Guest guest Posted September 8, 2002 Report Share Posted September 8, 2002 So, a status report regarding our icemaker that broke and flooded our condo. I've talked about this before, but this happened on date of escrow in January and we are still not living in the condo! Can I ask any of you who have had a waterloss and then mold remediation some questions: We are now at a standstill because the condo with adjoining wall also has mold because our condo flooded into theirs! They were unconcerned before but the owner is now on 3 inhalers and now is very concerned. Their condo has been tested for mold and they are to do their condo and also finish up some unfinished areas in ours. (Would you believe that our condo PASSED their clearance testing?) This was very upsetting to me as they knew that the back of their wallboard had visible mold 1 1/2 feet up the wall. They said they cleaned it and would see how testing came back. I said if you could clean wall board then why did they take out all my wallboard up 4 feet? (I have nothing left, kitchen and bathroom are gutted, all walls gone up 4 feet, and garage is gutted.) So, why would they leave that common wallboard, and then the mold testing company passed it! However, as I said they are now realizing they have to take down their wall board too. Another question: how do you do two condos? Do we put up our wallboard and then do their mold remediation? Then spores get on our wallboard? Or do we do theirs and then come back in and do air scrubbers in ours? Also put up plastic inside the wall? Here is another headache. The vapor barrier in our kitchen has become tatters. It is only thin paper which is treated. (Evidently this vapor barrier is on outside walls to keep the stucco from leaching in water.) To add to the complication the kitchen wall is the back of the neighbor's patio. They have a loose flower bed up against the wall which they will have to move. So, now there are two issues. -The mold testing and mold remediation company think vapor barrier is not to be touched under any circumstances. They admit that it is obviously moldy. But, said. " You can button up the wall and then take down the wall from the outside to replace the vapor barrier because that ist he only way to replace vapor barrier. They don't touch vapor barriers under any circumstances! Doesn't that sound ridiculous? I said I do not want to put up new wallboard and insulation against moldy, moldy vapor barrier. Also, NO ONE has said that they will replace that outside wall. They are still considering the best way to deal with it. Put a sealant on the stucco outside. sigh Then the issue is who will pay for it, insurance company, neighbor, Homeowner's association. So, now the neighbor is probably upset with me. Does anyone know of a site that lays out info on what a mold remediation company does in some of these situations? What should you expect from a mold remediation company? I am upset because they refused to put into writing that that common wall had visible mold on it. They would tell me verbally, but not in writing. They also didn't take pictures, and didn't give me any reports on their progress. Only that they did hepa vacuum, sanding etc. Nothing about what they saw. Thanks for your insight into any of this. Arlene Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 Arlene I shared your email with one of the remediation professionals that The Mold Source.com refers site visitors to; the following was his response to your question(s) Several questions to answer here. Let's try one issue at a time. 1) The common wall between the two condos (I am asuming) was insulated. That means that it should have been remediated to at least four feet on each side to ensure that all framing members (2x4's) were sanded and treated to avoid the return of the infestation. 2) The stucco on the outside of the residence may have been another source of mold. The vapor barrier, usually placed on the inside of the framing members, will trap the moisture from the wet stucco while it is being applied. 3) It is highly likely that the remaining wallboard on the common wall passed the clearance test because it was treated, sealed and possibly scraped. But that simply removed the mold from the surface. Also, the testing company tested for the presence of mold, not the toxins from the mold infestation. 4) I agree that the flower bed should be removed. It will allow moisture to stay in direct contact with the exterior wall and water will always travel the easiest path, whether that is down or to the interior of the wall. 5) Coverage on this incident is a very complicated issue. The Homeowners' Association should have those answers since they deal with these issues on a regular basis. However, since the refrigerator leaked and caused the problem (or at least made it visible), the owner of the refrigerator may be held responsible. 6) The testing company and the remediation company should have reported any findings that were made in your condo. The findings from the other condos, however, are regarded as sensitive and should not be reported to anyone but that homeowner or his designee. 7) As far as treatment, it would be far more advantageous to treat both condos as one building. Remove the contents to separate sites, then treat the building, not the separate homes therein. Treating each as a separate site will allow the spread of spores to the untreated side. Do all the remediation, then treat the entire structure or at least the affected area. Kev >From: imd <imd@...