in adults a long time ago. It's very challenging to clearly know, and probably there are multiple causes and multiple combinations of reasons why it occurs and why it may be more severe in some than others. Regardless, my hope is that time/research/advocacy will let us know more difinitively what these causes are, and that our children get the help that they need and deserve to live full, productive, satisfying lives. :-) Diane > > > Mixed reaction after autism study termed fraud > > > > > > With the publication of new research that declares a 13-year-old study " an > > > elaborate fraud " for linking autism and bowel disease to the > > > measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, the division between medical experts and > > > devotees to the notion has grown deeper and sharper. > > > > > > In 1998, Dr. Wakefield published a study in The Lancet purporting an > > > association between the MMR vaccine and the two medical conditions. And > > > while never stating a direct cause and effect, Wakefield, who has since been > > > stripped of his British medical license, called on doctors to suspend > > > vaccinating children with the two-dose vaccine. He now runs a Texas-based > > > institute called the Thoughtful House Center for Children. > > > > > > Last year, more than a decade after publishing the medical report, The > > > Lancet retracted it. Now, in a series of three articles that began this week > > > in the British Medical Journal, a new investigation reveals the extent of > > > what's being called a scam behind the vaccine scare. > > > > > > The reports are written by an investigative journalist who probed the > > > motivations behind Wakefield's research, an effort that has consumed the > > > past seven years. Deer reported that Wakefield and a lawyer were > > > probably co-conspirators who attempted to extort compensation from vaccine > > > makers and that Wakefield concocted his findings to aid the lawyer's > > > lawsuits against the companies. Wakefield, who has spoken at autism events > > > on Long Island, did not return Newsday's calls Thursday. > > > > > > Heeren of Middle Island, who was key in bringing Wakefield to Long > > > Island to speak at a conference on autism five years ago, said she is > > > sickened by reports against a doctor who she says has helped thousands of > > > children. " To see him dragged through the mud like this is heartbreaking, " > > > said Heeren, the mother of an 11-year-old son with autism. > > > > > > But medical experts say Wakefield's research caused thousands of children to > > > go unvaccinated because of parental fears. Thousands of parents have > > > abandoned vaccines of all kinds based on junk science notions in Wakefield's > > > research, said Dr. Beth Koslap-Petraco, who chairs the legislative > > > affairs division of the Nurse Practitioner Association of Long Island. > > > > > > Koslap-Petraco, who has also served on the National Vaccine Advisory > > > Committee, which advises the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, > > > says there is an upsurge in the United States in cases of whooping cough, > > > measles, mumps and chickenpox that can be directly linked to avoiding > > > vaccines. > > > > > > Krakow, a Garden City lawyer who represented dozens of families in a > > > case three years ago that sought to link autism to vaccine, sees Wakefield > > > as a victim. " You wonder why this focus on him and these misleading > > > statements - these efforts to tar and feather him. " > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 12, 2011 Report Share Posted January 12, 2011 Diane, While there may be an overdiagnose of ASD--along with ADHD and othe disorders that doctors are quick to diagnose when they can't quite tell what it is--The POINT IS--there is a RISE in all Neurological and metabolic disorders--in all ages--the young and the old being the most vulnerable. That cannot be denied--not at thsi point---10 years ago--maybe--but now we jsut have to accept that because the numbers are overwhealming and we cannot hide behind the better diagnosis excuse. Sure there is overdiagnosis to some extent---some apraxic only kids are dignosed ASD--sadly so becuase they get the wrong--inapropriate tratment. But that does NOT change the fact that there is MORE neurological damage of all kinds---everywhere--that is what both apraxia and ASD have in common--neurological and metabolic damage--many if not most apraxic kids have sensory issues, low tone, have autoimmune disorders be it skin, respiratory or digestive--food inolernaces. And many ASD kids also have apraxia. I read an article which puts it at 40% but they are not diagnosed as apraxic because everyone focuses on their most disturbing symptoms --the repetative motions -stimming--and the missing social components so speech is just another facet--they are given group speech therapy to help them interact-=-when in fact many of them have speech motor planning difficulties and no amount of group therpay will help that. To me the actual diagnosis matters less--it matters for therapy of course--but that is precisely why the symptoms should be addressed--not just the " diagnosis " --if an ASD child has apraxia--his apraxia shoudl be treated as well--if an apraxic child also has the so called " neurological soft signs " --toe walking, low tone, sensory issues--those too should be treated and diagnosed as such in order to be treated--and get covered by insurance--otherwise this facet of their neurological damage will remain untreated and create difficutlies as the child grows--the sensory issues can put them into an unwaranted ASD diagnosis later when they scream and cover their ears every time a truck goes by or they are in a loud environemt or can't take visual overstimulation and get hyper--tha tis when the drugs ar epulled out unfortunatley--and that makes everything--toned down--but doesn't affect the underlying cause of their disorder--that progresses and remains and the drugs do their number on the child's metabolic, immune and neurological fucntioning as well--but that's a different topic. The point is ---A lot of ADHD/ADD kids have visual or auditory langauge processing problems that can make them hyper and overstimulate their brain--or drain them out as they try to make it through a busy day at school----and they too can be misdiagnosed as being on the spectrum--particularly if they also have speech issues--again--which my daughter has--so we could have landed an ASD diagnosis many times and the neurologist almost begged me to take it--even though he wasn't convinced one way or another--but said she woudl get more services--I refused because more services does NOT mean better services--if they are NOT appropriate for her needs. he reluctantly agreed with that--but definately i cna see that doctor erring on the side of overdiagnosing ASD--and ther emay e others like him--- and ther emay be others who are really keen on an MR diagnosis--and parents fight it--but I recently learned from one of those aprents that the doctor confessed that he felt the kids needed that to be covered in adulthood for services and support--without an MR diagnsois the severly autistic--or even moderately autistic who could alwyas get worse--are left without any support when they turn 21. Many states do not recognize autism as a disability that entitles the individuals to support and care beyond age 21 and that means the full burden is on the aprents--who may not always be there. Sad but true--this doctor was trying to help--and work with the system--but these cases could not ahve been anythign else--it was just the MR-label that she felt was critical for these lower functioning kids to ge ttheir needs met beyond age 21-- and she explained that the label can be overlooked--as the child progresses--but cna be pulled out as needed late ron. Again--most parents hate to think of their ASD but apparently smart child as being diagnosed MR--when clearly if you took away the stimming and the behavioral problems that child can be as smart as whip---but in terms of functioning in society-they may still not be able to make it--and the laws are pretty unkind at this point in time--though they will hopefully change. So parents always ahve to make decisions like that when they are dealing with their child's diagnosis-BUT--the rise cannot be denied and balmed exclusively on that--because regardless of actual diagnsois--ASD or not--they are damaged neurologically and are on the neurological disorders continuum---which is real and rising. So yes there is misdiagnosis for various reasons--but if you add all of these together--all the 1 in 6 children who accordng to the public schools records have a learnign dissability and---believe me--I know how hard it is to get such a label in the public school system because my daughter is most likely dyslexic on top of apraxic and they will not conceed to that until after 4-5th grade or so whe they will not longer be able to deny it--and of course the best window of intervention woudl ahve been missed and her self esteem and love of learnign and reading compromised etc --if I left it up to them--so if they say 1 in 6 kids had a learnign disability--believe me it's more like one in 4-5 and this is not accounting for the privately schooled or home schooled kids. and no it isn't due to ESL issues either--they jsut offer speech for that--the learnign disability label is very real--very worrisome--more and more kids ahve these learning problems and this too is neurological damage. So you still have more cases of neurological damage--no mater what diagnosis you look at--ASD-ADHD-apraxia or learning disabilities, not to mention a growing number of children suffer from anxiety and depression and OCD--etc.. Auditory Processing-Dyslexia etc etc-all these amount to neurological damage and have been linked to metabolic components and environmental toxicity----and yes--there is that genetic component--but in order for a gene to be expresed--we need environmentla triggers--that must NOT be overlloked. The genes have always been there--the environment has't--so yes some families are more affected due to their genes---but it is the environnmental triggers that led those genes to be expressed and the disease to manifest itself--and again environmental factors (diet/supplemnts/avoidence of toxic exposure etc) that can determine recovery or progression of the damage. So there is really a neurological disorder continuum that we are looking at --that is growing--affecting the most vulnerable populations----the very young --whose brains are still developing---and the old--who've accumulated more toxins and are more vulnerable. So it doesn't matter is ASD is overdiagnosed at all. Neurological developmental disorders are growing at an allarming rate and that cannot be denied no matter how you look at it. To me the vaccines are NOT the only sources of toxicity and immune impairement --unfortunately there is so much more tha tis toxic in our environment---and in our bodies even--the mother's body--like the number of her dental amalgam fillings which is 50% mercury. Top that off with a course of antibiotics at birth and then the usual routine shots and between the toxic ingredients and just the assault on the newborn's immune system--a whole lot of things could be happening beyod just the thimersol. let's not forget that over 80% of our immune su=ystem is in the gut. That intestinal permeability happens at various levels and that this permeability compromises absorption and stimulates antibodies against the foods that enter the blood stream in larger particles than they normally do. this is turn trigger genetic cchanges and so it is way more complex than we could ever research unelss our methodology is adapted to look at multiple factors that afect immune and neurological functioning at various levels. it is undeniable that ASD- kids in particular--but my apraxic only daughter included have metabolic processing problems with or without direct digestive manifestations. We actually had none--but doing biomed routine investigations--blood/urine/fecal testing---we learned that she was intolernat to gluten and casein among other things---though no immediate allergic reaction was noted when doing the skin test yet her gluten response and casein IgG response was abnormal as are her skin autoimmune issues and her neurological damage--her behaviors when on gluten /casein. So in spite of NOT being a celiac or having overt digestive problems she was neverhteless malabsorbing vital brain nutrients--was deficient in B12 and fatty aicds, vitamin D, E, Bs and Co Q10--among others. This is also very common in many ASd kids--as it is in many Alzheimer's patients--who also show neurological and immune damage as well as faulty metabolic processing. These