Guest guest Posted August 28, 2002 Report Share Posted August 28, 2002 Right about xenoestrogens. It is also believed that the chemical manufactureres spray inside cans to make the food inside taste less canny is a xenoestrogenic agent. Since I am very sensitive to those, I guess I'll have to get my omega 3's another way. Not everyone is sensitive to xenoestrogen (sometimes called ecoestrogen) and there is controversy around the issue. -Jo -----Original Message----- From: Dave Noel [mailto:davenoel@...] Canned Salmon!? Yuckkkk! (very scientific response, don't you think?). Please tell us that lox and or a nice grilled piece of fresh Alaskan Salmon with a touch of coconut and teriyaki will do the trick. Here is a brief overview of Jo's concern with Xenoestrogens. http://www.quackbusters.com.au/chronicles/xenoestrogens.htm Dave Noel ----- Original Message ----- From: Francesca Skelton Jo: It has nothing to do with price. Canned salmon has a couple of excellent qualities: 1. Most canned salmon is of the superior Wild Alaskan variety (contains the most Omega 3's) whereas much of the fresh salmon is not. 2. It contains chewable soft bones full of valuable minerals. I would limit the amount of smoked salmon you ingest, since smoking meat or fish exposes you to carcinogens. I've never heard of xenoestrogens; could you elaborate? on 8/28/2002 10:44 AM, Jo at johastings@... wrote: > Francesca, > I've heard reference to canned salmon a few times now since joining the list. > Is there something more to salmon being canned or does fresh or smoked salmon > do the same job? Is it just a price issue, as I'm sure canned is cheaper? I'm > trying to avoid xenoestrogens in canned foods, so I eat a lot of fresh > salmon/tuna. > > Jo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.