Re: is a nuero really necessary

[Guest guest]

Hi Chris

I forgot my LDN one night. I was okay for most of the day until about 5PM.

Then I got extremely fatigued and my balance went haywire. I could barely

cook supper. I couldn't wait until it was time to take it that night.

Just my experience

Marie

----- Original Message -----

From: " Long " <Clong38@...>

<low dose naltrexone >

Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:34 PM

Subject: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

> HI ALL,

>

> I HAVE 2 QUESTIONS TODAY. FIRST, LAST NIGHT WAS THE FIRST NIGHT SINCE

TAKING

> LDN THAT I WAS TIRED AND FORGOT IT. I AWOKE AT 3 A.M. AND DEBATED ABOUT

> TAKING IT THEN. I DIDN;T BUT SHOULD I HAVE? SO FAR DON'T FEEL ANY

DIFFERENT

> TODAY WITHOUT IT. ALSO WE ARE THINKING ABOUT CHANGING OUR INSURANCE TO

JUST

> AN HMO TO SAVE MONEY. MY NEUROLOGIST WON'T TAKE AN HMO SO I WONDERED HOW

> NECESSARY IS A NUEROLOGIST FOR US? MINE REALLY HASN'T DONE ANYTHING FOR ME

> EXCEPT TRY TO GET ME ON DIFFERENT DRUGS.

> CHRIS LONG

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

At 3 AM I wouldn't have worried about taking it however, that would have to

be each individual's decision. In following Dr. Lawrence's thinking, you

could miss taking the LDN for two consective days and it would only

rejuvenate or restart the LDN action.

Your question about the need for a neuro is the same as mine about the need

for an Oncologist. They both seem to want to pump you full of chemicals to

see if you can survive them.

You might check to see who the HMO refers to for Neurological treatment.

Then, decide whether you can tolerate that Doctor.

Noland

----- Original Message -----

From: " Long " <Clong38@...>

<low dose naltrexone >

Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:34 PM

Subject: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

> HI ALL,

>

> I HAVE 2 QUESTIONS TODAY. FIRST, LAST NIGHT WAS THE FIRST NIGHT SINCE

TAKING

> LDN THAT I WAS TIRED AND FORGOT IT. I AWOKE AT 3 A.M. AND DEBATED ABOUT

> TAKING IT THEN. I DIDN;T BUT SHOULD I HAVE? SO FAR DON'T FEEL ANY

DIFFERENT

> TODAY WITHOUT IT. ALSO WE ARE THINKING ABOUT CHANGING OUR INSURANCE TO

JUST

> AN HMO TO SAVE MONEY. MY NEUROLOGIST WON'T TAKE AN HMO SO I WONDERED HOW

> NECESSARY IS A NUEROLOGIST FOR US? MINE REALLY HASN'T DONE ANYTHING FOR ME

> EXCEPT TRY TO GET ME ON DIFFERENT DRUGS.

> CHRIS LONG

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Sandy:

As I recall from the information at www.LDNinfo.org the endorphins normally

only " kick-in " between 2-4 AM so the LDN has to be in your body prior to

that time in order to " block " them temporarily and force them to build to a

higher strength. Therefore, the LDN would not normally be expected to work

as planned if taken during the day.

As I recall, there is one person on this board that has experimented with

taking a low dose of LDN during the day with apparently good results.

Noland

----- Original Message -----

From: " sandra " <destress@...>

<low dose naltrexone >; " Long " <Clong38@...>;

" Noland R. Durnell, P.E. " <rangeus50@...>

Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 12:50 PM

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

> Hi Noland and Group....If I miss a night...should I take LDN ..during

the

> day....why is it that it can't be taken during the day ? has anyone taken

> it during the day who may have trouble sleeping at night ?thanks

...Sandy

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: Noland R. Durnell, P.E. <rangeus50@...>

> <low dose naltrexone >; Long <Clong38@...>

> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:26 AM

> Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

>

>

> > At 3 AM I wouldn't have worried about taking it however, that would have

> to

> > be each individual's decision. In following Dr. Lawrence's thinking,

you

> > could miss taking the LDN for two consective days and it would only

> > rejuvenate or restart the LDN action.

