Guest guest Posted October 8, 2006 Report Share Posted October 8, 2006 > > We just found out that our baby play group has had 2 outbreaks of > Roseola. We were exposed last week and didn't know it. I'm just trying > to take my vitamins and get lots of rest to avoid it. Whats > interesting though is that both babies that have it were vaccinated > within two weeks of the rash. I believe it was their six month visit. > Could this just be a coincidence? > Actually, I looked at the dates and it was within a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 Do you mean Rubella? There is no vaccine for Roseola. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your question. If you're just asking is it possible that the vaccines they received lowered their resistance and they developed Roseola soon afterwards, yes, that's quite possible. Vaccines cause the immune system to go haywire, leaving one more susceptible to all kinds of illnesses. My son had Roseola when he was 12 months old... fever of 105 then a rash on his body when the fever broke. My daughter was 2 at the time and never did get it. It's not something you have to be concerned about getting, as it is a disease of young children, typically 1-3 years old. How old is you baby? Are you still breast feeding? That will be your baby's best defense. HTH Kay Re: Roseola > >> >> We just found out that our baby play group has had 2 outbreaks of >> Roseola. We were exposed last week and didn't know it. I'm just trying >> to take my vitamins and get lots of rest to avoid it. Whats >> interesting though is that both babies that have it were vaccinated >> within two weeks of the rash. I believe it was their six month visit. >> Could this just be a coincidence? >> > Actually, I looked at the dates and it was within a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 It would be interesting to know what vaccines they got. My grandson (now age 10) had 2 cases of roseola between his first and second birthdays. He was very sick with it, which is not common. One night we rushed him to the hospital with a high fever and limp body. They misdiagnosed him then and put him on antibiotics (!) saying he had 2 bad ear infections (no symptoms for that) the following Monday he broke out in the rash and I took him to the Ped and he said he didn't have ear infections but Roseola. He regressed into autism at age 23 months after his last round of shots. Since then I have read papers about children with autism having the HHV-6 (7?) virus and I do think there is a connection between Tristan's autism and HHV-6 which is the Roseola virus. There is no doubt that vaccines caused his autism, but the exact culprit in the vaccines is hard to pinpoint. Some think it is the mercury, others the MMR and others think HHV-6 is the culprit. It is horrifying to see that more toddlers are regressing into autism from vaccines (my opinion) and still the medical cartel denies the dangers. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 I think she meant they had other vaccinations and the rash appeared and then diagnosed as Roseola. I think it is interesting also The vaccines lower the immunity making susceptible to other illness, whatever that might be Or the doctor is diagnosing roseola based on the symptom picture and actually caused by the vaccine Either way I think you are very right that the vaccines may very well be what contributed to their illness Sheri At 08:30 AM 10/9/2006 -0400, you wrote: >Do you mean Rubella? There is no vaccine for Roseola. Or maybe I'm >misunderstanding your question. If you're just asking is it possible that >the vaccines they received lowered their resistance and they developed >Roseola soon afterwards, yes, that's quite possible. Vaccines cause the >immune system to go haywire, leaving one more susceptible to all kinds of >illnesses. > >My son had Roseola when he was 12 months old... fever of 105 then a rash on >his body when the fever broke. My daughter was 2 at the time and never did >get it. It's not something you have to be concerned about getting, as it >is a disease of young children, typically 1-3 years old. How old is you >baby? Are you still breast feeding? That will be your baby's best defense. > >HTH > >Kay> -------------------------------------------------------- Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales UK $$ Donations to help in the work - accepted by Paypal account earthmysteriestours@... voicemail US 530-740-0561 (go to http://www.paypal.com) or by mail Vaccines - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm Vaccine Dangers On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Reality of the Diseases & Treatment - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccineclass.htm Homeopathy On-Line course - http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 If you do mean Roseola, I would guess that is was not a vaccination side effect, but that they caught it when the were in the doctors office getting their shots. Roseola is contracted by either airborne or saliva and so if there was a baby at the docs office with Roseola before they got there, then it is likely that the babies touched something that that baby touched and they got it. Of course they were probably more likely to get it because their immune system was compromised by the vaccinations. C _____ From: Vaccinations [mailto:Vaccinations ] On Behalf Of Kay Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:31 AM Vaccinations Subject: Re: Re: Roseola Do you mean Rubella? There is no vaccine for Roseola. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your question. If you're just asking is it possible that the vaccines they received lowered their resistance and they developed Roseola soon afterwards, yes, that's quite possible. Vaccines cause the immune system to go haywire, leaving one more susceptible to all kinds of illnesses. My son had Roseola when he was 12 months old... fever of 105 then a rash on his body when the fever broke. My daughter was 2 at the time and never did get it. It's not something you have to be concerned about getting, as it is a disease of young children, typically 1-3 years old. How old is you baby? Are you still breast feeding? That will be your baby's best defense. HTH Kay Re: Roseola > >> >> We just found out that our baby play group has had 2 outbreaks of >> Roseola. We were exposed last week and didn't know it. I'm just trying >> to take my vitamins and get lots of rest to avoid it. Whats >> interesting though is that both babies that have it were vaccinated >> within two weeks of the rash. I believe it was their six month visit. >> Could this just be a coincidence? >> > Actually, I looked at the dates and it was within a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 I posted already about my grandson having Roseola twice. I am wondering if the HHV-6 (Roseola) virus may not be a piggy back virus in vaccines. I read on a Ped site years ago that it is a common childhood disease that is a mild illness with some having no symptoms. It is just another reason vaccines are harmful because we know that the SV40 is a piggy back virus in the Polio vaccine, which causes cancer. I have believed for years that vaccines cause childhood cancers so there may be other viruses in vaccines that we know nothing about. If the vaccine makers know about them they certainly won't tell. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 Yes, I was wondering if it was the vaccines that may have caused a rash that was diagnosed as Roseola, since rashes can be a side affect. I just thought it was interesting that both babies who caught it were vaccinated a week before it appeared. --- Hildebrand <christina@...> wrote: > If you do mean Roseola, I would guess that is was > not a vaccination side > effect, but that they caught it when the were in the > doctors office getting > their shots. Roseola is contracted by either > airborne or saliva and so if > there was a baby at the docs office with Roseola > before they got there, then > it is likely that the babies touched something that > that baby touched and > they got it. Of course they were probably more > likely to get it because > their immune system was compromised by the > vaccinations. > > C > > > > _____ > > From: Vaccinations > [mailto:Vaccinations ] On > Behalf Of Kay > Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:31 AM > Vaccinations > Subject: Re: Re: Roseola > > > > Do you mean Rubella? There is no vaccine for > Roseola. Or maybe I'm > misunderstanding your question. If you're just > asking is it possible that > the vaccines they received lowered their resistance > and they developed > Roseola soon afterwards, yes, that's quite possible. > Vaccines cause the > immune system to go haywire, leaving one more > susceptible to all kinds of > illnesses. > > My son had Roseola when he was 12 months old... > fever of 105 then a rash on > his body when the fever broke. My daughter was 2 at > the time and never did > get it. It's not something you have to be concerned > about getting, as it > is a disease of young children, typically 1-3 years > old. How old is you > baby? Are you still breast feeding? That will be > your baby's best defense. > > HTH > > Kay > > Re: Roseola > > > > >> > >> We just found out that our baby play group has > had 2 outbreaks of > >> Roseola. We were exposed last week and didn't > know it. I'm just trying > >> to take my vitamins and get lots of rest to avoid > it. Whats > >> interesting though is that both babies that have > it were vaccinated > >> within two weeks of the rash. I believe it was > their six month visit. > >> Could this just be a coincidence? > >> > > Actually, I looked at the dates and it was within > a week. > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 And I would say, no matter the cause, it's a good thing. A harmless, natural exercise for the immune system. At least we know it's a natural disease vs a vaccine induced version and part of that baby's rite of passage ~ something the medical world is trying to eliminate...Anita Hildebrand <christina@...