Re: URGENT: TX Supreme Court rules in favor of homebuyers!

[Guest guest]

, You know I am thrilled over that one, that is what I am in suit for: Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability. We checked our case yesterday and the Judge has not ruled in favor of their summary judgement, so I assume it is going as scheduled to trial on Nov. 20-23, 2002 for 1.5 mil. I am having to try it myself.

Best to you, what a great day!

Carroll-Bower, President of Natioanl Toxic Mold Coalition and Foundation

http://ntmc0.tripod.com

http://ntmc0.tripod.com/scorecard

http:

johncoby wrote: For Immediate Release Contact: Janet Ahmad President HomeOwners for Better Building 210-494-6404 R. Cobaruvias Houston 281-486-5203 After almost 2 years since the hearing the TX Supreme Court agreed in upholding an appeals court decision that said homeowners should not be forced to contract away the implied warranty of habitability and good workmanship to buy a new home. This is a HUGE fist step in a series of steps that will bring back confidence in new homebuying in Texas. HOBB has always argued that the implied warranty was necessary because of the minimal protection provided with the expressed warranties. We are very glad the Supreme Court has ruled in the homebuyers favor. More will be posted on our website today. www.hobb.orgFAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

[Guest guest]

, You know I am thrilled over that one, that is what I am in suit for: Breach of Implied Warranty of Habitability. We checked our case yesterday and the Judge has not ruled in favor of their summary judgement, so I assume it is going as scheduled to trial on Nov. 20-23, 2002 for 1.5 mil. I am having to try it myself. Best to you, what a great day! Carroll-Bower, President of Natioanl Toxic Mold Coalition and Foundation http://ntmc0.tripod.com http://ntmc0.tripod.com/scorecard http: johncoby wrote: For Immediate Release Contact: Janet Ahmad President HomeOwners for Better Building 210-494-6404 R. Cobaruvias Houston 281-486-5203 After almost 2 years since the hearing the TX Supreme Court agreed in upholding an appeals court decision that said homeowners should not be forced to contract away the implied warranty of habitability and good workmanship to buy a new home. This is a HUGE fist step in a series of steps that will bring back confidence in new homebuying in Texas. HOBB has always argued that the implied warranty was necessary because of the minimal protection provided with the expressed warranties. We are very glad the Supreme Court has ruled in the homebuyers favor. More will be posted on our website today. www.hobb.orgFAIR USE NOTICE:This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.