> ><kevandterri@...> >Subject: How would you answer this lady? What's your thoughts? >Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:04:49 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from smtpout.ev1.net ([207.44.129.134]) by >mc4-f35.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 8 Sep >2002 07:05:12 -0700 >Received: from [216.40.218.144] [216.40.218.144] by smtpout.ev1.net with >ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A9934FF000E6; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:07:15 -0500 >User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 >Message-ID: <B9A0C331.6FD1%imd@...> >Return-Path: imd@... >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2002 14:05:12.0515 (UTC) >FILETIME=[bFADB130:01C25740] > >So, a status report regarding our icemaker that broke and flooded our >condo. I've talked about this before, but this happened on date of >escrow in January and we are still not living in the condo! > Can I ask any of you who have had a waterloss and then mold >remediation some questions: We are now at a standstill because the >condo with adjoining wall also has mold because our condo flooded into >theirs! They were unconcerned before but the owner is now on 3 >inhalers and now is very concerned. Their condo has been tested for >mold and they are to do their condo and also finish up some unfinished >areas in ours. (Would you believe that our condo PASSED their >clearance testing?) This was very upsetting to me as they knew that >the back of their wallboard had visible mold 1 1/2 feet up the >wall. They said they cleaned it and would see how testing came back. >I said if you could clean wall board then why did they take out all my >wallboard up 4 feet? (I have nothing left, kitchen and bathroom are >gutted, all walls gone up 4 feet, and garage is gutted.) >So, why would they leave that common wallboard, and then the mold >testing company passed it! > However, as I said they are now realizing they have to take down >their wall board too. Another question: how do you do two condos? Do >we put up our wallboard and then do their mold remediation? Then >spores get on our wallboard? Or do we do theirs and then come back in >and do air scrubbers in ours? Also put up plastic inside the wall? > Here is another headache. The vapor barrier in our kitchen has >become tatters. It is only thin paper which is treated. (Evidently >this vapor barrier is on outside walls to keep the stucco from >leaching in water.) To add to the complication the kitchen wall is >the back of the neighbor's patio. They have a loose flower bed up >against the wall which they will have to move. >So, now there are two issues. >-The mold testing and mold remediation company think vapor barrier is >not to be touched under any circumstances. They admit that it is >obviously moldy. But, said. " You can button up the wall and then take >down the wall from the outside to replace the vapor barrier because >that ist he only way to replace vapor barrier. They don't touch vapor >barriers under any circumstances! Doesn't that sound ridiculous? I >said I do not want to put up new wallboard and insulation against >moldy, moldy vapor barrier. Also, NO ONE has said that they will >replace that outside wall. They are still considering the best way to >deal with it. Put a sealant on the stucco outside. sigh Then the issue >is who will pay for it, insurance company, neighbor, Homeowner's >association. So, now the neighbor is probably upset with me. > Does anyone know of a site that lays out info on what a mold >remediation company does in some of these situations? What should you >expect from a mold remediation company? I am upset because they >refused to put into writing that that common wall had visible mold on >it. They would tell me verbally, but not in writing. They also didn't >take pictures, and didn't give me any reports on their progress. Only >that they did hepa vacuum, sanding etc. Nothing about what they saw. >Thanks for your insight into any of this. >Arlene > , Terri and the Kids _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com > From: " arounce " <arounce@...> > Reply- > Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 13:07:43 -0000 > > Subject: [] Mold Remediation/vapor barrier > > So, a status report regarding our icemaker that broke and flooded our > condo. I've talked about this before, but this happened on date of > escrow in January and we are still not living in the condo! > Can I ask any of you who have had a waterloss and then mold > remediation some questions: We are now at a standstill because the > condo with adjoining wall also has mold because our condo flooded into > theirs! They were unconcerned before but the owner is now on 3 > inhalers and now is very concerned. Their condo has been tested for > mold and they are to do their condo and also finish up some unfinished > areas in ours. (Would you believe that our condo PASSED their > clearance testing?) This was very upsetting to me as they knew that > the back of their wallboard had visible mold 1 1/2 feet up the > wall. They said they cleaned it and would see how testing came back. > I said if you could clean wall board then why did they take out all my > wallboard up 4 feet? (I have nothing left, kitchen and bathroom are > gutted, all walls gone up 4 feet, and garage is gutted.) > So, why would they leave that common