Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 What an awesome family!!! That is awesome how you and your son are a perfect match!!! Did you share this news (that you posted) with your son? I bet he would feel so proud to know this, and relate it to: How he like numbers, and accounts use numbers too (explain account) & we use numbers in math, than share your family story. I bet he would love to know this. Have you tried working with him with the numbers? there are math sites that have games with numbers. I bet he would like that. there are so many ways to work with numbers..This seems like a strength for your son, and then to find out your a math whiz too. awesome!!! Now this sounds like a good family tradition!! RoseDee DiMemmo <craftychick70@...> wrote: its actually a family tradition...my mother is an accountant, my father was an accountant, my stepfather was an acccountant, one grandfather was a professor at the london college of economics, the other grandfather was an actuary, my aunt had a phd in math. did i mention that we all lack social skills?Rose <beachbodytan2002 > wrote: amazing!!! *smile*Dee DiMemmo <craftychick70 > wrote: i have to laugh because i was an accountant! and a math whiz too!Rose <beachbodytan2002 > wrote: Math wiz and maybe a future accountant, they make good money and well neededDee DiMemmo <craftychick70 > wrote: hugs heidi!! i know how you feel. there are days when i think that saber was diagnosed because he was so different and it was a convenient way to placate his birth parents. he can be so "normal" sometimes, and then you put him next to a "normal" child and you realize just how different he really is. its like a punch in the gut. and when i think about all this kiddo has been thru in 5 years, it breaks my heart. it just compounds his diagnosis with another layer...there are days when i wish he would just draw a picture of something other than a letter or number. then there are days when i realize that he is a math whiz, so it all balances out i guess. Heidi Guarino <heidi.guarinogmail> wrote: How do you get past that? I think I feel it every day. Whenever he has a good day I'm certain this is all behind us. Then, he'll have a tantrum or insist on talking like Curious , refuse to get dressed, or talk endlessly about the same thing for hours and I'll realize that I'm just kidding myself. We are doin everything in our power to help him -- we've pulled every string we have to get him a tutor on weekends, and to place him in a full-day integrated preschool program focused on social interactions. He's getting speech and occupational therapy twice a week, and I swear somedays it really seems like lights are being turned on in his head. But then there are other days that make me just want to cry. I think as a parent I've become accustomed to being able to "fix" things. I can put a band-aid on a scraped knee, put batteries in toys when they die, give medicine to my kids when they're sick. I can take them places, buy them things, sing them to sleep, make them giggle when they're sad and calm them down when they're going crazy. But THIS.... I can't fix this and it's really, really hard for me to accept that. You should all know that I'm being more honest on this listserve than I've been with anyone... including my husband. Damn, that's really sad. On 10/26/07, Donna B <donnabzygmail> wrote: Crazy? No way -- we all know our own kids the best, and we have to make individual choices based on that. You'll find that on this list, we often have different approaches but there's respect for that, so even if someone did think you were crazy (which I doubt anyone would lol) who cares. Do what's right for your son, and you know best what that is. And denial is a tough thing. I think everyone goes through a certain phase of it. My husband had it bad, like a lot of dads do. Me, I jumped in with both feet to get help, but I think part of me hoped throughout the last almost 3 years that there was a mistake with his dx -- I know there's something going on there, so I've did the 'well, maybe...' a few times, but that just means that when he's having a bad day, my stomach goes bam, and I think " he really DOES have autism." It's so clear, but as a parent, I think we still have those moments of sadness/denial about it. Heidi Guarino wrote: the advice came from my son's tutor who said she works with a 12 year old who claims he can't learn to read "becasue he's autistic." Our hope is to have Owen in a good place emotionally and socially by the time he's old enough to notice and never have to make a big deal out of this to him. could be this is part our problem and our unwillingness to accept that this is a "forever" thing. I don't know... all I know is that I don't want my son to ever think there's something wrong with him, or try to use it as an excuse to get out of achieving at his fullest potential. Do folks think I'm crazy? I've only been on this group for a couple of days and I feel like I've learned a lot from all of you... I think I hadn't realized just how much I';vebeen in denial about this and how much it would help to have someone to talk to. On 10/26/07, and/or Robin Lemke <jrisjs > wrote: Wow....we've never really been told what to do,,,,,but try to look at it kind of like how we deal with telling our adopted daughter that she is adopted. It's been a part of all of our vocabularies since day 1. AS and ADHD and Tourettes and adoption. No one blinks twice when the words come up. It's simply a part of our family. I didn't want any of our kids to one day say, "What? What's that?" and wonder why they weren't told. Who knows. I think it's a very personal thing. I do think that no matter what your child "has".....it's gonna be a natural thing to try to "use it" at some point. When Ian has brought up AS and has tried to use it,,,,,,we've laughed it off and said, "good try". Robin Heidi Guarino <heidi.guarinogmail> wrote: Donna, We were told the opposite -- to never, ever tell our 4-year-old son that he's been diagnosed with anything. That if we told him, someday down the line he woudl learn that he could use it as a crutch. On 10/26/07, Donna B <donnabzygmail> wrote: A behavioral therapist told us about 2 years ago that we should tell our son he's different, so when others start noticing it and treating him differently, he'd have a reason why, and it wouldn't be as hurtful. Our way? "You're a high-maintenance dude!" We say it with a smile and a laugh, and if he's having a bad day, we joke about how he's being even more high-maintenance. Now, he'll say "That's because I'm high-maintenance!" A couple of times now, if he sees others having a bad day, he'll say "They must be high-maintenance, too." It's helped his understanding of others because he can relate. Not a cure-all, but it's definitely helped! Toni wrote: If your family members are telling you not to come around.. I wouldn't . They are missing a blessing. They are closed minded, they are pitiful (sorry). I understand your hurt. I hate to see my kids with other kids because that is when it is so obvious they are different. But, you know what, Debbie, it doesn't bother my kids to be different, they are proud.. they don't want to be pedestrian (their words) and boring and mundane.. to them we are the weird ones who ask about somebody's day and don't really care if they answer or not.. it's a nicety... CHIN up girl, I bet it doesn't bother your son (or mine) as nearly as their treatment bothers us.By the way, my boys are 19 and they do get it, they just don't care. They said the kids at school all drank, smoked, did drugs, had sex etc and that they and one other boy were the only virgins and they didn't WANT to be like the rest of the kids. Try to concentrate on HIS positives just for today and you'll feel better... My pdoc told me when I first started talking to him about the boys... Look at every picture you see of Einstein, his hair is all over his head, he had a 'keeper', his clothes were unkempt, and yet he was brilliant and made a difference. Your boys will find their niche and make a difference too... I understand feeling low... I have felt like I was on a treadmill getting nowhere fast..sat in my room and cried... but it will get better... Toni ( ) Re: Larry King Live I don't think I can agree with that statement. I know we all have our quirks and weaknesses, but my child cannot connect with his peers. How it must be to feel like an outsider amongst your peers I cannot imagine. That is why my heart breaks, that is why I personally would not have another child. I can't take the pain of seeing my son try to connect and get frustrated and anxious and then aggressive because he is hurt and angry that he can't be successful with connecting to other kids. He doesn't even know why he can't connect because he is 7 and he doesn't get it yet. There are no play dates, no friends, even my family members are telling us not to come around. It is so hard. Sorry if I am negative but I guess we all have our highs and lows and I am low right now.Debbie __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 Amen to the "pitocin" theory!!!! I got it with all of mine. RobinDee DiMemmo <craftychick70@...> wrote: what about autistic kids who did not receive the vaccine? What about those who were autistic long before vaccinations became common? there probably is a long laundry list of things that can cause autism, just like there is a laundry list of things that cause diabetes or heart disease or any other disease. maybe with the toxin theory there's a kernel of truth to it-kids may be more sensitive to these toxins and it might cause a reaction. but its just as true to say pitocin causes autism because there is anectodal evidence that a number of autistic children have mothers that were given pitocinRoxanna <madideaszoominternet (DOT) net> wrote: You don't have to prove there isn't, you have to prove there is. But you said it was a common cause of autism and it's not proven that it is even "A" cause of autism, let alone the common cause. Even if people feel like a vaccine caused autism, it doesn't mean it's any more true. I don't think it is widely accepted either. There is just a certain segment of people who do and like to push their theories. I personally get upset that people want to hyper focus on this one thing and not look around at other possible causes. I think it will slow down the search for answers. It's fine to consider this option, IMO, but not at the expense of any other. RoxannaAutism Happens Re: ( ) Larry King Live I agreed with Dr. Kartzinel -- my thoughts are that these kids do have some broken mechanisms in their body, things that don't work right for one way or another. But, it may be because I see my son have a ton of intestinal issues, rashes, aches, etc., that can't be explained, and many, many children on the spectrum face similar issues. Dr. Kartzinel is an amazing man, very much on our side, so I'd have a hard time feeling bad about the fact he's getting awareness out there. Honestly, personally? I don't get caught up in the semantics. My son has issues, and I don't care if he's referred to as autistic, which is the peeve I have with Holly -Peete; she can feel that way about her son, but to say that it's the wrong vernacular is misrepresentation, imo. I say my son 'is autistic' sometimes, but I don't say he is "an autistic." My daughter is epileptic, it's true, it's factual, I can't be bothered by that. It's just words. also never says she 'cured' her son. She says she recovered him. You probably heard her bus analogy -- you get hit by a bus, you'll never be cured, you'll always have aches, pains, scars, but you can recover. The thing with the MMR shot is that it's a huge dose of vaccine on a body that is still growing and the mixture can be dangerous to a child who cannot process the viral/toxic loads as bodies are supposed to. (Which explains why not every child gets autism after having vaccines. Most children can process the loads fine, but toxins increase, the number of children who can't process the increased toxins is growing at a scary epidemic rate.)Be careful to just research the FDA and government sites. It makes sense that they aren't going to show the side-effects, unless they are in