Guest guest Posted March 2, 2010 Report Share Posted March 2, 2010 March 1, 2010 Announcement: The publication ban that is statutorily set by the Director for children who have received government support is considered waived with regards to . On February 24th 2010, the Executive Assistant to Child & Youth Services' Minister, Fritz, Ms. Margaret Molenkamp, verbally relayed that no ban is in place and that I am free to speak of my daughter. To ensure factual accuracy, I returned a follow-up letter to both the Minister as well as to Premier Ed Stelmach (as below). The Director chose not to respond, thus, the Government ban may be deemed legally waived. I will openly discuss details relating to my daughter, , born June 4th 1993; who became an angel on December 3rd 2006. December 3rd 2009 marks the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities table in the House of Commons. December 3rd is also a date of significance in the Province of Alberta, Canada. The life and circumstances surrounding , a child with a rare chromosome disorder, *Tetrasomy 18p, led her mother, Velvet , to challenge archaic laws inhibiting the rights of persons with disability & their families. Persistence resulted in the establishment of: " 's Law " Amendment to the Alberta FSCD (Family Support for Children with Disabilities) Act, effective December 2006: http://www.child.alberta.ca/home/527.cfm Section 2-3, Manual Amendments: Policy and Procedures in Family Centred Supports and Services: " The Family Support for Children with Disabilities Program to have separate legislation from that of child protection services. " In Celebration of the Importance of Life & Loving Memory of: , June 4, 1993 - December 3, 2006. Many recommendations were posed to Ministry regards to discerning the two groups. However, it is with great sadness that I relay, it was not until my child's death that Amendment was at last the catalyst to change in Alberta. passed on December 3rd 2006 and FSCD legislation was effected retroactive December 2006. While I appreciate that the Ministry refers to our history as " a learning experience " for them. For us, the absence of our child will forever hold an empty space in our hearts and lives. The sole consolation that we may take is the hope that archaic perspectives towards individuals with disability may begin to change and with this - " 's Law " - other loving families, their children and constitutional rights will better protected in the future. Often, laws have the ability to set precedence and be instituted in neighbouring jurisdiction... This is our greatest hope for all: Recognition that our daughter's life held significance as she continues to live on by aiding others in need. Sincerely, Velvet ---------------------------------------------------------------------- February 24, 2010 Honourable Fritz, Minister of Children and Youth Services Member of Executive Council Executive Branch 228 Legislature Building 10800 - 97 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5K 2B6 Dear Minister Fritz, To further today's telephone conversation with the Offices of the Premier and Ministry of Children's Services: The Office of the Premier referred back to the Child & Youth Ministry; although on February 10th, the Ministry referred to an Information Officer, Bob Arsenault, who indicated that response should be achieved through the Premier. It is most challenging to effect answers when Senior Personnel within the Government do not establish appropriate communication protocol. Upon consultation with Margaret Molenkamp, Executive Assistant, I was informed that I may speak freely of my daughter, . Thus, I will consider it accurate that the Publication Ban has been waived if I do not hear otherwise from the Director within 3 days. resided within a foster establishment strictly as a means to access funding & services (as directed by Representatives of the Ministry) and did not - at any time - fit the mandate of an individual in need of " Child Welfare " defined by the Government of Alberta; so the decision to waive the ban is appropriate. There remain 3 additional factors, however, that must be reviewed and responded to directly by Minister Fritz: 1/ The Director is responsible for the conduct of its employees. Therefore, the Minister is held responsible for its employees' failure to inform medical personnel and pursue needed intervention. The foster mother (name removed) and caseworker (name removed) - for treatment of conditions that prompted 's health collapse. Employees' behaviours need be consequenced appropriately and their ability to harm others eradicated. Grievances before the Government of Alberta for the negligent treatment of our daughter, , are not allegations, but factually based on evidence backed by hundreds of documents from medical and educational facilities. The Fatality Inquiry, we are informed, will not and cannot impose conditions of blame; thus, Justice is averted. *Who will take responsibility for the negligent actions that suffered? Only the Government, acting on behalf of the Child can effect Justice. *A powerful message must be relayed that zero tolerance will exist regards to negligence surrounding a child's care. Evasion of responsibility is completely unacceptable. 2/ Alberta Justice, Government-appointed solicitor (name removed) has proved unable to impartially present the case of within the scope of a Public Fatality Inquiry. A lawyer, acting as an employee of the Ministry, is essentially self-examining its own wrong-doing and unable to respond freely from bias. Furthermore,(name removed) personal feelings towards individuals with developmental disability are both archaic and ethically unconstitutional: (Name removed) erroneously views persons with developmental delay as necessarily " suffering " . To diminish a person, equating worthiness of life based upon preconceived notions of developmental ability is a serious breach of conduct. Reference to a child as " It " is a deplorable display that requires sanction. 3/ Though I have continuously devoted time and efforts to the Ministry assisting with internal review and strategic recommendations for policy amendment - which have been incorporated into legislation - no recognition follows. No apology, nor offer of restitution from the Government of Alberta. Not even a tribute for our daughter's life... " We, the victims, are left with unanswered questions. And, without a life. is deserving of a commemorative marker in her community where those who loved her may honour the significant impact of her existence. Implementation of the F.S.C.D. Amendment whereby children with disabilities shall be viewed distinctly from those individuals requiring protective services, I recommend, should be referred to in Legislation as " 's Law " . Sincerely, Velvet cc: Margaret Molenkamp Premier Ed Stelmach via facsimile ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (\ -- /) ( \()/ ) ( / \ ) TAKE THIS LITTLE ANGEL ^j^ (/\/\) AND KEEP HER CLOSE TO YOU / \ SHE IS SENT AS A GUARDIAN ( ___ ) TO PROTECT ALL THAT IS TRUE Velvet , Administrator for Tetrasomy 18p Canada " 's Syndrome " http://www.tetrasomy18p.ca/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.