Re: Digest Number 1043

April 14, 2001

Dear Poison Ivy sufferers...

Regarding Poison Ivy and Poison Oak, there is a

commercial product called " Technu " which, when used

with hot water, washes the oils off without spreading

them. You can get it at camping supply stores and some

drugstores. The company that makes Technu also makes

some kind of ointment that supposedly helps prevent

the oils from causing a reaction - I've never used it.

Jan Bolen

__________________________________________________

April 14, 2001

At 08:49 PM 4/13/01 +0000, you wrote:

>I have been trying for ten years to find the name again of a plant that

>neutralizes poison ivy/oak. When I originally read about it I thought I

Jewel Weed is a folk medicine plant said to help alleviate Poison Ivy.

Byron

April 14, 2001

<P>Urea cream is also a good topical antibiotic. & nbsp;

It helped my moms rash outbreaks due to allergy to

formaldehyde a great deal. & nbsp; Urea is basically

" horse pee " & nbsp;so it only makes sense that it has

anti-bacterial properties....</P>

<P>Deanna & nbsp;<BR></P>

<P> & nbsp; <B><I>Jan Bolen

& lt;jurimed@... & gt;</I></B> wrote: <BR>

<BLOCKQUOTE style= " BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid;

MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px " ><TT>Dear Poison

Ivy sufferers...<BR>Regarding Poison Ivy and Poison

Oak, there is a<BR>commercial product called " Technu "

which, when used<BR>with hot water, washes the oils

off without spreading<BR>them. You can get it at

camping supply stores and some<BR>drugstores. The

company that makes Technu also makes<BR>some kind of

ointment that supposedly helps prevent<BR>the oils

from causing a reaction - I've never used

it.<BR><BR>Jan

Bolen<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>__________________________________________________<BR>D\

o

You ?<BR>Get email at your own domain with

. <BR><A

href= " http://personal.mail./ " >http://personal.mail./</A><BR></\

TT><BR><!--

|**|begin egp html banner|**| --><BR>

Groups Sponsor</B></FONT></TD></TR><BR>

<FORM

action=http://rd./M=176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060814:\

N/A=637484/R=0/*http://store./cgi-bin/clinkform/ydomains+merchant-ad:dm\

ad/M=176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060814:N/A=637484/R=1/987256975\

+http://whois.domains./domains_wresults.html

method=get><INPUT name=action type=hidden

value=1><INPUT name=property type=hidden

value=domains> <BR>

<TABLE border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0

width=468><BR>

<TD bgColor=#660066 rowSpan=2><A

href= " http://rd./M=176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060814:N\

/A=637484/R=2/*http://store./cgi-bin/clink?ydomains+merchant-ad:dmad/M=\

176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060814:N/A=637484/R=3/987256975+http\

://domains./ " ><IMG

border=0 height=60

src= " http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/_domain/test/north3c_01.gif "

width=223></A></TD><BR>

<TD bgColor=#660066><A

href= " http://rd./M=176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060814:N\

/A=637484/R=4/*http://store./cgi-bin/clink?ydomains+merchant-ad:dmad/M=\

176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=1700060814:N/A=637484/R=5/987256975+http\

://domains./ " ><IMG

border=0 height=30

src= " http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ya/_domain/test/north3c_02.gif "

width=245></A></TD></TR><BR>

<TABLE align=center bgColor=#660066 border=0

cellPadding=1 cellSpacing=0 width= " 1% " ><BR>

<TD width= " 100% " ><INPUT name=name size=16

value=type-it-here></TD><BR>

<TD><INPUT name=Submit type=submit

value=Go!></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></FORM></TD></TR><\

BR>

<TD><IMG alt= " " height=1

src= " http://us.adserver./l?M=176325.1402487.2987152.2/D=egroupmail/S=17\

00060814:N/A=637484/rand=485446033 "

width=1></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><!-- |**|end egp

html banner|**| --><BR><TT>OxyPLUS is an unmoderated

e-ring dealing with oxidative therapies, and other

alternative self-help subjects.<BR><BR>THERE IS NO

MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!<BR><BR>This list is the 1st

Amendment in action. The things you will find here are

for information and research purposes only. & nbsp; We

are people sharing information we believe in. If you

act on ideas found here, you do so at your own

risk. & nbsp; Self-help requires intelligence, common

sense, and the ability to take responsibility for your

own actions. By joining the list you agree to hold

yourself FULLY responsible FOR yourself. & nbsp; Do not

use any ideas found here without consulting a medical

professional, unless you are a researcher or health

care provider. <BR><BR>You can unsubscribe via e-mail

by sending A NEW e-mail to the following address - NOT

TO THE OXYPLUS LIST! - <BR>DO NOT USE REPLY BUTTON

& amp; DO NOT PUT THIS IN THE SUBJECT LINE or BODY of

the message! :<BR><BR> & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp;

oxyplus-unsubscribeegroups<BR><BR> & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp;

oxyplus-normalonelist - switch your subscription

to normal mode. </TT><BR><BR><TT>

April 23, 2001

'oxyplus ' wrote:

====

- OxyPLUS is an unmoderated e-ring dealing with oxidative therapies, and other

alternative self-help subjects.

