Guest guest Posted March 31, 2002 Report Share Posted March 31, 2002 http://www.pennlive.com/news/expresstimes/index.ssf?/news/expresstimes/pa/na z_cou3.html Mayor worries fungus among Nazareth staff 03/29/02 By WAYNE FISHMAN The Express-Times NAZARETH - Controversy erupted into shouts Thursday night as council debated what to do about a possible air quality problem in the borough's municipal building at 30 Belvidere St. The building houses the police department and other borough employees. About 20 people work there. Mayor Earl Keller said the building has long been plagued by moisture. He described incidents of rainwater leaking through the roof and running down walls and noted that his concerns stem from the same troubles faced by the Nazareth Area School District five years ago. In 1997, dangerous stachybotrys chartarum fungus and other mold and bacteria were discovered in the district's high school and middle school, leading to a multimillion dollar cleanup bill. The district's problem was attributed to moisture. Keller said he is concerned about the safety of borough employees. At its March 4 meeting, council unanimously passed a motion to contract with Health One Source Services to evaluate air quality at the municipal building. At that time, council authorized an expenditure of up to $2,500, but Health One Source's bid came in at $2,600. Council President Chiavaroli said council would have to pass another motion authorizing the additional money if it wants to hire Health One Source. Thursday's controversy developed after Councilman Kim Kromer, chairman of the borough's ecology committee, told council he planned to conduct an air quality test of the building this weekend using a home testing kit. The controversy centered on how to interpret the results of such a test. Kromer said he intended the test to be preliminary and not a replacement for a professionally conducted evaluation. However, other council members suggested the home test, which would cost about $50, would be good enough. " I'm not going to spend $2,500 if the test comes up negative, " Councilman Larry Stoudt said. Councilwoman Werner said she would be inclined to use the cheaper home test, even in her own home. Keller said that while he does not object to Kromer performing the home test, he would be unsatisfied with the results of such a test. He said it isn't clear what the home test would be measuring and that a professional company would do a more thorough job. At one point, as voices started to rise, it appeared council would forego this weekend's test. In the end, however, council agreed to Kromer's home test, but instructed borough Engineer Keller to pursue further bids for a professional test. The issue will come before council again at its May meeting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.