Guest guest Posted March 28, 2011 Report Share Posted March 28, 2011 So I organized my thoughts and sent Liam's school speech therapist an e-mail inquiring about her comfort level and experience working with apraxia as well as asking to set the wheels in motion to increase his weekly speech time from 60 minutes. She called to talk and here is some of what she told me 1) she attended her first apraxia conference in 1981 and not much has changed since then. She said it is better to call it an oral motor disorder instead of using that " scary apraxia " word. 2) her caseload (pre-school setting) is 1/2 to 2/3 kids with apraxia versus speech delays. She divides speech problems into two main problems: phonological rule disorders and apraxia. She was surprised that I read somewhere recently that more speech therapists are treating kids with delays and believes oral motor disorders are much more prevalent. 3) she doesn't like the PROMPT method as she views it as a technique that is sold, therefore, questioning it's merit. She has her own techniques that have worked for her. 4) Although Liam doesn't have any words (has been in speech since July 2010 with home therapy and with her since January 2011) she feels 1 hour a week is adequate...as he is making progress towards his IEP goals. She said that if she increased all of her kid's treatment time that they would all make more progress but since Liam was making progress that was all she would advocate for 5) When I asked if she could recommend a private therapist that we could use to supplement school therapy she said it was unethical for her to do???? She said she understood that I wanted him to have speech " now " and I corrected her. I said I totally understood he wouldn't have speech " now " but I want to make sure we are providing him with the most appropriate therapy. I kinda feel like I just got bulldozed over. I do think she is a good therapist and I know she adores Liam. She simply sounded like a therapist who works within her boundaries and is very politically correct. For the remainder of this year she is his therapist. I don't know for sure what will happen for next school year. We talked about summer and she said he should qualify but it would be probably 3 weeks only through the summer and his treatments would probably only be 10 minutes because the goal is that he doesn't lose anything...not to necessarily work for improvement. As I read Latetalkers I only skimmed the chapters about being your child's advocate because I thought the school was so helpful. I guess that was before I really had any questions. We are pursuing private speech therapy through a name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.