Guest guest Posted January 11, 2002 Report Share Posted January 11, 2002 JAMA 2001 Dec 12;286(22):2804-5 <A HREF= " http:// " > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_u ids=11767732 & dopt=Abstract</A> From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pesticide-related illnesses associated with the use of a plant growth regulator--Italy, 2001. PMID: 11767732 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] 1: AAOHN J 2001 Apr;49(4):194-212; quiz 213-4 <A HREF= " http:// " > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_u ids=11760524 & dopt=Abstract</A> Essentials of environmental health. Enhancing your occupational health nursing practice (Part II). Chalupka SM. College of Health Professions, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, USA. 1. In the United States, approximately 24 million people use water daily from unregulated water supplies. Agents of water pollution can be categorized as biological (e.g., Cryptosporidium parvum), chemical (e.g., industrial solvents), or radionuclide (e.g., radon). 2. More than 600 chemicals are registered with the Environmental Protection Agency as pesticides in the United States. Human exposure occurs through direct contact or dermal absorption, inhalation, and ingestion of food, water, and breast milk. It is estimated that 50% of all the pesticides ingested in a lifetime are ingested in the first 5 years of life. 3. Children are at particular risk for exposure to environmental toxicants like pesticides because of time spent crawling and playing on floors, lawns, and other potentially contaminated surface areas, and hand to mouth behaviors. At this time, toxicity data for many pesticides in common use are inadequate to determine potential for neurotoxicity and adverse effects on the developing immune and endocrine system. 4. To meet the challenge of environmental health issues, occupational and environmental health nurses have important opportunities to promote health in the workplace and the community through research, direct clinical services, advocacy, and education. Publication Types: PMID: 11760524 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 1: Int J Occup Environ Health 2001 Oct-Dec;7(4):275-86 <A HREF= " http:// " > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_u ids=11783857 & dopt=Abstract</A> Paraquat in developing countries. Wesseling C, van Wendel de Joode B, Ruepert C, Leon C, Monge P, Hermosillo H, Partanen TJ. Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica. cwesseli@... The herbicide paraquat is considered safe by industry and the bulk of regulators worldwide. However, determinants of exposure from 30 years ago persist in developing countries. Little is known about systemic absorption from occupational exposures. The relationships between exposure determinants, levels of external exposure, biomarkers of exposure, and outcomes are not clear. High rates of severe acute poisonings have been documented. In addition, topical injuries occur in as many as 50% of exposed workers. Non-worker populations are also at risk, particularly children. Long-term and delayed health effects include Parkinson's disease, lung effects, and skin cancer. Regulatory agencies have not fully recognized either the inherent toxicity of paraquat or the particular risks derived from exposures in developing countries. Independent risk assessment in the developing-country context and application of the precautionary principle are necessary to prevent adverse effects of dangerous pesticides in susceptible populations. PMID: 11783857 [PubMed - in process] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1: Food Addit Contam 2001 Dec;18(12):1124-9 Assessing the risks of pesticide residues to consumers: recent and future developments. CA, Renfrew MJ, Woolridge MW. Pesticides Safety Directorate, York, UK. caroline.harris@... Assessing exposure of consumers to pesticide residues is an area of regulatory science that has rapidly developed over the last decade. From simplistic, deterministic models calculating lifetime exposure for adults only, assessment procedures have diversified so that more realistic estimates of long term exposures for adults, schoolchildren, toddlers and infants and short term exposures for adults and toddlers (who generally bound the more extreme consumer patterns) are now carried out. The final assessment of risk still remains a simplistic numeric comparison against hazard assessment based on a wide range of toxicity studies incorporating the appropriate safety or uncertainty factors. As development of risk assessments continues, the use of probabilistic models is becoming an invaluable information tool for quantitative risk management and aiding assessment of cumulative exposure. This paper examines the recent developments in risk assessment and consumer perception of the risks of pesticide residues, and speculates where the future developments in these areas may lie. PMID: 11761124 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] J Agric Food Chem 2002 Jan 2;50(1):235-41 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Refinements in acute dietary exposure assessments for chlorpyrifos. JP, Shaw MC, Keeler LC. Dow AgroSciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268. Food pesticide residue data are used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine potential dietary risk from chronic and acute exposures. An acute dietary risk assessment determines the pesticide exposure resulting from a single-day consumption of food, and uses stepwise refinement of residue estimates to better judge actual exposures. All exposure refinements use estimates of the fraction of crops treated and food residues measured increasingly closer to the point of actual food consumption, without changes in the pesticide uses. Exposure distributions at all levels of data refinement were extremely right skewed. At the highest level evaluated, estimated exposures at the 99.9th percentile were 0.00087 mg/kgBW/day compared to 0.2648 mg/kgBW/day at the tolerance level for children 1-6 years, theoretically the highest-exposed population sub-group. The estimated exposure at the 99.9th percentile of the U.S. population was approximately twice the exposure at the 99th percentile and 33 times the exposure at the 90th percentile. This evaluation showed the calculated exposure at the highest tier of assessment was 300 times lower than the tolerance level assessment for children 1-6 years at the 99.9th percentile. Reduction in exposure estimates between these tiers was due to a combination of the following factors: food residue measurements in a specially designed market-basket study, government-sponsored monitoring data, probabilistic methodologies, market share information, and food processing data. This case study demonstrates that an improved understanding of the uncertainties of acute dietary exposure from pesticides is possible by using well-established statistical tools and applying them to comprehensive exposure information, including residue monitoring data, consumption data, and pesticide use information. PMID: 11754574 [PubMed - in process] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.