Guest guest Posted March 18, 2002 Report Share Posted March 18, 2002 http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=3567258 & BRD=1674 & PAG=461 & dept_id=1 8041 & rfi=6 Little said at L. Pottsgrove school hearing Evan Brandt, Mercury staff writer March 17, 2002 LOWER POTTSGROVE -- A public hearing on the official closing of Lower Pottsgrove Elementary School generated little public comment and none of it in favor of the move. Superintendent Sharon Nalbone said the student population and the programs offered " grew beyond the space available. " The educational program in place when the school was built in 1931 had far fewer space requirements than educational mandates of today, she said. " It wasn't just overwhelming population " that forced the closure of the building, said Donna Cleaver, the board's secretary. " There was a segment of the public that want the building closed because they felt it wasn't safe, despite the fact that there was nothing to prove " it wasn't safe. The issue to which Cleaver referred was the months of controversy over the air quality in the building. Many parents complained about what they saw as a pattern of illnesses among children and staff which could have been related to the bacteria and mold spores found in the building. After more than a half-million dollars were spent to remediate the problems, the complaints continued, and the teachers' union eventually sued the district over the issue. Last June, the board voted to move the students from the building, located on Pleasantview Road, to be housed in classrooms and modulars at the three-year-old Pottsgrove Middle School on North Hanover Street in Upper Pottsgrove. The board has also decided to begin renovating the vacant Pottstown Intermediate School on Buchert Road as the new home for Lower Pottsgrove Elementary School. More recently, the board voted to begin the process of closing the old school building permanently. Tuesday's hearing was the beginning of that process. Solicitor Subers said the board is prevented from taking any action concerning the school for three months. If the few people who spoke out at the hearing are any indication, it won't be a popular move. " This has been a hard number for me to swallow all along, " said Jack , the board's former president. " There were a lot of shenanigans that went into this decision and there is no reason to close that building, " he said. " It was a small group of people who put the heat on to force the district to spend another $12 million (the estimated cost of the Intermediate School renovation) and I think the board should consider very seriously what they're doing. " Resident Dave Borzick said " if you close down this school, you are going to have to build another, there is no doubt in my mind. You are putting a temporary patch on a permanent problem -- again. " ©The Mercury 2002 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.