Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 I’m listening… The rats data shows that no exercise extreme CR results in the longest living lab-rats. Being a non-rat non-lab thingy myself, I’m for moderate CR and *MINIMAL* physical activity. My reasoning for minimal physical activity is that CR is stressful (on the body) enough as it is, and physical activity adds to this stress and requires higher levels of maintenance (read: calories) just to fix the “damage”, not to mention the extra calorie expenditure. Some people from the “old school” are avid exercisers, but since the “new school” of CR supposedly gives you the best health overall, including cardio-vascular (CV) health, then exercise as a better-health method gets only 3 stars (out of 5, which CRON gets… on my scale). That said, everyone has hir own priorities. I for example would like to maintain as much muscle as possible, though I accept the inevitable “shrinkage”… which is still in progress (my wife is less enthusiastic…). I also believe that strength is more important than CV fitness for health and in old age. Thus my workout schedule is a total of 100 minutes per week, divided into 3 workouts of very-heavy low-volume weight-lifting. I would have cut it down to 2 workouts per week if my ad-lib workout partner would comply. I don’t do any aerobics because I believe I get enough CV fitness from lifting weights (and CR!) and I feel it would be a waste of calories for me. The rest of the week I virtually sit on my butt and “rest”. (to put things in perspective: pre-CR I used to do about 7 hours a week of extreme aerobics and about 7 hours a week of weight-lifting). Protein: Rae from the main list (which I regard highly) provides evidence in favor of a high protein diet *especially* for CRONies. So I would say up your protein regardless of your workouts, but mostly if you do workout. I get about 175 grams of protein per day, out of 2000 calories. Creatine: IMO it’s useless in the CRONie-weight-lifting context (CRONies will not be monstrously big nor strong), but some consider it a good supplement in the general health context. I supplement about 3 grams about 3 times a week. Can’t say that I feel anything from using it. IIRC the famous Alpha-Lipoic-Acid and Acetyl-L-Carnitine experiment also used Creatine and Co-Q-10, but I’m not sure. Micky. -----Original Message----- From: Francesca Skelton [mailto:fskelton@...] Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 4:32 PM Subject: Re: [ ]Extreme CR (again) (was weighttraining--creatine study) Suz: I noticed this little gem from your post on lifting weights. This harkens back to our little tete-a-tete on the list a few days ago about extreme CR. Micky are you listening? Suz, can you tell us where in the book Dr W states this? on 9/3/2002 7:11 PM, Suzanne Cart at massuz@... wrote: The same goes for CR in general. Enough is enough and more isn't better. > From my rereadings of Dr. Walford's book, I'm hearing that the longest lived > lab animals are somewhat underweight, but not extremely so. This is where I > try to ride the line in my own CR, and in this condition, (snipped) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2002 Report Share Posted September 4, 2002 What I was calling your attention to was Suz's notice of a passage that the longest lived rats are somwhat underweight but not extremely so - IOW a testimonial from the man himself that extreme CR ain't such a hot idea. And by inference that moderate CR (which is promoted on this list) IS the way to go........... on 9/3/2002 8:00 PM, Micky Snir at mickys@... wrote: > I'm listening... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.