Guest guest Posted April 27, 2008 Report Share Posted April 27, 2008 >>> , What are your thoughts on Trienza? Appears to be a fine broad-spectrum enzyme product. Note a serving is 2 capsules, not 1 capsule, to get all the enzyme activities listed on the label. So there is not much difference in taking 1 Peptizyde and 1 Zyme Prime or 2 capsules of Trienza. The dosing is divided out differently. Of course, most companies already have some type of all-in-one broad- spectrum product. Most of the robust ones for autism also say 2 capsules / serving for a full dose. Digest Gold, however, lists 1 capsule per serving. So when doing cost comparisons with any products, remember to factor in the number of capsules per serving. In the grand scheme of things, you want to get whatever is working the best for you. However, since I have not been able to get a money-tree to grow in my backyard, and we have several people taking enzymes, cost is a consideration on some level. The advantage of an all-in-one enzyme product, and why other companies have traditionally done this, is because if you are having a snack or small amount of food, you can give 1 capsule and get some of all the different types of enzymes, instead of having to give capsules from 2 or 3 different products to get all the different types of enzymes. Giving more capsules of an all-in-one increases the doses of all enzyme across the board. In the case of HNI products, this meant that if a child had a snack, the parent may have felt they HAD to give 1 Peptizyde, 1 Zyme Prime, and possibly 1 No-Fenol just to eat a snack. Since the zyme didn't have the gluten/casein enzymes in it, you generally had to give at least two products, 1 Peptizyde and 1 Zyme Prime. With Trienza, you can give 1 capsule and still get some gluten/casein protease activity in there. In this case, the all-in- one is an advantage, just like all the other all-in-one enzyme products have this advantage. The disadvantage of an all-in-one, is the same basic reason. If you ONLY want to increase or decrease some particular enzyme in the mix, you have to increase or decrease all the enzymes proportionately. For example, if you really want additional gluten-casein activity, you have to give lots more Trienza capsules just to get the proteases up. OR if the child is flipping out and extra hyper/distressed because the protease levels are too high initially, you have to decrease ALL the enzymes in the Trienza just to get the levels of proteases down. In this case, the all-in-one is a disadvantage, just like all the other all-in-one enzyme products have this disadvantage. As far as all-in-one / broad-spectrum products go, there are other all-in-one products with 2 capsules per dose that have unique features which makes them definitely worth consideration. Klaire's Vital-Zyme Complete has a bonus in that it was one of the first added gluten-casein DPP IV protease blend, no fruity-enzymes, AND lysozyme to help control pathogens, and serratiopeptidase! Lysozyme can be very beneficial however is associated with egg whites. If you have allergy to eggs, better look at something else. http://www.klaire.com/K-VZM_proddetail.htm Kirkman's MAXIMUM Complete (not the other enzyme completes) has the added bonus of the Isogest stuff which has been reported to help with carb intolerances for whatever reason, and it also has the gluten-casein DPP IV protease blend, and (finally!) no fruity- enzymes. I am making an issue here of the Maximum because for a long time Kirkman used more fruit-derived enzymes than most companies, including actinidin, which seems a little odd when working with a target audience that has high levels of sensitivities to these ingredients. The Maximum does not have these. So, even if you are using a Kirkman general enzyme and happy with the results, try at least 1 bottle of the Maximum the next time around to see if this may give even a little better results. http://www.kirkmanlabs.com/products/enzymes/MaxSpecZym.html It also appears that the Trienza has some misleading, at best, descriptions - which can be a pain or hassle-factor when vendors do this. The site advertises " no fillers " several times, yet the bottle clearly lists MCT in the ingredient list in the capsule. Whether you want to word-play over fillers/excipients/enhancers/in-the-primary-product-vs-in-the-capsule or whatever, there is extra " stuff " in the capsule that is not an enzyme. And this is the point parents are interested in: what is in the product that my child might react to? Yes, there IS extra stuff, MCT, in the capsule. By the way, the Maximum also has the MCT and they do not claim the product has " no fillers. " MCT has only come up as an issue if you have a particular sensitivity or allergy to coconut or related fat. It is generally considered a very tame filler. Klaire's product lists L- leucine. Klaire's disclosure goes so far as to list the water that is part of all capsules as an ingredient! Enzymedica's products truly have NO fillers. Nada, Nothing. Just enzymes in a capsule. That's it. Is costs more to achieve that, but contributes to some sensitive people being able to use those products where they have problems with other ones. The fillers issue may not be a deal-breaker for many people, but if you are highly sensitive person, it can mean the entire difference between success with enzymes or not being able to use them at all - and thus, miss out on a very important gut-healing measure. This is one reason that Lacto is an awesome " best bet " enzyme product to start with when you have really bad gut injury or are very sensitive. You skip any potential issues with fillers. Later on with gut healing this tends to be less of an issue. Another point is Trienza advertises the " Cellulase enzyme was not added to this product so you don't have to worry about using TriEnza with time-released medications. " This has been discussed before. There IS cellulase activity in the product particularly due to xylanase and other hemi-cellulases. And this does *not* mean you can be worry-free with time-released medications. [several enzyme manufacturers are now looking into this specific issue and I will post anything as soon as I know it.] The thing is, the product can be sold as a regular broad-spectrum product without having to bring up the " no filler " or cellulase issues, and thus introduce doubt overall with unnecessary items to the marketing pitch. It makes it necessary to have to double-check every claim on every product. I hope this gives various aspects to consider on any type of enzyme product. As for giving two capsules per meal, you can also consider giving 1 capsule of a broad- spectrum product and 1 of a specialty-targeted product for your particular needs. For example, if it is gluten/casein, consider a broad-spectum plus a gluten/casein-targeting enzymes. Or if it is carbohydrates, consider a broad-spectrum plus some heavier on carbs. For fat digestion, make the second capsule one of the high lipase enzymes mentioned previously in this group. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.