Guest guest Posted August 30, 2002 Report Share Posted August 30, 2002 http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/local_news/article/0,1406,KNS_347_1357129,00.htm l Study: Haze raised locally National effort called for on home-grown pollution By Tim Whitmire, Associated Press August 30, 2002 ASHEVILLE, N.C. - A 10-year study of air pollution in the southern Appalachians has concluded that local sources cause most of the mountain haze, going against a long-held belief that it came from the industrial Midwest. The Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative, a voluntary effort by eight Southeastern states, the federal government and affected industries, said in its final report Thursday that each state in the region " will benefit the most from emission reductions in that state. " However, because some pollution crosses state and regional lines, the report concluded that a national approach is the only politically feasible solution to cut sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions. Sulfur dioxide, primarily spewed by coal-fired electric plants in the region, is a main ingredient in the haze that often obscures vistas in the Smokies and other southern Appalachian ranges. Nitrogen oxide is a primary component of smog. SAMI's effort focused on the region's two national parks and eight wilderness areas, which were studied because the 1977 Clean Air Act requires that they be protected from new sources of air pollution. The report included eight states: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. The numbers and bar graphs that crowd SAMI's 172-page report reveal a simple truth: The states are the creators of much of the tainted air that they breathe. " In 1990, 1995, the conventional wisdom was that air pollution traveled much farther distances than the SAMI study showed, " said Shore, Southeast Air Quality Manager for the group Environmental Defense and a member of SAMI's governing body. Historically, residents of East Tennessee and western North Carolina blamed the haze on pollution drifting downwind from states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Computer modeling that considered emissions and weather conditions in a " one-atmosphere " model concluded otherwise. For example, it showed that about 75 percent of the sulfate fine particles in the air over North Carolina's Shining Rock wilderness are the result of sulfur dioxide emitted within the SAMI region. Some environmentalists have criticized the report, saying it doesn't go far enough. It makes no precise recommendation on how soon or how much emissions should be reduced, saying only that national legislation " should result in no less than the reductions ... represented by the (Bush) administration's Clear Skies Initiative. " The White House's proposal would cap total output of sulfur dioxide, mercury and nitrogen oxide and allow utilities to trade pollution credits among themselves. Under the plan, which has been criticized by Democrats and environmental groups as unfair and inadequate, emissions of each substance would be reduced by about 70 percent by 2018. Participants said SAMI was slow and cautious because it was voluntary. However, they say that process produced the most complete scientific data ever produced on the subject. Tom Mather, spokesman for North Carolina's Division of Air Quality, said SAMI data was crucial in persuading his state's lawmakers this year to reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from coal-fired energy plants by 70 percent by 2013. " That made a big difference, when the legislators saw that data, " Mather said. Shipp, environmental policy general manager for the Tennessee Valley Authority, said the utility already is moving to clean up its coal-fired plants without action from the states in which it operates. By the end of the decade, he said, TVA will spend $2.8 billion to install sulfur dioxide-removing scrubbers and nitrogen oxide-reducing systems at plants in Kentucky, Alabama and Tennessee. The goal is to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by 85 percent and nitrogen oxide emissions by 75 percent. Because air pollution so easily crosses state and regional borders and because states and utilities have differed in their approaches, Shipp said TVA believes " a national approach is the only way to go. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.