Guest guest Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 I am all for organizing workshops. I can help in southern California ________________________________ From: willliam laurence <wmlua06@...> Dr Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:09:30 AM Subject: Re: Re: Did Dr pass away? here's my offering on this matter of Synchronometer education. I like the sevaral of us had a Syncrometer mentor in my town[Colorado Springs] but for reasones not applicable to this problem I lost him. He was an electronics PHd and used the device like it was a simple AM radio. I was learning but have not done well on my own since he departed. I've tried a couple of times to get a group started but to no avail. I have an associte here in CoS who is also desirous of furthering this endeavor; she's good too! But we need assistance. I'm available to participate and do whatever is needed on whatever level, for us to get a serious group going and to organize for events and workshops but can't do it all myself. Who out there is serious about this? Nutricon - Wm From: Pete <pastahaste (DOT) com> Subject: Re: Did Dr pass away? Dr@groups .com Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 12:59 PM I agree Ken. I would assume there are some people that were close to Dr. and are successful with the syncrometer, and are continuing to do research. I sure hope so anyway. I'm waiting for a new automatic syncrometer that works for everyone, as I have not had any success with the current syncrometer design myself, unfortunately for me. I have a computer programming background and am very technical, so my problem is not related to my lack of training. I also went to a syncrometer class at Dr.'s clinic too BTW. When I spoke with Kirk in 2007, he was fully aware of and hoping to make progress with this issue of alot of people not being able to get the syncrometer to work, too bad he passed on as well, I hope someone has picked up where he left off. He seemed like a good and smart man. At first I was a bit skeptical of him, because he was kind of one of those people that seem too good to be true. -Pete > > Hi cherylanne, > > Perhaps I wasn't too clear on what I was referring to when I said that not much progress could be made. I wasn't referring to *personal* progress in getting over an illness. Dr , along with so many others like her, laid down a foundation about eating simpler, living cleaner, avoiding polluted products, looking at the effects of electric devices to improve health, etc. The foundation is always the most important thing to lay down. She's done that, and then some. > > But over the years, some things change. Certain products that might not have been considered polluted now are, and vice versa. She mentioned the bleach and tap water issue in one of the newer books. I'm pretty sure these things would not have been discovered as soon, or as easily, unless she were discovering these things through use of the syncrometer. Remember, the syncrometer is touted to be many times more sensitive than the best common testing methods for pollutants (at least that's what I remember reading in the early books). > > So if someone like Hulda (in all her energy, curiosity, and enthusiasm) is not there to continue that same syncrometer research and testing, then progress and new discoveries about polluted products and manufacturing processes will be slow. And knowing what's polluted or not is 50% of the cure. > > I know Arthur Doerkson has done a lot of new work with the machines themselves. But I'm talking about straight written advice on what to avoid or not, advice that doesn't require the reader to right away build and use a machine to figure out or verify. A lot of people on this forum rely on her advice in the books and the updates to those books, and either aren't able to or don't want to use to learn the syncrometer. I think Hulda knew this and this is why she writes so much advice straight in the book, rather than telling everyone " Build a syncrometer and test everything yourself. " That would be a nice thing to do, but pretty redundant, and pie-in-the-sky thinking. > > -Ken Bagwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 OK, Guys ... we've got a start! Colorado Springs, CO and Southern California! Let's do this exponentially: everybody who's interested and enthusiastic, call your friends and HHC people and get one to add. I have one already who I KNOW will be IN. and , can you try for one? Then let's get our newbies to solicit one. This'll work, everyone and we can get a big Bio-electric snowball rolling down hill! we'll need activists who'll be ready willing and able to participate on a small level. We need a scribe who'll keep a Roster record of email addresses; a Cyber knowledgeable Guy/Gal who'll set up the website, [if we avoid a 'Group' it'll be easier to keep some reasonable control over bad motive infiltrators like ' haters'] and people who'll moderate ... and what else? warm sincere regards to all! write me personally if you wish: Nutricon c/o wmlua06@... can we propose a date goal for our first seminar? Wm , any/all of you who have 'networked' with anyone, exchanged emails, attended a workshop or associated on ANY LEVEL of Holistic health care, let's approach them and tell them what we're doing! . : From: Pete <pastahaste@ . com> Subject: Re: Did Dr pass away? Dr@groups .com Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 12:59 PM I agree Ken. I would assume there are some people that were close to Dr. and are successful with the syncrometer, and are continuing to do research. I sure hope so anyway. I'm waiting for a new automatic syncrometer that works for everyone, as I have not had any success with the