Guest guest Posted March 20, 2002 Report Share Posted March 20, 2002 http://www.santafenewmexican.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=3582949 & BRD=2144 & PAG=4 61 & dept_id=367954 & rfi=6 Report: Lab slow on compensation By JEFF TOLLEFSON/The New Mexican March 19, 2002 More than 350 people with ties to Los Alamos National Laboratory have filed claims under a federal compensation program for people who became ill or died working with radioactive and toxic materials at nuclear-weapons facilities, but only a few of those have been paid, according to a report by local worker advocates. To read the full report online, click here. http://www.sfnewmexican.com/site/news.asp?brd=2144 & pag=460 & dept_id=407873 " The bottom line is the program is not yet benefiting people in New Mexico, " said Ken Silver, a consultant working on the Los Alamos Project on Worker Safety, an effort by various local organizations to oversee implementation of the compensation program. Silver spoke during a news conference with Los Alamos employees and others in EspaƱola on Monday. Ill workers who qualify are eligible to receive $150,000 plus reimbursements for medical expenses. Survivors of people who died as a result of their illnesses are eligible for the $150,000. At Los Alamos, 189 claims involve cancer; 37 relate to problems from exposure to beryllium; 27 cite renal disorders; and 90 are linked to various lung conditions, according to the report, released by the union representing lab employees, Citizens for LANL Employee Rights and El Rio Arriba Environmental Health Association. In all, more the 400 people in New Mexico have submitted claims under the Energy Employees Illness Compensation Program, which was signed into law in the fall of 2000. Those claims include 43 people at Sandia, eight at the Los Alamos Medical Center and two at the South Albuquerque Works, a small nuclear facility that ceased operation in 1967. Federal officials say four claims have been paid in New Mexico; a fifth has been approved. The federal government has paid the most claims - 168 people - at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, one of four facilities that received blanket coverage for a suite of 21 cancers. Exposed workers who develop any of these cancers receive compensation, no questions asked. At these four sites, according to Silver, worker advocates successfully argued that the government did not properly warn employees of the hazards, monitor those hazards or take proper precautions to prevent problems. This was a theme at Monday's news conference. Former employees with various health problems said Los Alamos has also failed to inform workers of the dangers of certain chemicals, keep accurate records and properly document accidents in the past. " Why is Los Alamos so slow (to compensate ill workers)? It's not because our radiation is less toxic, " said Theresa Connaughton, vice president of University Professional and Technical Employees, the union that represents Los Alamos lab employees. The union is recommending that all Los Alamos employees who have been exposed to toxins file a claim now, even though cancers, lung diseases and other illnesses might not show up for years. Despite assurances from lab officials that such an action would not result in retaliation, Connaughton and others said many employees don't file claims for fear of losing their jobs. The compensation program also includes a petition process that would allow individual workers - or a group of workers at Los Alamos, for example - blanket cancer coverage like that provided at Oak Ridge, but that portion of the program has not been implemented. Monday's report recommends that the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety expedite that process. Congress and the Clinton administration set up two primary tracks in the 2000 legislation: One, operated by the U.S. Department of Labor, primarily addressed health problems caused by radiation and beryllium. The Department of Energy runs the other half, designed as a catch-all for workers affected by such toxins as solvents, acids, asbestos, mercury and other heavy metals. In both cases, worker advocates say, the federal government seems to be dragging its feet. The Department of Labor has yet to release a rule that would set out a process for examining claims of cancer and beryllium disease, like those filed at Los Alamos. For its part, the DOE came under heavy criticism last fall for proposing to require that all claimants to the federal program first qualify under individual state programs, which activists said misses the point of creating a federal program. The DOE program would establish a panel of physicians to evaluate claims. Those rules have yet to be released. The University of California, which operates Los Alamos, also raised the ire of local activists by arguing that it should be exempted from this portion of the program, since state workers compensation programs are already in place. Monday's report recommends that the DOE make the University of California subject to the law like other DOE contractors. The report also criticized the General Accounting Office for failing to meet its Congressional mandate to issue a report on implementation of the program by Feb. 1. Activist groups further requested that U.S. Rep. Tom Udall, D-N.M., and U.S. Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., hold a public meeting to discuss implementation of the compensation program. Representatives of both Bingaman and Udall said they plan to hold such a meeting this spring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.