Guest guest Posted June 17, 2002 Report Share Posted June 17, 2002 Francesca wrote: > It has also been pointed out that DEXA's can > be inaccurate in their readings; however that's the only > measurement we have. Francesca, fortunately you are mistaken. DEXA's aren't the only readily available measure we have that are indicative of bone health. The NTx test of bone resorption rate is one good example. See this post for details: crsociety/message/16299 Dan Manes and my NTx tests have shown that now that our weight have stabilized (and we are taking other active steps to promote bone health) our rate of bone resorption is actually BELOW normal. This bodes well for the idea that bone health stabilizes once weight stabilized (if it was ever compromised to begin with...). This stabilization of bone health with weight stabilization is also supported by the multiple DEXA data available from one of the long time CRonies on the main list (whose name escapes me). The data showed that once his weight stabilized, so did his DEXA measured BMD. --Dean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.