small print and hard to find. And a 'trace' of thimerasol can still be WAY more than a tiny body can process per pound. And last -- Thimerasol was 'recommended' to be phased out in 1999, but because it preserves vaccines for years, those vaccines that weren't yet used stayed on the shelf for years later because they weren't yet expired, so while new ones weren't made, those ones with thimerasol still remained.Thimerasol/vaccines aren't the sole reason for autism, they are just one of the most common ones -- pesticides, medications, etc., there's a lot of toxins out there contributing to it all. Hope that helps!Donna wrote: What is everyone's take on the Larry King Live show with McCarthy and Halle Pete? I was pretty frustrated to hear the docter refer to our kids as "Broken Children" and the other comment was from about curing her son of Autism. Autism is a neurological disorder that is not tecnically "curable" but is treatable. I was also listening to them talk about how the MMR shot, and the immunitizations were the causes of autism. I went to the FDA website and the MMR has NEVER contained Thimersoal. Also all other immunitizations have phased out the thimersoal starting in 1999, and most of them are free of mercury or never had it. I wanted imput from everyone here, because I feel like you will all give me great imput on what you think. Thanks! Chelle __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 I don't mind if people want to discuss what they "feel" is the cause of autism but it can't be said as if it's a fact or true when it's not. RoxannaAutism Happens Re: ( ) Larry King Live I agree with it all, I guess. People "repeating" what they hear or agree with doesn't bother me. I do it....you do it.....we all do it. If we agree with something and see a similarity or a link.....we tend to go that way. Doesn't mean we're all gonna see the link or agree. Since all of the "reasons" are valid,,,,,and we're dealing with the lives our our kids,,,,, it can become a very heated "discussion", though. I see that. People leaning twd something being more of a cause than something else is a very personal thing and shouldn't be questioned, I don't think. It should be accepted that THAT is the way THEY feel. We should allow it to be "written" without it becoming a back and forth, almost "uncomfortable to read" thread. Sorry if this offends.........but it's just the way I feel. Robin <mrathswohldaylemc (DOT) org> wrote: Hi Roxanna,Thank you for your imput here. I get so frustrated when I hear people just repeat what they hear. My sister-in-law refered to the MMR as the autism shot and said that she is not going to let her son get it. I personally feel that there are many factors that contribute to our kids developing autism. My son had the shots, the protection they give our kids (in my opinion) far outweighed the risks. Also I have a hard time beliving that the shots could have caused the multiple instances of Autism that are in my family. I think there is a genetic factor to be considered. My Grandfather, my 2 uncles, and 3 of my cousins (all male) as well as my son all have AS. There MUST be a genetic link there. That many men having AS can not possibly be a fluke. I know that I am going to give my daughter the shots. I know that I have concerns about the viral load and at our next appointment we will be discussing spreading out her shots more, but I don't ever want to have to see my baby suffer Whooping cough or the measles, rotovirus...the kinds of things that we get shots for as kids. I got all the shots that babies get, plus a ton more at 9 months of age because we moved to the Middle East. I didn't "get" autism from all those shots. I think our kids are wired differently, and that is exactly what I tell my son. We have struggles with behavior, and attitude, and I know a large part of his issues are because he doesn't get social rules, but he is who he is. I wouldn't change him for anything in the world. I really like, love and adore this unique, quirky little man that God gave me. I know that having a child with autism is hard, stressful and emotionally tiring, but when that angel looks up and smiles, it is worth it. Thanks again for the imput! I love all the support that is felt here. >> I'm not sure where your beef is then. People do have choices and are choosing to do their own thing. It's not been taken away from them. So all is good there. > > You said, "So no, I don't have to prove there is a cause if there is a suspicion -- I'm not a researcher, I'm a parent who knows her child and has talked to a ton of others and has researched a lot on a "mom" level." You can have your opinions but you can't say they are facts. That's all I care about here. If you don't feel the need to prove something is true before you decide it's true, that may be something that works for you personally. Not for me, though. I will demand more before I agree something is a fact. Think about it like this - they used to believe that people were witches and burn them at the stake for it. They didn't need fact or proof, they just felt it was true or had suspicions it was true. I mean you can make an example out of anything to make a point. > > Also, I did not say research should focus solely on genetics either. But nothing you've listed so far is a fact as to the cause of autism. > > Roxanna __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 I'll echo the " pitocin " . I had it with my son also. His physciatrist said that pitocin contributes to tramatic birth and that it changes the way the uterus contracts. In " normal " labor, that uterus contracts in waves. In a " pitocin " induced labor they uterus contracts all at once. Imagine a vice being put around your entire body for a few seconds or longer. Talk about toture. I can't imagine..... Me > what about autistic kids who did not receive the vaccine? What about those who were autistic long before vaccinations became common? > there probably is a long laundry list of things that can cause autism, just like there is a laundry list of things that cause diabetes or heart disease or any other disease. maybe with the toxin theory there's a kernel of truth to it-kids may be more sensitive to these toxins and it might cause a reaction. but its just as true to say pitocin causes autism because there is anectodal evidence that a number of autistic children have mothers that were given pitocin > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2007 Report Share Posted October 27, 2007 both of my 2 boys were pitocin babies. My 7 yr old for about 4 hours longer than my almost 5 yr old. basically 7 yr old was for about 6.5 hrs, and the 5 yr old was for about 2.5 hrs. No comments about the length please, older broke my pelvis and no drugs ever worked while i was having him. lol. anyway, ony my older is aspie, now younger has some aspie-ish traits, but not even enough to get pdd-nos dx. and he is very very mild with them in comparison to my older. zaztooe wrote: > > I'll echo the " pitocin " . I had it with my son also. His physciatrist > said that pitocin contributes to tramatic birth and that it changes > the way the uterus contracts. In " normal " labor, that uterus > contracts in waves. In a " pitocin " induced labor they uterus > contracts all at once. Imagine a vice being put around your entire > body for a few seconds or longer. Talk about toture. I can't > imagine..... > > Me > > > > what about autistic kids who did not receive the > vaccine? What about those who were autistic long before vaccinations > became common? > > there probably is a long laundry list of things that can cause > autism, just like there is a laundry list of things that cause > diabetes or heart disease or any other disease. maybe with the toxin > theory there's a kernel of truth to it-kids may be more sensitive to > these toxins and it might cause a reaction. but its just as true to > say pitocin causes autism because there is anectodal evidence that a > number of autistic children have mothers that were given pitocin > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2007 Report Share Posted October 28, 2007 Wow! I didn't know that! was due on 11/5. That day came and went. Then the doctors told me that they must have made a mistake; according to the first sonogram, she should be due on 11/15. That day came and went. She was finally born on 11/1, almost a month after her original due date. Deb In a message dated 10/27/2007 11:49:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, melindaj@... writes: I'll echo the "pitocin". I had it with my son also. His physciatrist said that pitocin contributes to tramatic birth and that it changes the way the uterus contracts. In "normal" labor, that uterus contracts in waves. In a "pitocin" induced labor they uterus contracts all at once. Imagine a vice being put around your entire body for a few seconds or longer. Talk about toture. I can't imagine.....Me> what about autistic kids who did not receive the vaccine? What about those who were autistic long before vaccinations became common? > there probably is a long laundry list of things that can cause autism, just like there is a laundry list of things that cause diabetes or heart disease or any other disease. maybe with the toxin theory there's a kernel of truth to it-kids may be more sensitive to these toxins and it might cause a reaction. but its just as true to say pitocin causes autism because there is anectodal evidence that a number of autistic children have mothers that were given pitocin> > Debbie SalernoMaine Coon RescueBoard MemberDNA ManagerEastern Regional DirectorVice Presidentwww.mainecoonrescue.netSee what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Hi, Heidi I think what you're feeling is normal -- I think we just slowly get used to 'this is how it is,' and what we do to help him is what gets us past it. For each of us, that's different, because our kids are different, but you have to remember that you ARE helping him, you ARE doing what he needs, and you should feel good about that. I still have days where I want to cry over something he's done, something I think he should be doing, how different he can be, etc. Yesterday, he had his first birthday party invitation in a good long while. (Wayyy too long, people are awful and judgmental so they don't invite him. Their kids don't necessarily 'get' him, so mom/dad doesn't make them do the right thing and invite him, so he's the lone person in a group not invited somewhere.) Anyway, at the party, I could see he was having difficulties. I could have sworn one parent asked him to stop saying his son's name wrong, and I could see my son's face change. He wouldn't tell me he said anything, but I saw him. Big bully, I really wish parents would learn to stop parenting others' kids, particularly when the parents are right there. Not long after, they played a game, ds had a really hard time, he didn't tantrum or get mad (yay! milestone there!) but he did ask if we could go home. This was before the party even got into full swing. I want him to be 'normal' and like birthday parties, games, prizes, but if he's happy, I need to learn to be content with that, so we came home. Hard thing for me as a mom, this is my 4th child so I can more easily see his differences from the other three. We can't always 'fix' things, though it's our instinct, but we can help and it sounds like you are doing all the right things! Don't beat yourself up -- it does get easier in some regards, and you become more 'empowered,' if that makes sense? Donna Heidi Guarino wrote: How do you get past that? I think I feel it every day. Whenever he has a good day I'm certain this is all behind us. Then, he'll have a tantrum or insist on talking like Curious , refuse to get dressed, or talk endlessly about the same thing for hours and I'll realize that I'm just kidding myself. We are doin everything in our power to help him -- we've pulled every string we have to get him a tutor on weekends, and to place him in a full-day integrated preschool program focused on social interactions. He's getting speech and occupational therapy twice a week, and I swear somedays it really seems like lights are being turned on in his head. But then there are other days that make me just want to cry. I think as a parent I've become accustomed to being able to "fix" things. I can put a band-aid on a scraped knee, put batteries in toys when they die, give medicine to my kids when they're sick. I can take them places, buy them things, sing them to sleep, make them giggle when they're sad and calm them down when they're going crazy. But THIS.... I can't fix this and it's really, really hard for me to accept that. You should all know that I'm being more honest on this listserve than I've been with anyone... including my husband. Damn, that's really sad. On 10/26/07, Donna B <donnabzygmail> wrote: Crazy? No way -- we all know our own kids the best, and we have to make individual choices based on that. You'll find that on this list, we often have different approaches but there's respect for that, so even if someone did think you were crazy (which I doubt anyone would lol) who cares. Do what's right for your son, and you know best what that is. And denial is a tough thing. I think everyone goes through a certain phase of it. My husband had it bad, like a lot of dads do. Me, I jumped in with both feet to get help, but I think part of me hoped throughout the last almost 3 years that there was a mistake with his dx -- I know there's something going on there, so I've did the 'well, maybe...' a few times, but that just means that when he's having a bad day, my stomach goes bam, and I think " he really DOES have autism." It's so clear, but as a parent, I think we still have those moments of sadness/denial about it. Heidi Guarino wrote: the advice came from my son's tutor who said she works with a 12 year old who claims he can't learn to read "becasue he's autistic." Our hope is to have Owen in a good place emotionally and socially by the time he's old enough to notice and never have to make a big deal out of this to him. could be this is part our problem and our unwillingness to accept that this is a "forever" thing. I don't know... all I know is that I don't want my son to ever think there's something wrong with him, or try to use it as an excuse to get out of achieving at his fullest potential. Do folks think I'm crazy? I've only been on this group for a couple of days and I feel like I've learned a lot from all of you... I think I hadn't realized just how much I';vebeen in denial about this and how much it would help to have someone to talk to. On 10/26/07, and/or Robin Lemke <jrisjs > wrote: Wow....we've never really been told what to do,,,,,but try to look at it kind of like how we deal with telling our adopted daughter that she is adopted. It's been a part of all of our vocabularies since day 1. AS and ADHD and Tourettes and adoption. No one blinks twice when the words come up. It's simply a part of our family. I didn't want any of our kids to one day say, "What? What's that?" and wonder why they weren't told. Who knows. I think it's a very personal thing. I do think that no matter what your child "has".....it's gonna be a natural thing to try to "use it" at some point. When Ian has brought up AS and has tried to use it,,,,,,we've laughed it off and said, "good try". Robin Heidi Guarino <heidi.guarinogmail> wrote: Donna, We were told the opposite -- to never, ever tell our 4-year-old son that he's been diagnosed with anything. That if we told him, someday down the line he woudl learn that he could use it as a crutch. On 10/26/07, Donna B <donnabzygmail> wrote: A behavioral therapist told us about 2 years ago that we should tell our son he's different, so when others start noticing it and treating him differently, he'd have a reason why, and it wouldn't be as hurtful. Our way? "You're a high-maintenance dude!" We say it with a smile and a laugh, and if he's having a bad day, we joke about how he's being even more high-maintenance. Now, he'll say "That's because I'm high-maintenance!" A couple of times now, if he sees others having a bad day, he'll say "They must be high-maintenance, too." It's helped his understanding of others because he can relate. Not a cure-all, but it's definitely helped! Toni wrote: If your family members are telling you not to come around.. I wouldn't . They are missing a blessing. They are closed minded, they are pitiful (sorry). I understand your hurt. I hate to see my kids with other kids because that is when it is so obvious they are different. But, you know what, Debbie, it doesn't bother my kids to be different, they are proud.. they don't want to be pedestrian (their words) and boring and mundane.. to them we are the weird ones who ask about somebody's day and don't really care if they answer or not.. it's a nicety... CHIN up girl, I bet it doesn't bother your son (or mine) as nearly as their treatment bothers us.By the way, my boys are 19 and they do get it, they just don't care. They said the kids at school all drank, smoked, did drugs, had sex etc and that they and one other boy were the only virgins and they didn't WANT to be like the rest of the kids. Try to concentrate on HIS positives just for today and you'll feel better... My pdoc told me when I first started talking to him about the boys... Look at every picture you see of Einstein, his hair is all over his head, he had a 'keeper', his clothes were unkempt, and yet he was brilliant and made a difference. Your boys will find their niche and make a difference too... I understand feeling low... I have felt like I was on a treadmill getting nowhere fast..sat in my room and cried... but it will get better... Toni ----- Original Message ----- From: debramelamed To: Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:38 PM Subject: ( ) Re: Larry King Live I don't think I can agree with that statement. I know we all have our quirks and weaknesses, but my child cannot connect with his peers. How it must be to feel like an outsider amongst your peers I cannot imagine. That is why my heart breaks, that is why I personally would not have another child. I can't take the pain of seeing my son try to connect and get frustrated and anxious and then aggressive because he is hurt and angry that he can't be successful with connecting to other kids. He doesn't even know why he can't connect because he is 7 and he doesn't get it yet. There are no play dates, no friends, even my family members are telling us not to come around. It is so hard. Sorry if I am negative but I guess we all have our highs and lows and I am low right now. Debbie __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Wait, just to be sure you understand me -- I DO believe in ABA. I'm just saying that the medical establishment in general pushes ABA but nothing is considered "proven" in the eyes of those insurance companies being asked to pay for it. We use ABA...and biomedical...but we're not in ABA right now, so I know where the change is coming from. However, ABA starts again in a few weeks (YAY -- the waiting list was forever long for this program) so I know we'll see more positive change too. (You'd think insurance companies would be more willing, given that the cost to care for kids as adults costs so much more.) I really don't want to give the wrong impression -- I really was saying that I caved, because I worried about the vaccines and got them anyway. Was my worry rational? Who knows, but in my mind, I gave in when I shouldn't have. Not everyone has those worries, so I couldn't say they caved, if that makes it more clear? Eh, I'm not sure I misrepresent that autism is caused by vaccines -- a very growing belief is that it is caused by toxins in genetically predisposed children. Thimerasol's a toxin... It's my opinion, just like an opinion to the contrary. I'm just glad for the freedom to be able to state that, and if it helps even a single parent realize that THEY are in charge of their child, that they should research on their own and ask around, just be sure for their own needs, I'm glad. Touche on Columbus -- but some kids with chelation and other biomedical treatments no longer have an autism diagnosis. That would make for an awful lot of doctors who were wrong, and parents who went along with it. I've seen some of them before/after. No doubt before, and no doubt now. Amazing differences. It won't work for everyone, but for those it does, how awesome -- I just don't want that negated or that option removed, because I didn't think it would help my child, but the fact remains, it very much is. Roxanna, I enjoy talking with you...I hope you know I'm never directing my feelings at you? Donna Roxanna wrote: It is called proven by people who use it. You just need to hang out with a different crowd. As to why it's not covered - why isn't "autism" in general covered by insurance, because it isn't a real disability? No. Because they don't have to and it saves them money not to. The longer insurance and schools do not admit coverage and services for ABA, the longer they save money. And as we know, money rules the world. My state is just now working on autism parity in insurance. We'll see if it happens. They used to turn down coverage on my ds for strep throat just because he is also autistic. So I don't think of "insurance" as the guiding light of what is real in the world. I know you didn't say that "I" personally caved, but you are giving the impression that people who allow their children to get immunizations are being bullied into it or caving. I think I said that if people feel bullied by their pediatrician, then they definitely should get another doctor. There is no reason for people to put up with that. But in connection with other comments that there is a known cause for autism when there isn't, I think it gives the impression that this is a fact when it's not. People can have different opinions but not different facts. I know some people want to believe in the vaccine connection and I don't care if they do. I just can't have people saying things are fact when they are not fact. And really, I also think that people who don't buy into this theory should speak up more because too often, only your version of this gets publicized. I don't think there is any worry that your theory won't get told. I don't think the "Columbus" comparison would even fit here. Columbus set sail and landed. Roxanna Autism Happens ----- Original Message ----- From: Donna B To: Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 2:39 PM Subject: Re: ( ) Re: Larry King Live Just to clarify -- I didn't say you caved -- I said "I caved," specifically because I gave my kid a vaccine that a doctor made me feel bad for doing something I didn't think was right. I know we're not all going to agree on this, and that's okay. (People didn't agree with Columbus when he said the world was round, so I can deal LOL) I just expect everyone to understand that it is okay to have other thoughts on it, to look in other directions, and try new things. Even the medical establishment wouldn't be anywhere today if new things weren't tried. I've always wondered, if ABA is proven, why isn't it covered by insurance? I totally believe in its necessity, but even it's not called 'proven.' Roxanna wrote: I don't think coming up with new vaccines removes our rights as parents. I think we owe a lot to vaccines in helping cure/solve a lot of illnesses. I also don't think I have caved because I have had my kids given their immunizations. If a doctor makes anyone feel that way, maybe they should get a different doc. I know I would! Roxanna Autism Happens ----- Original Message ----- From: Donna B To: Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:17 PM Subject: Re: ( ) Re: Larry King Live Texas tried to make it mandatory, but it was changed -- not enough research and it was taking the choice out of the parents' hands. Every vaccine, new or not, removes a bit more of our rights -- the medical establishment is not perfect. (Think thalidomide.) I don't want my children ever being someone's guinea pigs or hurt because I caved when a doctor made me feel bad for doing what I think is right. They are my kids, so stand back lol Rose wrote: Deb, <<<the new one for young girls>>>. are you speaking of the vaccine that's new, that's suppose to prevent ovarian cancer? I heard on the news that some states made it mandatory for girls to have this, and some schools are giving