wallboard, and then the mold > testing company passed it! > However, as I said they are now realizing they have to take down > their wall board too. Another question: how do you do two condos? Do > we put up our wallboard and then do their mold remediation? Then > spores get on our wallboard? Or do we do theirs and then come back in > and do air scrubbers in ours? Also put up plastic inside the wall? > Here is another headache. The vapor barrier in our kitchen has > become tatters. It is only thin paper which is treated. (Evidently > this vapor barrier is on outside walls to keep the stucco from > leaching in water.) To add to the complication the kitchen wall is > the back of the neighbor's patio. They have a loose flower bed up > against the wall which they will have to move. > So, now there are two issues. > -The mold testing and mold remediation company think vapor barrier is > not to be touched under any circumstances. They admit that it is > obviously moldy. But, said. " You can button up the wall and then take > down the wall from the outside to replace the vapor barrier because > that ist he only way to replace vapor barrier. They don't touch vapor > barriers under any circumstances! Doesn't that sound ridiculous? I > said I do not want to put up new wallboard and insulation against > moldy, moldy vapor barrier. Also, NO ONE has said that they will > replace that outside wall. They are still considering the best way to > deal with it. Put a sealant on the stucco outside. sigh Then the issue > is who will pay for it, insurance company, neighbor, Homeowner's > association. So, now the neighbor is probably upset with me. > Does anyone know of a site that lays out info on what a mold > remediation company does in some of these situations? What should you > expect from a mold remediation company? I am upset because they > refused to put into writing that that common wall had visible mold on > it. They would tell me verbally, but not in writing. They also didn't > take pictures, and didn't give me any reports on their progress. Only > that they did hepa vacuum, sanding etc. Nothing about what they saw. > Thanks for your insight into any of this. > Arlene > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2002 Report Share Posted September 10, 2002 Hi , Thanks so much for your advice. I believe that you are correct in how the common wall passed clearance testing. They did sand off the mold and " tried " to clean it. When they did clearance testing they said it was ok. HOWEVER, clearance testing was not cultured. They took a piece of the wallboard from my side, They did go up 4' and they took the sample from the bottom of this area. Testing did show level 1 contamination of Chaemonium. Which to them level 1 is not worth worrying about. This wallboard backs up the the other contaminated wallboard of the neighbor's condo. Now, they have a wall of mirrors on this wall, that is STILL testing as WET--8 months after the water loss. So, now I also worry that they need to keep taking our wall board as high as they take theirs because of the possibility that their entire wallboard is contaminated from the mirrors that never allowed the wall to dry. I agree that both condo's should be done at the same time. Sad fact is that ours has already been done, and now we have to wait while they get around to do the other one. Plus then finish ours up too. They have their furniture etc in there, ours in the only lucky part of this thing, was empty since it was date of escrow. Right now the Homeowner's Association is covering the loss in the major part. However, the current issue is how to deal with the deteriorated vapor barrier. This we don't know if was caused by this water loss or from the flower bed, etc. (Their patio backs onto our kitchen.) Everyone thinks that vapor barrier has to be left there even if it is shredded and moldy. Can anyone explain this? The mold testing and the mold remediation company both don't want anything to do with the vapor barrier! I want then to take down the visible moldy vapor barrier and clean the stucco. They both have black powdery substance which is suspiciously just like the Stachy that we had in the house. Mold testing company admits it is moldy. But, says best to put up new wallboard and then take down the stucco from t he other side. No one has said they will do that to replace the vapor barrier, and I don't want mold in my wall from contamination to the wallboard and insulation. That sounds very stupid to me! Thoughts on this? Any way to replace vapor barrier without taking down the wall? water seal. I'd hate to go through alllllllllllll this and then have mold in that kitchen wall because we have no vapor barrier and we have mold spores from this loss in there. The patio behind would be washed down, plants watered etc. Very open to water intrusion. Plus there is another wall that is not as bad in the kitchen that goes to our backyard and not to patio. So, perhaps this is a result of the water loss? Wahhhhh, I'm sick of this! Thanks for listening! I have argued so much the last 8 months that I am making myself sick. I had EKG for chest pain and now have to have stress test. I can't believe these people can torture all of us and make it go on and on. I feel so much for all of what everyone is going through. It is nice to have a place for support. :-) > > > Arlene > > I shared your email with one of the remediation professionals that The Mold > Source.com refers