Guest guest Posted May 18, 2006 Report Share Posted May 18, 2006 ML-Gold Salts chelation theory There will be more studies on the use of Gold Salts in the near future. But what I don’t understands is why so many people are against trying it when Gold Salts have been used for a long time throughout history, with good results. And these days, there are many methods to prevent the potential problems that have occured in rare cases in the past. Regardless, from the new studies being done it has been shown that the use of Gold Salts helps to unbind mercury from enzymes. With the release of mercury from enzymes, proper enzyme function is more likely. In a person like my son, whose enzyme function is off across the board, increasing enzyme function could have a dramatic effect. It is also been widely known that mercury and gold have an infinity for each other. There is an attraction ,whether it is ionic or molecular. And the attraction is very strong. Stronger than the attraction that DMPS has for mercury. Not surprisingly, DMPS does chelate gold. Knowing this information, I see no problem using Gold Salts with the 1-3 protocol. The use of Gold Salts for one month is not enough to create any level of metal toxicity, which is a concern. However, it may be enough to release some of the mercury bound to enzymes, and visa versa. After one month go back to the use of DMPS for 3 months. If mercury has been released the DMPS can mop it up. The DMPS will also chelate any gold to prevent a build up. After 3 months, another month of Gold Salts. The key to this process is that once the enzyme function has improved, normal body functions such as digestion, immune responses and even self detoxification will improve. Meaning that the use of DMPS will also have a greater pull of mercury and the detoxifaction of mercury will be accelerated. Personally I see no drawbacks to this theory or the use of Gold Salts in this manner. But I would love to hear other thoughts on this topic. I think this is the next evolution in our search to help our kids. Now I just have to convince our sons doctor. Mel Lindstrom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 > But > what I don’t understands is why so many people are against trying it when Gold > Salts have been used for a long time throughout history, with good results. I'm not doing it because Andy says it's a bad idea, and he's been right about all of his treatment recommendations for me and my son so far. (You can use onibasu to find his comments.) Gold is a toxic metal. As for historical use, I don't think that's proof of safety -- look at amalgams. Nell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.