Documents emerge proving Dr Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Deer caught misrepresenting the facts b

[Guest guest]

NaturalNews.com printable article

Originally published January 26 2011

Documents emerge proving Dr Wakefield innocent; BMJ and Deer caught

misrepresenting the facts

by Mike , the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) New documents have emerged that clear Dr Wakefield

of the allegations of fraud recently made by the British Medical Journal

and its reporter Deer. This new evidence " completely negates the

allegations that I committed scientific

fraud. Deer and Dr. Godlee of the British Medical Journal (BMJ) knew or

should

have

known about the facts set out below before publishing their false

allegations, " says Dr Wakefield (see sources, below).

Newly-revealed documents show that on December 20th, 1996, a meeting of The

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group based at the Royal Free Hospital Medical

School

featured a presentation by Professor - on seven of the

children who would later become part of the group of patients Dr

Wakefield wrote about in his 1998 The Lancet paper (which was later retracted by

The Lancet).

Remember,

Dr Wakefield has been accused of completely fabricating his findings

about these same children in his 1998 paper, but these documents reveal

that fourteen months before Dr Wakefield's paper was published, two

other researchers -- Professor - and Dr Amar Dhillon --

independently documented the same problems in these children, including

symptoms of autism.

Thus, Dr Wakefield could not have

" fabricated " these findings as alleged by the British Medical Journal,

which now finds itself in the position of needing to issue a retraction,

or it must now expand its accusations of fraud to include Professor

- and Dr Dhillon... essentially, the BMJ must now insist that

a " conspiracy of fraud " existed among at least these three researchers,

and possibly more, in order to back up its allegation that Dr

Wakefield's study results were fabricated.

The smoking-gun evidenceProfessor -'s 1996 presentation at the Royal

Free Hospital Medical School was entitled, " Entero-colitis and Disintegrative

Disorder Following MMR - A Review of the First Seven Cases. "

His

presentation notes began with the following text: " “I wish today, to

present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys,

who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably

autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly present

their case history [sic]. "

He

then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as

derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar

Dhillon. Importantly, Dr Wakefield was not part of this

investigation. This means that Dr Wakefield's findings were independently

replicated by another medical research team.

The

British Medical Journal's accusations against Dr Wakefield -- that he

fabricated his findings -- are therefore false. The mainstream media

accusation that Dr Wakefield's findings have " never been replicated " is

also blatantly false.

Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE

Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:

Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]

Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism

Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum

Treated Asacol

INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)

Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.

Hyperactive from 18 months.

Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure

Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen

core.

Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation

Acute and chronic inflammation.

Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]

INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN’S DISEASE

Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development

MMR at 5 months [sic]

Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior

Hyperactive with food

Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular

hyperplasia.

Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.

Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)

Routine normal

LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

INDETERMINATE COLITIS**

[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of

age and MMR at 2.5. years]

Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death

(DPT)

MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.

“measles rash†week before

Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern

Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**

Treated

INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS

LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.

Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal

thereafter.

Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia

Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL’s [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in

ileum

with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory

cells in colon and IELs increased.

LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

INDETERMINATE COLITIS

Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction

2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years

Screaming attacks - / food related

Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum

Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles

Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL’s, increase in chronic

inflammatory

cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma

INDTERMINATE COLITIS

Child 78. MMR 14 months

16 months “growling voiceâ€

18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years

Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of

terminal ileum

Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum

Mild proctitis with granular mucosa

Histology

Ileum - reactive follicles

Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL’s

Slight increase in inflammatory cells

INDETERMINATE COLITIS

? CROHN’S DISEASE

NOTES:

(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn’s disease or

ulcerative colitis

(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the

final Lancet paper.

(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper

BMJ caught in its own fraudThese

documents reveal that the British Medical Journal has been caught in

its own fraud for willfully ignoring this evidence, which was presented

to it long before its recent publication of Deer's article calling

Dr Wakefield a fraud.

The BMJ willfully ignored this evidence

and simply decided to destroy Dr Wakefield's professional reputation by

any means necessary. As Dr Wakefield explains:

" In allowing

itself to become the vehicle for Deer’s particular brand of

journalism; in circumventing the process of due diligence in its

enthusiasm to “kill the beastâ€, the BMJ has taken a huge risk. As the

document presented above shows, this was a mistake. Medicine, presented

with the possibility of an iatrogenic catastrophe, has boarded a

dissonant bandwagon and has gone after those who have concerns - genuine

concerns - that childhood vaccines may be responsible, at least in

part, for the autism epidemic. The relevant science has been grossly

misrepresented, crushed beneath the wheels of a Public Relations

16-wheeler that is out of control. In the meantime a relentless tsunami

of damaged children claims this land. "

Deer caught as a liarIt

has also been revealed that journalist Deer, the author of the

BMJ article condemning Dr Wakefield as a fraud, is himself a liar. In

attempting to gather evidence for his article in the BMJ, he lied about

his identity and entered the home of one of the parents of the autism

children. Specifically, he claimed he was working for The Sunday Times even

though he was never a Sunday Times employee.

This

is just the tip of the iceberg of the outright deception that has been

used by the BMJ and Deer in their attempt to silence a doctor

whose only " crime " was publicly expressing concern about the safety of

MMR vaccines.

That the BMJ and its writer Deer have now

been caught ignoring evidence and engaging in their own fraud gives

credence to the idea that MMR vaccines may, indeed, not only be

dangerous; but that they may be so dangerous that the top medical journals have

to lie about the facts in order to protect them.

What's

clear here is that the BMJ has strayed so far from the realm of

evidence-based scientific thinking that it can no longer be called a

reputable medical journal at all. Its callous disregard for the

truth -- and its politically-motivated witch hunt against a researcher

who only sought to protect the health of children -- exposes it as a danger to

the scientific community and the world of conventional medicine.

As this truth unfolds, these revelations will rock the medical world and expose

these science journals as the frauds they truly are.

Think about this: While these medical journals are taking money from

vaccine manufacturers (who pay their ads), they are ignoring any

scientific evidence they don't like in order to vilify anyone who

threatens the profits of these very same vaccine companies! And yet,

these medical journals never admit that their very existence depends on

the financial flow of money from these vaccine manufacturers who are

strongly impacted by their editorial decisions!

There is fraud

taking place in the vaccine industry today, of course, and the medical

journals are the point men who push their distorted disinformation into

the minds of doctors, journalists and anyone they can reach with their

scientific distortions. At stake is the future of the vaccine industry,

which is of course a multi-billion-dollar industry that thrives on

misinformation and the ongoing scientific censorship of the facts surrounding

the health risks posed by vaccines.

Read the book Callous DisregardDr Wakefield is the author of Callous

Disregard,

the book that exposes the truth behind conventional medicine's

political witch hunt. The book is sold everywhere, including Amazon.com:

http://www.amazon.com/Callous-Disre...

Sources for this story include:

http://www.vaccinesafetyfirst.com/p...

All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is

protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole

responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products

and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com

is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not

be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner.

Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this

material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit

www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml