Guest guest Posted June 26, 2002 Report Share Posted June 26, 2002 on 6/26/2002 1:50 PM, Gifford at gifford@... wrote: > Dried apricots? I'm not sure if they are supplemented, but the last time I > checked the vitamin E levels were through the roof... Anyone have more > specific comments or details? > > Cheers, > : what is your source? According to Earl Mindell's " Vitamin Bible " best sources are: wheat germ, soybeans,vegetable oils, broccoli, brussel sprouts, spinach, whole wheat, whole grain cereals and eggs. Hmmm More reasons for eating some soy and eggs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2002 Report Share Posted September 6, 2002 > > > Dried apricots? I'm not sure if they are supplemented, but the last time I > > checked the vitamin E levels were through the roof... Anyone have more > > specific comments or details? > > > > Cheers, > > > > : what is your source? According to Earl Mindell's " Vitamin Bible " > best sources are: wheat germ, soybeans,vegetable oils, broccoli, brussel > sprouts, spinach, whole wheat, whole grain cereals and eggs. > > Hmmm More reasons for eating some soy and eggs. I have concerns re the validity and trustworthiness of Earl Mindell's books especially " Vitamin Bible " . Here's why: http://www.hcrc.org/special/bookrevs/vitbib.html Quote: Mindell claims to hold valid credentials in nutrition. Although he does have a bachelor's degree in pharmacy from the University of North Dakota, his Ph.D. is from the University of Beverly Hills, an unaccredited school which lacks a campus or laboratory facilities. During his speech, Mindell also said that he studied at Rutgers University, but representatives in Rutgers' records office whom I contacted could find no record of this. Mindell's Vitamin Bible was written while he was working toward his Ph.D. His adjunct faculty adviser for the project was Kenney, Ph.D., R.D., who is currently a nutritionist at the Pritikin Longevity Center in Santa , California. Kenney reviewed the manuscript while tutoring Mindell and told him that it contained over 400 errors, more than 100 of which were important. Kenney told me that most of the errors remain in the published edition. The acknowledgments section of the book recognizes Dr. Kenney for his help and also thanks the American Medical Association, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Dairy Council, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Nutrition Foundation, ``without whom a project of this scope could never have been completed.'' However, the fact that all of these prestigious organizations would strenuously disagree with information in the book is not mentioned. Mindell told the audience that 300 milligrams daily of zinc supplementation is safe, but research reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association [246:2188, 1978] shows that dosages of more than 150 milligrams daily may cause serious copper loss. According to Dr. Harold Sandstead, a major zinc researcher, people who take more than 50 milligrams of zinc a day should have their copper levels monitored. In fact, it has been reported that supplements of only 15 milligrams per day can cause above-normal copper loss [Journal of Nutrition 108:1449, 1976]. Now retired from active management of his stores, Mindell spends much of his time writing, lecturing and appearing on talk shows. Despite the astonishing number of inaccuracies he has been promoting, his ideas are rarely questioned in encounters with members of the media. End of selected specific quotations. In addition, search for Mindell at http://www.quackwatch.com indicates this same concern. Feedback? Any and all responses appreciated. Thanks in advance for all thoughtful replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2002 Report Share Posted September 6, 2002 I only know one thing about dried apricots, but if everyone is going to be adding them to their grocery lists, this might be helpful. Go ORGANIC! I could not believe the difference between those orange sulphured things that make your mouth dry and an dark colored, organic, dried apricot. They are like two different food items. Trust me on this...you will thank me later...on this item -> Go Organic! Dave PS: No, I do not own stock in the world's sole supplier of organic apricots ~ I just love them now that I discovered the difference! ----- Original Message ----- From: samanthahiggins2001 Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: [ ] Re: [ ] Vitamin E sources? > > > Dried apricots? I'm not sure if they are supplemented, but the last time I> > checked the vitamin E levels were through the roof... Anyone have more> > specific comments or details?> > > > Cheers,> > > > : what is your source? According to Earl Mindell's "Vitamin Bible"> best sources are: wheat germ, soybeans,vegetable oils, broccoli, brussel> sprouts, spinach, whole wheat, whole grain cereals and eggs.> > Hmmm More reasons for eating some soy and eggs.I have concerns re the validity and trustworthiness ofEarl Mindell's books especially "Vitamin Bible".Here's why:http://www.hcrc.org/special/bookrevs/vitbib.htmlQuote:Mindell claims to hold valid credentials in nutrition. Although he does have a bachelor's degree in pharmacy from the University of North Dakota, his Ph.D. is from the University of Beverly Hills, an unaccredited school which lacks a campus or laboratory facilities. During his speech, Mindell also said that he studied at Rutgers University, but representatives in Rutgers' records office whom I contacted could find no record of this.Mindell's Vitamin Bible was written while he was working toward his Ph.D. His adjunct faculty adviser for the project was Kenney, Ph.D., R.D., who is currently a nutritionist at the Pritikin Longevity Center in Santa , California. Kenney reviewed the manuscript while tutoring Mindell and told him that it contained over 400 errors, more than 100 of which were important. Kenney told me that most of the errors remain in the published edition. The acknowledgments section of the book recognizes Dr. Kenney for his help and also thanks the American Medical Association, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Dairy Council, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Nutrition Foundation, ``without whom a project of this scope could never have been completed.'' However, the fact that all of these prestigious organizations would strenuously disagree with information in the book is not mentioned.Mindell told the audience that 300 milligrams daily of zinc supplementation is safe, but research reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association [246:2188, 1978] shows that dosages of more than 150 milligrams daily may cause serious copper loss. According to Dr. Harold Sandstead, a major zinc researcher, people who take more than 50 milligrams of zinc a day should have their copper levels monitored. In fact, it has been reported that supplements of only 15 milligrams per day can cause above-normal copper loss [Journal of Nutrition 108:1449, 1976].Now retired from active management of his stores, Mindell spends much of his time writing, lecturing and appearing on talk shows. Despite the astonishing number of inaccuracies he has been promoting, his ideas are rarely questioned in encounters with members of the media.End of selected specific quotations.In addition, search for Mindell at http://www.quackwatch.comindicates this same concern.Feedback?Any and all responses appreciated.Thanks in advance for all thoughtful replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2002 Report Share Posted September 6, 2002 , I am confused. After I wrote my very opinionated note on apricots, I realized that I had no idea that they were high in Vitamin E, so I checked on the Diet Power software and it show no E (but fairly high in potassium and fiber). I haven't checked DWIDP yet...perhaps I am confused. You did say "E" right? Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: samanthahiggins2001 Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: [ ] Re: [ ] Vitamin E sources? > > > Dried apricots? I'm not sure if they are supplemented, but the last time I> > checked the vitamin E levels were through the roof... Anyone have more> > specific comments or details?> > > > Cheers,> > > > : what is your source? According to Earl Mindell's "Vitamin Bible"> best sources are: wheat germ, soybeans,vegetable oils, broccoli, brussel> sprouts, spinach, whole wheat, whole grain cereals and eggs.> > Hmmm More reasons for eating some soy and eggs.I have concerns re the validity and trustworthiness ofEarl Mindell's books especially "Vitamin Bible".Here's why:http://www.hcrc.org/special/bookrevs/vitbib.htmlQuote:Mindell claims to hold valid credentials in nutrition. Although he does have a bachelor's degree in pharmacy from the University of North Dakota, his Ph.D. is from the University of Beverly Hills, an unaccredited school which lacks a campus or laboratory facilities. During his speech, Mindell also said that he studied at Rutgers University, but representatives in Rutgers' records office whom I contacted could find no record of this.Mindell's Vitamin Bible was written while he was working toward his Ph.D. His adjunct faculty adviser for the project was Kenney, Ph.D., R.D., who is currently a nutritionist at the Pritikin Longevity Center in Santa , California. Kenney reviewed the manuscript while tutoring Mindell and told him that it contained over 400 errors, more than 100 of which were important. Kenney told me that most of the errors remain in the published edition. The acknowledgments section of the book recognizes Dr. Kenney for his help and also thanks the American Medical Association, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Dairy Council, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Nutrition Foundation, ``without whom a project of this scope could never have been completed.'' However, the fact that all of these prestigious organizations would strenuously disagree with information in the book is not mentioned.Mindell told the audience that 300 milligrams daily of zinc supplementation is safe, but research reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association [246:2188, 1978] shows that dosages of more than 150 milligrams daily may cause serious copper loss. According to Dr. Harold Sandstead, a major zinc researcher, people who take more than 50 milligrams of zinc a day should have their copper levels monitored. In fact, it has been reported that supplements of only 15 milligrams per day can cause