Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 well whatever I got out, my allergies and burning skin are gone and I feel 100x better. Holly Speaking of gallstones... I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the gallstone. I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very much with new info since then, unfortunately. Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr could sit down at a table together and talk this all out and come to some level of agreement about what's true or not. The fact that these two opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for fence sitters (probably most people - people who like to listen to doctors because of their education and background, but also want the hope that alternative medicine often offers) to come off the fence. Text below.... -Ken Bagwell --------------------------- Gallstone Flush PESSIMISTIC People who have gallstones, or think they have gallstones, are invited to " flush " them out by swallowing a concoction of 1/2 cup of olive oil, a big grapefruit, 4 tablespoons of Epsom salts, and three cups of water. It was a nice idea, and interesting things will appear in the toilet bowl soon after. But I'm afraid that they're not your gallstones. Here's why: * Real gallstones are faceted polyhedra, like the ones in the picture on the links below, or else shaped like mulberries. What you'll get from the recipe are spheres. One of my correspondents describes a friend who saved the spheres and displayed them to his friends. * Real gallstones hurt bad when they pass through the cystic and common bile ducts. * Real gallstones sink in water. (As an autopsy pathologist, I'm very familiar with this.) The " gallstones " you'll produce from this recipe will float, as the " alternative thinkers " themselves point out. (They claim that real gallstones float, too. Liars.) If you know a little basic chemistry, you'll realize what is happening. The Epsom salts are magnesium sulfate, and the grapefruit contains some complex carbohydrates. When these slosh around in the stomach and small intestine, they'll form a tough film which will encase drops of olive oil. This will produce some yellowish balls which will float in the toilet. Hulda Regehr , the author of " The Cure for all Cancers " and " The Cure For HIV/AIDS " promotes this. Since she claims to have both a doctorate in naturopathy and a Ph.D. in something (the latter implying having done substantial original lab research), one would think she would have made an experiment with a real gallstone and discovered that it sinks. There's a nice photo which she stole from my friend, pathologist Ed Klatt. She calls them " such small stones " though they're obviously 7-10 mm across. She thinks the stones she displayed formed in the liver and " rolled " into the gallbladder, which is silly. You see many more stones in the gallbladder because that's where bile is concentrated and stored; if they all " rolled " there from the liver, we'd see much more biliary colic. She says gallstones " can be of any color " which is a hoot. She also claims that the major cause of gallstones is wearing shoes. If you want to believe these people, that is your business. If you try the purge, please chew your grapefruit up thoroughly. Otherwise, you're asking for a gastic bezoar and a trip to the endoscopist to remove the obstruction. Gallstone cleansing The premiere site is now down. Gallstone Flush from Hulda Regehr . Much of the material on these sites is identical though it's not clear who has borrowed from who. Follow-up: April 2003. My notes on the gallstone flush have generated considerable " controversy " . I look forward to a real surgeon taking these people on a visit to the surgical ward to see whether it's really true that 99% of people who pass a gallstone have no pain, or whether most gallstones sink or float in water. (The impurities make them heavy. They sink. If you have any doubts about who is massively ignorant, go ask any general surgeon or pathologist.) There are also photos, some of which appear to be real smooth faceted gallstones, and others showing shaggy surfaces which are obviously not gallstones. Instead of continuing to sling mud at me, these people should take somebody with ultrasonographically-proven gallstones, administer the " flush " , and repeat the ultrasonogram. If there are now no gallstones, publish the finding in a non-refereed junk journal. The fact that nobody's done this invites the obvious conclusion. If you are presented with the physical results of a " gallstone flush " , cut it in half. Real gallstones have concentric layers of colors often varying from pale yellow through black, sometimes with a center of radiating crystals. END Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Holly, I'm glad you're feeling better, because it works! Ken, in this article they are saying that 'gallstones' don't float; that is partially true. They are talking about the calcified gallstones. You're right, they don't float, because they are calcified. The gallstones that come out that float, those are gallstones too. They float because they are not calcified yet. You can read more about it here: http://curezone.Com/cleanse/liver/ I have done 7 flushes and my PMS is so much better. Midge I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the gallstone. I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very much with new info since then, unfortunately. Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr could sit down at a table together and talk this all out and come to some level of agreement about what's true or not. The fact that these two opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for fence sitters (probably most people - people who like to listen to doctors because of their education and background, but also want the hope that alternative medicine often offers) to come off the fence. Text below.... -Ken Bagwell --------------------------- Gallstone Flush PESSIMISTIC People who have gallstones, or think they have gallstones, are invited to " flush " them out by swallowing a concoction of 1/2 cup of olive oil, a big grapefruit, 4 tablespoons of Epsom salts, and three cups of water. It was a nice idea, and interesting things will appear in the toilet bowl soon after. But I'm afraid that they're not your gallstones. Here's why: * Real gallstones are faceted polyhedra, like the ones in the picture on the links below, or else shaped like mulberries. What you'll get from the recipe are spheres. One of my correspondents describes a friend who saved the spheres and displayed them to his friends. * Real gallstones hurt bad when they pass through the cystic and common bile ducts. * Real gallstones sink in water. (As an autopsy pathologist, I'm very familiar with this.) The " gallstones " you'll produce from this recipe will float, as the " alternative thinkers " themselves point out. (They claim that real gallstones float, too. Liars.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Ken - as someone who has done around 10 flushes already (and still going), I can tell you that the " stones " - or whatever they want to call them - are of all shapes and sizes. They do float for they are not calcified (yet - thank goodness!). They also are of several colors - deep to light green and brown - yellow - depending on hwere they come from (liver of gallbladder). This guy think a bit too much of himself, as many doctors do. For example, in my opinion his premise that epsom salt mixes In the Stomach with citrus juice and coats olive oil doesn't make sense: we take epsom salt two hours before taking Emulcified mix of citrus juice and olive oil, etc... This fellow also poo-poos EDTA chelation. I have done it myself as a preventitive thing, and I have see myself people that pretty much came back from the dead by doing this chelation. Regular doctors sent them home and said - we can't do anything anymore (after a number of bypasses), you are just going to die soon. The bottom line as far as I am concerned: Liver Flushes are One of the Most important things (if not The Most Important) we can do to rectify the decades of wrong nutrition and lifestyle. It is not necesserily an easy path, but, done carefully, is very rewarding. My 2 cents, Ilya Speaking of gallstones... I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the gallstone. I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very much with new info since then, unfortunately. Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr could sit down at a table together and talk this all out and come to some level of agreement about what's true or not. The fact that these two opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for fence sitters (probably most people - people who like to listen to doctors because of their education and background, but also want the hope that alternative medicine often offers) to come off the fence. Text below.... -Ken Bagwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 Hi Ken, From someone else who is going on 8+ liver flushes, I can say it helped tremedously! Before the first flush I did, my liver area was hard as a rock, kinda achy and my digestion wasn't so hot. Of course I have discovered some of that was a stomach lining problem, but the low bile production probably didn't help. After my very first flush, my liver area was so much softer and I definitely did see the difference in the color of the stool, just as Dr. says. Before it was very tan, but after it was much darker and sank, showing it was more fully digested. And the achy pressure in that area was gone, too. And it has only gotten better with each flush. That fellow definitely hasn't tried a liver flush, obviously. And I, too, think, in that only the calcified ones sink, and apparently those are the only ones that count, to the medical professional. Of course if we all successfully remove our gall/liver stones with flushes, just think of how much money the doctors would lose in gall bladder removal sugeries, eh?? There's an easy and quick couple thousand bucks for them! I know I would have had to had my gall bladder out by now if I hadn't discovered this flush! Also, believe me, considering the size of some of the stones I got out doing these flushes, they would have hurt like heck