Guest guest Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 gelatin is a big improvement in efficency like say up to 50% but the whole 100% is needed and in my expereince you only get that by sprinkling. thats sprinkling on food on the plate and not mixing. sometimes i may mix enzymes in double cream. tipping the loose powder down the back of the throat after the meal is ok if you forget. i don't mix enzymes with drinks as this dilutes the stomach contents. generally i avoid diluting the stomach contents during a meal, no fluids half an hour before and up to an hour afterwards, though i may take a small amount of fluid soon after the meal as the enzymes seem to to use a bit of fluid as they digest the stomach contents. > , > > I saw you write that taking enzymes in the capsules as opposed to > mixing in food makes them only 30% effective. Is this the case if > you transfer the enzymes from the vegetable capsule to a gelatin > capsule? > > Thanks, > Liz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2004 Report Share Posted September 28, 2004 Hi , .... can you please elaborate on why, and do you then think saliva test is more accurate?------ Hi Norton I never did answer your previous post, but sorry to hear the T- therapy success against your wife's migraines didn't last. Just when you think you have something figured out! But glad the extra oxygen is working now. Maybe the headaches have more than one cause. I know sleeping too long can cause them, and I figure it is probably oxygen deprivation and maybe dehydration as well. Hope she continues to stay pain-free. She's lucky to have such a devoted and resourceful " migraine therapist " in her corner! Now for your other questions, I'm not sure about saliva tests as I have no experience with them and have yet to run across professional opinions about them. But let's say I'm skeptical since the problems inherent in measuring hormones by whatever means remain the same. The following is copied and pasted from correspondence and messages I've written to other persons and forums: Hormones and neurotransmitter levels are in a constant state of flux, along with each individual's unique chemical makeup, and the amount of usable hormones at any given time simply cannot be quantified. These tests exist for two reasons, IMO: 1) Profit 2) Protection against litigation for practitioners, in the event a patient on HRT develops cancer and decides to sue. The psychiatric community knows better than to try measuring seratonin levels as an aid in prescribing anti-depressants. There are just too many influencing factors involved. They use their patients' mental health as a barometer, since this is the only accurate measuring tool. 1) Exerpt from: Official Recommendations of ISSAM (The International Society for the Study of the Aging Male) http://www.issam.ch/ The accepted value for testosterone in andropause is defined to be 2 standard deviations below normal values for young men (317 ng/dLtotal testosterone, 7.34 ng/dL freetestosterone,15and 86–231 ng/dL forbioavailable testosterone). The normal ranges and methods vary widely, and physicians are urged to consult with their local laboratories for the applicable values in their clinical practice environment. The actual value in an individual does not tell the whole story, for the following reasons: the history of what has been a normal continued testosterone level for a given patient in previous years is almost always unknown; the sensitivity of different target organs (brain, muscle, bone, etc) varies; there are other, unmeasured hormones contributing to the condition (testosterone is a major factor but not the only one); and there may be unrecognized molecules (endocrinedisruptors) blocking the normal action of testosterone Table 4: Factors Influencing the Variability in Presentation of Andropause and the Attendant Testosterone Values Normal ranges vary widely History of individual normal testosterone is unknown Sensitivity of target organs (brain, muscle, bone, etc) varies Other unmeasured hormones contribute Potential, unrecognized endocrine disruptors This variability in symptoms presents difficulties in giving a simple clinical picture Despite these findings ISSAM's Official Recommendations are to do hormone tests! Go figure - they largely discredit the tests, then recommend using them! I first became aware of the gross inaccuracy of panel hormone tests 10 years ago when my dog developed chronic skin lesions, brittle falling hair, lethargy and weight loss. His thyroid panel test (same test as used in human medicine) came back in the upper normal range, but my astute vet said " no wait, these tests can be VERY ambiguous. Let's try him on thyroid hormone replacement first. " The poor creature by now looked like a concentration camp victim, but on thyroxine recovered permanently from his skin problems, grew a new shiney coat, gained weight, and was infused with energy. I have also read that a quite large percentage of people, esp women, go undiagnosed or are wrongly diagnosed, but suffer from hypothyroidism. This from a last year veterinary student: Thyroid question Our dermatology professor calls this " the blonde frizzies " :-) A couple of her dogs tested in the normal range for thyroid BUT she put them on thyroid supplementation and their skins and coats improved (they had some hair loss and skin problems). OK . just so you guys know : . . RESPONSE TO TREATMENT *IS* a way to diagnose hypothyroidism if the blood tests are not conclusive. I know someone else . . . Her dogs have a problem but since their *bloodwork* is normal, she says it must be OK . .. that's probably another reason that vets are a bit reluctant to go through the testing . . . the results can be extremely variable and influenced by so many other factors that the test might not give you anything you can " hang your hat on. " A more on-topic example - my own bi-weekly blood tests during my fight for a prescription for t-gel. The results flew in the face of all reason. When I was amply estrogenated, the tests claimed I was low in estrogen but high in freeT (yeah right! I had yet to gain access to testosterone and menopause with oral hrt had depleted my supply.) I was taking the same amount of E and P throughout, but over the months the results would proclaim one high and the other deficient. Then the next test would claim the reverse. Finally a test randomly supplied the result I was waiting for - low in free T. I got my T-gel and left. I will *never* put myself in a position of being held hostage by these bogus tests again! That was over a year ago. I went back last month for an annual exam and pap smear, and to hand the doctor a written dissertation on exactly what is wrong with HRT research to date, and the current protocol that the research community has handed down to practitioners for prescribing HRT. It listed sources, as well as information about the new topical HRT products currently undergoing final testing, which include the androgen group. Her 3 most relevant comments were that 1) My vaginal tissues resemble those of a 20 yr old 2) She planned to photocopy and share the document I handed her with her associates 3) Research in Europe (where most of the new topicals were conceived and tested) is far more advanced than here in the states. Some blood tests are good diagnostic tools, tests for cancer, diabetes, mineral deficiences etc, but it is my opinion that hormonal levels simply cannot be measured in this way with any accuracy. I would at least suggest that if you have hormone test results in front of you saying one thing, and your body is telling you something entirely different, trust the latter! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2005 Report Share Posted September 14, 2005 > > Ernie, > > > > Testosterone pellets seem like they would be the best way to get > testosterone into ones > > body in a controled way. Even if the dose was too low, one could > add on top of that with > > creams, gels, orals, or small injections. The entire cattle > industry would fail if they stopped > > useing pellets in cattle. You are right about the TRT industry and > all the favors to doctors > > who use a type of gel. There might be one dollar worth of > testosterone in a $400.00 a > > month Rx of a well know gel. It is sad that here in the USA TRT is > so expensive, and as > > gels go i think there are more problems with those then with > pellets. I do think using gels/ > > creams as needed is good though in conjunction with pellets or > injections or HCG. > > > > Anyway it is a pleasure to read your posts on pellets, and those > that have a different take > > on them. > > > > > ---------------------- > Hi , you say in your above words to Ernest that you think > there are more problems with gels then with pellets. I am very > interested in hearing you elaborate on this thread. I was not aware > that there were more problems, especially considering the expense, > surgical procedure, high cost, and risk of infection and improper > dosage, pellet size, number, and T release, associated with > pellets. How can a T gel application have more problems associated > with it than the pellet possible problems? > thanks > norton Norton, You ask a very good question, i was thinking more in the overall effects of the testosterone delivery into the body then about the issues with expense, surgical procedure, high cost, and risk of infection and improper dosage, pellet size, number, and T release. The problems with say AG are high cost, improper dosage, T release, DHT conversion, estrogen conversion, skin effects, effects on children, women, and anyone who comes in contact with the gel that should not. My main point was that it just seems that pellets would give the best T release profile over an extended time. I could be 100% wrong on that but from all the studies from the cattle industry, they seem to have it down. Humans are of course much more complex then cattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 A while back you posted about some supplement youf husband was taking that greatly increased his ejaculate, now a " flood " if I recall. I want to flood also!... norton, ready to get juiced up---- ROTFL! Hi Norton! ----TRT has reduced to a trickle, so disappointing.