Guest guest Posted June 20, 2002 Report Share Posted June 20, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: " Kathi " <pureheart@...> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:38 PM Subject: PLEASE POST Saline Support > Caroline-- > > I stand corrected--the Sixth Circuit Court is not a > Nevada Court. And I knew that--where's my head? > > Good info in your post--I did not know one had > recourse and could change her vote!!! I would have been > on this issue for years!!! I wonder > how many know this--it is my understanding that > many women are unhappy with their votes now that > they realize the facts in the bankruptcy. Many never > read the Plan, and many didn't even ask to read it--they > don't realize that a settlement is in fact, dropping the case. > Many still do not realize that Dow Corning still denies > the whole thing--continuously, throughout the Plan. > > WOMEN (AND MEN) if you wish to change your vote, > I'm not sure who to contact, but I would suppose that > the Tort Claimants Committee could tell you. . . and > do not accept any excuses. If you voted yes to this Plan, > and if the appeal now wins, and you do not change your > vote, you will be unable to sue Dow Chemical, if in fact, > you filed against them intially and do not live in CA, NY > or MI. You will have to wait and take whatever you get > from this Plan. I would think that most attorneys did file > against Dow Chemical initially, but I know some did not. > > > A rush of changes to " no " might carry a lot more weight > than you think. . .if nothing else, it sends a message both > to the judge and to the public, should the whole issue > ever come forth. This needs to be done quickly--like > immediately. And, if you do not know, check your copy > of the suit, or call your attorney and find out whether he > sued Dow Chemical initially--unless you live in California, > NY or Michigan and cannot sue them. If I'm not mistaken, > the State in which your implantation took place is the > determining factor--not necessarily where you live now. > > If this is appealed to the US Supreme Court, and if > the US Supreme Court decides after waiting awhile > that it will not hear it, what happens? Just more time > lost? > > What if a number of people attempt to change their vote > and are thwarted? I'm having a difficult time understanding > why this option has not been presented in the past? Or > has it and I missed it? > > > An older surgeon friend said the same thing you did--it > will take about twenty years total and recipients are going > to really be surprised at how little they receive--if anything. > It appears to me that Dow Corning is counting on most > women receiving the $2000 expedited payment--one way > or the other. > > Would really appreciate a reply > > Bonnie > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.