without the epsom salts which, as Dr. points out, *relaxes* the bile ducts. Duh. That fellow is obviously a stooge for the AMA or phamacuetical companies. I am pretty sure there are people getting paid to 'debunk' alternate health methodology, and he sure sounds like just such a flunky. And besides, if it doesn't work, it isn't going to hurt anything, unlike 99.9% of all perscription drugs. Funny how we will trust a doctor's decision to poison us with some 'FDA' approved drug (which later gets pulled from the market because it has fatal side effects), and get all twitchy and uptight over something that is comprised of only natural ingredients, with no harmful side effects. Boy oh boy don't they have us all so brain washed eh?? Annette > > I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: > http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > > I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not > yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially > the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or > floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the > gallstone. > > I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It > has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very > much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr could sit > down at a table together and talk this all out and come to some level > of agreement about what's true or not. The fact that these two > opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for fence sitters > (probably most people - people who like to listen to doctors because > of their education and background, but also want the hope that > alternative medicine often offers) to come off the fence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 I'm not sure if my post got here a few weeks ago but I received my sensiblehealth liver detox 4 pack. In the pamphlet it says the epsom salts may actually mix with the olive oil concoction to make the " gallstones " ....I've never done the flush without the epsom salts (fear of pain!)...has anyone gotten similar looking stones with and without the salts? Best! Shefy sandie55a <amhall@...> wrote: Hi Ken, From someone else who is going on 8+ liver flushes, I can say it helped tremedously! Before the first flush I did, my liver area was hard as a rock, kinda achy and my digestion wasn't so hot. Of course I have discovered some of that was a stomach lining problem, but the low bile production probably didn't help. After my very first flush, my liver area was so much softer and I definitely did see the difference in the color of the stool, just as Dr. says. Before it was very tan, but after it was much darker and sank, showing it was more fully digested. And the achy pressure in that area was gone, too. And it has only gotten better with each flush. That fellow definitely hasn't tried a liver flush, obviously. And I, too, think, in that only the calcified ones sink, and apparently those are the only ones that count, to the medical professional. Of course if we all successfully remove our gall/liver stones with flushes, just think of how much money the doctors would lose in gall bladder removal sugeries, eh?? There's an easy and quick couple thousand bucks for them! I know I would have had to had my gall bladder out by now if I hadn't discovered this flush! Also, believe me, considering the size of some of the stones I got out doing these flushes, they would have hurt like heck without the epsom salts which, as Dr. points out, *relaxes* the bile ducts. Duh. That fellow is obviously a stooge for the AMA or phamacuetical companies. I am pretty sure there are people getting paid to 'debunk' alternate health methodology, and he sure sounds like just such a flunky. And besides, if it doesn't work, it isn't going to hurt anything, unlike 99.9% of all perscription drugs. Funny how we will trust a doctor's decision to poison us with some 'FDA' approved drug (which later gets pulled from the market because it has fatal side effects), and get all twitchy and uptight over something that is comprised of only natural ingredients, with no harmful side effects. Boy oh boy don't they have us all so brain washed eh?? Annette > > I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: > http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > > I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not > yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially > the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or > floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the > gallstone. > > I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It > has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very > much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr could sit > down at a table together and talk this all out and come to some level > of agreement about what's true or not. The fact that these two > opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for fence sitters > (probably most people - people who like to listen to doctors because > of their education and background, but also want the hope that > alternative medicine often offers) to come off the fence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 I don't use epsom salts at all. I use Magnesium Oxide capsules and I get plenty of stones out when I have cleansed. Remember, the epsom salts are to open the bile ducts and cleanse the colon. By the time you take the OO and GF, the epsom salts are out of your system. Diane shefy gupta wrote: >I'm not sure if my post got here a few weeks ago but I received my sensiblehealth liver detox 4 pack. In the pamphlet it says the epsom salts may actually mix with the olive oil concoction to make the " gallstones " ....I've never done the flush without the epsom salts (fear of pain!)