Guest guest Posted March 31, 2002 Report Share Posted March 31, 2002 http://www.detnews.com/2002/politics/0203/30/politics-453024.htm Defying court, EPA to allow use of herbicides without permits By Heilprin / Associated Press WASHINGTON -- The Environmental Protection Agency said Friday it will allow farmers to use herbicides in irrigation canals without permits despite a federal appeals court ruling that permits are necessary. EPA said applying aquatic herbicides to maintain an irrigation system, if done according to the product's EPA-approved labeling, should be considered exempt from a requirement for a permit under the federal Clean Water Act. The agency expects its policy, based on language by Congress in the 1977 Clean Water Act amendments, to be challenged further in court. " The court didn't have the opportunity to consider the exemption, " said Joe Martyak, a spokesman for the EPA. " At some point in time this will be resolved in the court system as folks look at the scope of the exemption. " In March 2001, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled that the Talent Irrigation District in southern Oregon must get a Clean Water Act permit if it is to use acrolein -- a highly toxic compound harmful to fish and wildlife -- to control weeds in its irrigation canals. Two environmental groups had sued the district after it accidentally spilled acrolein into a local creek in 1996 and killed thousands of juvenile steelhead trout. The federal appeals court overturned a lower court ruling that the district did not need a permit to discharge the chemical. The EPA said it issued its new policy to clarify its regulatory and enforcement authority under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. The agency said its intent was " to resolve a degree of confusion " from the lawsuit and to prevent the misuse of herbicides in agricultural irrigation systems. To justify the new policy, EPA cited language by Congress that said the EPA administrator " shall not require a (Clean Water Act) permit ... for discharges composed entirely of return flows from irrigated agriculture. " Court documents showed that water spilled at least once through an accidentally opened gate into Bear Creek at Ashland, Ore. However, Jay Feldman, executive director of the National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides, said any such chemicals applied to water should be evaluated through permits issued under the Clean Water Act. " The permitting process offers another level of protection that is warranted given the broad failure of those who use pesticides to follow labels, " he said. On the Net: EPA Pesticides: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.