them out "in school". I don't know which states. debmetsfanaol wrote: 's pediatrician wants to give her the meningitis vaccine and the new one for young girls. Should I be concerned at all? Deb In a message dated 10/24/2007 10:34:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mrathswohldaylemc (DOT) org writes: I guess part of my problem with Dr. Kartzinel is just that I don't really see my son as broken, but different. I did listen to the clip again and she did say recovered, so I have to back away from that issue there. My only reason for saying anything about the MMR is that I keep hearing people blame the mercury in the MMR for their kids being autistic, and the MMR does not contain any. I do think that we need to have research on the issue of the viral load and overloading our kids immune systems. That just seems to be a far more likely cause, and if that is the cause I belive that we need to spread out the immunitizations better so they are not getting so much at one. Thanks for the feedback. > > I agreed with Dr. Kartzinel -- my thoughts are that these kids do have > some broken mechanisms in their body, things that don't work right for > one way or another. But, it may be because I see my son have a ton of > intestinal issues, rashes, aches, etc., that can't be explained, and > many, many children on the spectrum face similar issues. Dr. Kartzinel > is an amazing man, very much on our side, so I'd have a hard time > feeling bad about the fact he's getting awareness out there. Honestly, > personally? I don't get caught up in the semantics. My son has issues, > and I don't care if he's referred to as autistic, which is the peeve I > have with Holly -Peete; she can feel that way about her son, but > to say that it's the wrong vernacular is misrepresentation, imo. I say > my son 'is autistic' sometimes, but I don't say he is "an autistic." My > daughter is epileptic, it's true, it's factual, I can't be bothered by > that. It's just words. > > also never says she 'cured' her son. She says she recovered him. > You probably heard her bus analogy -- you get hit by a bus, you'll never > be cured, you'll always have aches, pains, scars, but you can recover. > > The thing with the MMR shot is that it's a huge dose of vaccine on a > body that is still growing and the mixture can be dangerous to a child > who cannot process the viral/toxic loads as bodies are supposed to. > (Which explains why not every child gets autism after having vaccines. > Most children can process the loads fine, but toxins increase, the > number of children who can't process the increased toxins is growing at > a scary epidemic rate.) > > Be careful to just research the FDA and government sites. It makes sense > that they aren't going to show the side-effects, unless they are in > small print and hard to find. And a 'trace' of thimerasol can still be > WAY more than a tiny body can process per pound. > > And last -- Thimerasol was 'recommended' to be phased out in 1999, but > because it preserves vaccines for years, those vaccines that weren't yet > used stayed on the shelf for years later because they weren't yet > expired, so while new ones weren't made, those ones with thimerasol > still remained. > > Thimerasol/vaccines aren't the sole reason for autism, they are just one > of the most common ones -- pesticides, medications, etc., there's a lot > of toxins out there contributing to it all. > > Hope that helps! > Donna > Debbie Salerno Maine Coon Rescue Board Member DNA Manager Eastern Regional Director Vice President www.mainecoonrescue.net See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 ACK...no one said cure! And, it doesn't work for everyone. It's a help for a lot of kids, a way to improve, but not a cure, and it doesn't work for all. I'm sorry you're feeling stalked -- no one should do that to anyone. Sounds like some of the pages you're looking at are by doctors in it for the money, when that's not the majority. (And honestly, I get tired of people telling me their vitamin is better, by this cookie, whatever...but that's life, I get more viagra ads in my inbox daily than anything else lol) For what it's worth, I don't pay a DAN doctor. I don't buy from expensive retailers. I don't use expensive programs. I use books, the internet, and so forth. No expensive outlay of cash here at all. I'd buy my kid vitamins anyway, you know? My son's OT appts cost more, and that's even after the insurance coverage. And amen to that -- use your own judgment, something I've said all along. RUTHIE BRYAN DOLEZAL wrote: If this is about a cure, etc., then why are those promoting DAN and DAN conferences, etc., needing DAN or this support group (for example)? 'Cuz, if it works so well, then why aren't the autistic children all better or cured, and our website (or need for it) ended? Just my honest thought here...... That being said: One of my concerns is that, when I, personally, along with my husband, have PERSONALLY been stalked and / or harassed and chased by these 'hell bent roar' die hard believers of all that stuff to do the diets and DAN and all this stuff, I am sent to all these websites, and doctors pages, and I looked at them, very open-minded for a moment; that moment was killed nearly INSTANTLY, as, in my opinion, my husband and I are both very well educated college grads, etc., and most of the pages are very scant and / or just appear to be 'scams' or 'scam like' material, and not very legitimate. THEY LOOK FAKE and LIKE SCAMS TO US!! Seems to us more like MONEY MAKING EFFORTS THAN GENUINE---and, that is where I will leave it, as I am NOT sure I want to get involved in the 'heated debate' here; I think ROXANNA rocks (as everyone knows) but that is just our intellectual and GUT opinions and reactions. I have learned to follow my GUT every time, it is almost always right on; the times I went against my first opinion, I regretted it. USE YOUR OWN JUDGMENTS----just wanted to share what we feel and see when we are pushed to that stuff...... Ruthie Dolezal ----- Original Message ----- From: Roxanna To: Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:50 PM Subject: Re: ( ) Larry King Live I'm not sure where your beef is then. People do have choices and are choosing to do their own thing. It's not been taken away from them. So all is good there. You said, "So no, I don't have to prove there is a cause if there is a suspicion -- I'm not a researcher, I'm a parent who knows her child and has talked to a ton of others and has researched a lot on a "mom" level." You can have your opinions but you can't say they are facts. That's all I care about here. If you don't feel the need to prove something is true before you decide it's true, that may be something that works for you personally. Not for me, though. I will demand more before I agree something is a fact. Think about it like this - they used to believe that people were witches and burn them at the stake for it. They didn't need fact or proof, they just felt it was true or had suspicions it was true. I mean you can make an example out of anything to make a point. Also, I did not say research should focus solely on genetics either. But nothing you've listed so far is a fact as to the cause of autism. Roxanna Autism Happens ----- Original Message ----- From: Donna B To: Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 4:13 PM Subject: Re: ( ) Larry King Live Have you ever been to a DAN conference? The stats they share there are enlightening. The lists and lists of doctors, researchers alone is staggering. A certain segment believes vaccinations have nothing to do with autism, so being a 'certain segment' doesn't lessen their input or concerns. The 'vaccines are fine' population certainly pushes their theories. Many, many doctors and researchers not a part of the DAN population specifically are now saying that autism is a whole body disorder, with genetic factors, and something that the child is exposed to causes it to 'bloom,' for lack of a better word, into autism. For some kids, it's thimerasol. For others, medication mom had to take to stay pregnant. (I honestly believe it contributed to my son.) For others, it's an illness that was treated with something that their body couldn't handle. In short though, it is becoming widely spread that children with autism have issues because their bodies can't process something to which they were exposed. What? They haven't quite figured out the magic thing, but maybe someday. Until then, it makes sense, imo, to lessen the exposure to things not thoroughly proven to be safe..or not related to a toxin that the FDA recommends people watch carefully. It's a fact that thimerasol is a toxin. That's all I need to know to make it suspect to inject into a child or anyone else. So no, I don't have to prove there is a cause if there is a suspicion -- I'm not a researcher, I'm a parent who knows her child and has talked to a ton of others and has researched a lot on a "mom" level. If people kept smoking until they proved it was cigarettes that caused lung cancer, look where the rates would be. It was presumed long before proven, and it started out with a small group of people who believed it, much like many other diseases. I'm not saying all autism is caused by vaccines, MMR, or thimerasol. I'm saying it contributes and in some cases is the cause. I'm not going to be in favor of giving a baby 36 shots before they are 2.5 years old....I'd much rather give 50 and have them spread out so the child's body can recoup in between. Until they can prove it isn't, because so far they can't prove squat about what causes it, I'm not going to be in favor of injecting a toxin into anyone. They've proven nothing unequivocally. I think they need to leave the field wide open -- continue to consider thimerasol, medications taken during pregnancy, other vaccinations, poisons in cleaning products, you name it...but to focus solely on genetics when thousands of people have seen improvements with other methods, it makes no sense. If it doesn't work for someone, great, but it shouldn't remove the right for someone else to have their choice for their own child. And that's my biggest beef, I guess? I will be the first to admit that there is a faction of people out there who are overzealous, to the point of namecalling and nastiness towards those that vaccinate. It's awful -- I think as a community of parents of children with autism, sticking together is much more productive. We don't need to all agree but we shouldn't be divisive. Just because I feel one way doesn't mean someone else should, though I think the sharing of opinions and feelings is what leads us all to learn. Overzealousness lies on both sides of the fence and should be done away with. I'd much rather have a friendly talk about something, however contentious the topic, than argue. Roxanna wrote: You don't have to prove there isn't, you have to prove there is. But you said it was a common cause of autism and it's not proven that it is even "A" cause of autism, let alone the common cause. Even if people feel like a vaccine caused autism, it doesn't mean it's any more true. I don't think it is widely accepted either. There is just a certain segment of people who do and like to push their theories. I personally get upset that people want to hyper focus on this one thing and not look around at other possible causes. I think it will slow down the search for answers. It's fine to consider this option, IMO, but not at the expense of any other. Roxanna Autism Happens ----- Original Message ----- From: Donna B To: Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 2:36 PM Subject: Re: ( ) Larry King Live I didn't say there was proof -- as well as there is no proof it hasn't. It is widely accepted though, not by everyone, but a lot though, and with growing numbers, that autism is caused in genetically predisposed kids by toxins, one of them being thimerasol because it is a toxin. (If mercury was safe, we could eat all the fish we wanted and go back to mercury thermometers.) It's common because most kids get vaccines. Roxanna wrote: There is no proof at all that thimerasol causes autism nor is it a "common cause" of autism. Roxanna Autism Happens ----- Original Message ----- From: Donna B