Guest guest Posted February 17, 2002 Report Share Posted February 17, 2002 http://www.heraldtribune.com/frontpage/story.cfm?ID=62437 Report cites sludge concerns The EPA can't ensure that humans are safe from recycled waste. posted 02/16/02 STAFF REPORT DESOTO COUNTY -- Just as officials here are backing off efforts to ban sludge, a federal investigation has found that the stew of recycled human waste may be more dangerous than previously thought. The inspector general of the Environmental Protection Agency says the government can't ensure that humans are safe from the viruses, bacteria and toxins contained in sludge. And despite growing safety worries, the EPA has cut money, staff and oversight since allowing sludge to be used as fertilizer in the 1990s, the investigation found. " The agency can neither investigate nor keep track of all of the complaints of adverse health effects that are reported, " the internal watchdog wrote in a draft report obtained by The Associated Press. " There are indications that more research is needed on risks to human health from pathogens in sludge, " the draft states. More than 4 million tons of recycled wastewater sewage are spread on rural and suburban properties across America each year. In Florida, much of the state's sludge ends up in DeSoto County, where it is used as fertilizer for citrus crops and cattle fields. After years of complaints from residents that the sludge was making them sick and polluting the area, including pristine Horse Creek, the county last year banned the least-treated sludge, known as Class B. But the main sludge hauler in the county, Azurix -- a subsidiary of Enron -- sued, claiming the ban usurped federal laws allowing sludge. A federal judge agreed and overturned the ban. Azurix and the county are trying to work out a settlement agreement. The two sides are scheduled to meet Monday to discuss terms of the settlement. The agreement would allow sludge, but regulate it. Currently DeSoto has no laws regulating sludge. Former DeSoto County resident Mari Hollingsworth said the EPA report verifies what she already knows -- that sludge is dangerous. Two of Hollingsworth's children were hospitalized after sludge was dumped near her DeSoto County home, and she has been fighting to ban sludge in DeSoto ever since. " I think people are finally starting to realize what's going on, especially the EPA, " said Hollingsworth, who now lives in Charlotte County. " It's time to stop pointing fingers and figure out what to do about sludge. I don't want other families to have to go through what me and my kids lived through. " The EPA has asked the National Research Council, a panel of distinguished scientists, to study any possible health concerns related to sludge recycling, but has no evidence it is unsafe. " We have thousands of workers in sewage treatment plants and handling biosolids all the time, every day. We have tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, handling raw manure. There is no evidence these people are any sicker than the general population, " said Mike Cook, the EPA's director of wastewater and management. With tougher clean water and air rules and declining landfill space, during the 1990s the government approved the use of sludge as fertilizer on fields. It is most commonly spread on rural and suburban properties, especially farms. There are two forms of sludge -- the less common is so heavily treated that it is not believed to contain any detectable poisons. The other and more common recycled sludge is treated but still contains bacteria, viruses, toxins and parasites. The harmful substances can include salmonella, typhoid, dysentery, hepatitis, rotaviruses and tapeworms. Sarasota, Manatee and Charlotte counties combined produce more than 6,000 tons of this minimally treated sludge a year. Sarasota sends most of its sludge to DeSoto. Manatee had been sending its sludge there until November, when it began disposing of it in Manatee. Charlotte dumps its sludge on a farm that straddles the Charlotte-DeSoto county line. The inspector general report comes amid growing concerns among some states, communities and federal scientists that using sludge as fertilizer may not be as safe as thought. Those concerns have prompted several counties in California, Florida and Virginia and more than 60 towns in Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania to place restrictions or bans on sludge recycling. Staff writer Carroll and The Associated Press contributed to this report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.