investigations shoudl be routine in all patients showing neurological damage of unknown etiology--meaning not hit in the head--no external source of damage. i think what would be found is what research is increasingly showing--that the gut /brain connection is HUGE and cannot be denied. Our kids have varoiosu metabolic abnormalities and various degrees of brain damage --inflamation is brain damage and apraxia is brain damae-even if the brain is plastic and new paths are developed---and progress is seen with therapy--but no way near what progress can be seen with apropriate metabolic/biomed interventions. dr. Wakefield's study looked at one small piece--but it happened to be the msot controversial, which is why he is being cricified and he and his colleagiues and their research dragged through the mud. We have to understand that it really goes way beyond just vaccines and beyond ASD--we are living in an increasingly toxic environment affecting--food, air, water--medications/cleaning agents, cosmetics etc etc-----and as a result vital metabolic enzymatic processes are interfered with---we are malabsorbing vital nutrients both at gut and cellular levels and this affects us directly and indirectly--opening the flood gates to opportunistic infections--viruses, bacteria, parasites which further damage our normal development and functioning. So no, Diane, all this is not just becuase we're much more aware of the problems--it is happening because we live in an increasingly toxic environment in many ways--beyond just vaccines--but vaccines are a major source of toxicity for individuals with certain susceptibilities--triggered by toxicity in the environment of their parents and grandparents really. Toxic parents beget toxic children and the effects of toxicity is cummulative and synergistic--hence the variability we are seeing--no two kids respond to the exat same protocol--they all have slightly different issues and different metbolic needs even if the symptoms seem to be very similar. Anyway-this is a very complex topic--but No, sadly it is not just becuase we are better at identifying these disorders---ask most ASD parents if they feel theiir child's disorder would have been considered soemething normal in the past--and they'll set you straight about what their daily life is like. Yes we do have better diagnosis criteria--but that's because we now are delaing with an epidemic of gigantic proportions affecting one in 68 boys in states like CA, NJ, MN. It is 4 boys to every girl so this is why when you adjust for the girls you get somethign different than the 1 in one 100 which in itself is HUGE for the US as a whole. Remember 30-40 years ago it ws one in 10,000 and OK--it may have been 1 in 8,000 because the high functioning Aspies were missed---but that still does not and cannot explain the HUGE rise in this neurological afliction--which is most definately NOT just of the brain--but of the whole body--of the metabolic processing and immune functioning. No, sadly it is not just do to better diagnosis...it is due to greater environmental toxicity. see articles posted at the end. All the best, Elena Child Autism Epidemic Firmly Linked to Environment Autism among U.S. children has reached epidemic proportion. And it's getting worse by the year. Since the '70's, there has been a 60-fold increase in American children with autism. Currently one in every 100 U.S. children and one in every 58 boys are being diagnosed with autism. That's over 2.6 percent of all male children in America. The number of autistic children expected to reach adulthood in the next 10 years along with their caregivers will exceed the population of Rhode Island and cost an estimated $27 billion in additional care beyond the almost $60 billion being spent on current autism-related costs. (1,2) Under the specter of an autism epidemic sweeping America, Senator Barbara Boxer (CA) convened hearings last week on the " State of Research on Potential Environmental Health Factors with Autism. " (3) The result? Experts agree that the primary explanation for the dramatic increase in autism is toxic environmental exposure and gene-environment interactions. New research shows that even low-dose, multiple toxic and infectious exposures may be a key factor to the onset of autism. One expert, Dr. Birnbaum, Director of the National Institute of Environmental Health, testified that " Research supported by NIEH has clearly shown that it is not just genetics that causes neuro-developmental disorders such as autism but rather the interplay of both genes and the environment " . Dr. Birnbaum also stated that NIEH has uncovered information on the role that early environmental exposures play in the development of a broad spectrum of childhood disorders, including not only autism but also ADHD, and other learning disorders. Another expert, Dr. Anastas, the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency's assistant administrator, told the subcommittee that children are especially susceptible to the effects of chemicals in the environment because they eat, drink and breathe in more for their body weight than adults. They absorb a greater proportion of many chemicals in the environment than adults, and due to hand to mouth behaviors, young children tend to have higher exposures to contaminants, such as pollutants in the surrounding air and dust, deposited from lead paint, tobacco smoke, cleaning products, pesticides and other chemicals. (4,5) We already know that prenatal and early childhood exposures to chemicals such as methyl mercury (commonly found in fish and some vaccines), lead (in paints), PCBs (in plastics such as baby bottles and food storage containers) and arsenic (in the air) can affect development of the nervous system and lead to developmental disability. (6,7,8) Also, the developing brain and nervous system can be disrupted by much lower levels of environmental exposures than would affect adults. (9,10,11) You can read about the current levels of exposure in the just released CDC's National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, a frightening document. Dr. Isaac Pessah, Director of the UC Center for Children's Environmental Health, testified that many of the molecular and cellular systems associated with autism are the same ones that are the target of environmental chemicals currently of concern to human health because of their widespread use. He