Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Zap @ Rife frequency

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Arthur, thanks for your point of view, I would like also that other people

let us know their opinion because I think that there are a lot of common points

from Rife (High freq.) and (Low freq.) there are some excell sheets to

choose the right low freq. to have the right armonic at the Rife freq.(high

freq.)

For my understanding RF/Direct_Contact is a try to have a tranfer funcion on

sick cells or pathogenic agents.

Thanks Arthur

Rino_Italy

>

> The reason I don't zap at Rife frequencies is that Royal Rife's work was not

at all related to Dr. 's methods or results. The zapper works by gently

energizing our immune system, not by trying to kill things electronically. Royal

Rife used a powerful RF transmitter and his MOR's (killing frequencies) to

actually put the bacteria or pathogens to death in the patient's body. Rife's

method took a lot of power and exposed the patient to a lot more electromagnetic

stress, although it was very successful with the 16 terminal cancer patients at

the Scripps Ranch in 1934..

>

> I see a lot of folks get these two completely different approaches mixed up on

the Internet, whether by accident or design. I will go with the gentle

method every time. It is well to remember that nobody has been able to

duplicate Rife's machines, methods or (especially) his cancer results since his

death. In fact, his disciples do not even know the exact frequencies he used,

despite his lab notes. I suggest you try a good zapper like our Auto-Zap

Pro to address your concerns with guaranteed success, or your money back.

>

> Blessings!

>

> Arthur

> www.BestZapper.com

> www.ForgetDrugs.com

>

> P. S. Are you as healthy as you would like?

>

>

>

>

> Zap @ Rife frequency ?

>

>

>

>

>

> Dear all, I need to understand why we usually zap at low frequency (Hz)and

not at Rife frequency (KHz).

>

> Is it the apparatus cost ?

> Could it be safety working directly at Rife freq in the same way as Zapper ?

>

> Thanks

> Rino_Italy

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hi, Arthur and others in the discussion of Rife and zapper frequencies and

whether purpose of " killing " parasites;

Arthur, I believe you were stating that the zapper was NOT meant to kill

parasites when you stated that:

The zapper works by gently energizing our immune system, not by trying to kill

things electronically. Royal Rife used a powerful ....(killing frequencies)...

to actually put the bacteria or pathogens to death ...

Example: On pg. 159, 160 and 161 of The Cure and Prevention book she discusses

the method etc. needed in zapping to kill parasites. Specific excerpts

referencing " killing " the parasites include these:

The original technique showed that very small animals, like our parasites, could

be killed with a very small voltage. But only IF the voltage is 100% Postiive

offset and only IF the voltage is varied up and down repeatedly. P.159

If the voltage is applied in pulses, to produce a " square " wave, it will affect

many parasites at once so that the rate of pulsing, called frequendcy is not

critical. P.159

A Postive electrical force that pulss up and down not only appears to kill tiny

invaders; it also seems to energize your white blood cells to go on a all-out

attack on your enemies: your parasites ..... in spite of their immunity

blockers. P.159

A zapper, on the other hand, not only destroys parasites; it does so by turning

on immune power....P.160

..... you may build or purchase a zapper. It is energized by a 9-volt battery.

P.160

These are just among the 1st of the proofs I found for reference again to all of

us that Dr. does indeed include killing parasites as part of the zapper

work as well as to boost immune power as you referred to. It is both, not

either/or. I just wanted to clarify that for any new persons.

Also reference was made that Royal had 16 successful cancer cures, and an

implication the way I read it, that Dr. did NOT have that many. My

understanding is that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of persons cured

under her tutelage, recalling reading testimonies of more than 16 in the brief

time I've been studying by skimming her works.

I bring these points up because they go to the basis of her methods and

credibility. If I have misunderstood by taking out of context, I apologize ahead

of time and will await reading the explanation.

Blessings to all, Joyce Simmerman

There is ALWAYS a " BETTER WAY " ! Together WE can find IT and make IT a " Cradle

for Humanity " !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...