Homeowners and insurers differ over impact of mold

[Guest guest]

http://www.miami.com/mld/miami/business/3766920.htm

Posted on Wed, Jul. 31, 2002

Homeowners and insurers differ over impact of mold

Homeowners, insurers at odds

BY MICHAEL A.W. OTTEY

mottey@...

BOB EIGHMIE / HERALD STAFF

AIRING DIFFERENCES: Hundreds of people fill Plantation City Hall for one of

three hearings the state is holding on homeowners' claims about mold.

As state regulators patiently listened, the insurance industry and

homeowners on Tuesday squared off on the issue of a tiny organism both sides

agree could have huge consequences: toxic mold.

But the adversaries are miles apart on what impact the mold issue could have

in the state.

Homeowners and consumer lobbyists say the insurers are denying consumers

their rights to claim financial losses because of toxic mold found in their

homes.

The insurers and their representatives say the issue is nothing more than

hysteria being fanned by lawyers looking to make a buck.

The Florida Department of Insurance will decide how future mold claims will

be handled after it holds three public hearings, the first of which was held

Tuesday in Plantation. Hearings will be held in Tampa and Orlando in August.

At least 300 people crammed into Plantation City Hall for the forum. Among

them were people with claims that mold has forced them out of their homes

and cost them their health, not to mention huge financial losses.

But the insurance companies say there is no scientific basis for the claims

and are asking the state to limit such claims. According to insurers, they

could wipe out the industry, lead to higher premiums or even force them to

stop writing policies in Florida.

''It clearly goes without saying mold has become something of a hot topic in

the last several years,'' said Steve Roddenberry, a member of the state

insurance panel. He said the state has received more than 430 filings from

insurers to exclude or limit mold coverage.

''The challenge facing the department is to find a way to ensure continued c

omprehensive coverage,'' Roddenberry said. ``The state needs a viable

insurance industry.''

Lucania, who described herself as a victim of mold, told the panel

that nobody wants the insurance companies to go bankrupt.

''But we want an equitable treatment,'' she said. ``We need to educate the

public. The insurance companies have done quite a disservice to the public

because they've been ignoring it for years. I think there's a bad-faith

issue there. They do not do right by the people who are paying them.''

Roy Oppenheim, an attorney, blamed the insurers' stance on the stock market.

He said insurance companies had investments in companies such as Enron and

are trying to pass on their losses to consumers.

He said mold has never been excluded.

''Why do we pay this insurance if they're not going to be there when we need

them?'' he said.

Guzzo, who represents the Florida Insurance Council, said insurers are

concerned that the mold litigation explosion in Texas and California is

spreading to Florida ``and threatens the affordability and availability of

homeowner and commercial property insurance here.''

He continued: ``The mold litigation explosion does not have a scientific

basis, nor is it the result of a natural disaster.''