spoke of a critical need to identify which chemicals in the environment influence the same biological pathways that are effected in autism. Dr. Pessah said that limiting exposure to these chemicals is the only way to mitigate or prevent autism in susceptible individuals. Increasingly, evidence links even chronic, low-level exposure to industrial pollutants to many of the most prevalent and disabling learning and behavioral problems in children. Professor Bruce Lanphear Ph.D, of the Child & Family Research Institute, Simon Fraser University, reported that some of the most widely dispersed environmental toxicants, even at very low levels are risk factors for the " new morbidities " of childhood -- both intellectual and behavioral impairments such as autism. Indeed, there is often no apparent threshold -- in some cases the effects appear to be greater at the lowest levels of exposure. (12) Emerging evidence shows that a whole host of new environmental chemicals such as Bisphenol A, (the protective inner lining in tin cans and baby bottles) PBDEs, pesticides, phthalates and airborne pollutants are all associated with intellectual deficits or behavioral problems in children. (13,14,15) Just prior to the Senate hearing, several important research papers were published that further documented the relationship between environmental toxins and autism: • A study in India correlated the increased body burdens of lead and mercury with the severity of children's autism -- the more severe the autism, the higher concentrations of heavy metals were found in their bodies. (16) • An exhaustive scientific literature search just completed in August shows that the link between autism and toxic exposures in infants is supported by current published research. (17) My own recent study of a large autistic clinical database shows that children with autism had elevated levels in their bodies of several chemicals known to be neurotoxic. The children have genetic variations, which interfere with the proper detoxification of those chemicals. With over 2,000 patients in the database, my paper is one of the largest studies to show that environmental factors interacting with associated genetic components may be contributing to the causation of autism. Development of the human nervous system begins in the womb and extends throughout childhood. During these periods of rapid development, the brain is vulnerable to some environmental exposures, which may have the potential to disrupt the chemical signals that organize development. Even small changes can have potentially major consequences for brain structure and function. Thus, even brief adverse exposure at these vulnerable stages can have lasting effects on brain function throughout life. My report showed on average the amount of lead and mercury in the children's blood was 50 percent higher than normal. Their genetic changes (SNPs) were related to what is called Phase I and Phase II detoxification -- specifically the CYP and GST family of genes. This defect reduced the children's ability to remove excess toxins from their bodies. These autistic children also had a several fold higher level of bad gut bacteria and reduced levels of beneficial gut bacteria. Bad gut bacteria can produce neurotoxic amines and cause a " leaky gut " which allows toxic substances to more easily enter the circulatory system (see my previous Huffington Post entry " The Keys to Maintaining a Healthy Gut " ). You may read the full clinical study here: http://personalizedmedicine.posterous.com/environmental-factors-contributing-to-\ the-ons# We as a society have a toxic chemical addiction, which we need to kick now. We need to be better informed consumers -- choosing chemically free foods, products and environments, affecting change with our wallets. Here are some Toxic Exposure Avoidance Tips for All of Us -- And Especially For Pregnant Women. Start taking them, right now: Avoid eating foods that may contain high levels of toxic chemicals While fish are a good source of protein and omega-3 fatty acids, some contain high levels of mercury. Tuna, Cod and Mahi Mahi are ones to avoid. Wild salmon is a good healthy choice.Consume organic foods and drinks as much as possible.Use glass containers instead of plastic to store left over foods and drinks.Reduce our purchase of foods in cans as the can lining contains high levels of Bisphenol A (an endocrine disrupter linked to increased rates of cancer and abnormal behavior in children).Limit exposure to toxic household chemicals, pesticides and cleaning supplies. Look for natural alternatives.Install HEPA and carbon filter air purifiers in bedrooms to insure a healthy toxin free nights rest. Exposure to toxic chemicals by pregnant women, fetuses and children has a high probability of causing autism and other neuro-developmental disorders and learning disabilities in those whose genetic profile expresses in a reduced ability to detoxify these chemicals. This is not " fringe " science; it's fact. The time for action is now. We must reduce our exposure to toxic chemicals for ourselves, for our children's sake and for future generations. We have a responsibility to protect those who cannot protect themselves. We cannot afford to be incurious, indifferent or uninformed when the price of inattention is disability and heartache -- an overwhelming emotional and financial burden to families and society. Ask for help: Tell your government that we must lessen our exposure to these chemicals. For the future of all Americans. Email or call your own representatives. Senator Boxer can be reached at: senator@.... Please share your thoughts by adding a comment below. In good health, References (1) Autism Society of America (ASA). 2003. Facts and statistics. Available: www.autism-society.org/ (2) Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfate. 2005 PA Autism Census Project: Final Report; Oct 2009 (3) US Senate Subcommittee on Environment and Public Works. Aug 2010 (4) National Research Council. 1993. Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC. (5) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005 Guidance on selecting age groups for monitoring and assessing childhood exposures to environmental contaminants. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC; EPA/630/P-03/003F (6) Wasserman GA, Liu X, Parvez F, Ahsan H, Factor-Litvak P, Kline J, van Geen A, Slavkovich V, Loiacono NJ, Levy D, Cheng Z, Graziano JH. 2007. Water arsenic exposure and intellectual function in 6-year-old children in Araihazar, Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect. 115(2):285-9 (7) Landrigan PJ, Whitworth RH, Baloh RW, Barthel WF, Staehling NW, Rosenblum BF. 1975. Neuropsychological dysfunction in children with chronic low-level lead absorption. Lancet 1:708-712 (8) Rogan WJ, Ware JH. 2003. Exposure to lead in children - how low is low enough? N Engl J Med. 348:1515-1516 (9)(ATSDR). 2007. Toxicological profile for Lead. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp13-c3.pdf (10) Grandjean P, and Landrigan PJ. 2006. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet.;368(9553):2167-78. (11) Jett DA, Kuhlmann AC, Farmer SJ, Guilarte TR.1997. Age-dependent effects of developmental lead exposure on performance in the water maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav.57(1-2):271-9 (12) Canfield RL, CR, Cory-Slechta DA, C, Jusko TA, Lanphear BP. Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 micrograms per deciliter. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1517-1526 (13) Eskenazi B, Marks AR, Bradman A, et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and neurodevelopment in young Mexican-American children. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:792-798 (14) Herbstman JB, Sjödin A, Kurzon M, et al. Prenatal exposure to PBDEs and neuro-development. Environ Health Perspect 2010;118:712-719 (15) Braun JM, Froehlich TE, s JL, et al. Association of environmental toxicants and conduct disorder in U.S. children: NHANES 2001-2004. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116:956-962 (16) Priya MD. Level of Trace Elements (Copper, Zinc, Magnesium and Selenium) and Toxic Elements (Lead and Mercury) in the Hair and Nail of Children with Autism. Biol Trace Elem Res DOI 10.1007/s12011-010-8766-2 (17) DeSoto MC. Sorting out the spinning of autism: heavy metals and the question of incidence. Acta Neurobiol Exp 2010, 70: 165-176 ********************************************************* And OK--let's say Wakefield did somethign or other and his research is flawed----Ther esi so much more research pointing to the fact that soemthing--SOMETHING is affecting these kids's mitochondria and it's NOT affecting every kid--but those who are affected sufer neurological damage with various impairments--very much like ASD---regardless of what diagnosis the child ultimately gets. So, we can now call Dr. Wakefield a quack--but let's see---how long before the UC team is called into question, and they lose their funding unless they retreact their conclusions and make up soem imaginary factor that woudl show that we all have mitochondrial dysfunction anyway--or that they were wrong and there is no such thing-or what ever.... this was previously posted on this list as are many other articles we cannot ignore-which makes Dr. Wakefild's defamation even more laughable--or sad--depending on how you look at it--but it doe spoint to the fact that the Pharmaceutical industry must be getting desperate and losing profits based on all this research that implicates toxicity in their findings--whether they state it outright or not. Dr. Wakefield didn't even mention vaccines--but the measles virus found was the vacine virus--he couldn't call it soemthign else--he's a scientist and had to report the facts--and no this was not a controlled doubel blind etc-study--it was a small case study--and chances are he did nothign worng but chose the wrong topic to study, Here's another team of unfortunate scientists who may soon regret their findings if we let Dr. Wakefield be discredited and dealt with in this way. Yes-there isn't much other than toxicity that can cause such mitochondrial damage--and while granted toxicity can be from various sources--let's not forget the Hanah Polling case and the most obvious toxic encounters for infants and young children: And YES--the CDC admited that Hanah had a mitochondrial disorder that was exacerbated by the vaccines-but tht it is oh so rare---maybe not... Public release date: 30-Nov-2010 [ Print | E-mail | Share ] [ Close Window ] Contact: Phyllis Brown phyllis.brown@... 916-752-2768 University of California - Health System UC study finds children with autism have mitochondrial dysfunction (CHICAGO) -- Children with autism are far more likely to have deficits in their ability to produce cellular energy than are typically developing children, a new study by researchers at UC has found. The study, published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), found that cumulative damage and oxidative stress in mitochondria, the cell's energy producer, could influence both the onset and severity of autism, suggesting a strong link between autism and mitochondrial defects. After the heart, the brain is the most voracious consumer of energy in the body. The authors propose that deficiencies in the ability to fuel brain neurons might lead to some of the cognitive impairments associated with autism. Mitochondria are the primary source of energy production in cells and carry their own set of genetic instructions, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), to carry out aerobic respiration. Dysfunction in mitochondria already is associated with a number of other neurological conditions, including Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. " Children with mitochondrial diseases may present exercise intolerance, seizures and cognitive decline, among other conditions. Some will manifest disease symptoms and some will appear as sporadic cases, " said Cecilia Giulivi, the study's lead author and professor in the Department of Molecular Biosciences in the School of Veterinary Medicine at UC . " Many of these characteristics are shared by children with autism. " The researchers stress that these new findings, which may help physicians provide early diagnoses, do not identify the cause or the effects of autism, which affects as many as 1 in every 110 children in the United States, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While previous studies have revealed hints of a connection between autism and mitochondrial dysfunction, these reports have been either anecdotal or involved tissues that might not be representative of neural metabolism. " It is remarkable that evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction and changes in mitochondrial DNA were detected in the blood of these young children with autism, " said Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer of Autism Speaks, which provided funding for the study. " One of the challenges has been that it has been difficult to diagnose mitochondrial dysfunction because it usually requires a muscle biopsy. If we could screen for these metabolic problems with a blood test, it would be a big step forward. " For the study, Giulivi and her colleagues recruited 10 autistic children aged 2 to 5, and 10 age-matched typically developing children from similar backgrounds. The children were randomly selected from Northern California subjects who previously had participated in the 1,600-participant Childhood Autism Risk from Genetics and the Environment (CHARGE) Study and who also consented to return for a subsequent study known as CHARGE-BACK, conducted by the UC Center for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention. The children with autism met stringent diagnostic criteria for autism as defined by the two most widely used and rigorous assessment tools. Though the total number of children studied was small, it is generally representative of the much larger CHARGE cohort, and that increases the significance of the study results, the authors said. The researchers obtained blood samples from each child and analyzed the metabolic pathways of mitochondria in immune cells called lymphocytes. Previous studies sampled mitochondria obtained from muscle, but the mitochondrial dysfunction sometimes is not expressed in muscle. Muscle cells can generate much of their energy through anaerobic glycolysis, which does not involve mitochondria. By contrast, lymphocytes, and to a greater extent brain neurons, rely more heavily on the aerobic respiration conducted by mitochondria. The researchers found that mitochondria from children with autism consumed far less oxygen than mitochondria from the group of control children, a sign of lowered mitochondrial activity. For example, the oxygen consumption of one critical mitochondrial enzyme complex, NADH oxidase, in autistic children was only a third of that found in control children. " A 66 percent decrease is significant, " Giulivi said. " When these levels are lower, you have less capability to produce ATP (adenosine triphosphate) to pay for cellular work. Even if this decrease is considered moderate, deficits in mitochondrial energy output do not have to be dismissed, for they could be exacerbated or evidenced during the perinatal period but appear subclinical in the adult years. " Reduced mitochondrial enzyme function proved widespread among the autistic children. Eighty percent had lowered activity in NADH oxidase than did controls, while 60 percent, 40 percent and 30 percent had low activity in succinate oxidase, ATPase and cytochrome c oxidase, respectively. The researchers went on to isolate the origins of these defects by assessing the activity of each of the five enzyme complexes involved in mitochondrial respiration. Complex I was the site of the most common deficiency, found in 60 percent of autistic subjects, and occurred five out of six times in combination with Complex V. Other children had problems in Complexes III and IV. Levels of pyruvate, the raw material mitochondria transform into cellular energy, also were elevated in the blood plasma of autistic children. This suggests the mitochondria of children with autism are unable to process pyruvate fast enough to keep up with the demand for energy, pointing to a novel deficiency at the level of an enzyme named pyruvate dehydrogenase. Mitochondria also are the main intracellular source of oxygen free radicals. Free radicals are very reactive species that can harm cellular structures, including DNA. Cells are able to repair typical levels of such oxidative damage. Giulivi and her colleagues found that hydrogen peroxide levels in autistic children were twice as high as in normal children. As a result, the cells of children with autism were exposed to higher oxidative stress. Mitochondria often respond to oxidative stress by making extra copies of their own DNA. The strategy helps ensure that some normal genes are present even if others have been damaged by oxidation. The researchers found higher mtDNA copy numbers in the lymphocytes of half of the children with autism. These children carried equally high numbers of mtDNA sets in their granulocytes, another type of immune cell, demonstrating that these effects were not limited to a specific cell type. Two of the five children also had deletions in their mtDNA genes, whereas none of the control children showed deletions. Taken together, the various abnormalities, defects and levels of malfunction measured in the mitochondria of autistic children imply that oxidative stress in these organelles could be influencing autism's onset. " The various dysfunctions we measured are probably even more extreme in brain cells, which rely exclusively on mitochondria for energy, " said Isaac Pessah, director of the Center for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention, a UC MIND Institute researcher and professor of molecular biosciences at the UC School of Veterinary Medicine. Giulivi cautions that these findings do not amount to establishing a cause for autism. " We took a snapshot of the mitochondrial dysfunction when the children were 2-to-5 years old. Whether this happened before they were born or after, this study can't tell us, " she said. " However, the research furthers the understanding of autism on several fronts and may, if replicated, be used to help physicians diagnose the problem earlier. " " Pediatricians need to be aware of this issue so that they can ask the right questions to determine whether children with autism have vision or hearing problems or myopathies, " Giulivi said. Exercise intolerance in the form of muscle cramps during intensive physical activity is one of the characteristics of mitochondrial myopathies. The chemical fingerprints of mitochondrial dysfunction also may hold potential as a diagnostic tool. Giulivi and colleagues are now examining the mitochondrial DNA of their subjects more closely to pinpoint more precise differences between autistic and non-autistic children. " If we find some kind of blood marker that is consistent with and unique to children with autism, maybe we can change the way