To: Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:00 PM Subject: Re: ( ) Larry King Live I agreed with Dr. Kartzinel -- my thoughts are that these kids do have some broken mechanisms in their body, things that don't work right for one way or another. But, it may be because I see my son have a ton of intestinal issues, rashes, aches, etc., that can't be explained, and many, many children on the spectrum face similar issues. Dr. Kartzinel is an amazing man, very much on our side, so I'd have a hard time feeling bad about the fact he's getting awareness out there. Honestly, personally? I don't get caught up in the semantics. My son has issues, and I don't care if he's referred to as autistic, which is the peeve I have with Holly -Peete; she can feel that way about her son, but to say that it's the wrong vernacular is misrepresentation, imo. I say my son 'is autistic' sometimes, but I don't say he is "an autistic." My daughter is epileptic, it's true, it's factual, I can't be bothered by that. It's just words. also never says she 'cured' her son. She says she recovered him. You probably heard her bus analogy -- you get hit by a bus, you'll never be cured, you'll always have aches, pains, scars, but you can recover. The thing with the MMR shot is that it's a huge dose of vaccine on a body that is still growing and the mixture can be dangerous to a child who cannot process the viral/toxic loads as bodies are supposed to. (Which explains why not every child gets autism after having vaccines. Most children can process the loads fine, but toxins increase, the number of children who can't process the increased toxins is growing at a scary epidemic rate.) Be careful to just research the FDA and government sites. It makes sense that they aren't going to show the side-effects, unless they are in small print and hard to find. And a 'trace' of thimerasol can still be WAY more than a tiny body can process per pound. And last -- Thimerasol was 'recommended' to be phased out in 1999, but because it preserves vaccines for years, those vaccines that weren't yet used stayed on the shelf for years later because they weren't yet expired, so while new ones weren't made, those ones with thimerasol still remained. Thimerasol/vaccines aren't the sole reason for autism, they are just one of the most common ones -- pesticides, medications, etc., there's a lot of toxins out there contributing to it all. Hope that helps! Donna wrote: What is everyone's take on the Larry King Live show with McCarthy and Halle Pete? I was pretty frustrated to hear the docter refer to our kids as "Broken Children" and the other comment was from about curing her son of Autism. Autism is a neurological disorder that is not tecnically "curable" but is treatable. I was also listening to them talk about how the MMR shot, and the immunitizations were the causes of autism. I went to the FDA website and the MMR has NEVER contained Thimersoal. Also all other immunitizations have phased out the thimersoal starting in 1999, and most of them are free of mercury or never had it. I wanted imput from everyone here, because I feel like you will all give me great imput on what you think. Thanks! Chelle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 I was planning on moving on to another topic, I didn't intend on getting into a debate about the merits of what has worked for my son, and is still working, nor my beliefs on vaccines because I believe we all have the right to our feelings. But your second sentence has caught my eye. I am not repeating what I hear. That's actually quite offensive, if you think about it. It pretty much outright says that we're not thinking for ourselves, which is entirely not the case. Maybe there are people who do that, but it's not the norm. Parents who vaccinate, I could just as easily say they're just doing what they hear...but that would be a completely irrational, rude, incorrect blanket judgment. Could we try and remember that it's okay to have other feelings? I've never slammed someone for vaccinating, I'd really prefer if we could not slam those of us who have different feelings? We have enough crap to deal with in real life, no need to add to it. wrote: Hi Roxanna, Thank you for your imput here. I get so frustrated when I hear people just repeat what they hear. My sister-in-law refered to the MMR as the autism shot and said that she is not going to let her son get it. I personally feel that there are many factors that contribute to our kids developing autism. My son had the shots, the protection they give our kids (in my opinion) far outweighed the risks. Also I have a hard time beliving that the shots could have caused the multiple instances of Autism that are in my family. I think there is a genetic factor to be considered. My Grandfather, my 2 uncles, and 3 of my cousins (all male) as well as my son all have AS. There MUST be a genetic link there. That many men having AS can not possibly be a fluke. I know that I am going to give my daughter the shots. I know that I have concerns about the viral load and at our next appointment we will be discussing spreading out her shots more, but I don't ever want to have to see my baby suffer Whooping cough or the measles, rotovirus...the kinds of things that we get shots for as kids. I got all the shots that babies get, plus a ton more at 9 months of age because we moved to the Middle East. I didn't "get" autism from all those shots. I think our kids are wired differently, and that is exactly what I tell my son. We have struggles with behavior, and attitude, and I know a large part of his issues are because he doesn't get social rules, but he is who he is. I wouldn't change him for anything in the world. I really like, love and adore this unique, quirky little man that God gave me. I know that having a child with autism is hard, stressful and emotionally tiring, but when that angel looks up and smiles, it is worth it. Thanks again for the imput! I love all the support that is felt here. > > I'm not sure where your beef is then. People do have choices and are choosing to do their own thing. It's not been taken away from them. So all is good there. > > You said, "So no, I don't have to prove there is a cause if there is a suspicion -- I'm not a researcher, I'm a parent who knows her child and has talked to a ton of others and has researched a lot on a "mom" level." You can have your opinions but you can't say they are facts. That's all I care about here. If you don't feel the need to prove something is true before you decide it's true, that may be something that works for you personally. Not for me, though. I will demand more before I agree something is a fact. Think about it like this - they used to believe that people were witches and burn them at the stake for it. They didn't need fact or proof, they just felt it was true or had suspicions it was true. I mean you can make an example out of anything to make a point. > > Also, I did not say research should focus solely on genetics either. But nothing you've listed so far is a fact as to the cause of autism. > > Roxanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2007 Report Share Posted October 29, 2007 Awww, that's just a shame. Don't you want to shake people sometimes? I truly hate it when others jump in and try to parent my child, particularly if I'm standing right there. IMO, it sure doesn't help a child if mom steps in and fixes every little injustice he/she may experience either...meaning the other lady's son, that's life, he'll never learn either. But I love your response! I may have to steal that!! Dee DiMemmo wrote: we were in barnes & noble a while back and saber was playing with the train set that was there, he had started playing with it before another little boy came over and saber didnt want to share...the other boys mother told me that i needed to teach my son to play nice with others. i just looked at her and said he's autistic. next time i'll hang a sign around his neck to let you know. it shut her up real fast!!!! its so hard when people look at you like you're a bad parent or something, when its our kiddo not knowing how to handle a situation Donna B <donnabzygmail> wrote: Hi Debbie -- don't apologize, like you said, we all have our highs and lows. I know I've come here on a bad day plenty of times! I've got four kids, and only my youngest has autism (which, for me, bolsters my thoughts that it's toxins that have just increased through the years), but my 12 yod has seizure disorder, and I see how it affects her life too, though she is SUCH a trouper. Anyway, it's so hard watching your child try to connect and not be able to. People really downplay the social aspects, "they'll learn, they'll get by" are things I hear often. Sure, they will, but does that make it okay? Are we supposed to overlook it? We took my son to the dentist a couple of days ago, and he attempted to play with the other kids at the toy area. One boy was playing with him, but ds had to be in charge. He was telling the other boy what to do, how, when, etc. That's typical, everywhere we go, he has to be in charge. He wants it that way at home, too, so why it would be any different elsewhere makes no sense. He wants waffles for breakfast every day (when he's not on a pancake binge) but they must be sliced, dry, then have the syrup poured over. His 'coffee' (almond chocolate milk) must be in a specific cup. Everything has a way about it, and while we try to break some habits, shake things up, we choose our battles and some things just aren't worth it. Lots of years to work on that. Donna debramelamed wrote: I don't think I can agree with that statement. I know we all have our quirks and weaknesses, but my child cannot connect with his peers. How it must be to feel like an outsider amongst your peers I cannot imagine. That is why my heart breaks, that is why I personally would not have another child. I can't take the pain of seeing my son try to connect and get frustrated and anxious and then aggressive because he is hurt and angry that he can't be successful with connecting to other kids. He doesn't even know why he can't connect because he is 7 and he doesn't get it yet. There are no play dates, no friends, even my family members are telling us not to come around. It is so hard. Sorry if I am negative but I guess we all have our highs and lows and I am low right now. Debbie __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 First, this subject is over. If you continue to have a "beef" and want to call me names or make stuff up that you have decided I said, you will need to email me off this list. But taking pot shots at the list owner is just a bad idea overall. Second, you are way over stepping yourself and misconstruing what I have said. This is the major reason why there are problems between people in the autism community. There is no other way to argue with fact than to pull this stuff and people just don't like it. I don't. So I'll just move off the subject and say it more clearly - you cannot say something is a fact or a cure unless it is proven scientifically. This is a rule. Take whatever you want from that and say I called you anything you like. When it doubt, throw mud, huh? RoxannaAutism Happens Re: ( ) Larry King Live .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2007 Report Share Posted October 30, 2007 What in the world is going on? Am I missing something?Roxanna <madideas@...