Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 Paige, From what I understand, school based therapy is to provide the " academic " means of speech and what is most needed educationally. I have a 2.5 yr old daughter with microcephaly (from loss of oxygen to her brain before birth), and she has been in private speech therapy since four months old. She still has no words and barely any sounds. Her private speech therapist has advised us to continue with private therapy after she begins school this fall. The non-school therapy is a more rounded therapy that takes everything into account. When I talk to her private therapist, we talk weekly about how she is swallowing food, facial expressions she is making, vision problems she has, and even dental/jaw issues that might be affecting her oral motor abilities. I've been told my daughter probably won't get the total therapy like this from the school setting, since their number one priority is based on educational goals. Not sure if this is completely correct, since my daughter isn't in school yet. I just thought I'd let you know what I've been told to this point. ~Mindy > > So I organized my thoughts and sent Liam's school speech therapist an e-mail inquiring about her comfort level and experience working with apraxia as well as asking to set the wheels in motion to increase his weekly speech time from 60 minutes. She called to talk and here is some of what she told me > > 1) she attended her first apraxia conference in 1981 and not much has changed since then. She said it is better to call it an oral motor disorder instead of using that " scary apraxia " word. > > 2) her caseload (pre-school setting) is 1/2 to 2/3 kids with apraxia versus speech delays. She divides speech problems into two main problems: phonological rule disorders and apraxia. She was surprised that I read somewhere recently that more speech therapists are treating kids with delays and believes oral motor disorders are much more prevalent. > > 3) she doesn't like the PROMPT method as she views it as a technique that is sold, therefore, questioning it's merit. She has her own techniques that have worked for her. > > 4) Although Liam doesn't have any words (has been in speech since July 2010 with home therapy and with her since January 2011) she feels 1 hour a week is adequate...as he is making progress towards his IEP goals. She said that if she increased all of her kid's treatment time that they would all make more progress but since Liam was making progress that was all she would advocate for > > 5) When I asked if she could recommend a private therapist that we could use to supplement school therapy she said it was unethical for her to do???? > > She said she understood that I wanted him to have speech " now " and I corrected her. I said I totally understood he wouldn't have speech " now " but I want to make sure we are providing him with the most appropriate therapy. > > I kinda feel like I just got bulldozed over. I do think she is a good therapist and I know she adores Liam. She simply sounded like a therapist who works within her boundaries and is very politically correct. For the remainder of this year she is his therapist. I don't know for sure what will happen for next school year. We talked about summer and she said he should qualify but it would be probably 3 weeks only through the summer and his treatments would probably only be 10 minutes because the goal is that he doesn't lose anything...not to necessarily work for improvement. As I read Latetalkers I only skimmed the chapters about being your child's advocate because I thought the school was so helpful. I guess that was before I really had any questions. We are pursuing private speech therapy through a name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 No, many of the things on here do not sound correct to me. I will try to reply in full this evening. Meyer From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:37 PM Subject: [ ] Does this sound right???? So I organized my thoughts and sent Liam's school speech therapist an e-mail inquiring about her comfort level and experience working with apraxia as well as asking to set the wheels in motion to increase his weekly speech time from 60 minutes. She called to talk and here is some of what she told me 1) she attended her first apraxia conference in 1981 and not much has changed since then. She said it is better to call it an oral motor disorder instead of using that " scary apraxia " word. 2) her caseload (pre-school setting) is 1/2 to 2/3 kids with apraxia versus speech delays. She divides speech problems into two main problems: phonological rule disorders and apraxia. She was surprised that I read somewhere recently that more speech therapists are treating kids with delays and believes oral motor disorders are much more prevalent. 3) she doesn't like the PROMPT method as she views it as a technique that is sold, therefore, questioning it's merit. She has her own techniques that have worked for her. 4) Although Liam doesn't have any words (has been in speech since July 2010 with home therapy and with her since January 2011) she feels 1 hour a week is adequate...as he is making progress towards his IEP goals. She said that if she increased all of her kid's treatment time that they would all make more progress but since Liam was making progress that was all she would advocate for 5) When I asked if she could recommend a private therapist that we could use to supplement school therapy she said it was unethical for her to do???? She said she understood that I wanted him to have speech " now " and I corrected her. I said I totally understood he wouldn't have speech " now " but I want to make sure we are providing him with the most appropriate therapy. I kinda feel like I just got bulldozed over. I do think she is a good therapist and I know she adores Liam. She simply sounded like a therapist who works within her boundaries and is very politically correct. For the remainder of this year she is his therapist. I don't know for sure what will happen for next school year. We talked about summer and she said he should qualify but it would be probably 3 weeks only through the summer and his treatments would probably only be 10 minutes because the goal is that he doesn't lose anything...not to necessarily work for improvement. As I read Latetalkers I only skimmed the chapters about being your child's advocate because I thought the school was so helpful. I guess that was before I really had any questions. We are pursuing private speech therapy through a name Geng provided us but obviously school based therapy is a big deal. Do her comments sound in line or way off base or somewhere in between? An unbiased opinion would be appreciated. Thank you. Paige Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 Paige I'm not sure in what way you consider this SLP a good therapist if you take nice aside. How long has your 3 year 2 month old son been in therapy with her and he's still without any words?!! What are the IEP goals he is meeting? Ability to breath through his nose?!! I just put a call into and left 2 VERY long messages for our Cherab VP Cheryl who is a school therapist, educator and an award winning one in NJ featured on TV even! http://www.cherabfoundation.org/about/advisoryboard/cheryl-bennett-johnson-m-a-s\ lseducational-consultant/ Yay Cheryl (not that she'll read this as she's not into computers much- but she'll call me back and I'll type out the answer for you. The angrier she is the quicker she speaks and I have to type pretty fast!!) Also don't underestimate the SLP I referred you to to help you advocate against this mess - Hoffman was president of the speech language hearing association in St Louis and works as an assistant professor at St Louis University. What do you think is going to say when she reads this SLP feels all she needs to know about apraxia she learned about sometime after the discovery of fire -or what did you say the 1800s?!! 's entire message after the poem about Tricia's son is about the importance of continuing education!!! http://www.cherab.org/information/silentnomore.html Apraxia today just like autism is extremely different than it was decades ago!!! And if she doesn't like the PROMPT method because it's sold- does she believe in the Kaufman technique which is another proven method for apraxia therapy? What isn't sold? Where did she learn how to be a therapist for free?!!! Or is it she's just against anything that brings a child to say words too quickly...it must be scary for someone so back in the dark ages...progress, change- and all that. What methods does she do? PROMPT is a form of touch cue -does she do that? And better to call apraxia oral motor disorder and confuse apraxia with every possible type of oral motor dysfunction that exists today? Apraxia isn't a scary word -it's a diagnosis just like dyspraxia or dysarthria -both of them are oral motor disorders but very different -and there are tons more . And 'slap slap' to you Paige!! You actually asked HER who SHE would recommend as a private therapist?!!! That's the one thing she has said to you that was awesome -not that she can't recommend but thank goodness she didn't for whatever bizarre reason!! Listen I know she's probably a really nice lady that adores your son. I know you are all caught up in that emotional aspect. But there are tons of very nice people out there and the goal isn't to find nice people to babysit your son -it's to get appropriate therapy from someone that can make true progress with your Liam. Five years from now you may never see this therapist again, you can move, she can retire or be fired or start working in a different field -but your goal is to help your son who will always be your son. And sooner rather than later. And PS -I find most SLPs and OTs are very nice people -the good ones and the bad ones. You so need an advocate on the outside of this school that can help you set real goals for Liam and help you advocate for appropriate therapy -and if this SLP isn't appropriate -then the school will have to look into something else. Bringing in an expert to train staff, paying for you to take your child elsewhere for therapy, or even out of district placement etc. There are a huge amount of options and when a school professional starts talking about the rest of their caseload when you are talking about your child that is not appropriate. That is none of your business what is going on with the other children -the goal is to set appropriate goals and meet them through appropriate therapies and placement. I do hope Hoffman gets back to you -and I know I'll have more to share from Cheryl when she calls me back. In the meantime you may want to pull out The Late Talker book I co authored again and check out the advocacy chapter -there are many pointers in there too. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 , thanks for the words of guidance and reassurance. Like I said, I felt like I was bulldozed over after I spoke with Liam's SLP. Actually, nauseated is a better word. Good news is that got back with me today and it looks like things should work out for her to be able to help us. I promise to keep you updated. I plan to go review his IEP goals and meet with so I can go into a review of his IEP with an advocate. I am anxious to hear the additional information you receive as well as the feedback of others. Looks like my Latetalkers book will be well worn sooner than later. Thanks for the support. Paige > > Paige I'm not sure in what way you consider this SLP a good therapist if you take nice aside. How long has your 3 year 2 month old son been in therapy with her and he's still without any words?!! What are the IEP goals he is meeting? Ability to breath through his nose?!! > > I just put a call into and left 2 VERY long messages for our Cherab VP Cheryl who is a school therapist, educator and an award winning one in NJ featured on TV even! http://www.cherabfoundation.org/about/advisoryboard/cheryl-bennett-johnson-m-a-s\ lseducational-consultant/ Yay Cheryl (not that she'll read this as she's not into computers much- but she'll call me back and I'll type out the answer for you. The angrier she is the quicker she speaks and I have to type pretty fast!!) > > Also don't underestimate the SLP I referred you to to help you advocate against this mess - Hoffman was president of the speech language hearing association in St Louis and works as an assistant professor at St Louis University. What do you think is going to say when she reads this SLP feels all she needs to know about apraxia she learned about sometime after the discovery of fire -or what did you say the 1800s?!! 's entire message after the poem about Tricia's son is about the importance of continuing education!!! http://www.cherab.org/information/silentnomore.html Apraxia today just like autism is extremely different than it was decades ago!!! > > And if she doesn't like the PROMPT method because it's sold- does she believe in the Kaufman technique which is another proven method for apraxia therapy? What isn't sold? Where did she learn how to be a therapist for free?!!! Or is it she's just against anything that brings a child to say words too quickly...it must be scary for someone so back in the dark ages...progress, change- and all that. What methods does she do? PROMPT is a form of touch cue -does she do that? > > And better to call apraxia oral motor disorder and confuse apraxia with every possible type of oral motor dysfunction that exists today? Apraxia isn't a scary word -it's a diagnosis just like dyspraxia or dysarthria -both of them are oral motor disorders but very different -and there are tons more . > > And 'slap slap' to you Paige!! You actually asked HER who SHE would recommend as a private therapist?!!! That's the one thing she has said to you that was awesome -not that she can't recommend but thank goodness she didn't for whatever bizarre reason!! > > Listen I know she's probably a really nice lady that adores your son. I know you are all caught up in that emotional aspect. But there are tons of very nice people out there and the goal isn't to find nice people to babysit your son -it's to get appropriate therapy from someone that can make true progress with your Liam. Five years from now you may never see this therapist again, you can move, she can retire or be fired or start working in a different field -but your goal is to help your son who will always be your son. And sooner rather than later. And PS -I find most SLPs and OTs are very nice people -the good ones and the bad ones. > > You so need an advocate on the outside of this school that can help you set real goals for Liam and help you advocate for appropriate therapy -and if this SLP isn't appropriate -then the school will have to look into something else. Bringing in an expert to train staff, paying for you to take your child elsewhere for therapy, or even out of district placement etc. There are a huge amount of options and when a school professional starts talking about the rest of their caseload when you are talking about your child that is not appropriate. That is none of your business what is going on with the other children -the goal is to set appropriate goals and meet them through appropriate therapies and placement. > > I do hope Hoffman gets back to you -and I know I'll have more to share from Cheryl when she calls me back. In the meantime you may want to pull out The Late Talker book I co authored again and check out the advocacy chapter -there are many pointers in there too. > > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2011 Report Share Posted March 29, 2011 That's so good you reached !! I did get a call back from Cheryl today but missed it -but I'm sure we'll speak sometime soon. She always has such awesome advice for advocacy. When we worked on the book The Late Talker -the advocacy chapter we had help from special education attorneys as well as Cheryl -I just love her!!! Of course I put in the parent view -Dr. Agin put in the developmental pediatrician view (but again she has a background as an SLP prior to medical school) and my other co author Malcolm is an international journalist so he's the one that knows how to dig for the facts and write them as if they are poetry. So when you flip through it -keep in mind for the advocacy chapter there is a wealth of information from a variety of sources to help. I have a feeling again you are in great hands with !! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.