An article from IndyStar.com

[Guest guest]

Forwarded by Beverly Weikert, weikert004@.... This story was published at

IndyStar.com, http://www.indystar.com.

What a poor choice the Indy Star made on reporting this distorted piece of

information. Thought some may be interested.

To read the full story, click on the link below, or copy and paste it into your

Web browser:

http://www.indystar.com/article.php?mold02.html

If you have problems accessing this story, please let us know at

http://www.indystar.com/help/contact/contact_us.html.

[Guest guest]

Re: the story Forwarded by Beverly Weikert, weikert004@...

on Gots presentation at a recent mold symposium, as reported at

www.indystar.com/article.php?mold02.html

What I find fascinating is how certain factions insist that their action of

demanding scientific validity means their opinion is therefore

scientifically valid -- and therefore, all others are wrong.

Their argument to support that position? The lack of science!!!

If the science is lacking, then they have no scientific basis for any

conclusion other than they can't scientifically formulate a conclusion

because of the lack of science -- one way or the other -- on any issue.

Anything else is not science. It is opinion -- no matter what their

credentials or reputation. To insist otherwise is an abuse of their

credentials and the assumed authority they carry.

This is MHO -- Because I have no valid science to support that

conclusion. That's why it is an " opinion " ;-)