...has anyone gotten similar looking stones with and without the salts? > > Best! > Shefy > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2006 Report Share Posted May 16, 2006 In a message dated 5/16/2006 5:54:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, shefy7@... writes: I'm not sure if my post got here a few weeks ago but I received my sensiblehealth liver detox 4 pack. In the pamphlet it says the epsom salts may actually mix with the olive oil concoction to make the " gallstones " ....I've never done the flush without the epsom salts (fear of pain!)...has anyone gotten similar looking stones with and without the salts? Best! Shefy * * Yes I have done several (10 or more) and didn't use epson salts until 2 flushes recently. The stones are identical with either method and based on my experience this " making of gallstones " theory makes less sense than putting screen doors on submarines. I did my first cleanses over 10 years ago following a " recipe " from (author of young again) and hadn't even heard of Dr or using epsom or grapefruit. I used 4oz olive oil and 4 oz lemon juice. Also the time of day does not seem to make any difference for me. I prefer cleansing about 10 AM. The key is to have an empty intestinal tract and you dont have to fast all day if you do the cleanse in the morning, you just have to skip breakfast. I do lie down after drinking the lemon and olive oil, but get up 45 minutes to an hour later, seeing stones about 4 to 6 hours later. Just my experience....please don't listen to the pro drug company wack jobs. Jim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 Ken, This guy is a pathologist, who looks at the tissue of the deceased, takes stones directly from the gall bladder, not stones that have passed through colon, and collected debris along the way. After reading the whole page, and what he states about himself, the only person he links to is STEVEN BARRETT!!!! I don't find Ed's opinon credible and I find it odd that he never mentions parasites in the stones at all. He also suggests we should follow a real surgeon to see what gall stones really look like, again, the stones taken from the gall bladder will not look like those that have been through the elimination track, and God forbid, I could never recommend to anyone that they should have their gall bladder removed when I know FOR A FACT, they can flush out stones and repair their liver through natural means, because I have done it! I don't see anything of value on his site other than a difference of personal opinion. He damns Dr. and others who have been successful, because they don't have " studies " . Well, you can spend millions on studies, such as those done by Merck for Vioxx and manipulate the data to hide the bad news, and never use any of those funds to compare a toxic drug to natural remedies. I would think all the drug scandals of late, would send more people looking for natural remedies that work, rather than those that are studied with biased results, because the studies are manipulated to fail, using the wrong ingredients, useless dosages, and people who have compromised health that couldn't expect results for the remedy being tested. The gallstone debate is an old one. People have used colored dyes in the olive oil, and that STILL didn't change the color of the stones, so they are not made up of the olive oil, as this guy claims. So, if the stones are not made of olive oil, then they have to be bile and toxins, because the epsom salts are not taken with the olive oil and is already passed through the system, so his theory is bunk. Olive oil does not coagulate at body temperature either, it stays liquid! This guy has never tested Dr. 's theories, had never done a gall bladder flush, and has no idea what people are eliminating other than to call it " interesting things " He is stating a biased opinion with no facts to back it up, nor first hand knowledge about liver flushes. The only way to convince you is that you have to do the flush yourself a few times and you will know who has the true power of knowledge. When you see how it improves so many maladies, you will know who to doubt. Dr. has helped to cure many people of serious illness with the knowledge she shares. Just what has this pathologist done but share his opinion over things he knows NOTHING about, because he has never tried it or studied it being done? Diane Ken Bagwell wrote: >I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: >http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > >I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not >yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially >the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or >floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the >gallstone. > >I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It >has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very >much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 Diane and list, I learned a long time ago the futility of trying to persuade the " dogma-zealots " God made these guys for us to learn how bad can things get. Rgeards In the same fashion that Re: Speaking of gallstones... Ken, This guy is a pathologist, who looks at the tissue of the deceased, takes stones directly from the gall bladder, not stones that have passed through colon, and collected debris along the way. After reading the whole page, and what he states about himself, the only person he links to is STEVEN BARRETT!!!! I don't find Ed's opinon credible and I find it odd that he never mentions parasites in the stones at all. He also suggests we should follow a real surgeon to see what gall stones really look like, again, the stones taken from the gall bladder will not look like those that have been through the elimination track, and God forbid, I could never recommend to anyone that they should have their gall bladder removed when I know FOR A FACT, they can flush out stones and repair their liver through natural means, because I have done it! I don't see anything of value on his site other than a difference of personal opinion. He damns Dr. and others who have been successful, because they don't have " studies " . Well, you can spend millions on studies, such as those done by Merck for Vioxx and manipulate the data to hide the bad news, and never use any of those funds to compare a toxic drug to natural remedies. I would think all the drug scandals of late, would send more people looking for natural remedies that work, rather than those that are studied with biased results, because the studies are manipulated to fail, using the wrong ingredients, useless dosages, and people who have compromised health that couldn't expect results for the remedy being tested. The gallstone debate is an old one. People have used colored dyes in the olive oil, and that STILL didn't change the color of the stones, so they are not made up of the olive oil, as this guy claims. So, if the stones are not made of olive oil, then they have to be bile and toxins, because the epsom salts are not taken with the olive oil and is already passed through the system, so his theory is bunk. Olive oil does not coagulate at body temperature either, it stays liquid! This guy has never tested Dr. 's theories, had never done a gall bladder flush, and has no idea what people are eliminating other than to call it " interesting things " He is stating a biased opinion with no facts to back it up, nor first hand knowledge about liver flushes. The only way to convince you is that you have to do the flush yourself a few times and you will know who has the true power of knowledge. When you see how it improves so many maladies, you will know who to doubt. Dr. has helped to cure many people of serious illness with the knowledge she shares. Just what has this pathologist done but share his opinion over things he knows NOTHING about, because he has never tried it or studied it being done? Diane Ken Bagwell wrote: >I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: >http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > >I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not >yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially >the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or >floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the >gallstone. > >I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It >has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very >much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 Diane you have done a good job of reminding the list (again) of the mindless opinions and poorly done research out there that not only contradict Dr. but contradict our own experiences. Leo ------------------------------------ > > >I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: > >http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > > > >I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some time, but have not > >yet got around to it, but this article got me wondering, especially > >the issue about what constitutes real gallstones (sinking or > >floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric layers inside the > >gallstone. > > > >I didn't post this to start any battles, but comments are welcome. It > >has been some years since I read her books, and I haven't kept up very > >much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2006 Report Share Posted May 17, 2006 Hi Ken We have bin doing 17 liver cleanses in the last 5 years. Do the cleans just as Dr. tells you to do it and your body will tell you the by how good you fil and it will not take you long to do the next one Albert --- Ken Bagwell <kenancy2000@...