Re: treatment of 70 MS patients with LDN

[Guest guest]

Mr. Harding wrote that 70 MS patients were treated with a 98%

response rate toward positive results.

I am wondering if this is a statistic directly from the researcher

with whom you spoke, or is this one of Bihari's stats?

Thanks very much for your very informative posts.

J...

[Guest guest]

it's from the LDN website, so you are right that it is not a published

stat but something on the site,

http://www.low dose naltrexone.org/ldn_and_ms.htm

I spoke via email with the lead researcher on MS here at MI last night

after having asked him about LDN and MS. He said " LDN is a joke " -- he

didn't see how HIV patients with a depressed immune system and MS

patients with an overactive immune system could benefit from the same

treatment. OK, I respect his opinion, but if the thought is to

*rebalance* the immune system and get it working properly again, why

NOT LDN? I don't know, I'm not a neuro scientist, but it makes sense to

me.

You all probably know there is a lot of skepticism out there regarding

LDN, but I say the proof is in the pudding, and if people are seeing

results from it, then that is the bottom line and the reason I myself

am going to try it rather than steroids/chemo we KNOW does NOT work.

On Thursday, April 10, 2003, at 07:43 AM, kwanyin41 wrote:

> Mr. Harding wrote that 70 MS patients were treated with a 98%

> response rate toward positive results.

>

> I am wondering if this is a statistic directly from the researcher

> with whom you spoke, or is this one of Bihari's stats?

>

> Thanks very much for your very informative posts.

>

> J...

>

>

>