Guest guest Posted March 9, 2002 Report Share Posted March 9, 2002 http://republican.chicagosuburbannews.com/display/inn_news/ST%20CHARLES/NEWS 01.TXT Parents question mold cleanup costs vs. building new school By Cirillo/Staff writer The mold remediation at St. East High School is still cheaper than building a new high school, but not by a lot, say some School District 303 parents. Budget numbers released by District 303 Assistant Superintendent Dave Zager show the cost of the work at East to have reached $14,091,930. That is about $3 million more than the original cost estimates generated in August when the School Board decided to clean and repair the school rather than demolish it and start over. The $14 million figure does not include costs for experts to study the building, construction supervision or for rental and installation of mobile classrooms. These extra costs would have been associated with the building of a new high school, said district Director of Communications Tom . said the biggest cost that surpassed the original estimate is $1.5 million for the cleaning and remodeling of the Norris Cultural Arts Center, which was not included in the original scope of work. But school officials still say the mold remediation at East is still significantly less than building a new facility. School officials said a new high school, including a new Cultural Arts Center estimated at $6 million, would have cost about $52 million; more than double the mold remediation. However, some parents say the bottom line is misleading. Villwock, who supported building a new high school, said the numbers would likely climb higher than the current figure before the project is completed. " For what they spent [when finished], they'll be right there at a brand new building, " she said. One of the numbers left out of the calculations is a potential state grant the School District might have received if it had rebuilt the school and applied for it in time. Villwock said the grant would have brought the total of grant money from the state to $14 million. This would have allowed the district to spend $38 million using the same funds for the cleanup. While $38 million is still $14 million less than an estimated $52 million for a new building, Villwock said the costs could not be compared equally. " We're not getting a brand new building, we're getting an inferior building with no improved technology and no guarantees, " she said. " We're getting the same '75 Chevy with new parts and a little clean up. " The mold remediation is being paid for with $5.9 million from the district's education fund balance, $5.1 million from the 2001 Life Safety bond issue and $12.8 million from the $67 million 1998 bond issue that built St. North High School and Bell-Graham Elementary School. Parent Bobbie Raehl said the use of the money from the 1998 bond referendum was unethical. Raehl said the standard practice is to put that money toward abating the taxes created by the bond. Instead, she said the district held on to the money after the projects were completed in 2000. " If the voters had said they wanted to repair the high school, at least they'd be using the money for what we want to use it for, " Raehl said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.