above-normal copper loss [Journal of Nutrition 108:1449, 1976].Now retired from active management of his stores, Mindell spends much of his time writing, lecturing and appearing on talk shows. Despite the astonishing number of inaccuracies he has been promoting, his ideas are rarely questioned in encounters with members of the media.End of selected specific quotations.In addition, search for Mindell at http://www.quackwatch.comindicates this same concern.Feedback?Any and all responses appreciated.Thanks in advance for all thoughtful replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2002 Report Share Posted September 7, 2002 Hello all, This likely won't reach the CR list, so perhaps Dave will forward it for me. I'm scratching my head a little trying to recall a vague comment from three months ago, but a quick check online has the USDA listing 100 grams of sulphur dried apricots (albeit 240ish calories) giving a full %50 of the RDA on Vitamin E. If this is all bioavailable or not, I don't really know, but they're a good source of Vit. A (not hard to get) and fibre, so I like them for other reasons. I seem to recall this level of vit E being much higher, but that could have been for a particular brand, which is why I said I wasn't sure if they were supplemented. Many vitamin lists don't include Vitamin E at all for apricots, or for any foods much of the time, so if anyone has a better source, please speak up. I generally don't have any trouble getting enough E, so I'm not too worried about it. Cheers, -----Original Message-----From: Dave Noel [mailto:davenoel@...]Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:29 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Re: [ ] Vitamin E sources? , I am confused. After I wrote my very opinionated note on apricots, I realized that I had no idea that they were high in Vitamin E, so I checked on the Diet Power software and it show no E (but fairly high in potassium and fiber). I haven't checked DWIDP yet...perhaps I am confused. You did say "E" right? Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: samanthahiggins2001 Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:51 PM Subject: [ ] Re: [ ] Vitamin E sources? > > > Dried apricots? I'm not sure if they are supplemented, but the last time I> > checked the vitamin E levels were through the roof... Anyone have more> > specific comments or details?> > > > Cheers,> > > > : what is your source? According to Earl Mindell's "Vitamin Bible"> best sources are: wheat germ, soybeans,vegetable oils, broccoli, brussel> sprouts, spinach, whole wheat, whole grain cereals and eggs.> > Hmmm More reasons for eating some soy and eggs.I have concerns re the validity and trustworthiness ofEarl Mindell's books especially "Vitamin Bible".Here's why:http://www.hcrc.org/special/bookrevs/vitbib.htmlQuote:Mindell claims to hold valid credentials in nutrition. Although he does have a bachelor's degree in pharmacy from the University of North Dakota, his Ph.D. is from the University of Beverly Hills, an unaccredited school which lacks a campus or laboratory facilities. During his speech, Mindell also said that he studied at Rutgers University, but representatives in Rutgers' records office whom I contacted could find no record of this.Mindell's Vitamin Bible was written while he was working toward his Ph.D. His adjunct faculty adviser for the project was Kenney, Ph.D., R.D., who is currently a nutritionist at the Pritikin Longevity Center in Santa , California. Kenney reviewed the manuscript while tutoring Mindell and told him that it contained over 400 errors, more than 100 of which were important. Kenney told me that most of the errors remain in the published edition. The acknowledgments section of the book recognizes Dr. Kenney for his help and also thanks the American Medical Association, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Dairy Council, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Nutrition Foundation, ``without whom a project of this scope could never have been completed.'' However, the fact that all of these prestigious organizations would strenuously disagree with information in the book is not mentioned.Mindell told the audience that 300 milligrams daily of zinc supplementation is safe, but research reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association [246:2188, 1978] shows that dosages of more than 150 milligrams daily may cause serious copper loss. According to Dr. Harold Sandstead, a major zinc researcher, people who take more than 50 milligrams of zinc a day should have their copper levels monitored. In fact, it has been reported that supplements of only 15 milligrams per day can cause above-normal copper loss [Journal of Nutrition 108:1449, 1976].Now retired from active management of his stores, Mindell spends much of his time writing, lecturing and appearing on talk shows. Despite the astonishing number of inaccuracies he has been promoting, his ideas are rarely questioned in encounters with members of the media.End of selected specific quotations.In addition, search for Mindell at http://www.quackwatch.comindicates this same concern.Feedback?Any and all responses appreciated.Thanks in advance for all thoughtful replies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.