---- That is a TRT side effect I hadn't been aware of until a number men on this forum mentioned it recently. I wonder.. does this also happen if you are also taking HCG? ----I think one was ALC and the other ALA--- Yep, those are the two. --- there may have been some others you mentioned--- Nope, just the ALC/ALA. I have a web page with all this info on it and more at http://infowomanhrt.tripod.com/EDcureALC_ALA.html and a copy of this same file in the *Files* section of this group but if for some reason you have trouble accessing it, let me know and I can re-post the specific info you asked for. ----- I presume they are no presciption? Can you get these at like Whole Foods or Wild Oats or is there an online source you use? ---- Right, they are classified as supplements; no script needed. Acetyl- l-carnitine (ALC)is an amino acid and not sure what classification Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) falls under although it is an anti-oxidant. I imagine the places you mention sell it, although the cheapest place we found is American Nutrition. A link and prices are on the web page. Because the supplement industry is largely unregulated I'm somewhat wary of brands we haven't tried. Hubby has used GNC brand on occasion without noticing a change in quality and another has purchased ALC/ALA in bulk powder from another link on the web page with good results. The cost of ALC/ALA therapy is approx $50-60 per month. It's not cheap but worth the cost! It generally takes about 4 months of ALC/ALA treatment to see significant results, either for it to build up in one's system or for it to accomplish repairs. However one guy in his 30s noticed big improvements in only a week. We attribute his unique recovery to his young age. (My husband, the other couple men we know who are taking it and the test subjects in the clinical trial are all in the 50-70s age range, with a lot more built-up neural and other cellular damage needing repair.) The test subjects reported increases in fluid volume but none of them were on TRT. However one man on the ED forum is on TRT and he cited increased ejaculate volume as a result of ALC/ALA use. (He stated that testosterone and ALC/ALA each have very unique and distinguishable effects although both work in many areas to accomplish the same purposes. So apparently being on TRT does inhibit or prevent the action of ALC/ALA on ejaculate volume, at least for him.) If you decide to try the therapy and stick with it at a sufficient dose for at least a few months, let us know the results if you don't mind, ok? We're both interested in finding out if it works for a majority of men and a profile of those who are most likely (and unlikely) to benefit from it. Also if you purchase ALC/ALA from another place and it works for you, let me know and I'll add to the list of reliable brands/sellers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 , I have been reading your posts and the success your husband has had with the ALC/ALA supplementation. I'm 58 and on TRT and have the same problem and was wondering if you could share the name of the brands and sellers you have dealt with. I usually use capsules or pill form and have never used bulk powder of any supplement. Do you feel this would be a better form to use? Thanks for your help, Guy --- Summers <rsummers@...> wrote: > > A while back you posted about some supplement youf > husband was taking > that greatly increased his ejaculate, now a " flood " > if I recall. > I want to flood also!... norton, ready to get juiced > up---- > > ROTFL! Hi Norton! > > ----TRT has reduced to a trickle, so > disappointing.---- > > That is a TRT side effect I hadn't been aware of > until a number men > on this forum mentioned it recently. I wonder.. > does this also > happen if you are also taking HCG? > > ----I think one was ALC and the other ALA--- > > Yep, those are the two. > > --- there may have been some others you mentioned--- > > Nope, just the ALC/ALA. > > I have a web page with all this info on it and more > at > http://infowomanhrt.tripod.com/EDcureALC_ALA.html > and a copy of this same file in the *Files* section > of this group > but if for some reason you have trouble accessing > it, let me know and > I can re-post the specific info you asked for. > > ----- I presume they are no presciption? > Can you get these at like Whole Foods or Wild Oats > or is there an > online source you use? ---- > > Right, they are classified as supplements; no script > needed. Acetyl- > l-carnitine (ALC)is an amino acid and not sure what > classification > Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) falls under although it is > an anti-oxidant. > I imagine the places you mention sell it, although > the cheapest place > we found is American Nutrition. > A link and prices are on the web page. > > Because the supplement industry is largely > unregulated I'm somewhat > wary of brands we haven't tried. Hubby has used GNC > brand on > occasion without noticing a change in quality and > another has > purchased ALC/ALA in bulk powder from another link > on the web page > with good results. The cost of ALC/ALA therapy is > approx $50-60 per > month. It's not cheap but worth the cost! > > It generally takes about 4 months of ALC/ALA > treatment to see > significant results, either for it to build up in > one's system or for > it to accomplish repairs. However one guy in his > 30s noticed big > improvements in only a week. We attribute his > unique recovery to his > young age. (My husband, the other couple men we know > who are taking > it and the test subjects in the clinical trial are > all in the 50-70s > age range, with a lot more built-up neural and other > cellular damage > needing repair.) > > The test subjects reported increases in fluid volume > but none of them > were on TRT. However one man on the ED forum is on > TRT and he cited > increased ejaculate volume as a result of ALC/ALA > use. (He stated > that testosterone and ALC/ALA each have very unique > and > distinguishable effects although both work in many > areas to > accomplish the same purposes. So apparently