site visitors to; the following was his response to your > question(s) > > Several questions to answer here. Let's try one issue at a time. > 1) The common wall between the two condos (I am asuming) was insulated. That > means that it should have been remediated to at least four feet on each side > to ensure that all framing members (2x4's) were sanded and treated to avoid > the return of the infestation. > > 2) The stucco on the outside of the residence may have been another source > of mold. The vapor barrier, usually placed on the inside of the framing > members, will trap the moisture from the wet stucco while it is being > applied. > > 3) It is highly likely that the remaining wallboard on the common wall > passed the clearance test because it was treated, sealed and possibly > scraped. But that simply removed the mold from the surface. Also, the > testing company tested for the presence of mold, not the toxins from the > mold infestation. > > 4) I agree that the flower bed should be removed. It will allow moisture to > stay in direct contact with the exterior wall and water will always travel > the easiest path, whether that is down or to the interior of the wall. > > 5) Coverage on this incident is a very complicated issue. The Homeowners' > Association should have those answers since they deal with these issues on a > regular basis. However, since the refrigerator leaked and caused the problem > (or at least made it visible), the owner of the refrigerator may be held > responsible. > > 6) The testing company and the remediation company should have reported any > findings that were made in your condo. The findings from the other condos, > however, are regarded as sensitive and should not be reported to anyone but > that homeowner or his designee. > > 7) As far as treatment, it would be far more advantageous to treat both > condos as one building. Remove the contents to separate sites, then treat > the building, not the separate homes therein. Treating each as a separate > site will allow the spread of spores to the untreated side. Do all the > remediation, then treat the entire structure or at least the affected area. > > > Kev > > > >From: imd <imd@t...> > ><kevandterri@h...> > >Subject: How would you answer this lady? What's your thoughts? > >Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:04:49 -0500 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from smtpout.ev1.net ([207.44.129.134]) by > >mc4-f35.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Sun, 8 Sep > >2002 07:05:12 -0700 > >Received: from [216.40.218.144] [216.40.218.144] by smtpout.ev1.net with > >ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A9934FF000E6; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 09:07:15 -0500 > >User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 > >Message-ID: <B9A0C331.6FD1%imd@t...> > >Return-Path: imd@t... > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2002 14:05:12.0515 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[bFADB130:01C25740] > > > >So, a status report regarding our icemaker that broke and flooded our > >condo. I've talked about this before, but this happened on date of > >escrow in January and we are still not living in the condo! > > Can I ask any of you who have had a waterloss and then mold > >remediation some questions: We are now at a standstill because the > >condo with adjoining wall also has mold because our condo flooded into > >theirs! They were unconcerned before but the owner is now on 3 > >inhalers and now is very concerned. Their condo has been tested for > >mold and they are to do their condo and also finish up some unfinished > >areas in ours. (Would you believe that our condo PASSED their > >clearance testing?) This was very upsetting to me as they knew that > >the back of their wallboard had visible mold 1 1/2 feet up the > >wall. They said they cleaned it and would see how testing came back. > >I said if you could clean wall board then why did they take out all my > >wallboard up 4 feet? (I have nothing left, kitchen and bathroom are > >gutted, all walls gone up 4 feet, and garage is gutted.) > >So, why would they leave that common wallboard, and then the mold > >testing company passed it! > > However, as I said they are now realizing they have to take down > >their wall board too. Another question: how do you do two condos? Do > >we put up our wallboard and then do their mold remediation? Then > >spores get on our wallboard? Or do we do theirs and then come back in > >and do air scrubbers in ours? Also put up plastic inside the wall? > > Here is another headache. The vapor barrier in our kitchen has > >become tatters. It is only thin paper which is treated. (Evidently > >this vapor barrier is on outside walls to keep the stucco from > >leaching in water.) To add to the complication the kitchen wall is > >the back of the neighbor's patio. They have a loose flower bed up > >against the wall which they will have to move. > >So, now there are two issues. > >-The mold testing and mold remediation company think vapor barrier is > >not to be touched under any circumstances. They admit that it is > >obviously moldy. But, said. " You can button up the wall and then take > >down the wall from the outside to replace the vapor barrier because > >that ist he only way to replace vapor barrier. They don't touch vapor > >barriers under any circumstances! Doesn't that sound ridiculous? I > >said I do not want to put up new