-

- THERE IS NO MEDICAL ADVICE HERE!

-

- This list is the 1st Amendment in action. The things you will find here are

for information and research purposes only. We are people sharing information

we believe in. If you act on ideas found here, you do so at your own risk.

Self-help requires intelligence, common sense, and the ability to take

responsibility ...'

> Take a look to the attachment.

November 1, 2002

I am so sorry you don't like the info on the site, we try to help many

ladies, so when I read that I was a bit taken back. Hope that Martha will

answer you questions.

good luck

----- Original Message -----

From: " S. WIlkins " <eckymae@...>

< >

Cc: <eckymae@...>

Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:08 PM

Subject: Re: Digest Number 1043

> Martha, I was so hoping you would read my words. I felt like you would

have

> some feedback for me. I live in Vidalia, GA and had my implantation in

> Augusta, GA. I live 100 miles from Augusta, 100 from Savannah, and 200

from

> Atlanta. I would like a referral to an atty. I have absolutely no idea

> what brand or model implant I have. I do have a copy of the hospital

> records, however they did not sent labs, pathology, etc. But the

operative

> report. Dr. Kolb explained the dobule lumen with saline and gel

indicating

> I did have " Silicone. " My Dr. may be dead by now. I did request he send

> records to Dr. Kolb, but he did not. I am requesting them again, but I

want

> to find out if he's living or not. I'm not sure if I mentioned it before,

> but the report was signed " joseph still by Dr. Orlett, and PS in his

office.

> During my surgery, my sone and husband saw my Dr. still in the cafeteria

> eating chilli. I have also wondered just what did happen to me in the OR.

> I have since discovering my plight, what kind of papers I signed when

> admitted to the hospital giving permission for surgery. (You know, the 30

> to 60 mintues of filling out forms and signing away your life with no real

> time to actually read them and getting a short sentence to explain what

the

> paper before you is.) Having worked with gov agencies with form

experience,

> who really has the option of " informed consent. " If all the patients

> admitted to hospitals read all these papers before signing....would the

> doctors get so rich?) May God help us all at the mercy of persons we are

> supposed to be able to trust. Thankfully, I am still able to trust

people,

> as I do believe GOD IS IN CONTROL. I haven't figured out exactly what God

> wants me to learn from this experience, but onward I go. Please do tell

me

> more about the automatic opt-in since I did not opt-out of the

Class-Action

> lawsuits. Dr. Kolb mentioned that I might be eligible for the Dow suit

> depending on the brand I have. She also mentioned that some of the suits

> were closed (mentor, etc.) Are there exceptions? How do I get included?

> And do you have any suggestions for a suit agains the PS. I do

appreciated

> you comments and I agree that often there's to much other on the site.

> Thanks for all the concrete information and spiritual uplifiting you

> provide. Love in Christ,

> from Sweet Onion Country(Vidalia)

>

> Original Message -----

> From: < >

> < >

> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 8:27 PM

> Subject: Digest Number 1043

>

October 7, 2003

Dear

Thank you for your succinct but depressing message about the 3rd part of

the register. It seems to me that our concerns behind the Mayday

campaign have become reality.

Health visiting has been sidelined and devalued for many years (except

in govt policy documents!)and the third part of the new Register is part

of this process. The apparent disregard for health visiting (both

principles and practice)by those behind this development will inevitably

have consequences in practice: we might see an increase in bogus health

visitors, for example. It will affect recruitment on a wide scale,

especially new developments like Children's Trusts and Children's

centres, as employers will have to be very careful to avoid employing

people who don't have the skills their title suggests they have. But

maybe this has to happen in order for things to change? Maybe we have to

wait for these effects to be seen before being able to make people

listen?

Paradoxically, I think it actually leaves an opportunity for direct

entry and for educational establishments to develop new courses. And as

for the students not being registered with the NMC, health visiting as a

profession in its own right has been eradicated, so what have we got to

lose? We could end up with a much better training for students, with no

nursing/medical baggage and hopefully far less of a policy-practice

divide. As for what we call this new breed of professional.....

So perhaps we have a glimmer of hope?

Best wishes

Gill

Digest Number 1043

October 11, 2003

Gill, I am sorry for the delay replying; I have been busy moving house;

currently surrounded by boxes, dust and remaining doggy/cigarette smells

from pervious owner!

However, I think I am inclined to agree with you. There is a worrying

risk to the public if health visiting is not regulated, but the

government (DH, anyway) have made it quite clear that they are not

prepared to listen to us about this. We have lost the argument about

protecting the public, although it remains an issue. Nurses are

regulated so health visitors do not need to be, is the government view;

if we want a register of any kind, then we must stop being health

visitors, give up our knowledge base and concentrate on nursing.

The risk to the health visiting profession must be our next concern:

and, paradoxical though it may seem, deregulation actually gives us a

golden opportunity to redevelop in line with what is really required to

meet the needs of the community and changing service configurations.

Oddly, whilst the DH are busy rather huffily disregarding health

visiting, reducing our numbers, pressing us to stop worrying about

family support because that is not an NHS target and so on, the parts of

government responsible for children and families (DfES, Sure Start Unit

etc) are really keen to have health visiting under their wing. They

need us, too, because the green paper is seriously lacking in health

input or representation.

I am interested that there has been very little comment or response

about this issue, although I have had 'side messages' from a few people

who know they would 'at risk' if they voice opinions about health

visiting publicly.

Is there little interest or concern? Has everyone given up hope, or

decided it doesn't matter? Is the consensus that the community public

health nursing register will be alright in the end? Or is it one worry

too many, on top of all the other, practice-based concerns?

best wishes

Gill Newell wrote:

>Dear

>

>Thank you for your succinct but depressing message about the 3rd part of

>the register. It seems to me that our concerns behind the Mayday

>campaign have become reality.

>

>Health visiting has been sidelined and devalued for many years (except

>in govt policy documents!)and the third part of the new Register is part

>of this process. The apparent disregard for health visiting (both

>principles and practice)by those behind this development will inevitably

>have consequences in practice: we might see an increase in bogus health

>visitors, for example. It will affect recruitment on a wide scale,

>especially new developments like Children's Trusts and Children's

>centres, as employers will have to be very careful to avoid employing

>people who don't have the skills their title suggests they have. But

>maybe this has to happen in order for things to change? Maybe we have to

>wait for these effects to be seen before being able to make people

>listen?

>

>Paradoxically, I think it actually leaves an opportunity for direct

>entry and for educational establishments to develop new courses. And as

>for the students not being registered with the NMC, health visiting as a

>profession in its own right has been eradicated, so what have we got to

>lose? We could end up with a much better training for students, with no

>nursing/medical baggage and hopefully far less of a policy-practice

>divide. As for what we call this new breed of professional.....

>

>So perhaps we have a glimmer of hope?

>

>Best wishes

>

>Gill

>

> Digest Number 1043

>

October 11, 2003

Why could not, like many other professional groups at the moment,

health visitors be a self-regulating profession..can the CPHVA

lead on this, or could some independent free spirited HVs start moving

matters in that direction?

Pleae forgive my ignorance here and this may well have all been well

rehearsed before!

Digest Number 1043

>

October 12, 2003

As someone based in practice, I felt

rather embarrassed to read of the lack of comment on this issue – because I am

guilty of not commenting.The reason for not commenting is the last sentence in

your last paragraph. In spite of the low morale at the coalface in general, I think

youd be surprised at how many HV¡Çs aren¡Çt aware of this debate at all .

Digest Number 1043

>

October 12, 2003

That is a good thought Chris; there is an organisation (UK Standing Conference

on Health visiting education) that comprises most of the universities that

run health visiting courses. They might be able to reach a consensus on

what is needed and provide a lead. b/w

Manning wrote:

Why could not, like many other professional groups at the moment,

health visitors be a self-regulating profession..can the CPHVA

lead on this, or could some independent free spirited HVs start moving

matters in that direction?

Pleae forgive my ignorance here and this may well have all been well

rehearsed before!

Digest Number 1043

October 12, 2003

Thanks ; it is really hard to keep taking on board new 'future oriented'

things, when the present seems so hard to contend with!

Noy wrote:

As someone based

in practice, I felt rather embarrassed to read of the lack of comment on

this issue – because I am guilty of not commenting.The reason for not commenting

is the last sentence in your last paragraph. In spite of the low morale at

the coalface in general, I think youd be surprised at how many HV¡Çs aren¡Çt

aware of this debate at all .

October 12, 2003

Are you 'top bananas' in Senate going to catalyse and enable that consensus?

The future is through the 'bubble-up' robust networking of enthused, aspirational individuals

linking up in this way to 'head off' the inane process-driven mandarins

who gain power and act out their own narcisstic and psychopatholigcal needs....

even sending their finest young men to die in battle.I note that whilst their

spirits might have been present at the memorial service, their bodies

(unlike Tony Blur and Cheri's) were conspicuous by their absence?

History repeats itself until people listen (Groundhog Day) and whilst this is not Iraq,

in my book, the broad principles are the same. We need positive practice and

evidence-experience driving health, social care and national infrastructure, coupled

up to the right engines (us), sustainable funding and uncoupled from short-term

politicisation, sound-bites and mindless lowest common denominator targets.

This is real empowerment..we are not given it by others, we claim it for ourselves.

It is not the majority who work in the NHS who need 'modernising' (a term variously

interpreted and used to label those 'recidivists' unenamoured of New Labour), it

is our political and bureaucratic systems.

All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing..the principle of entropy?

Digest Number 1043

October 12, 2003

Hi . Hope you are finally settling in. I haven't responded because at present I find the whole thing so depressing, but will try to get into a more positive mood soon. Where is the CPHVA in all this?

June

October 13, 2003

HI

Your response set me thinking - we did talk about meeting up to consider and

write a joint response form Senate and we probably do need to do that in

the next few weeks.

Interestingly despite the comments on SENATE about cutbacks - this is

certainly not the case everywhere as there does in many places seem to be a

realisation that what HVs and SN do is important and is very much part of

the new agenda. There are also some excellent champions out there trying to

make it happen.

Has anyone heard any more about the Chief Nurse looking at the role of the

Hv with those at risk - like you suggest there seems to be little

comment any where.

I am also amazed at how few people know about the consultation on the third

part of the register even at senior levels and have found myself on more

than one occasion in the last two weeks explaining it to people. I also

came across some practice nurses/nurse practitioners or were very concerned

at its contents and how it would not meet their needs.

I am beginning to get a sense that we have just not had enough debate and

discussion to know what is required and the change that is going on in

primary care at present with the new gp contract, the children's green paper

and so on means that what is decided now will not be right next year. I do

wander if the NMC is perhaps being forced to do this the wrong way round and

that it needs to explore post registration education first before it can

decide on the register.

Margaret

Digest Number 1043

> >

May 7, 2004

In a message dated 5/7/04 3:16:40 AM Mountain Daylight Time,

SSRI medications writes:

> all those murdered by doctors and

> psychiatrists in Germany, Austria and Poland from 1939 to 1948.

>

> A psychiatric diagnosis was their death verdict.

>

> Remembering these past victims, we are aware that even today state

> supported coercive psychiatric laws and practices violate human

> rights woridwide.

>

And what's changed today??? Not very much! It's the same old same old --

now we just have a better arsenal of chemical lobotomies and drugs that make you

kill yourself and others.

Blind Reason

a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue

Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again.

An army of sheep led by a lion would

defeat an army of lions led by a sheep.

- Oriental proverb

July 2, 2006

Hi Patrice,

I am not sure what's best for your brother - perhaps someone else

here more knowledgeable in the world of VCO can answer your question.

You may want to provide more specific information about your

brother's condition, too.

All the best,

Karl

On 02/07/2006, at 1:36 AM, Coconut Oil wrote:

> Re: article extract

>

> Posted by: " Patrice " patricethompson27@...

> patricethompson27

>

> Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:25 am (PST)

>

> Hey Karl thanks for emailing me, I'm trying to get some information

> for my brother, about how many teaspoons of the coconut he should

> take concerning his cd4 count. Please email me back soon. Thanks

November 10, 2011

Sent from my Windows PhoneFrom:

Sent: 11/9/2011 2:07 PM

Subject: Digest Number 1043

Vitamix Enthusiasts

Messages In This Digest (25 Messages)

1a.

Chocolate cherry soft serve from Jane on Blend it and Mend It

From: flnancy1958

1b.

Re: Chocolate cherry soft serve from Jane on Blend it and Mend It

From: Marsha

1c.

Re: Chocolate cherry soft serve from Jane on Blend it and Mend It

From: Bridge

2a.

Sweet and Spicy Cinnamon Nut Butter

From: flnancy1958

2b.

Re: Sweet and Spicy Cinnamon Nut Butter

From: Lea Ann Savage

3.

Cashew nut butter

From: flnancy1958

4.1.

Re: Winter Smoothies?

From: flnancy1958

4.2.

Re: Winter Smoothies?

From:

4.3.

Re: Winter Smoothies?

From: anetaze

5.1.

Green Soup and Healthy Smoothies

From:

5.2.

Re: Green Soup and Healthy Smoothies

From: Lea Ann Savage

6a.

Green Drinks

From: chefodin

6b.

Re: Green Drinks

From: Lea Ann Savage

7a.

I want to try a low carbÂ pizzacrustÂ using cauliflower

From: crenita2

7b.