> wrote: If you do mean Roseola, I would guess that is was not a vaccination side effect, but that they caught it when the were in the doctors office getting their shots. Roseola is contracted by either airborne or saliva and so if there was a baby at the docs office with Roseola before they got there, then it is likely that the babies touched something that that baby touched and they got it. Of course they were probably more likely to get it because their immune system was compromised by the vaccinations. C _____ From: Vaccinations [mailto:Vaccinations ] On Behalf Of Kay Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 5:31 AM Vaccinations Subject: Re: Re: Roseola Do you mean Rubella? There is no vaccine for Roseola. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding your question. If you're just asking is it possible that the vaccines they received lowered their resistance and they developed Roseola soon afterwards, yes, that's quite possible. Vaccines cause the immune system to go haywire, leaving one more susceptible to all kinds of illnesses. My son had Roseola when he was 12 months old... fever of 105 then a rash on his body when the fever broke. My daughter was 2 at the time and never did get it. It's not something you have to be concerned about getting, as it is a disease of young children, typically 1-3 years old. How old is you baby? Are you still breast feeding? That will be your baby's best defense. HTH Kay Re: Roseola > >> >> We just found out that our baby play group has had 2 outbreaks of >> Roseola. We were exposed last week and didn't know it. I'm just trying >> to take my vitamins and get lots of rest to avoid it. Whats >> interesting though is that both babies that have it were vaccinated >> within two weeks of the rash. I believe it was their six month visit. >> Could this just be a coincidence? >> > Actually, I looked at the dates and it was within a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 Although my daughter got Roseola at 12 months and is not vaccinated. Given she may have caught if from a child that was vaxed. C _____ From: Vaccinations [mailto:Vaccinations ] On Behalf Of Carlson Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:51 AM Vaccinations Subject: Re: Roseola I posted already about my grandson having Roseola twice. I am wondering if the HHV-6 (Roseola) virus may not be a piggy back virus in vaccines. I read on a Ped site years ago that it is a common childhood disease that is a mild illness with some having no symptoms. It is just another reason vaccines are harmful because we know that the SV40 is a piggy back virus in the Polio vaccine, which causes cancer. I have believed for years that vaccines cause childhood cancers so there may be other viruses in vaccines that we know nothing about. If the vaccine makers know about them they certainly won't tell. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 It is interesting too that he had Roseola twice. Usually children only get this once and then have the immunity against it for future exposure. Maybe because they put him on antibiotics so quickly that it he was not able to build up immunity to it. C _____ From: Vaccinations [mailto:Vaccinations ] On Behalf Of Carlson Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:40 AM Vaccinations Subject: Re: Roseola It would be interesting to know what vaccines they got. My grandson (now age 10) had 2 cases of roseola between his first and second birthdays. He was very sick with it, which is not common. One night we rushed him to the hospital with a high fever and limp body. They misdiagnosed him then and put him on antibiotics (!) saying he had 2 bad ear infections (no symptoms for that) the following Monday he broke out in the rash and I took him to the Ped and he said he didn't have ear infections but Roseola. He regressed into autism at age 23 months after his last round of shots. Since then I have read papers about children with autism having the HHV-6 (7?) virus and I do think there is a connection between Tristan's autism and HHV-6 which is the Roseola virus. There is no doubt that vaccines caused his autism, but the exact culprit in the vaccines is hard to pinpoint. Some think it is the mercury, others the MMR and others think HHV-6 is the culprit. It is horrifying to see that more toddlers are regressing into autism from vaccines (my opinion) and still the medical cartel denies the dangers. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 As far as I understand, antibiotics do nothing to kill roseola, so probably he has been misdiagnosed once. I guess this is the case with my daughter who also had roseola-like illnesses twice. Wrong diagnose is pretty common with roseola-like stuff since they don't do any tests. Re: Roseola It would be interesting to know what vaccines they got. My grandson (now age 10) had 2 cases of roseola between his first and second birthdays. He was very sick with it, which is not common. One night we rushed him to the hospital with a high fever and limp body. They misdiagnosed him then and put him on antibiotics (!) saying he had 2 bad ear infections (no symptoms for that) the following Monday he broke out in the rash and I took him to the Ped and he said he didn't have ear infections but Roseola. He regressed into autism at age 23 months after his last round of shots. Since then I have read papers about children with autism having the HHV-6 (7?) virus and I do think there is a connection between Tristan's autism and HHV-6 which is the Roseola virus. There is no doubt that vaccines caused his autism, but the exact culprit in the vaccines is hard to pinpoint. Some think it is the mercury, others the MMR and others think HHV-6 is the culprit. It is horrifying to see that more toddlers are regressing into autism from vaccines (my opinion) and still the medical cartel denies the dangers. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 Sounds like the poor kid couldn't fully express the illness from his body due to abx interference...Anita Hildebrand <christina@...> wrote: It is interesting too that he had Roseola twice. Usually children only get this once and then have the immunity against it for future exposure. Maybe because they put him on antibiotics so quickly that it he was not able to build up immunity to it. C _____ From: Vaccinations [mailto:Vaccinations ] On Behalf Of Carlson Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 7:40 AM Vaccinations Subject: Re: Roseola It would be interesting to know what vaccines they got. My grandson (now age 10) had 2 cases of roseola between his first and second birthdays. He was very sick with it, which is not common. One night we rushed him to the hospital with a high fever and limp body. They misdiagnosed him then and put him on antibiotics (!) saying he had 2 bad ear infections (no symptoms for that) the following Monday he broke out in the rash and I took him to the Ped and he said he didn't have ear infections but Roseola. He regressed into autism at age 23 months after his last round of shots. Since then I have read papers about children with autism having the HHV-6 (7?) virus and I do think there is a connection between Tristan's autism and HHV-6 which is the Roseola virus. There is no doubt that vaccines caused his autism, but the exact culprit in the vaccines is hard to pinpoint. Some think it is the mercury, others the MMR and others think HHV-6 is the culprit. It is horrifying to see that more toddlers are regressing into autism from vaccines (my opinion) and still the medical cartel denies the dangers. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 > > As far as I understand, antibiotics do nothing to kill roseola, so probably he has been misdiagnosed once. I guess this is the case with my daughter who also had roseola-like illnesses twice. Wrong diagnose is pretty common with roseola-like stuff since they don't do any tests. > > > > Re: Roseola > > It would be interesting to know what vaccines they got. My grandson (now age > 10) had 2 cases of roseola between his first and second birthdays. He was > very sick with it, which is not common. One night we rushed him to the > hospital with a high fever and limp body. They misdiagnosed him then and put > him on antibiotics (!) saying he had 2 bad ear infections (no symptoms for > that) the following Monday he broke out in the rash and I took him to the > Ped and he said he didn't have ear infections but Roseola. He regressed into > autism at age 23 months after his last round of shots. Since then I have > read papers about children with autism having the HHV-6 (7?) virus and I do > think there is a connection between Tristan's autism and HHV-6 which is the > Roseola virus. There is no doubt that vaccines caused his autism, but the > exact culprit in the vaccines is hard to pinpoint. Some think it is the > mercury, others the MMR and others think HHV-6 is the culprit. It is > horrifying to see that more toddlers are regressing into autism from > vaccines (my opinion) and still the medical cartel denies the dangers. > > C. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2006 Report Share Posted October 9, 2006 My daughter had Roseola (or what was diagnosed as Roseola) when we were living in France. She was 5 at the time and came out in the rash the day after our wedding. Being our wedding I have to say we were a bit distracted that day but I can definately say that she wasn't sick in any way, maybe she had a slight fever but other than the rash there was no obvious sign of illness. She has never been vaxed and we didn't choose to treat it in any way. Just took her to the doctor because I didn't feel comfortable sending her to school like that. At first I wondered if she just had a skin reaction to something (the flowers she carried?) but the rash was quite extensive. Anyway, if she did have Roseola it was extremely mild and the rash disappeared in a few days. Half her class had it, and it appeared to be a total non-event for everyone there. I wouldn't be too worried if your child is breast-fed and generally healthy. Regards Debbie > > As far as I understand, antibiotics do nothing to kill roseola, so probably he has been misdiagnosed once. I guess this is the case with my daughter who also had roseola-like illnesses twice. Wrong diagnose is pretty common with roseola-like stuff since they don't do any tests. > > > > Re: Roseola > > It would be interesting to know what vaccines they got. My grandson (now age > 10) had 2 cases of roseola between his first and second birthdays. He was > very sick with it, which is not common. One night we rushed him to the > hospital with a high fever and limp body. They misdiagnosed him then and put > him on antibiotics (!) saying he had 2 bad ear infections (no symptoms for > that) the following Monday he broke out in the rash and I took him to the > Ped and he said he didn't have ear infections but Roseola. He regressed into > autism at age 23 months after his last round of shots. Since then I have > read papers about children with autism having the HHV-6 (7?) virus and I do > think there is a connection between Tristan's autism and HHV-6 which is the > Roseola virus. There is no doubt that vaccines caused his autism, but the > exact culprit in the vaccines is hard to pinpoint. Some think it is the > mercury, others the MMR and others think HHV-6 is the culprit. It is > horrifying to see that more toddlers are regressing into autism from > vaccines (my opinion) and still the medical cartel denies the dangers. > > C. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 I don't believe in coincidence. ;o) If you're susceptible, you'll get it - if you aren't, you won't. Keep looking after the *terrain* and all will be well. Sue > > We just found out that our baby play group has had 2 outbreaks of > Roseola. We were exposed last week and didn't know it. I'm just trying > to take my vitamins and get lots of rest to avoid it. Whats > interesting though is that both babies that have it were vaccinated > within two weeks of the rash. I believe it was their six month visit. > Could this just be a coincidence? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 Hi, What is HHV-6 (7?) Thanks Mom to Ella, 11 months old Arbonne International Independent Sales Pure Swiss Skin Care --------------------------------- Stay in the know. Pulse on the new .com. Check it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Haas " <sunfllower7@...> > > What is HHV-6 (7?) xxxxxxx one of _h_uman _h_erpes _v_iruses. also known as human B-cell lymphotrofic virus, thought to cause exanthem subitum (childhood roseola) hhv-7 is closely related. -will- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 I suspect my 10 month old son has Roseola. He woke up this morning with a rash after having a fever for 3 days prior. Any ideas on treatment? Is this a direct result of my diet since I still nurse him? Kandee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2008 Report Share Posted May 30, 2008 Hi Kandee, My daughter had Roseola at 9-10 months and she was bottle fed, it has nothing to do with diet. It is a relatively safe "baby measles". Just keep him drinking well, maybe increase your intake of high vitamin A foods and it will leave quickly, really nothing to worry about. Do keep him in and away from any pregnant women. [ ] Roseola I suspect my 10 month old son has Roseola. He woke up this morning with a rash after having a fever for 3 days prior. Any ideas on treatment? Is this a direct result of my diet since I still nurse him? Kandee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 14, 2010 Report Share Posted July 14, 2010 My daughter was about that age when she got it...2 nights of fever about 104 then 5 days of rash. I didn't give her anything (antibiotics) and she was fine. ONly one day of laying on the couch, all the other days she was eating and playing. Vaccinations From: vaccinedangers@...Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 08:09:33 +0000Subject: roseola what do you want to knowIt is usually a high fever for a few days and then the fever drops and rash comes. No treatment neededSheri (writing from England)listowner>> does anyone know anything about roseola in 18 month old?> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.