Guest guest Posted August 16, 2003 Report Share Posted August 16, 2003 Many of the people here have mentioned being too hot this summer. Without getting into global warming and fuel consumption and all that, it might be good to understand what is going on with " our " disease when we are hot. I believe the worsening of symptoms when I am hot is not an indication of the heat causing disease progress. Nor is it a trigger to new disease progress. The nerve and axonal damage that has already taken place has caused a slowing down of electrical conduction through nerves and axons. This results in the many symptoms we are all familiar with. Fatigue is a bit puzzling but I think it is similar, since it also worsens with heat. Head trauma causes the same kind of fatigue and I think in both cases there is slowing down (due to new pathways for the signals?) of mental signals across damaged or broken pathways. Anyway the proof in this pudding is that the problems can be remedied, or put back to the way they were before overheating took place, when we get cooled down. These changes happen because of the way nerve signals conduct. Unfortunately our nerves conduct better the colder they get. So places where there is a conduction problem anyway, have even more of a problem when they are hot. These places are the lesions/scars/scleroses on myelin. I have also found that even though 90% (or is it more?) of your body heat goes up and out via your head, the heat gets there mainly via the blood, which has to pass through the heart. So cooling your core is best, and that is why digestion seems to increase fatigue (it results is some more core heating), and ice-water cools you down. There is a device on the market for MS sufferers that applies cooling and actually cools down your core temperature, which once done takes quite a while to undo (depending on your heat input and internal production -- try a hot or cold bath). You are a liquid cooled engine. Concerning LDN and dosage: A lot of people here have written about trying to increase their dose to 4 or 4.5 mg., etc. I think it is important to understand that the action of this stuff is not like other drugs where increasing the dose increases the effect. The effect we are looking for is almost the *opposite* of the action of this drug, and it is due to our bodies' reaction to the very short-lived blocking, not of endorphin production but of endorphin reception, that occurs when we give ourselves a quick pulse of the drug. We fool the body into reacting to what appears as a problem with production, and the reaction is to *increase* production. This helps because we can't produce enough natural endorphins anyway. I would think that the closer we can come to mimicking the body recovering from the " condition " that it " believes " caused the block *due* *to* the immune system reacting to the drug, the better we can train it to behave. This mimicking occurs when the drug *stops* its blocking action. For now, the idea is to take a small dose of this blocking drug every day just before it was going to start its production cycle anyway. This gives it time to start up at a higher rate of production, and has to be soon enough that the small block does not affect any of the " next day's " absorption of newly produced endorphins. The bottom line being that more blocking/LDN may not help. The dosage may be related to your weight, but more will not necessarily give you more endorphins. You may end up producing more but absorbing less. Discuss it with the prescribing doctor, or if he/she doesn't know anything about it (and I think a few don't), then discuss it through this list with someone who does. I also espouse patience because if this drug has any effect it is to cut progression of the nerve damage. The rest is up to the body's own healing processes. I have been told that nerves heal at a very slow rate compared to other tissues. Of course if they are killed off completely (as axons are) there is no healing, rather the signals must find a new route. But I think I remember the figure of 1cm/month for nerves. And more time the older you are, of course. Also: I have recently seen information on this list about a drug company refusing to reveal the dose they are using of LDN. If this is a low- dose effect which stimulates endorphin up-regulation I doubt they have much of a case for patenting it. On another topic, why can't a drug trial be completely run by volunteers, and through self-funding? -Sullivan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.