> >

> > Your question about the need for a neuro is the same as mine about the

> need

> > for an Oncologist. They both seem to want to pump you full of chemicals

> to

> > see if you can survive them.

> >

> > You might check to see who the HMO refers to for Neurological treatment.

> > Then, decide whether you can tolerate that Doctor.

> >

> > Noland

> >

> > ----- Original Message -----

> > From: " Long " <Clong38@...>

> > <low dose naltrexone >

> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:34 PM

> > Subject: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

> >

> >

> > > HI ALL,

> > >

> > > I HAVE 2 QUESTIONS TODAY. FIRST, LAST NIGHT WAS THE FIRST NIGHT SINCE

> > TAKING

> > > LDN THAT I WAS TIRED AND FORGOT IT. I AWOKE AT 3 A.M. AND DEBATED

ABOUT

> > > TAKING IT THEN. I DIDN;T BUT SHOULD I HAVE? SO FAR DON'T FEEL ANY

> > DIFFERENT

> > > TODAY WITHOUT IT. ALSO WE ARE THINKING ABOUT CHANGING OUR INSURANCE TO

> > JUST

> > > AN HMO TO SAVE MONEY. MY NEUROLOGIST WON'T TAKE AN HMO SO I WONDERED

HOW

> > > NECESSARY IS A NUEROLOGIST FOR US? MINE REALLY HASN'T DONE ANYTHING

FOR

> ME

> > > EXCEPT TRY TO GET ME ON DIFFERENT DRUGS.

> > > CHRIS LONG

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

[Guest guest]

At http//www.LDNinfo.org it says to take your LDN between 9PM and 3 AM.

Last night due to falling asleep too early I took mine ar 2 AM it if

anything it worked better than my normal time of between 9 and 10 PM.

Original Message:

-----------------

From: Noland R. Durnell, P.E. rangeus50@...

Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:28:33 -0700

low dose naltrexone , Clong38@...,

destress@...

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

<html><body>

<tt>

Sandy:<BR>

<BR>

As I recall from the information at www.LDNinfo.org the endorphins

normally<BR>

only " kick-in " between 2-4 AM so the LDN has to be in your body prior to<BR>

that time in order to " block " them temporarily and force them to build to

a<BR>

higher strength.  Therefore, the LDN would not normally be expected to

work<BR>

as planned if taken during the day.<BR>

<BR>

As I recall, there is one person on this board that has experimented

with<BR>

taking a low dose of LDN during the day with apparently good results.<BR>

<BR>

Noland<BR>

<BR>

----- Original Message ----- <BR>

From: " sandra " <destress@...><BR>

<low dose naltrexone >; " Long "