being > on TRT does > inhibit or prevent the action of ALC/ALA on > ejaculate volume, at > least for him.) > > If you decide to try the therapy and stick with it > at a sufficient > dose for at least a few months, let us know the > results if you don't > mind, ok? We're both interested in finding out if > it works for a > majority of men and a profile of those who are most > likely (and > unlikely) to benefit from it. > > Also if you purchase ALC/ALA from another place and > it works for you, > let me know and I'll add to the list of reliable > brands/sellers. > > > > > > > > test'; " > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 > A while back you posted about some supplement youf husband was taking > that greatly increased his ejaculate, now a " flood " if I recall. > I want to flood also!... norton, ready to get juiced up---- > > ROTFL! Hi Norton! > > ----TRT has reduced to a trickle, so disappointing.---- > > That is a TRT side effect I hadn't been aware of until a number men > on this forum mentioned it recently. I wonder.. does this also > happen if you are also taking HCG? -------------------- , my balls are dead from injecting depoT for the past 34 years, so I am hoping the anticipated flood come from a stimulated prostate! HCG would not work work on me, maybe some other guys here can comment on this it they are on HCG and TRT, and also try the supplements. I will now cruise the links and file section as you suggest. thanks for this information norton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 Norton why did HCG not work did you try it by it's self. My nuts are dead also for over 21 yrs. but doing the shots and adding HCG 500 IU's 3 times a week doubled my Total T levels and my nuts are back now filled right out. I tryed Dr. 's treatment go to this site and read HCG Update. http://www.allthingsmale.com/ Phil nort828 <nort828@...> wrote: > A while back you posted about some supplement youf husband was taking > that greatly increased his ejaculate, now a " flood " if I recall. > I want to flood also!... norton, ready to get juiced up---- > > ROTFL! Hi Norton! > > ----TRT has reduced to a trickle, so disappointing.---- > > That is a TRT side effect I hadn't been aware of until a number men > on this forum mentioned it recently. I wonder.. does this also > happen if you are also taking HCG? -------------------- , my balls are dead from injecting depoT for the past 34 years, so I am hoping the anticipated flood come from a stimulated prostate! HCG would not work work on me, maybe some other guys here can comment on this it they are on HCG and TRT, and also try the supplements. I will now cruise the links and file section as you suggest. thanks for this information norton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 --- In , " nort828 " <nort828@y...> I will now cruise the links and file section as you suggest.--- No need. Just click on: http://infowomanhrt.tripod.com/EDcureALC_ALA.html If it does not not appear as an active link, copy and paste it into your browser window. I'm not sure what effect ALC/ALA might have on shut-down testicles. As to prostate health, in the study, ALC did not increase prostate size as testosterone did, and neither raised PSA levels. Little is known to my knowledge about the effects of TRT and ALC/ALA combined therapies. Research to date has contrasted the two treatments and found ALC to have the edge, but only two anecdotal cases so far involve men using both treatments simultaneously. Reports from both are very good but neither subject had used TRT long enough to have developed testicular atrophy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 20, 2005 Report Share Posted September 20, 2005 I usually use capsules or pill form and have never used bulk powder of any supplement. Do you feel this would be a better form to use?----- Personally no, we both prefer easier-to-swallow capsules. (I also take ALC/ALA for the myriad of health benefits to aging tissues and organs) Four grams of ALC and 1600mgs of ALA equates to 16 horse- sized gel caps everyday (unless you buy a combined version of ALC/ALA capsules from GNC or some other place, in which case it is only 8 large capsules daily) but no matter how you look at it, it is a lot of pills to take everyday, so convenience is worth the extra money to us. The advantage to bulk powders of course is a slightly lower cost, but I have no idea what the stuff tastes like mixed in liquid and don't want to spend the time packing it into empty gelatin capsules. I highly recommend to anyone considering ALC/ALA therapy that they first read ALL the information on this web link below before deciding to invest the time and money the treatment requires. Links to ordering info and prices are on the web page. http://infowomanhrt.tripod.com/EDcureALC_ALA.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2005 Report Share Posted October 17, 2005 >>> Correct me if I am mistaken, but my understanding is that with food the enzymes work on food mainly, but on an empty stomach they work on other " issues " in the body? You are correct. Also, I think you may get better inflammation control if you take some enzymes with food (even if just a standard dose of good broad-spectrum enzyme product) as well as between meals. Taking enzymes with food will help prevent the gunk from getting into the body to begin with and causing more inflammation. But taking enzymes between meals, particularly the proteases, helps inflammation that is already present. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 10, 2009 Report Share Posted January 10, 2009 Sherry, Body Bio is the new name of E-Lyte. They are exactly the same. It's the one I use. I give 25 drops/day to my son (8 y. old, 68 lb). You're welcome. . Question for > >@ > > > > It may be zinc deficiency. Try ionic zinc (E-Lyte), for better > absorption. > > > > . > > > > Hi , Do you have any experience with BodyBio 2 zinc? Is this the ionic zinc you were speaking of? It's a liquid and says zinc sulphate in an aqueous solution. I'm desperately trying to get my son's zinc levels up. Thank you! Sherry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 , I am hoping to get some advice from you... As mentioned in a previous post, we got the go ahead from my son's pediatrician regarding trying Nutriveda... My son is currently on Thorne DHA - which is an algae based DHA. Should I try to switch him to fish oils first or keep up with the DHA and try Nutriveda first? Thanks! The Family Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2010 Report Share Posted April 27, 2010 So glad you got the go ahead from the doc and to hope someone has the answer for you about reflux. Do you have to check all foods out prior to feeding him? Perhaps we can add the answer to this question here? http://pursuitofresearch.org/faq.html I do not believe it matters from what is being reported as brand and source doesn't matter -it would still be providing the essential fatty acid (omega 3s EFAs PUFAs) and if that is the formula that works for your child it's not the norm -but you have to stick with what works for your own child. It is becoming more clear that the Omega 3s together with nutriiveda are better than one alone based on feedback. In fact just got this update from from Israel (Sara if you see this just click on reply and can add to it " New and interesting updates regarding Tal Dear , In the interest of the research and after just reading a post about tantrums after reducing or stopping fish oils, I wanted to update you on Tal's progress. We haven't been in touch for a few weeks. Well we got a bit cocky after starting Tal on the nutriiveda and after seeing so much progress in a relatively short time we decided to cut his fish oil dose in half as many were doing. Well initially this didn't have an effect but slowly we beacame aware of Tal's bad and grumpy mood, definite deterioration and regression in clarity of speech, word finding and sophistication. He was still on his high dose of nutriiveda and we couldn't understand it as we hadn't read of any others regressing on the nutriiveda. A few days ago I was about to write to you in desperation and my husband had a moment of clarity and said why don't we up his fish oil dose back to what it was originally and see what happens.....Well, low and behold we have our boy back to where he was, calmer, more mature, much more pleasant to be around and speech much improved. I just thought that it should be noted that a fish oil reduction may not be indicated for everyone and people should be aware of that. Honestly, I nearly lost it! All that progress and then just like that to see it go.......you can imagine! Hope you are well and regards, " Tanner was on nutriiveda full dosage for him which is 4 scoops a day for 4 or 5 months prior to me reducing his oils. Dakota my other son as I said on a previous post has only been on the full dosage for around 2 months and no way can reduce his dosage yet either!! Sometimes it is trial and error -but have heard from others over time that they are able to reduce if on a higher dosage. Again if you are only on a capsule a day I would not go lower than that Based on feedback from our survey so far -I'm sure you'll be seeing really great things soon! Yay!!! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2011 Report Share Posted March 24, 2011 Joy, has my permission. He asked for it which was an appreciated courtesy. The person who was such a cheese aficionado was internationally famous immunologist Eli Sercarz. He was diagnosed with stage 4 renal cancer and had perhaps a couple of months left to live. We stretched that into 5 years of quality life without chemo or radiation and he died at age 75. He was able to work writing papers (some 400 peer-reviewed papers), obtaining research grants, speaking at international conferences, and giving talks at our center until the end. When all his family, friends, and many post-docs got together to celebrate his life we had a smorgasbord of maybe 20 of his favorite cheeses. _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Joy Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 8:42 AM Subject: [ ] Question for Good morning, I noticed you were quoted on the website fightingcancer.com/blog by Chamberlain. Is that by permission? I ask because he has a book that is being advertised and your words about resisting sales hype are running through my brain. Your quote concerned people's attitudes and cancer and you were telling of a man that was not a very good patient in that he ate cheese with almost every meal and ended up with good results concerning his cancer. I had to laugh. I have been craving pizza for about four weeks and after reading that, my husband and I went out and had pizza. I savored every single bite and am still smiling. Point taken! Now, how about that book? Thanks, . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.