Re: How often should the zapper be used (skiwp_nancy)

[Guest guest]

The confusion here may be more about linguistics than actual premise,

I am thinking. *My* read is that " immunodepression " seems the

identifying 'label' she gives for the overarching problem i.e. living

in an industrialized world.

Since she isn't into simply identifying a problem, but also applying

prevention and cures, I would say her main premise definately includes

the toxicity and parasites as causitive factors in immune system

dysfunction. The toxins and parasites must be dealt with to be rid of

the *symptoms* which are Cancer & AIDS (and the other major illnesses

she addresses).

I would say therefore, from *my* understanding, her premise still is

-- 'Because of the polluted world we live in, getting rid of the

toxins, and the parasites (which take advantage of that toxicity),

will allow your immune system to heal, and your body to return to and

stay at full health.'

But if you have a copy of " Prevention " to send my way, I would be very

happy to read it.

Annette

>

> Wow, you need to read " Prevention " . The basic premise of all 's

> research is NOT parasites and toxins, the basic premise is

> IMMUNODEPRESSION. Parasites and toxins are only symptoms of an immune

> system that has ceased to function correctly. The reason she studies

> CANCER (and AIDS) is because those are the most prevalent manifestions

> of IMMUNODEPRESSION of our times, the industrial revolution. The

> theories and information in her " Cancer books " may be applied to every

> disease and you would benefit greatly from her latest research.

>

[Guest guest]

Opps! Forgot to change the response name!

> I can see how helping your white blood cells would be a primary

> concern, for sure, since they are pretty front line in dealing with

> pathogens, etc. But still I see Dr. 's focus ultimately in

> restoring health thru ridding the body of toxins and parasites, which

> whack out the immune system, (white blood cells in particular?) pretty

> badly. It sounds like she has just gone deeper into the whys of that

> problem, versus changed her mind about her essential theory though.

> I would of course love to read that particular book. And of course,

> being cheap, and not seeing it as essential in my own healing process,

> I would greatly prefer to get it from someone in adobe reader file, if

> anyone has it.

>

>

> >

> > Actually, my point was that in her latest research she elaborates on

> > the immune system, specifically the role of the white blood cells in

> > succumbing to and curing disease (parasites and toxins). It's another

> > dimension to address when curing disease (any disease) that raises

> > your long term success rates. I always recommend " Prevention " to

> > people before any other of s' books because it so clearly maps

> > out the predicament of the white blood cells and exactly how to 'cure'

> > them first before attacking your 'disease'. And for some reason, in

> > 'Prevention', the clarity of the research makes the recommended cure

> > MUCH less daunting. The lightbulb finally goes on. Without it, you

> > can't really get the full picture of her research.

> >

> > But, I don't even know how I got on this conversation in the first

> place.

> >

>