> wrote: > I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: > http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > > I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some > time, but have not > yet got around to it, but this article got me > wondering, especially > the issue about what constitutes real gallstones > (sinking or > floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric > layers inside the > gallstone. > > I didn't post this to start any battles, but > comments are welcome. It > has been some years since I read her books, and I > haven't kept up very > much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr > could sit > down at a table together and talk this all out and > come to some level > of agreement about what's true or not. The fact > that these two > opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for > fence sitters > (probably most people - people who like to listen to > doctors because > of their education and background, but also want the > hope that > alternative medicine often offers) to come off the > fence. > > Text below.... > > -Ken Bagwell > > --------------------------- > Gallstone Flush PESSIMISTIC > > People who have gallstones, or think they have > gallstones, are invited > to " flush " them out by swallowing a concoction of > 1/2 cup of olive > oil, a big grapefruit, 4 tablespoons of Epsom salts, > and three cups of > water. > > It was a nice idea, and interesting things will > appear in the toilet > bowl soon after. But I'm afraid that they're not > your gallstones. > Here's why: > > * Real gallstones are faceted polyhedra, like > the ones in the > picture on the links below, or else shaped like > mulberries. What > you'll get from the recipe are spheres. One of my > correspondents > describes a friend who saved the spheres and > displayed them to his > friends. > > * Real gallstones hurt bad when they pass > through the cystic and > common bile ducts. > > * Real gallstones sink in water. (As an autopsy > pathologist, I'm > very familiar with this.) The " gallstones " you'll > produce from this > recipe will float, as the " alternative thinkers " > themselves point out. > (They claim that real gallstones float, too. Liars.) > > If you know a little basic chemistry, you'll realize > what is > happening. The Epsom salts are magnesium sulfate, > and the grapefruit > contains some complex carbohydrates. When these > slosh around in the > stomach and small intestine, they'll form a tough > film which will > encase drops of olive oil. This will produce some > yellowish balls > which will float in the toilet. > > Hulda Regehr , the author of " The Cure for all > Cancers " and " The > Cure For HIV/AIDS " promotes this. Since she claims > to have both a > doctorate in naturopathy and a Ph.D. in something > (the latter implying > having done substantial original lab research), one > would think she > would have made an experiment with a real gallstone > and discovered > that it sinks. There's a nice photo which she stole > from my friend, > pathologist Ed Klatt. She calls them " such small > stones " though > they're obviously 7-10 mm across. She thinks the > stones she displayed > formed in the liver and " rolled " into the > gallbladder, which is silly. > You see many more stones in the gallbladder because > that's where bile > is concentrated and stored; if they all " rolled " > there from the liver, > we'd see much more biliary colic. She says > gallstones " can be of any > color " which is a hoot. She also claims that the > major cause of > gallstones is wearing shoes. > > If you want to believe these people, that is your > business. If you try > the purge, please chew your grapefruit up > thoroughly. Otherwise, > you're asking for a gastic bezoar and a trip to the > endoscopist to > remove the obstruction. > > Gallstone cleansing > > The premiere site is now down. Gallstone Flush > from Hulda Regehr > . Much of the material on these sites is > identical though it's > not clear who has borrowed from who. > > Follow-up: April 2003. My notes on the gallstone > flush have generated > considerable " controversy " . I look forward to a real > surgeon taking > these people on a visit to the surgical ward to see > whether it's > really true that 99% of people who pass a gallstone > have no pain, or > whether most gallstones sink or float in water. (The > impurities make > them heavy. They sink. If you have any doubts about > who is massively > ignorant, go ask any general surgeon or > pathologist.) There are also > photos, some of which appear to be real smooth > faceted gallstones, and > others showing shaggy surfaces which are obviously > not gallstones. > Instead of continuing to sling mud at me, these > people should take > somebody with ultrasonographically-proven > gallstones, administer the > " flush " , and repeat the ultrasonogram. If there are > now no gallstones, > publish the finding in a non-refereed junk journal. > The fact that > nobody's done this invites the obvious conclusion. > If you are > presented with the physical results of a " gallstone > flush " , cut it in > half. Real gallstones have concentric layers of > colors often varying > from pale yellow through black, sometimes with a > center of radiating > crystals. > > END > > > > __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Thanks to everyone for all your comments. I really appreciate it, nad feel more confident about this after taking what you've said into consideration. Now...to just do it. -Ken Bagwell > > > I found the below text from a site a few weeks back: > > http://www.pathguy.com/altermed.htm#gallstone > > > > I have been wanting to do the liver flush for some > > time, but have not > > yet got around to it, but this article got me > > wondering, especially > > the issue about what constitutes real gallstones > > (sinking or > > floating), ultrasonogram proof, and concentric > > layers inside the > > gallstone. > > > > I didn't post this to start any battles, but > > comments are welcome. It > > has been some years since I read her books, and I > > haven't kept up very > > much with new info since then, unfortunately. > > > > Sometimes I wish this guy below and people like Dr > > could sit > > down at a table together and talk this all out and > > come to some level > > of agreement about what's true or not. The fact > > that these two > > opposing sides never do this makes it very hard for > > fence sitters > > (probably most people - people who like to listen to > > doctors because > > of their education and background, but also want the > > hope that > > alternative medicine often offers) to come off the > > fence. > > > > Text below.... > > > > -Ken Bagwell > > > > --------------------------- > > Gallstone Flush PESSIMISTIC > > > > People who have gallstones, or think they have > > gallstones, are invited > > to " flush " them out by swallowing a concoction of > > 1/2 cup of olive > > oil, a big grapefruit, 4 tablespoons of Epsom salts, > > and three cups of > > water. > > > > It was a nice idea, and interesting things will > > appear in the toilet > > bowl soon after. But I'm afraid that they're not > > your gallstones. > > Here's why: > > > > * Real gallstones are faceted polyhedra, like > > the ones in the > > picture on the links below, or else shaped like > > mulberries. What > > you'll get from the recipe are spheres. One of my > > correspondents > > describes a friend who saved the spheres and > > displayed them to his > > friends. > > > > * Real gallstones hurt bad when they pass > > through the cystic and > > common bile ducts. > > > > * Real gallstones sink in water. (As an autopsy > > pathologist, I'm > > very familiar with this.) The " gallstones " you'll > > produce from this > > recipe will float, as the " alternative thinkers " > > themselves point out. > > (They claim that real gallstones float, too. Liars.) > > > > If you know a little basic chemistry, you'll realize > > what is > > happening. The Epsom salts are magnesium sulfate, > > and the grapefruit > > contains some complex carbohydrates. When these > > slosh around in the > > stomach and small intestine, they'll form a tough > > film which will > > encase drops of olive oil. This will produce some > > yellowish balls > > which will float in the toilet. > > > > Hulda Regehr , the author of " The Cure for all > > Cancers " and " The > > Cure For HIV/AIDS " promotes this. Since she claims > > to have both a > > doctorate in naturopathy and a Ph.D. in something > > (the latter implying > > having done substantial original lab research), one > > would think she > > would have made an experiment with a real gallstone > > and discovered > > that it sinks. There's a nice photo which she stole > > from my friend, > > pathologist Ed Klatt. She calls them " such small > > stones " though > > they're obviously 7-10 mm across. She thinks the > > stones she displayed > > formed in the liver and " rolled " into the > > gallbladder, which is silly. > > You see many more stones in the gallbladder because > > that's where bile > > is concentrated and stored; if they all " rolled " > > there from the liver, > > we'd see much more biliary colic. She says > > gallstones " can be of any > > color " which is a hoot. She also claims that the > > major cause of > > gallstones is wearing shoes. > > > > If you want to believe these people, that is your > > business. If you try > > the purge, please chew your grapefruit up > > thoroughly. Otherwise, > > you're asking for a gastic bezoar and a trip to the > > endoscopist to > > remove the obstruction. > > > > Gallstone cleansing > > > > The premiere site is now down. Gallstone Flush > > from Hulda Regehr > > . Much of the material on these sites is > > identical though it's > > not clear who has borrowed from who. > > > > Follow-up: April 2003. My notes on the gallstone > > flush have generated > > considerable " controversy " . I look forward to a real > > surgeon taking > > these people on a visit to the surgical ward to see > > whether it's > > really true that 99% of people who pass a gallstone > > have no pain, or > > whether most gallstones sink or float in water. (The > > impurities make > > them heavy. They sink. If you have any doubts about > > who is massively > > ignorant, go