Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: ParfumGigi@... BreastImplantNews@... ; Atrice@... ; frontiers20k@... Cc: RSLB49@... ; Gimfl@... ; GATOR1KW@... ; Vellee@... ; Ming39@... ; NEspina@... ; Sparkielane@... ; RE7010@... ; IceMaidenZ@... ; idagirl@... ; Bsiemer@... ; Dixyland@... ; Eagle5xV@... ; IrD@... ; KENOTBONE@... ; nateandkay@... ; ONESOMER@... ; rn911a@... ; SILLS64VET@... ; SOOPAGAL1@... ; THEKOWALFAMILY@... Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 8:29 PM Subject: Study Finds Many Drug Errors Study Finds Many Drug Errors Study Finds an Average of Over 40 Potentially Harmful Drug Errors Daily at Hospitals More than 40 potentially harmful drug errors daily were found on average in hospitals in a new study, yet another report on a worrisome problem regulators are working to remedy. The most common errors were giving hospitalized patients medication at the wrong time or not at all, researchers found in a study of 36 hospitals and nursing homes in Colorado and Georgia. Errors occurred in nearly one of five doses in a typical, 300-bed hospital, which translates to about two errors per patient daily. Seven percent of the errors were considered potentially harmful. The study, which did not evaluate death or injury rates, is published in Sept. 9th's Archives of Internal Medicine. It is based on data collected in 1999. The rates are similar to those in other reports on drug errors, but the new study highlights a specific point in the process of getting a drug to a patient: "administering errors" made by nurses or other hospital staffers after a doctor has properly prescribed a drug. Other studies focused on earlier steps, such as doctors prescribing the wrong drug, or pharmacists incorrectly reading a doctor's messy handwriting. "It's a major problem, not a minor problem, and it doesn't lend itself to an easy solution," said researcher Barker, an Auburn University professor of pharmacy care systems. Barker and colleagues evaluated hospitals accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, nonaccredited hospitals and nursing facilities. Error rates were similar, regardless of whether an institution was accredited. The researchers said their findings support implications in a highly publicized 1999 Institute of Medicine report suggesting that the nation's hospitals have "major systems problems." The IOM report said medical errors contribute to more than 1 million injuries and up to 98,000 deaths annually. Health care workers trained for the new study were sent on-site and recorded errors during 81 days of observation. Potentially harmful errors included overdoses and instances when nurses failed to give patients prescribed medication. The study follows the Joint Commission's recent announcement of six safety standards it will require starting in January to reduce medical errors. The hospital regulatory agency accredits most of the nation's 6,000 hospitals. The new standards include demanding better methods of preventing drug errors, and hospitals that don't measure up could risk losing accreditation and federal money. JCAHO says hospitals should use at least two "identifiers" other than a patient's hospital room number to ensure that the right drug gets to the right patient. For example, nurses should check patients' wrist bands and ask them verbally, when possible, to identify themselves, before administering a drug, said Dr. Schyve, JCAHO's senior vice president. Using a room number has been done, but is risky because a patient could be transferred without a nurse's knowledge, Schyve said. Schyve said the study helps confirm "that there is a problem here and helps guide people to understand where some of those errors lie." He discounted the study's finding that error rates were similar at accredited hospitals because only 12 such facilities were included. Also, Schyve said, accredited hospitals tend to be larger and handle the sickest patients, thus may be more prone to errors. Unaccredited hospitals include small, rural facilities that can't afford accrediting regulations, such as having quick access to an anesthesiologist for obstetric patients in case an emergency Caesarean section is needed, Schyve said. gigi* I've had this problem occur myself, an other family members were given another patients medication, don't take it un less you're positive it's the correct medication prescribed by your physician. Whenever you, or a family member are in the hospital, be vigilant at all times. Don't be afraid to question the physician, or a family members if you aren't in agreement with the treatment they have prescribed, a conference to discuss these matters is your right. I have no respect for the IOM committee, after the meeting on breast implants, they were totally bias in favor of the breast implant manufactures, so is the FDA. I'd call breast implants not only harmful, but they've taken the lives of how many among us, not counting those with other silicone medical devices. How clear does the picture have to be for the FDA to admit silicone, should be removed again from the consumers market forever, instead of approving known toxic substance? http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Living/ap20020908_1066.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.