another view

[Guest guest]

http://www.truthminers.com/truth/aspartame.htm

[Guest guest]

When i read this warning about aspartame in my mail was ready to believe a connection to ms. Hate the stuff. Do know that it was first developed as ant poison and from all reports works. Still not ready to believe it harmless to ms or any other people with weakened condition. The controversy goes on.

----- Original Message -----

From: Sullivan

low dose naltrexone

Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:36 AM

Subject: [low dose naltrexone] another view

http://www.truthminers.com/truth/aspartame.htm

[Guest guest]

HI RON, I DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING I READ AND ONLY HALF OF WHAT I

SEE...LOL....BUT I DO NOT USE ASPARTAME, JUST TO BE ON THE SAFE SIDE.

HOWEVER, AFTER STOPPING ALL ASPERTAME, I STILL HAVE MS.

THANKS FOR INFO THOUGH, BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY,

HUGS, SALLY

> When i read this warning about aspartame in my mail was ready to

believe a connection to ms. Hate the stuff. Do know that it was

first developed as ant poison and from all reports works. Still not

ready to believe it harmless to ms or any other people with weakened

condition. The controversy goes on.

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: Sullivan

> low dose naltrexone

> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:36 AM

> Subject: [low dose naltrexone] another view

>

>

> http://www.truthminers.com/truth/aspartame.htm

>

>

[Guest guest]

O, btw, I think Big Red is one of the few chewing gums I have found

that doesnt contain aspartame.

[Guest guest]

….and this could be an excellent explanation to use to

write to your MP's, responses to the RCP and any other organisation you might

wish to write to in an attempt to get them on to our side. Please use this, and

meanwhile, I will put it into our FILES section for others to use when

necessary.

Many thanks .

Luv - Sheila

Hello All,

There is another view to our problem. If one withdraws some and looks at this

problem from some distance one would see the following:

1. Medical science has discovered the bodily functions that can be the culprit

in our feeling bad. This was done by Refetoff, Braverman, et al. in the 60's.

So by 1970, medical science knows that there is no longer a direct connection

between the thyroid and symptoms. So while a deficient thyroid secretion can cause

the symptoms of hypothyroidism, so can deficiencies in the discovered bodily

functions of peripheral metabolism and peripheral cellular hormone reception.

The thyroid predominately produces the prohormone thyroxine (T4) -- sort of

like crude oil. This crude must be then refined by the peripheral metabolism

into the active hormone (T3) -- which is akin to petrol or gasoline. Then the

T3 must go to the cells' nuclei by way of the hormone reception -- very loosely

like the carburator atomizing the petrol and creating an air-gas mixture that

can be ignited to create power.

So cars don't run on crude and they don't run with some sort of means of

creating an air-gas mixture. We don't run unless we have triiodothyronine (T3)

and the cells can acquire the T3 from the circulating blood.

In short these functions, which are known to medical science, exists.

2. Just as your car mechanic checks on the carburator, fuel injectors, ignition

system, etc. when your car does not run, physicians should also check on bodily

functions that are known to exist that also produce the patient's symptoms.

This is fundamental to the medical philosophies of Evidence Based Medicine and

Differential Diagnosis.

So if you have continuting symptoms of hypothyroidism, the mimics of hypothyroidism,

those post thyroid operations of peripheral metabolism and peripheral cellular

hormone reception should be tested.

But they are not. The T3 and rT3 tests would be a good beginning, but they are

not recommended by endocrinology establishment. In fact, no test that would

suggest a T3 containing hormone replacement is recommended. In fact, they are

virtually banned.

3. Next, let us assume that we have arrived at non-prescribed test that

suggests a T3 replacement. Well, those are banned as well. Instead the

self-proclaimed masters of thyroid mechanics replace the fuel injectors with

spark plugs or something equally silly -- i.e., they want to replace the

deficient T3 with T4 (assuming all the time that peripheral metabolism and

peripheral hormone reception, the post thyroid functions, never fail.

So what do we have? In the name of combatting quackery, the victims of post

thyroid deficiencies are restricted from the information that would suggest the

prescription of needed but banned hormone replacements. In the name of

combatting quackery, with respect to the post thyroid deficient patient, they

promote quackery -- life-long quackery.

4. But we must step back and see where the fault is. The fault is in the

ignoring of medical science and the ignoring of medical protocols for

diagnosis. If your mechanic ignored the functionality of cars, he would be out

of business shortly. But since the endocrinology establishment is not subject

to the same requirements of providing good and proper service, they don't. They

do not need to know the complete functionality of the greater thyroid system

(including the post thyroid operations of peripheral metabolism and hormone

reception) to make money.

And they won't provide good service until things go horridly wrong for them. .

.. . .

Have a great day,

No virus

found in this incoming message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.21/2014 - Release Date: 03/20/09

06:59:00