ask any general surgeon or > > pathologist.) There are also > > photos, some of which appear to be real smooth > > faceted gallstones, and > > others showing shaggy surfaces which are obviously > > not gallstones. > > Instead of continuing to sling mud at me, these > > people should take > > somebody with ultrasonographically-proven > > gallstones, administer the > > " flush " , and repeat the ultrasonogram. If there are > > now no gallstones, > > publish the finding in a non-refereed junk journal. > > The fact that > > nobody's done this invites the obvious conclusion. > > If you are > > presented with the physical results of a " gallstone > > flush " , cut it in > > half. Real gallstones have concentric layers of > > colors often varying > > from pale yellow through black, sometimes with a > > center of radiating > > crystals. > > > > END > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2006 Report Share Posted May 19, 2006 Thank you Leo. I have no tolerance for anyone who damns Dr. and those like her, without facts or first hand knowledge of the remedies they are dissing. The most knowledgeable person in the world would not have any credibility if they did not research or use the remedies, but stated an opinion based on nothing but their own biased thinking. I think we are all very blessed to have people like Dr. , Jon Barron, Dr. Donsbach, Dr. , and many others who truly " First do no harm " but share their wealth of knowledge and research so we can prevent and effectively treat disease to a cure. Those who are doing right by us, are all under constant scrutiny, which would be welcome if it were valid, but instead it is a witch hunt, that tries to keep us from easily and affordably healing ourselves and discredit those hard working and compassionate healers. Thank you Leo, for having this list so that we can share knowledge about the great things about Dr. Diane regehr2001 wrote: >Diane you have done a good job of reminding the list (again) of the >mindless opinions and poorly done research out there that not only >contradict Dr. but contradict our own experiences. >Leo >------------------------------------ > > > >>Ken, >> >>This guy is a pathologist, who looks at the tissue of the deceased, >>takes stones directly from the gall bladder, not stones that have >> >> >passed > > >>through colon, and collected debris along the way. After reading the >>whole page, and what he states about himself, the only person he links >>to is STEVEN BARRETT!!!! I don't find Ed's opinon credible and I find >>it odd that he never mentions parasites in the stones at all. >> >>He also suggests we should follow a real surgeon to see what gall >> >> >stones > > >>really look like, again, the stones taken from the gall bladder will >> >> >not > > >>look like those that have been through the elimination track, and God >>forbid, I could never recommend to anyone that they should have their >>gall bladder removed when I know FOR A FACT, they can flush out stones >>and repair their liver through natural means, because I have done it! >> >>I don't see anything of value on his site other than a difference of >>personal opinion. He damns Dr. and others who have been >>successful, because they don't have " studies " . Well, you can spend >>millions on studies, such as those done by Merck for Vioxx and >>manipulate the data to hide the bad news, and never use any of those >>funds to compare a toxic drug to natural remedies. I would think all >> >> >the > > >>drug scandals of late, would send more people looking for natural >>remedies that work, rather than those that are studied with biased >>results, because the studies are manipulated to fail, using the wrong >>ingredients, useless dosages, and people who have compromised health >>that couldn't expect results for the remedy being tested. >> >>The gallstone debate is an old one. People have used colored dyes in >>the olive oil, and that STILL didn't change the color of the stones, so >>they are not made up of the olive oil, as this guy claims. So, if the >>stones are not made of olive oil, then they have to be bile and toxins, >>because the epsom salts are not taken with the olive oil and is already >>passed through the system, so his theory is bunk. Olive oil does not >>coagulate at body temperature either, it stays liquid! This guy has >>never tested Dr. 's theories, had never done a gall bladder flush, >>and has no idea what people are eliminating other than to call it >> " interesting things " He is stating a biased opinion with no facts to >>back it up, nor first hand knowledge about liver flushes. >> >>The only way to convince you is that you have to do the flush >> >> >yourself a > > >>few times and you will know who has the true power of knowledge. When >>you see how it improves so many maladies, you will know who to doubt. >>Dr. has helped to cure many people of serious illness with the >>knowledge she shares. Just what has this pathologist done but share >> >> >his > > >>opinion over things he knows NOTHING about, because he has never tried >>it or studied it being done? >> >>Diane >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.