Guest guest Posted October 21, 2003 Report Share Posted October 21, 2003 DOES ANY ONE KNOW IF YOUR SAPOSE TO FO OFF LDN FOR A WHILE? IVE BEEN ON IT SENSE APRIL. LIN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2003 Report Share Posted October 21, 2003 It depends if you're English or not. LOL J/K I believe many people in the UK are told to stop a few days every so often. I don't know what that would do for me, I have yet to try it. Been on 3.0 daily since 4/17 with no breaks. I keep thinking to not take it for 2 nights.. but then I grab it and gulp it down... and say "maybe tomorrow". ----- Original Message ----- From: linriker low dose naltrexone Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 12:57 Subject: [low dose naltrexone] LDN DOES ANY ONE KNOW IF YOUR SAPOSE TO FO OFF LDN FOR A WHILE?IVE BEEN ON IT SENSE APRIL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2003 Report Share Posted October 30, 2003 THANKS STEVE.....THE ONLY REASON, THAT I CAN THING OF, AS TO THE AMERICANS DRIVING ON THE RIGHT IS: MUST BE THE REPUBLICAN INFLUENCE...LOL SALLY > > >> As you say, in the UK we drive on the left hand side of the road. I > >> could explain why that is historically correct but it would be a > >> bit off topic here > >> > >> Steve > > >PLEASE STEVE....EXPLAIN!! > > > > OK. In days of old when knights were bold the sword arm had to be kept > free. Most people were right handed. It was accepted that when two > riders crossed they went to the left thus the right arm was free to > manipulate the sword in conflict situations. It also became " polite " > to cross on the left in non conflict situations. Cavalry were trained > to ride over to the left side when anything was ahead. Then came > Napoleon. He was a power freak and to demonstrate his power he > instructed his cavalry to ride to the right. That meant, other than > left handers, they had to half turn to engage the enemy. Some think it > could have been an advantage but I don't see how. All Napoleons area > of influence throughout Europe started to cross over on the right but > he had no influence in GB so they stuck to the old rules. When cars > arrived the British " empire " continued with the old rules that had > been used with horses for centuries. I had a list of countries that > drive on the left but I can't find it. They are mainly the countries > that were part of the British area of influence. > > I've no idea when or why the USA decided to cross on the right. > Perhaps it was when they booted the English out! > > Steve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2003 Report Share Posted November 20, 2003 Hi ....no I am quite sure that I have read statements from some people that those reports of liver damage happened during trials with 300 mg doseages. I will await some news that anyone might have and hopefully somewhere where it is documented. I am sure this guy just wants to do the right thing by including his disclosure but I just want it to be accurate. Of course I could be mistaken but that is why I'm asking. JoyceF From: Eik594@... wkendz32@... Subject: LDN Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:41:43 EST Hey Joyce, I am confused by your LDN question. Did you mean 3.0 mg instead of 300 mg? I know that liver damage is a concern in doses of 50 mg. However, 3.5 is a far cry from 50 mg. _________________________________________________________________ Share holiday photos without swamping your Inbox. Get MSN Extra Storage now! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2003 Report Share Posted November 20, 2003 You'll find that information in www.LDNinfo.org ----- Original Message ----- From: " wkendz 32 " <wkendz32@...> <Eik594@...> Cc: <low dose naltrexone > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:56 AM Subject: [low dose naltrexone] Re: LDN > Hi ....no I am quite sure that I have read statements from some > people that those reports of liver damage happened during trials with 300 mg > doseages. > I will await some news that anyone might have and hopefully somewhere where > it is documented. I am sure this guy just wants to do the right thing by > including his disclosure but I just want it to be accurate. Of course I > could be mistaken but that is why I'm asking. JoyceF > > From: Eik594@... > wkendz32@... > Subject: LDN > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:41:43 EST > > Hey Joyce, > I am confused by your LDN question. Did you mean 3.0 mg instead of 300 mg? I > know that liver damage is a concern in doses of 50 mg. However, 3.5 is a far > cry from 50 mg. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Share holiday photos without swamping your Inbox. Get MSN Extra Storage > now! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.