Re: A neponsetvalleydailynews.com article from MLMJ75@...

[Guest guest]

I wish there was a way to sue the government. Mine is from a toxic dump of a basement at a shipyard. I wear a mask all the time.....dont go outdoors....allways sick...cant get near plants...havee to use air cleaners. But you know what? 15 years of gov. service and I had a doc at the clinic telling me I have a pschyoiactric problem!!! I have been tested . HES nuts. I have never had asthma before in my life. I cant even be around strong smells now. My best to everyone in their battles.

...Janet

[Guest guest]

Isn't it wonderful, when a Judge stands up for what's right. Now if they will all turn around and do this, maybe the people will regain the faith they have lost in the system. Carroll-Bower, President, National Toxic Mold Coalition and Foundation

http://ntmc0.tripod.com

http://ntmc0.tripod.com/scorecard

check us out!

MLMJ75@... wrote:

You have been sent this message from MLMJ75@... as a courtesy of neponsetvalleydailynews.com (http://www.neponsetvalleydailynews.com).Comments: Great example of what can happen if people unite on this serious health issue. You can fight City Hall or the State House for that matter!To view the entire article, go to http://www.neponsetvalleydailynews.com/news/local_regional/dedh_court08162002.htm____________________________________________________________Judge rules for court employees: Hearing next week will consider how and when move will happen By Hartzel Friday, August 16, 2002

DEDHAM - A judge yesterday ordered the state to move the Norfolk Probate and Family Court from its downtown Dedham courthouse, siding with court employees who have maintained for years the facility makes them sick and impedes the court's ability to deliver justice.

In a 33-page ruling, circuit Superior Court Judge Donovan dictated that the state sign and execute a lease to temporarily relocate the court. Her ruling was based on evidence and testimony from a 10-day Norfolk Superior Court bench trial in July. "It's a complete victory for the people of the court and shows that what they've gone through in the last decade is real," said Milne, the attorney for court employees who sued the state to force relocation.

Milne represented more than 50 court employees, lawyers and others who took legal filed suit against the state after years of frustration during which their concerns were ignored or tied up in bureaucratic red tape. Milne argued that overcrowding, lack of air ventilation, fire safety code violations and other health hazards make the county-owned Registry of Deeds building - whose basement and second floor houses the court - "constitutionally inadequate." In her ruling, Donovan noted that the state defense didn't even try to dispute many of the complaints about the courthouse.

The Massachusetts Attorney General's Office, which defended the state and argued Donovan had no authority to order relocation, said it will not appeal the decision. "The state defendants are prepared to comply with order of the court," the Attorney General's Office said in a statement issued yesterday. Defendants included Perini, commissioner of the Division of Capital Asset Management; Barbara Dortch-Okara, chief justice of trial court administration and management; and Dunphy, chief justice of probate courts. Donovan will hold a hearing next week to consider implementation of her order. State building officials have already selected a new office building at 35 Shawmut Road in Canton the winning bidder to house the court. Property owner Salah won with a low bid of $4.6 million for a five-year lease. Five other properties in Canton, Westwood and Dedham were considered.

The question of funding for leased space enveloped the recent trial but was answered last week when acting Gov. Jane Swift last week signed legislation authorizing $5.5 million for relocation. Donovan's ruling is crucial because the Division of Capital Asset Management still hadn't signed a lease for the court - even after funding, which the agency had said was the main obstacle preventing a move, became available. DCAM Commissioner Perini was the lead defendant in the sick building case.

Salah has said his Shawmut Road property could be ready for the court within 60 days. "On the outside (the move) would be by Dec. 1, but it's looking likely it could be even sooner than that," said Milne. Legislation signed by Swift also provides for the rehabilitation of the Registry of Deeds building.

Dedham officials hope the court will move back following a five-year stay in Canton. A master plan for Norfolk County calls for construction of a new courthouse, but that could be years or decades away. Schmidt, the Norfolk register of probate and lead plaintiff in the case, said yesterday that he hopes to work with state and local officials to provide a new permanent home for the court in Dedham. But thoughts of the future couldn't stop Schmidt from savoring yesterday's long-sought and hard-fought victory. "It was a long battle," he said. "It's certainly a great feeling." Dedham reporter Hartzel can be reached at 781-433-8368 or phartzel@....

____________________________________________________________News you need, from neponsetvalleydailynews.com e-newsGet the top headlines of the day delivered right to your e-mail in-box with neponsetvalleydailynews.com e-news. It's free, and it's easy to sign up. Stay on top of the news you want - in sports, business, local news and opinions, entertainment and more!Sign up now at: http://neponsetvalleydailynews.publishmail.com____________________________________________________________) Copyright by the neponsetvalleydailynews.com and Herald Interactive Advertising Systems, Inc.No portion of neponsetvalleydailynews.com or its content may be reproduced without the owner's written permission. Privacy Commitment ____________________________________________________________ FAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.