wallboard and insulation against > >moldy, moldy vapor barrier. Also, NO ONE has said that they will > >replace that outside wall. They are still considering the best way to > >deal with it. Put a sealant on the stucco outside. sigh Then the issue > >is who will pay for it, insurance company, neighbor, Homeowner's > >association. So, now the neighbor is probably upset with me. > > Does anyone know of a site that lays out info on what a mold > >remediation company does in some of these situations? What should you > >expect from a mold remediation company? I am upset because they > >refused to put into writing that that common wall had visible mold on > >it. They would tell me verbally, but not in writing. They also didn't > >take pictures, and didn't give me any reports on their progress. Only > >that they did hepa vacuum, sanding etc. Nothing about what they saw. > >Thanks for your insight into any of this. > >Arlene > > > > > > > , Terri and the Kids > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > From: " arounce " <arounce@a...> > > Reply-@y... > > Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 13:07:43 -0000 > > @y... > > Subject: [] Mold Remediation/vapor barrier > > > > So, a status report regarding our icemaker that broke and flooded our > > condo. I've talked about this before, but this happened on date of > > escrow in January and we are still not living in the condo! > > Can I ask any of you who have had a waterloss and then mold > > remediation some questions: We are now at a standstill because the > > condo with adjoining wall also has mold because our condo flooded into > > theirs! They were unconcerned before but the owner is now on 3 > > inhalers and now is very concerned. Their condo has been tested for > > mold and they are to do their condo and also finish up some unfinished > > areas in ours. (Would you believe that our condo PASSED their > > clearance testing?) This was very upsetting to me as they knew that > > the back of their wallboard had visible mold 1 1/2 feet up the > > wall. They said they cleaned it and would see how testing came back. > > I said if you could clean wall board then why did they take out all my > > wallboard up 4 feet? (I have nothing left, kitchen and bathroom are > > gutted, all walls gone up 4 feet, and garage is gutted.) > > So, why would they leave that common wallboard, and then the mold > > testing company passed it! > > However, as I said they are now realizing they have to take down > > their wall board too. Another question: how do you do two condos? Do > > we put up our wallboard and then do their mold remediation? Then > > spores get on our wallboard? Or do we do theirs and then come back in > > and do air scrubbers in ours? Also put up plastic inside the wall? > > Here is another headache. The vapor barrier in our kitchen has > > become tatters. It is only thin paper which is treated. (Evidently > > this vapor barrier is on outside walls to keep the stucco from > > leaching in water.) To add to the complication the kitchen wall is > > the back of the neighbor's patio. They have a loose flower bed up > > against the wall which they will have to move. > > So, now there are two issues. > > -The mold testing and mold remediation company think vapor barrier is > > not to be touched under any circumstances. They admit that it is > > obviously moldy. But, said. " You can button up the wall and then take > > down the wall from the outside to replace the vapor barrier because > > that ist he only way to replace vapor barrier. They don't touch vapor > > barriers under any circumstances! Doesn't that sound ridiculous? I > > said I do not want to put up new wallboard and insulation against > > moldy, moldy vapor barrier. Also, NO ONE has said that they will > > replace that outside wall. They are still considering the best way to > > deal with it. Put a sealant on the stucco outside. sigh Then the issue > > is who will pay for it, insurance company, neighbor, Homeowner's > > association. So, now the neighbor is probably upset with me. > > Does anyone know of a site that lays out info on what a mold > > remediation company does in some of these situations? What should you > > expect from a mold remediation company? I am upset because they > > refused to put into writing that that common wall had visible mold on > > it. They would tell me verbally, but not in writing. They also didn't > > take pictures, and didn't give me any reports on their progress. Only > > that they did hepa vacuum, sanding etc. Nothing about what they saw. > > Thanks for your insight into any of this. > > Arlene > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > > This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been > > specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material > > available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, > > human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. > > We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as > > provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title > > 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit > > to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included > > information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: > > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted > > material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', > > you must obtain permiss Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.