we diagnose this difficult-to-assess condition, " she said. The study also helps refine the search for autism's origins. " The real challenge now is to try and understand the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in children with autism, " Pessah said. " For instance, many environmental stressors can cause mitochondrial damage. Depending on when a child was exposed, maternally or neonatally, and how severe that exposure was, it might explain the range of the symptoms of autism. " " This important exploratory research addresses in a rigorous way an emerging hypothesis about potential mitochondrial dysfunction and autism, " said Lawler, program director at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), which provided funding for the study. " Additional research in this area could ultimately lead to prevention or intervention efforts for this serious developmental disorder. " ###Other study authors include Yi-Fan Zhang, Alicja Omanska-Klusek, Ross-Inta, Wong, Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Flora Tassone of UC . Funding for the study was provided by a UC MIND Institute Pilot Research Grant, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Autism Speaks, including an Environmental Innovator Award from Autism Speaks. The UC MIND Institute in Sacramento, CA, was founded in 1998 as a unique interdisciplinary research center where parents, community leaders, researchers, clinicians and volunteers work together toward a common goal: researching causes, treatments and eventual preventions and cures for neurodevelopmental disorders. The institute has major research efforts in autism, Tourette syndrome, fragile X syndrome, chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). More information about the institute including previous presentations in its Distinguished Lecturer Series, is available on the Web at http://mindinstitute.ucdavis.edu/. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2011 Report Share Posted January 13, 2011 I actually am shocked that the argument remains that all of the children being diagnosed today are just due to more awareness. Years ago I was sent through the US Department of Education report books that covered the Nation's classification stats for special education over about a ten year period and I checked the numbers of those children classified across the board and most categories dramatically increased outside of MR (except for some reason in NC from what I recall) and visual and hearing impairments remained about the same. I was focused on MR because the argument would be those children that used to fall under that classification may not be falling into the autism classification -but the numbers no way supported that theory -and that was super clear for anyone to see. It's difficult to get a very accurate mapping of exactly what is going on as far as diagnosis because unlike autism which gets it's own classification now, in each state the classifications are not exactly the same for just about any other impairment....even ADHD doesn't have it's own classification...but yes clearly the increase was beyond huge for speech and language or speech or language or communication impaired (called so many things!) and the increase in developmentally disabled or general like classifications there was a tremendous increase as well. I have quotes of some of the the actual numbers in the archives here when I looked at it -but at this point that was years ago. Point being if I was able to look at the classifications over a decade it's there for anyone to clearly see. Also the point regarding genetic...undoubtedly there are genetic components in many cases, but clearly the rise is NOT from genetics alone! It is well documented that environmental aspects can affect genetics, so clearly what is going on to me anyway is a combination of either or both environmental and nutritional that is triggering genetic predispositions. All of us went to school I would suppose, and how many of you recall any friend that had to go to speech therapy? (insert cricket sound here) I mean kids just talked -or they were quiet -but that was the VERY rare exception...and probably none of us recall if that lone silent child could talk and just didn't or couldn't talk...do you? Now you can go block to block in certain areas such as in NJ or Ohio for just 2 examples and find kids with multifaceted aspects to a communication impairment. I don't care if dad's cousin was fanatic about lining up all his toys... adults that grow up with quirks are not undiagnosed autistic adults! I mean nobody is perfect we all have quirks..and to think you don't have any means you are now aware of your own. To not notice the increase or to think that we have adults walking around that are the same as all the kids today is illogical for one main reason....we KNOW the adults didn't receive any services that are appropriate and we know from the children today that without appropriate services these children do not function well and fall far behind their peers. So if Uncle Walt who is all fanatic about stuff in his office being lined up still is now VP of a bank....no he's not like his nephew who was just diagnosed with autism. To me there is a rise in whatever you want to call it -and no I don't believe it's classic autism think it's just called that because that's where all the monies are...but I don't think the apraxia we have today is the same as years ago either. To me the fact there is a rise in multifaceted communication impairments whatever you want to call them.... that is clear. And speaking of environmental issues...nobody here commented on the blog I wrote -but clearly I outline the increase, environmental toxins- and give many credible examples. Did you guys take the time to read what went on where I used to live in NJ???? http://pursuitofresearch.org/2011/01/09/dr-wakefield-attacked-potentially-causin\ g-thousands-of-birds-to-die/ And about environmental toxins http://pursuitofresearch.org/2011/01/09/a-tale-of-dead-birds-and-black-ooze-in-n\ j/ and my original blog on this http://www.cherab.org/news/Save.html And a final PS...and I'll just throw this out here..in general I do not believe the kids today are presenting quite as severe as the kids diagnosed with either apraxia or autism back when my son Tanner was first diagnosed. Today you hear about kids that are talking at 2 but " only " saying a few words...I do believe that removing the thimerosal was a great thing because while I don't believe they are the main cause of the rise -I believe the thimerosal in many cases -my son probably included, was the final straw. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2011 Report Share Posted January 14, 2011 Hi, It's been a busy couple of days, but have read responses to my post. Have to keep moving so I'll be quick. :-) - I also don't think increased awareness is the sole reason for an increase in diagnosis. Just that it may account for part of it. - Also, I agree that it's difficult to figure out what's creating the increase because it's most likely more than one thing. Add in different diagnostic criteria depending on geographical area, plus the possibility that diagnostically we are categorizing what could be either multiple disorders with very similar constellations of symptoms or one disorder/constellation of sypmtoms with multiple causes and it makes it difficult right now to see the picture clearly. On the flip side, I have seen a few adults in my practice with depression/anxiety that have undiagnosed dyspraxia/sensory processing issues that have always been there but were not diagnosed or treated 15-20 years ago. It's been quite interesting to see how it plays out without treatment, what challenges come up for people and how they compensate. I've ended up consulting with my kid's OT a few times regarding clients. There is an increased incidence of anxiety/depression in people with dyspraxia and sensory processing issues, and I can certainly see how this could manifest when it goes untreated. Could say more, but gotta go! Diane > > I actually am shocked that the argument remains that all of the children being diagnosed today are just due to more awareness. Years ago I was sent through the US Department of Education report books that covered the Nation's classification stats for special education over about a ten year period and I checked the numbers of those children classified across the board and most categories dramatically increased outside of MR (except for some reason in NC from what I recall) and visual and hearing impairments remained about the same. I was focused on MR because the argument would be those children that used to fall under that classification may not be falling into the autism classification -but the numbers no way supported that theory -and that was super clear for anyone to see. > > It's difficult to get a very accurate mapping of exactly what is going on as far as diagnosis because unlike autism which gets it's own classification now, in each state the classifications are not exactly the same for just about any other impairment....even ADHD doesn't have it's own classification...but yes clearly the increase was beyond huge for speech and language or speech or language or communication impaired (called so many things!) and the increase in developmentally disabled or general like classifications there was a tremendous increase as well. I have quotes of some of the the actual numbers in the archives here when I looked at it -but at this point that was years ago. Point being if I was able to look at the classifications over a decade it's there for anyone to clearly see. > > Also the point regarding genetic...undoubtedly there are genetic components in many cases, but clearly the rise is NOT from genetics alone! It is well documented that environmental aspects can affect genetics, so clearly what is going on to me anyway is a combination of either or both environmental and nutritional that is triggering genetic predispositions. > > All of us went to school I would suppose, and how many of you recall any friend that had to go to speech therapy? (insert cricket sound here) I mean kids just talked -or they were quiet -but that was the VERY rare exception...and probably none of us recall if that lone silent child could talk and just didn't or couldn't talk...do you? > > Now you can go block to block in certain areas such as in NJ or Ohio for just 2 examples and find kids with multifaceted aspects to a communication impairment. I don't care if dad's cousin was fanatic about lining up all his toys... adults that grow up with quirks are not undiagnosed autistic adults! I mean nobody is perfect we all have quirks..and to think you don't have any means you are now aware of your own. > > To not notice the increase or to think that we have adults walking around that are the same as all the kids today is illogical for one main reason....we KNOW the adults didn't receive any services that are appropriate and we know from the children today that without appropriate services these children do not function well and fall far behind their peers. So if Uncle Walt who is all fanatic about stuff in his office being lined up still is now VP of a bank....no he's not like his nephew who was just diagnosed with autism. To me there is a rise in whatever you want to call it -and no I don't believe it's classic autism think it's just called that because that's where all the monies are...but I don't think the apraxia we have today is the same as years ago either. To me the fact there is a rise in multifaceted communication impairments whatever you want to call them.... that is clear. > > And speaking of environmental issues...nobody here commented on the blog I wrote -but clearly I outline the increase, environmental toxins- and give many credible examples. Did you guys take the time to read what went on where I used to live in NJ???? > > > http://pursuitofresearch.org/2011/01/09/dr-wakefield-attacked-potentially-causin\ g-thousands-of-birds-to-die/ > > And about environmental toxins > http://pursuitofresearch.org/2011/01/09/a-tale-of-dead-birds-and-black-ooze-in-n\ j/ > > and my original blog on this > http://www.cherab.org/news/Save.html > > > And a final PS...and I'll just throw this out here..in general I do not believe the kids today are presenting quite as severe as the kids diagnosed with either apraxia or autism back when my son Tanner was first diagnosed. Today you hear about kids that are talking at 2 but " only " saying a few words...I do believe that removing the thimerosal was a great thing because while I don't believe they are the main cause of the rise -I believe the thimerosal in many cases -my son probably included, was the final straw. > > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.