current syncrometer design myself, unfortunately for me. I have a computer programming background and am very technical, so my problem is not related to my lack of training. I also went to a syncrometer class at Dr.'s clinic too BTW. When I spoke with Kirk in 2007, he was fully aware of and hoping to make progress with this issue of alot of people not being able to get the syncrometer to work, too bad he passed on as well, I hope someone has picked up where he left off. He seemed like a good and smart man. At first I was a bit skeptical of him, because he was kind of one of those people that seem too good to be true. -Pete > > Hi cherylanne, > > Perhaps I wasn't too clear on what I was referring to when I said that not much progress could be made. I wasn't referring to *personal* progress in getting over an illness. Dr , along with so many others like her, laid down a foundation about eating simpler, living cleaner, avoiding polluted products, looking at the effects of electric devices to improve health, etc. The foundation is always the most important thing to lay down. She's done that, and then some. > > But over the years, some things change. Certain products that might not have been considered polluted now are, and vice versa. She mentioned the bleach and tap water issue in one of the newer books. I'm pretty sure these things would not have been discovered as soon, or as easily, unless she were discovering these things through use of the syncrometer. Remember, the syncrometer is touted to be many times more sensitive than the best common testing methods for pollutants (at least that's what I remember reading in the early books). > > So if someone like Hulda (in all her energy, curiosity, and enthusiasm) is not there to continue that same syncrometer research and testing, then progress and new discoveries about polluted products and manufacturing processes will be slow. And knowing what's polluted or not is 50% of the cure. > > I know Arthur Doerkson has done a lot of new work with the machines themselves. But I'm talking about straight written advice on what to avoid or not, advice that doesn't require the reader to right away build and use a machine to figure out or verify. A lot of people on this forum rely on her advice in the books and the updates to those books, and either aren't able to or don't want to use to learn the syncrometer. I think Hulda knew this and this is why she writes so much advice straight in the book, rather than telling everyone " Build a syncrometer and test everything yourself. " That would be a nice thing to do, but pretty redundant, and pie-in-the-sky thinking. > > -Ken Bagwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 I live in Illinois and I really would like to be a part of this. I can set up a group with members only settings/privacy control so only those on the list can participate and therefore there are no intruders who are not aligned with what we ALL know works . . . Dr. 's stuff! Sherry From: Dr [mailto:Dr ] On Behalf Of willliam laurence Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:49 PM Dr Subject: Re: Re: Workshops! OK, Guys ... we've got a start! Colorado Springs, CO and Southern California! Let's do this exponentially: everybody who's interested and enthusiastic, call your friends and HHC people and get one to add. I have one already who I KNOW will be IN. and , can you try for one? Then let's get our newbies to solicit one. This'll work, everyone and we can get a big Bio-electric snowball rolling down hill! we'll need activists who'll be ready willing and able to participate on a small level. We need a scribe who'll keep a Roster record of email addresses; a Cyber knowledgeable Guy/Gal who'll set up the website, [if we avoid a 'Group' it'll be easier to keep some reasonable control over bad motive infiltrators like ' haters'] and people who'll moderate ... and what else? warm sincere regards to all! write me personally if you wish: Nutricon c/o wmlua06@... <mailto:wmlua06%40> can we propose a date goal for our first seminar? Wm , any/all of you who have 'networked' with anyone, exchanged emails, attended a workshop or associated on ANY LEVEL of Holistic health care, let's approach them and tell them what we're doing! . : From: Pete <pastahaste@ . com> Subject: Re: Did Dr pass away? Dr@groups .com Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 12:59 PM I agree Ken. I would assume there are some people that were close to Dr. and are successful with the syncrometer, and are continuing to do research. I sure hope so anyway. I'm waiting for a new automatic syncrometer that works for everyone, as I have not had any success with the current syncrometer design myself, unfortunately for me. I have a computer programming background and am very technical, so my problem is not related to my lack of training. I also went to a syncrometer class at Dr.'s clinic too BTW. When I spoke with Kirk in 2007, he was fully aware of and hoping to make progress with this issue of alot of people not being able to get the syncrometer to work, too bad he passed on as well, I hope someone has picked up where he left off. He seemed like a good and smart man. At first I was a bit skeptical of him, because he was kind of one of those people that seem too good to be true. -Pete > > Hi cherylanne, > > Perhaps I wasn't too clear on what I was referring to when I said that not much progress could be made. I wasn't referring to *personal* progress in getting over an illness. Dr , along with so many others like her, laid down a foundation about eating simpler, living cleaner, avoiding polluted products, looking at the effects of electric devices to improve health, etc. The foundation is