<Clong38@...>;<BR>

" Noland R. Durnell, P.E. " <rangeus50@...><BR>

Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 12:50 PM<BR>

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary<BR>

<BR>

<BR>

> Hi Noland   and Group....If I miss a night...should I take LDN 

...during<BR>

the<BR>

> day....why is it that it can't be taken during the day ?  has anyone

taken<BR>

> it during the day who may have trouble sleeping at night ?thanks<BR>

...Sandy<BR>

> ----- Original Message -----<BR>

> From: Noland R. Durnell, P.E. <rangeus50@...><BR>

> <low dose naltrexone >; Long

<Clong38@...><BR>

> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:26 AM<BR>

> Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary<BR>

><BR>

><BR>

> > At 3 AM I wouldn't have worried about taking it however, that would

have<BR>

> to<BR>

> > be each individual's decision.  In following Dr. Lawrence's

thinking,<BR>

you<BR>

> > could miss taking the LDN for two consective days and it would only<BR>

> > rejuvenate or restart the LDN action.<BR>

> ><BR>

> > Your question about the need for a neuro is the same as mine about

the<BR>

> need<BR>

> > for an Oncologist.  They both seem to want to pump you full of

chemicals<BR>

> to<BR>

> > see if you can survive them.<BR>

> ><BR>

> > You might check to see who the HMO refers to for Neurological

treatment.<BR>

> > Then, decide whether you can tolerate that Doctor.<BR>

> ><BR>

> > Noland<BR>

> ><BR>

> > ----- Original Message -----<BR>

> > From: " Long " <Clong38@...><BR>

> > <low dose naltrexone ><BR>

> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:34 PM<BR>

> > Subject: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary<BR>

> ><BR>

> ><BR>

> > > HI ALL,<BR>

> > ><BR>

> > > I HAVE 2 QUESTIONS TODAY. FIRST, LAST NIGHT WAS THE FIRST NIGHT

SINCE<BR>

> > TAKING<BR>

> > > LDN THAT I WAS TIRED AND FORGOT IT. I AWOKE AT 3 A.M. AND DEBATED<BR>

ABOUT<BR>

> > > TAKING IT THEN. I DIDN;T BUT SHOULD I HAVE? SO FAR DON'T FEEL ANY<BR>

> > DIFFERENT<BR>

> > > TODAY WITHOUT IT. ALSO WE ARE THINKING ABOUT CHANGING OUR INSURANCE

TO<BR>

> > JUST<BR>

> > > AN HMO TO SAVE MONEY. MY NEUROLOGIST WON'T TAKE AN HMO SO I

WONDERED<BR>

HOW<BR>

> > > NECESSARY IS A NUEROLOGIST FOR US? MINE REALLY HASN'T DONE

ANYTHING<BR>

FOR<BR>

> ME<BR>

> > > EXCEPT  TRY TO GET ME ON DIFFERENT DRUGS.<BR>

> > > CHRIS LONG<BR>

> > ><BR>

> > ><BR>

> > ><BR>

> > ><BR>

> > >

[Guest guest]

Hi Noland and Group....If I miss a night...should I take LDN ..during the

day....why is it that it can't be taken during the day ? has anyone taken

it during the day who may have trouble sleeping at night ?thanks ..Sandy

----- Original Message -----

From: Noland R. Durnell, P.E. <rangeus50@...>

<low dose naltrexone >; Long <Clong38@...>

Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 7:26 AM

Subject: Re: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

> At 3 AM I wouldn't have worried about taking it however, that would have

to

> be each individual's decision. In following Dr. Lawrence's thinking, you

> could miss taking the LDN for two consective days and it would only

> rejuvenate or restart the LDN action.

>

> Your question about the need for a neuro is the same as mine about the

need

> for an Oncologist. They both seem to want to pump you full of chemicals

to

> see if you can survive them.

>

> You might check to see who the HMO refers to for Neurological treatment.

> Then, decide whether you can tolerate that Doctor.

>

> Noland

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: " Long " <Clong38@...>

> <low dose naltrexone >

> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:34 PM

> Subject: [low dose naltrexone] is a nuero really necessary

>

>

> > HI ALL,

> >

> > I HAVE 2 QUESTIONS TODAY. FIRST, LAST NIGHT WAS THE FIRST NIGHT SINCE

> TAKING

> > LDN THAT I WAS TIRED AND FORGOT IT. I AWOKE AT 3 A.M. AND DEBATED ABOUT

> > TAKING IT THEN. I DIDN;T BUT SHOULD I HAVE? SO FAR DON'T FEEL ANY

> DIFFERENT

> > TODAY WITHOUT IT. ALSO WE ARE THINKING ABOUT CHANGING OUR INSURANCE TO

> JUST

> > AN HMO TO SAVE MONEY. MY NEUROLOGIST WON'T TAKE AN HMO SO I WONDERED HOW

> > NECESSARY IS A NUEROLOGIST FOR US? MINE REALLY HASN'T DONE ANYTHING FOR

ME

> > EXCEPT TRY TO GET ME ON DIFFERENT DRUGS.

> > CHRIS LONG

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >