Guest guest Posted October 20, 2002 Report Share Posted October 20, 2002 FYI! And thanks to all who wrote to our representatives re this Bill! Through the bi-partisan leadership efforts of Congressman Roy Blunt (R-MO), his legislative aide Annissa Mc, the women of Missouri led by Kim Hoffman, Congressman Gene Green (D-TX), his legislative aide Sharon Scribner, the women of Texas led by Keeling, Zuckerman, Ph.D., with the National Center for Policy Research for Women and Families, Beth Buchholz with The Sheridan Group - the House of Representatives included in the amendments to the Medical Device User Fee Bill provisions for an NIH study on breast implants and a GAO (General Accounting Office) study on informed consent issues. In a paper issued by the Commerce Committee, the NIH is directed to focus on the long-term health of breast cancer survivors including neurological and/or auto-immune irregularities that show possible links to silicone migration. The NIH is also directed to focus on young women who may have local complications including problems in breast-feeding with saline or silicone gel-filled implants. Many thanks to the many women who wrote letters and contacted their Congressional offices regarding this important women's health issue. If you would like to write a think-you letter, it may be sent to: Representative Roy Blunt 217 Cannon House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 FAX 202/225-5604 blunt@... Representative Gene Green 2335 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D. C. 20515 FAX 202/225-9903 www.house.gov/green Device makers are hoping the Senate will act on the legislation before Congress adjourns this year. The text of the Commerce Committee paper reads as follows: FDA Report Language The Committee believes that it is vital that women considering an implant procedure be provided objective, understandable information about the risks and benefits of implant surgery. Therefore, the Committee strongly encourages the Food and Drug Administration ensure that women receive such information in a timely fashion, particularly if the procedure is elective. In particular, the agency should consider working with an advisory panel, patients, consumer groups, implant manufacturers, plastic surgeons, and other interested parties to ensure such information is updated correctly, and as soon as possible when new information about adverse events becomes available. The agency should consider writing product guides if it believes it could help communicate fair and balanced information, and to ensure that such guides are appropriately updated. The agency should also work with patients, consumer groups, manufacturers, plastic surgeons, and other interested parties to ensure that women enrolling in clinical trails for silicone breast implants are provided with up-to-date, easy to understand informed consent documents, early in the clinical trial enrollment process. The agency should also take appropriate steps to ensure that clinical trail participants receive information on how to report problems about their participation or continued enrollment in a study or a particular clinical trial. NIH Report Language The Committee is aware of conflicting research as to the long-term health implications of breast implants. Therefore, the Committee has asked the NIH to report on all of its research in this area. Furthermore, we urge the NIH to continue and expand research programs that examine the long-term health implications of breast implants. If scientifically appropriate, such a study should allow for comparisons of women receiving implants for reconstruction after mastectomy to breast cancer patients who have not had reconstruction. The committee believes that it is important for these studies to include women who have had implants for at least eight years, separately analyzing women with saline implants and those with silicone gel implants. Such a study should include the rate of local complications, which may include capsular contracture, leakage, loss of nipple sensation, problems in breast feeding, deflation and rupture as well as systemic health problems which may include neurological and/or auto-immune irregularities that show possible links to silicone migration, or other leakage or breakage related issues. Martha Murdock, DirectorNational Silicone Implant Foundation | Dallas Headquarters"Supporting Survivors of Medical Implant Devices"4416 Willow LaneDallas, TX 75244-7537 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.