> wrote: First, this subject is over. If you continue to have a "beef" and want to call me names or make stuff up that you have decided I said, you will need to email me off this list. But taking pot shots at the list owner is just a bad idea overall. Second, you are way over stepping yourself and misconstruing what I have said. This is the major reason why there are problems between people in the autism community. There is no other way to argue with fact than to pull this stuff and people just don't like it. I don't. So I'll just move off the subject and say it more clearly - you cannot say something is a fact or a cure unless it is proven scientifically. This is a rule. Take whatever you want from that and say I called you anything you like. When it doubt, throw mud, huh? RoxannaAutism Happens Re: ( ) Larry King Live . __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 2, 2007 Report Share Posted November 2, 2007 Good for you! RoxannaAutism Happens Re: ( ) Re: Larry King Live we were in barnes & noble a while back and saber was playing with the train set that was there, he had started playing with it before another little boy came over and saber didnt want to share...the other boys mother told me that i needed to teach my son to play nice with others. i just looked at her and said he's autistic. next time i'll hang a sign around his neck to let you know. it shut her up real fast!!!! its so hard when people look at you like you're a bad parent or something, when its our kiddo not knowing how to handle a situationDonna B <donnabzygmail> wrote: Hi Debbie -- don't apologize, like you said, we all have our highs and lows. I know I've come here on a bad day plenty of times!I've got four kids, and only my youngest has autism (which, for me, bolsters my thoughts that it's toxins that have just increased through the years), but my 12 yod has seizure disorder, and I see how it affects her life too, though she is SUCH a trouper. Anyway, it's so hard watching your child try to connect and not be able to. People really downplay the social aspects, "they'll learn, they'll get by" are things I hear often. Sure, they will, but does that make it okay? Are we supposed to overlook it?We took my son to the dentist a couple of days ago, and he attempted to play with the other kids at the toy area. One boy was playing with him, but ds had to be in charge. He was telling the other boy what to do, how, when, etc. That's typical, everywhere we go, he has to be in charge. He wants it that way at home, too, so why it would be any different elsewhere makes no sense. He wants waffles for breakfast every day (when he's not on a pancake binge) but they must be sliced, dry, then have the syrup poured over. His 'coffee' (almond chocolate milk) must be in a specific cup. Everything has a way about it, and while we try to break some habits, shake things up, we choose our battles and some things just aren't worth it. Lots of years to work on that.Donnadebramelamed wrote: I don't think I can agree with that statement. I know we all have our quirks and weaknesses, but my child cannot connect with his peers. How it must be to feel like an outsider amongst your peers I cannot imagine. That is why my heart breaks, that is why I personally would not have another child. I can't take the pain of seeing my son try to connect and get frustrated and anxious and then aggressive because he is hurt and angry that he can't be successful with connecting to other kids. He doesn't even know why he can't connect because he is 7 and he doesn't get it yet. There are no play dates, no friends, even my family members are telling us not to come around. It is so hard. Sorry if I am negative but I guess we all have our highs and lows and I am low right now.Debbie __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 Yeah Cliff. he got it in before Larry cut them off. Maurine Nanstiel <erik@...> wrote: I'm recording the whole program and it will appear on AutismMedia.org as soon as possible.thanks, Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 I didn't get to see the show, but here is the transcript: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0904/03/lkl.01.html CNN LARRY KING LIVE No Scientific Link Between Autism and Vaccinations Aired April 3, 2009 - 21:00 ET THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED. (This is a little bit of the other side:) KING: We're back. Now the other side. In New York, Dr. Margaret Fisher, chairman, department of pediatrics, medical director at the Children's Hospital at Monmouth Medical Center. In Cleveland, Dr. Max Wiznitzer, pediatric neurologist, Rainbow Babies in Children's Hospital in Cleveland. He's been dealing with autistic children for 25 years. And in Washington, our old friend Dr. Bernardine Healey, health editor, " U.S. News and World Report " and former director of the National Institutes of Health. All right, Dr. Fisher, an overview of what we have just heard. What do you think? DR. MARGARET FISHER, THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: An overview? Well, I think we have heard some very interesting things about autism. I am disappointed that they were so negative about the American Academy of Pediatrics. The mission of our academy is actually to ensure the health and the well-being of all children. Immunizations have really been a part of our effort to ensure that safety. We know that if you stop immunizing children, you will see the diseases come back. And I know they said they don't want to stop immunizing, but two of those vaccines that have been added since the 1980s are the vaccine against Homofluous (ph) Influenza type B and the vaccine against the Numacocus (ph). These are two very serious bacterial infections that really do harm to children. Before the Homofluous vaccine, there were 20,000 case of invasive disease each year and 1,000 deaths. That's three deaths a day. We don't want it to come back. KING: What causes autism, in your opinion? If not vaccines, what does? DR. MAX WIZNITZER, PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGIST: Well, we know that in about 10 percent to 15 percent of the cases, we can identify a genetic causation, unlike the number that was quoted before hand. The research as its moved forward and we have been able to look at genes more closely, we can get that information. We also know that from studies, family studies and such, that autism has a strong genetic basis and it's prenatally based, which kids are born with the tendency. Whether they show the tendency at age one month or show it at one year or at two years is very dependent on what's going on with them. It's not just as simple as saying it's one thing. It's autism, there's multiple reasons why it occurs. KING: Dr. Wiznitzer, do you dismiss vaccines as not being involved? WIZNITZER: I do. In fact I'm a bit concerned. Initially the complaint was Mercury. That was disproven. Then the complaint was MMR. That was disproven. Now we've got a new moving target, which is that the combined vaccines all together that do this. We can only spend our research money so far before we basically say, let's put it where we know for sure we can help, and not just on speculative ideas. KING: Dr. Healey, what are your thoughts? DR. BERNADINE HEALEY, FMR. PRESIDENT, AMERICAN RED CROSS: I think one has to listen to the families of these children. I have always believed, you listen the patients and the patients will teach. I think there are many legitimate concerns that families have. And I honestly believe that the focus that we have on autism today and the embarrassing recognition that we know so little about it, in terms of what causes it, in terms of how to treat it, in terms of whether it's dynamic, whether it's structural, I think that says that we have neglected this disease for all too long in the face of this growing epidemic. We have got to focus on it and we have got to listen to families. And I think that environmental triggers in the context of a genetic predisposition makes a lot of sense. But we don't have the foggiest notion of what those environmental triggers are. Vaccines might be one of those components. Let's respect that and let's investigate it. And I don't think it's been fully investigated. KING: We'll come right back. If you want more information about autism, go to CNN.com/Autism There's comprehensive information for those of you with more questions. Honestly, we've got it for you. Stay with us. We'll be right back. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) KING: Dr. Fisher, isn't Dr. Healey right when she says listen to the parents? FISHER: Absolutely. I couldn't have agreed with her more. Every pediatrician knows that if you want to find out what's the matter with the children, you have to talk to the parents. They're the ones who are living with them. They're the ones who are with them all the time. KING: So when all these parents say too many vaccines, we have added too many vaccines -- there used to be three and now there's 30 -- they associate that with the cause. Shouldn't your organization or the association listen to them? FISHER: The organization does listen to them. And we also listen to all of the other parents who are asking us to protect their children with vaccines. In Pennsylvania right now, there is an outbreak, a resurgence of Homofluous influenza disease. Those three deaths that have occurred already this year are in children who were not immunized. There are lots of parents who want to know about the vaccines, who want to know how to protect their children against infectious disease. Clearly, those are the children, the parents we need to listen to as well. So, yes, pediatricians have to listen to their parents. KING: At what age should pediatricians start screening for autism? WIZNITZER: We have screening that is basically recommended at age 18 months and 24 months. Obviously, if there's concerns that are raised earlier, it should be done. KING: What do you think causes it? WIZNITZER: I think what it is you're born with a tendency towards it. As Dr. Healey has stated, there's work being done right now trying to look for environmental causes. Are there factors that may tip them over? As far as we know right now, vaccines aren't those kind of factors. But there could be easily be factors that affect the brain prenatally, before birth. We know that exposure to certain drugs before birth clearly can cause autistic features in children after they're born. KING: Aren't you at least impressed a little with the association of vaccine as presented by the other side? Doesn't that give you pause? WIZNITZER: I have heard this for many, many years. But, more importantly, I have looked at the actual medical literature. I have looked at what people have said from both sides. I've asked people questions. It's not simply someone coming to me and saying, my child has had a change in his behavior and he looked autistic after he got a certain vaccine. You need to ask questions more closely. What was the child like before hand? Were there any other features that might have been there? Is that temporal association, that time association actually real? Could it have been longer or could it have been shorter? Most of the time I find out that the associations that the parents were concerned about really couldn't be supported. KING: Are we just at the tip of the iceberg, Dr. Healey? Is there still so much more to go and to learn? HEALEY: I think you have nailed it, Larry. I think there is so much more to learn. Simple things like a comparisons of children who have and have not been vaccinated. This is something that we have talked about doing for many years. It has not been done. It can be done through various models, through case control model models. It can be done retrospectively. It has to be done. Also, looking specifically at the children with progressive autism, the kids who were just fine, and then, shortly after immunization, they have a high fever, likely have an ensefalopothy (ph), and they never come pack from it. We need to look at that subset of patients. Study 500 of those kids. Do you know, Larry, we have 5,000 children who are in the vaccine course, and they're sitting there in a lawyer environment. The CDC has not gone and analyzed those 5,000 children. These are children that have passed a certain screen, children who have had significant health problems right after they have been vaccinated, usually multiple times, and we haven't connected. So I think part of what's missing here, we have got to stop all this battling and we've got to honor each other's perspective and we've got to do a lot of research. That's where, Larry, I think there is an inexcusable issue. And that's the lack of research that's been done here. And I really don't believe that this is a closed case from a research point of view. And I think you can talk to the NIH, you can look at what has been discussed in recent panels about what we don't know, and then you will say, let's carry on with research. And now there's moneys to do it, there's a means to do it. Let's get on it and let's shake hands and do it together. KING: More about autism in 60 seconds. Stay with us. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) KING: Dr. Fisher, are you concerned that so much ground has been made by the other side, the other side has presented in the first half of this show, that you're going to have more problems with autism? FISHER: No. I'm not sure what you're getting at. KING: I'm trying to see, when they focus so much on the negative, people are going to drop -- they're going to stop vaccinating. A lot of people are going to stop vaccinating. I didn't mean more problems with autism. More problems with health? FISHER: Sure. We are concerned that if people stop vaccinating, we will see the reemergence of these infectious diseases. They haven't gone away and we want to ensure that children are protected. KING: Dr. Wiznitzer, you're not denying the sincerity of these people, though, are you? WIZNITZER: No. In fact if I could just make a quick comment from what Dr. Healey had mentioned; the NIH is doing research looking at regressive autism. One of my friends who's doing the research tells me she's having a hard time recruiting patients because when people claim regression, it turns out, when she investigates very closely, it wasn't regression. But going back to what you asked me before, yes, I do not doubt their sincerity in the least. And I think that it's very important that people always voice concerns when they have them. It happens in my practice. It should happen in any doctor's office. However, we need to look at the concerns. We need to be open minded on both sides, so that we can basically look at these issues and say do they have validity or not? KING: Dr. Healey, are you pessimistic or optimistic in this area? HEALEY: I think we haven't had the come to Jesus session yet that says, wait a minute, this polarization is very negative. It's not good for the children and it's not good for the science. Quite frankly, Larry, there is no such thing as anti-vaccine and pro- vaccine. We are all pro-vaccine. We know what Polio is. We know Meningitis is. We know what we want to avoid. But there are some vaccines here -- let's forget about autism. There are some vaccines here that one -- a parent can legitimately question: giving a one-day old baby, or a two-day old baby Hepatitis B vaccine, that has no risk for it. The mother has no risk for it. That's a heavy duty vaccine given on day two, at two months, at four months. I think those are legitimate questions. I think there has to be more flexibility and we need to have people smiling at each other, saying we're hearing you, let's move forward. KING: And to be friends. HEALEY: Let's be friends and nobody's anti-vaccine here. KING: Thanks Dr. Healey, always good seeing you. Dr. Wiznitzer and Dr. Fisher remain. Returning will be J.B. Hanley and Dr. Kartzinel. One thing is for certain about autism, it's subject to great debate. Opposing sides are here next. They'll get right into it. Don't go away. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) KING: All right, our panel now assembles together. I'll start with you, Dr. Kartzinel. What did you think of what you just heard with the other respective doctors in Cleveland and New York. KARTZINEL: I think they made some very good points, especially about doing studies with children who haven't been vaccinated. When you look at smoking, for example, when you look at smokers and the rates of lung cancer, it didn't become apparent until they compared that to non-smokers. Then the lung cancer rates were high. We need to look at these diseases, whether it be childhood asthma or attention deficit order or autism, and look at them among those who were vaccinated and compare them to those who weren't. KING: Are you saying it will show that vaccinations played a part? KARTZINEL: Absolutely. KING: How will you respond to that, Dr. Wiznitzer? WIZNITZER: Years ago, I thought about this idea among the Amish population here in northeast Ohio, to whom I am actually the neurologist. And I went to the public health nurses and said, tell me about their vaccination rates. And I was told that there is a very high rate of vaccination amongst the Amish population. Out of ten thousand of individuals in our population, we have one child with autism. I see all these children. The fact is, we can't basically use the argument. It's much more complex than just vaccinated versus unvaccinated. KING: J.B. Hanley, they were saying earlier that they're not against you. They're open to listen to you. They just disagree with what you're saying. HANLEY: The AAP doesn't listen at all, Larry. They never look at recovered children. They never look at recovered children. They rubber stamp every vaccine on the schedule. Dr. Fisher never answered why so few companies have picked up varicella flue roto virus (ph). Meantime, AAP rubber stamps every vaccine, like Gardasil (ph), which is damaging teenaged girls right now, which will likely be pulled from the market very soon. There is the AAP rubber stamp on that vaccine. KING: Dr. Fisher? FISHER: We hardly rubber stamp any vaccine. The American Academy of Pediatrics listens very closely before a vaccine is recommended for use. It goes through extensive trials. It goes through extensive information. All of that information is reviewed very quickly. It's both efficacy and safety information. There's never a rubber stamp. We work very closely before, while the vaccine is being tested to see if it works, it is safe? And only if it's been determined to be safe and effective is it recommended for use. It's not a rubber stamp. HANLEY: What about the other countries picked up the vaccine? FISHER: These vaccines are costly. In addition to the number of vaccines, have you looked at what's happened to the price of vaccinating a child? HANLEY: We're talking about first-world companies like Germany, the UK, France, Finland who haven't taken on varicella, roto virus, flu, and those vaccines have been on the market for ten years. How can you tell me it's a cost issue? And if these vaccines are so damn important to our kids, why aren't these other countries picking up the vaccines? FISHER: What I can tell you is the reason we recommend these vaccines in this country is -- HANLEY: You're not answering the question. KING: Let her answer. FISHER: I don't know what they do in Germany or the UK or anywhere else, nor do I suspect you know how they make those decisions. (CROSS TALK) FISHER: No, it doesn't. I'm concerned about how we make the decisions here. And since I have been part of some of those decisions, I know that the information about the safety and the efficacy of those vaccines is looked at very closely. KING: Doctor, you said earlier -- I think you said earlier, that this is big money and that to the pharmaceutical companies, this is big money. And you implied that the pharmaceutical companies sort of own your profession, true? KARTZINEL: Well, that wasn't quite it. But I did show the ad that they put into our journal. But the thing is, in real time right now, what I'm really concerned about is the fact that these children -- we're talking about children who were wounded by vaccines, hundreds of thousands of them. The estimates are now a million of our kids -- we're not talking about -- (CROSS TALK) KARTZINEL: Wounded, they are screaming, up all night. They are financially devastating to these families, spiritually devastating to these families. They can't get medical care. Pediatricians don't want to treat them. They don't take their time to answer the questions. They've got a ten minute time slot. HANLEY: Larry, we have no idea what the combination risk of our vaccine schedule looks like. At the two-month visit, a child gets six vaccines in under 15 minutes. The only way to test that properly would be to have a group of kids who get all six and a group of kids who get none and see what happens. They don't do that testing. They have no idea. KING: Doctor Wiznitzer, the CDC says autism impacts about one in 150 children. But is the incidence going up or is it the way children are being counted? WIZNITZER: It's a very complicated issue. Studies have been done and people have actually looked at this study even this year in their publications. And they've shown that issues such as diagnostic substitution, which means they had previous diagnosis, that we have loosening of the diagnostic criteria. An example would be if, all of a sudden in baseball, we moved the outfield wall 100 feet closer; we pump the players up with steroids, and then say, look they broke the baseball record for home runs over and over and over again. When you change the rules of how you make diagnosis, and that to some degree has happened, people are loosening up. Kids with social issues are being labeled as autistic. The majority -- I think we can account for at least 80 percent of the increased prevalence with those numbers. There's 20 percent of people still have -- KARTZINEL: How do you propose that we narrow that and make those people go away. They're not going to go away. WIZNITZER: Let me finish. KING: Go ahead, doctor. WIZNITZER: The other 20 percent, we basically have to keep looking. Issues that have been raised by government agencies, either potential environmental factors outside the issue of vaccines? Are there other genetic reasons? Are there other factors that we failed to recognize? That all has to be looked at. KING: I got to get one more break. We'll be right back. Do you think autism can be cured? That's tonight's quick vote question. Go to CNN.com/LarryKing and cast your ballot. More after this. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) KING: A comment from Carly, our guest blogger with autism: " it's the kids that are lost, because the parents are missing the cues by their children while they're wrapped up in all this. " Question for Dr. Fisher. There's a debate over vaccine schedules. What do you recommend? FISHER: What I recommend is the schedule that's been developed by the Centers for Disease Control, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practitioners. And that schedule has a reason. We know that children are born with the antibodies from their moms, so they're protected for that first six months of life. The reason we give so many vaccines in the first six months is so that we don't leave those children unprotected. As they lose their mother's antibody, we want them to make their own antibody. Before we had Homofluous vaccine, we began seeing this disease at six months, seven months, eight months, a year. We don't want to leave children unprotected. We want to give them the best possible protection as soon as possible. KING: J.B. Hanley wanted to respond to something Doctor Wiznitzer said. HANLEY: I want to talk about this issue of autism prevalence. It's going to be shocking for parents to learn that the CDC and the AAP don't actually acknowledge that there's been a real rise in autism cases. Larry, the Department of Education in 1992, 16,000 kids were getting autism services. Today 225,000. That means in 1992, they were missing 93 percent of kids with autism. Where are all the adults with autism? They don't exist. These numbers are real. But if you never acknowledge there's been a real rise, you don't have to find an environmental agent that caused it. WIZNITZER: May I answer? KING: Go ahead. WIZNITZER: First of all, in 1992, we weren't counting as much as we are counting now. Number two, families recognized the value of having the diagnosis for their children to get services and there's lots of services and lots of money that follows it. Number three, as these individuals get older, frequently they become less symptomatic, and you may no longer see the full blown features of autism. And that raises the issue of what do we do with them when they get older? How do we make sure that they have quality lives? How do we make sure they have quality work, quality living resources? That's also something we need to focus on. HANLEY: Did you see the January study from UC using California's numbers that said unequivocally there's been a clear rise, it's not do to diagnostic substitution. WIZNITZER: Mr. Hanley, you're misrepresenting the study. I read it. Actually they stated that diagnostic substitution was one of the reasons why that rise is occurring. More importantly, that is not an epidemiological study. That is looking at a database. If you look at the documents from the department there, they tell you not to be used for epidemiological -- (CROSS TALK) KING: We have obviously skimmed the surface. We are going to do a lot more on this in the days and months ahead. I guarantee it. Thank our panelists all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Well now how they really know that all these diseases would come back if they stopped their " immunizations " b/c they won't let the shots stop.. so how they do they really know for sure? Have to finish this later. Tired kids Nita (crew chief) and the crew: 16, Jon 14, 12, 10, 7, Christian (7/16/03 to 8/22/04), 3 and Isaac, 1 http://momof6.dotphoto.com <http://momof6.dotphoto.com/> for not necessarily current pictures http://nitasspot.blogspot.com Learn from the mistakes of others. Trust me... you can't live long enough to make them all yourself. Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1784 - Release Date: 11/12/2008 7:01 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 The purpose of which is to create fear (False Evidence Appearing Real) and sell more vaccines. From: Venita Garner <nitagarner@...> Subject: RE: Re: LARRY KING LIVE Vaccinations Date: Sunday, April 5, 2009, 7:47 PM Well now how they really know that all these diseases would come back if they stopped their " immunizations " b/c they won't let the shots stop.. so how they do they really know for sure? Have to finish this later. Tired kids Nita (crew chief) and the crew: 16, Jon 14, 12, 10, 7, Christian (7/16/03 to 8/22/04), 3 and Isaac, 1 http://momof6.dotphoto.com <http://momof6.dotphoto.com/> for not necessarily current pictures http://nitasspot.blogspot.com Learn from the mistakes of others. Trust me... you can't live long enough to make them all yourself. Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.2/1784 - Release Date: 11/12/2008 7:01 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 <<<Homofluous influenza disease.>>>> Is this the flu vaccine he is talking about???? >>>>FISHER: The organization does listen to them. And we also listen to all of the other parents who are asking us to protect their children with vaccines. In Pennsylvania right now, there is an outbreak, a resurgence of Homofluous influenza disease. Those three deaths that have occurred already this year are in children who were not immunized. There are lots of parents who want to know about the vaccines, who want to know how to protect their children against infectious disease.>>>>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2009 Report Share Posted April 5, 2009 Haemophilus influenza B or HiB. Never saw it in my life - only heard about it after a vax was produced. Seems it's caused by...vaccines! Don't know anyone who ever got it. From: genaqu <gena@...> Subject: Re: LARRY KING LIVE Vaccinations Date: Sunday, April 5, 2009, 8:10 PM <<<Homofluous influenza disease.>>>> Is this the flu vaccine he is talking about???? >>>>FISHER: The organization does listen to them. And we also listen to all of the other parents who are asking us to protect their children with vaccines. In Pennsylvania right now, there is an outbreak, a resurgence of Homofluous influenza disease. Those three deaths that have occurred already this year are in children who were not immunized. There are lots of parents who want to know about the vaccines, who want to know how to protect their children against infectious disease.>>>>> ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 > > Haemophilus influenza B or HiB. Never saw it in my life - only heard about it after a vax was produced. Seems it's caused by...vaccines! Don't know anyone who ever got it. > From my understanding, it's a bacteria that can cause meningitis, pnemonia, blood infection, epiglotitis(spelling?)So in the past, people would just hear that someone had meningitis. There usually would not be a specific microbe mentioned. Conventional science states that it used to be number one cause of childhood meningitis. I know of one case of meningitis in the 8o's who is alive and doing fine. My mom's best friend lost her firstborn son to meninigits in 1970's. Nobody know what bacteria caused it; was it HIB, meningococal, pnemococal, etc. The cases that happened in PA worry me very much. Too close to home(i am in NJ)One boy who was already old (4 years old) and was supposedly completely unvaxed because they were religious. The did not use any conventional medicine at all and they never too him to hospital for antibiotics and the boy died at home after a week of febrile fever. This is scarry, and if true, shows that we do need medicial care in instances like these. His body did not fight it off and the boy died. I am doing research on HIB and other bacterial meningitis and might consider these vaccines after all. None of the other diseases scare me more than deadly meningitis. Kaarina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 I totally understand as meningitis scares me too. However, I have not read anything that would make me think the vaccine would protect a child. There are many causes of meningitis and over all causes are much higher in vaccinated children than unvaccinated. I know it is scary, but the only cases they put in the mainstream news are the unvaccinated ones. They can say anything they want. Vaccinated children die from meningitis too, but they do not print those stories. Many things can cause those infections, just because the Hib bacteria is present they automatically blame it on that, but who knows if that is the real cause. Many cases of meningitis have no identifiable bacteria present. Plus, most people harmlessly carry these bacteria in their body. Maybe they are just innocent bystanders. Anyways, meningitis still scares me, but so do the vaccines and I am not convinced they would work. This family with the child that died, it is very sad, but they should have definitely seeked help. Plus, just because he was unvaccinated, we don't know what their other lifestyles were. Vida > > > > Haemophilus influenza B or HiB. Never saw it in my life - only heard about it after a vax was produced. Seems it's caused by...vaccines! Don't know anyone who ever got it. > > > From my understanding, it's a bacteria that can cause meningitis, pnemonia, blood infection, epiglotitis(spelling?)So in the past, people would just hear that someone had meningitis. There usually would not be a specific microbe mentioned. Conventional science states that it used to be number one cause of childhood meningitis. I know of one case of meningitis in the 8o's who is alive and doing fine. My mom's best friend lost her firstborn son to meninigits in 1970's. Nobody know what bacteria caused it; was it HIB, meningococal, pnemococal, etc. The cases that happened in PA worry me very much. Too close to home(i am in NJ)One boy who was already old (4 years old) and was supposedly completely unvaxed because they were religious. The did not use any conventional medicine at all and they never too him to hospital for antibiotics and the boy died at home after a week of febrile fever. This is scarry, and if true, shows that we do need medicial care in instances like these. His body did not fight it off and the boy died. I am doing research on HIB and other bacterial meningitis and might consider these vaccines after all. None of the other diseases scare me more than deadly meningitis. > > Kaarina > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 *Thank you for posting this! I'm on dial up, so it's very helpful From: genaqu <gena@...> Subject: Re: LARRY KING LIVE Vaccinations Date: Sunday, April 5, 2009, 9:27 PM I didn't get to see the show, but here is the transcript: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0904/03/lkl.01.html CNN LARRY KING LIVE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Vaccinated children die from meningitis > too, but they do not print those stories. And vaccinated children die from vaccines, too, and they don't print any of those stories, either. Winnie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Don't worry if it's close. Bugs are geographically illiterate. They like unhealthy human terrain. That poor little boy must have been quite deficient nutrition-wise. The other cases were also not vaccinated? The thing is quarter of the population exists with it in their bodies, yet never have any signs of disease. It is kept in check, not by vaccines, but by good nutrition, adequate sleep etc. What vaccines do is poison ALL the children who are given them, including the 75% who would never have come into contact with it under normal circumstances. The figures I've read are that the vaccine is only 85% effective and it's not even for all strains either. One year our equivalent of VAERS had 4 SIDS noted following vaccination - oddly one was in a 2yr old. Crib death in a 2yr old? In a population of 3.5m with probably less than 10% of vaccine reactions reported, we are safer refusing vaccines. In one 5 yr period, our govt insurer paid out to the families of 44 brain-damaged-by-vaccine children. One in a million, they assured us! It is very tough to win a vaccine claim, believe me.It is tough to even have your claim recognised as a possibility and be allowed to pursue the claim. Another 70 families were not permitted to pursue. How many more would never guess that it was the DPT that had killed or injured their children. When my son reacted to the DPT, the first thing that was done to him in hospital was a lumbar puncture to check for meningitis. His CNS WAS damaged, but it wasn't from meningitis. I know of far more people who have been injured by vaccines, than have had meningitis. Also, this has to be a worry: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8762955 Haemophilus influenzae meningitis following vaccination. Consequence or coincidence?In the 60's non-vaxers used to agonise over the polio vaccine in much the same way as parents are encouraged to fear meningitis today. Just like meningitis, one of the first symptoms was a stiff neck and back! So is meningitis just one of the many names that polio was given after the introduction of the polio vaccines to disguise the fact that the vaccines didn't work? www.whale.to/vaccine/polio1.html There was one boy I knew who got meningitis at high school in the 60's. We were told it was from swimming in hot pools. Who knows? He survived but the AB treatment made him deaf! Odd that no one else swimming in the hot pools succumbed. From: Katarina <kkatkov@...> Subject: Re: LARRY KING LIVE Vaccinations Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 6:45 AM > > Haemophilus influenza B or HiB. Never saw it in my life - only heard about it after a vax was produced. Seems it's caused by...vaccines! Don't know anyone who ever got it. > From my understanding, it's a bacteria that can cause meningitis, pnemonia, blood infection, epiglotitis(spelling?)So in the past, people would just hear that someone had meningitis. There usually would not be a specific microbe mentioned. Conventional science states that it used to be number one cause of childhood meningitis. I know of one case of meningitis in the 8o's who is alive and doing fine. My mom's best friend lost her firstborn son to meninigits in 1970's. Nobody know what bacteria caused it; was it HIB, meningococal, pnemococal, etc. The cases that happened in PA worry me very much.. Too close to home(i am in NJ)One boy who was already old (4 years old) and was supposedly completely unvaxed because they were religious. The did not use any conventional medicine at all and they never too him to hospital for antibiotics and the boy died at home after a week of febrile fever. This is scarry, and if true, shows that we do need medicial care in instances like these. His body did not fight it off and the boy died. I am doing research on HIB and other bacterial meningitis and might consider these vaccines after all. None of the other diseases scare me more than deadly meningitis. Kaarina ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.