always the most important thing to lay down. She's done that, and then some. > > But over the years, some things change. Certain products that might not have been considered polluted now are, and vice versa. She mentioned the bleach and tap water issue in one of the newer books. I'm pretty sure these things would not have been discovered as soon, or as easily, unless she were discovering these things through use of the syncrometer. Remember, the syncrometer is touted to be many times more sensitive than the best common testing methods for pollutants (at least that's what I remember reading in the early books). > > So if someone like Hulda (in all her energy, curiosity, and enthusiasm) is not there to continue that same syncrometer research and testing, then progress and new discoveries about polluted products and manufacturing processes will be slow. And knowing what's polluted or not is 50% of the cure. > > I know Arthur Doerkson has done a lot of new work with the machines themselves. But I'm talking about straight written advice on what to avoid or not, advice that doesn't require the reader to right away build and use a machine to figure out or verify. A lot of people on this forum rely on her advice in the books and the updates to those books, and either aren't able to or don't want to use to learn the syncrometer. I think Hulda knew this and this is why she writes so much advice straight in the book, rather than telling everyone " Build a syncrometer and test everything yourself. " That would be a nice thing to do, but pretty redundant, and pie-in-the-sky thinking. > > -Ken Bagwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hi Sherry! GREAT you're ON! We now have a small 'group' I'm attaching as a file the nucleus w/ what people and info we have so far. Whatever you can and are willing to do would be deeply appreciated. I'm a pretty good businessman, Organizer and Nutritionist and quite strong in the field of Parasitology but very weak in the Cyber World! I'd think that first need some sort if ability to contact everyone and keep them all in the loop while maintaining privacy and confidentiality. Am I on track here? Is that something you'd be willing to do? We need a Name too! [grinning] Please feel free to call me - 719.444-0479 if necessary, or email me and tell me to call you- since I have UNlimited LD on both land line and cell phone [719.684-3524] but try to keep my 'minutes' down on the cell program SO nice to hear from you! ]Lawrence Luecking [call me Larry or Luke] [my given name - william ce is my 'pen name' I am also a writer of sorts From: Pete <pastahaste@ . com> Subject: Re: Did Dr pass away? Dr@groups .com Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 12:59 PM I agree Ken. I would assume there are some people that were close to Dr. and are successful with the syncrometer, and are continuing to do research. I sure hope so anyway. I'm waiting for a new automatic syncrometer that works for everyone, as I have not had any success with the current syncrometer design myself, unfortunately for me. I have a computer programming background and am very technical, so my problem is not related to my lack of training. I also went to a syncrometer class at Dr.'s clinic too BTW. When I spoke with Kirk in 2007, he was fully aware of and hoping to make progress with this issue of alot of people not being able to get the syncrometer to work, too bad he passed on as well, I hope someone has picked up where he left off. He seemed like a good and smart man. At first I was a bit skeptical of him, because he was kind of one of those people that seem too good to be true. -Pete > > Hi cherylanne, > > Perhaps I wasn't too clear on what I was referring to when I said that not much progress could be made. I wasn't referring to *personal* progress in getting over an illness. Dr , along with so many others like her, laid down a foundation about eating simpler, living cleaner, avoiding polluted products, looking at the effects of electric devices to improve health, etc. The foundation is always the most important thing to lay down. She's done that, and then some. > > But over the years, some things change. Certain products that might not have been considered polluted now are, and vice versa. She mentioned the bleach and tap water issue in one of the newer books. I'm pretty sure these things would not have been discovered as soon, or as easily, unless she were discovering these things through use of the syncrometer. Remember, the syncrometer is touted to be many times more sensitive than the best common testing methods for pollutants (at least that's what I remember reading in the early books). > > So if someone like Hulda (in all her energy, curiosity, and enthusiasm) is not there to continue that same syncrometer research and testing, then progress and new discoveries about polluted products and manufacturing processes will be slow. And knowing what's polluted or not is 50% of the cure. > > I know Arthur Doerkson has done a lot of new work with the machines themselves. But I'm talking about straight written advice on what to avoid or not, advice that doesn't require the reader to right away build and use a machine to figure out or verify. A lot of people on this forum rely on her advice in the books and the updates to those books, and either aren't able to or don't want to use to learn the syncrometer. I think Hulda knew this and this is why she writes so much advice straight in the book, rather than telling everyone " Build a syncrometer and test everything yourself. " That would be a nice thing to do, but pretty redundant, and pie-in-the-sky thinking. > > -Ken Bagwell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.