Fw: OPEN LETTER TO ALL CANCER SUFFERERS

[Guest guest]

OPEN LETTER TO ALL SUFFERING FROM CANCER AND THOSE WANTING TO AVOID CANCER

Boy cures himself of cancer!

http://bonuspages.com/essiac/child.htm

Forgive me for the somewhat candid " lets get real " nature of this post. I feel

earnestly that everyone has the God-given right to know the truth about cancer.

So I offer these words in the hope that some will listen. Be warned. This

letter, and more particularly the references, might shock you. I make no

apology.

-oOo-

Are there REAL alternatives to the treatments offered by mainstream medicine?

I believe there are. And I am going to attempt to explain why.

When diagnosed with cancer a person can feel alone and helpless not knowing what

to do or where to turn. In this situation she or he has little knowledge of

alternative treatments unless they have read something beforehand. Even then,

once in the hands of the doctor, it is hard to resist his advice. For instance,

a woman with breast cancer might ask: " Do you really have to irradiate both

breasts, doctor? " and will probably consent even though she reasons " What's the

point of it if it has already spread? "

http://home.sol.no/~dusan/cancer_radiation_therapy.html

We have been conditioned from an early age to believe, " Doctor knows best " . And

it is most particularly when we are under stress that we tend to regress to an

earlier age for support, which makes it even harder to separate ourselves from

our early conditioning in order to assess the situation. Under these

circumstance we tend to 'do as we are told'.

The most vital step in making any decision about choosing a therapy is to TAKE

CHARGE of the situation and 'stay in the Adult' - a Transactional Analysis term

- which means, simply, to avoid Parent/Child dialogs so as to prevent being

carried along like a machine part on a conveyor belt. Only then will real

choices begin to become apparent.

There is a strong Parent-to-Child dialog underlying every transaction between

doctor and patient. Even the term 'patient' forces us into a psychologically

inadequate position. Our question to the doctor should not be " Will I get

better? " , but, " What has been the progress in cancer research over the last 30

years, doctor? What are my options? " . If he fails to answer then look elsewhere.

The real answer to this question is: Man has gone to the moon and his robots

have roved the surface of Mars yet he has declared that he has LOST the war

against cancer even after spending billions of dollars on research

(www.preventcancer.com/POCR/PofC-R.htm).

Why?

Unfortunately, the Cancer Industry is controlled mainly by the pharmaceutical

companies, who are making huge profits, and cancer authorities everywhere have

demonstrated that they have failed in their duty to provide effective cures for

cancer, being unilaterally responsible for the unnecessary death and mutilation

of millions of people worldwide:

www.citizensvoice.org http://www.preventcancer.com/POCR/PofC-R.htm

www.ralphmoss.com www.pnc.com.au/%7Ecafmr/online/research/cancer.html

Almost every cure for cancer to emerge since the turn of this century has been

suppressed by mainstream medical authorities. For this reason even the most

dedicated oncologist is unable to offer anything more than basic chemotherapy,

radiation, and surgery. If they try they usually get struck off.

(Well you may say: No, there are trials of new substances. But generally, trials

are limited to a few people and have been proving to be ineffective).

I realised there was a definite pattern here after joining an alternative cancer

society that gave me access to its library of books, reference materials, and

videotapes, along with their own collective personal knowledge gained over the

years.

I learned about the Cancer War and about the enormous power of the medical

establishment. Book after book convinced me that cancer is a systemic disease

that results when the bodies natural ability to fight cancer is diminished.

However, the one thing that clinched it for me, and got me started on my quest,

was a documentary video made by Realdad, called " Hoxsey: The Quack who Cured

Cancer " (www.artbell.com/waynebooks.html and www.nets.com/hoxsey), a story about

Harry Hoxsey, an oil tycoon, who had a herbal tonic that was passed down through

his family that would get rid of cancer. He had many clinics throughout the USA

in the '50s, but the AMA, using the FDA, closed him down by using the legal

system again and again to try to force him out of business.

The AMA eventually wore Hoxsey down and defeated him and closed down all of

his clinics - bar one.

There is now only one Hoxsey clinic left operating out of Mexico

(http://biomedical.hypermart.net/) run by a nurse, Mildred - who was

initially skeptical until she went to see for herself and became Hoxsey's most

ardent supporter. She still claims an extraordinary cure rate of 80% - and

that's even after the medical establishment have finished poking, prodding,

x-raying, irradiating, poisoning, and mutilating victims only to fail - which

makes it a lot harder to heal them. She also opens her medical records freely to

the public, and she has been audited many times.

So how has the truth been covered up for so long?!

Its simple.

The AMA's main thrust is to label all cancer crusaders, even bonefide doctors

and medical researchers with ph D's, as " quacks " and then drag them through

court and literally jail them (eg Rife, Koch, Gaston Naessens)! Most of the time

the cases get thrown out of court through lack of evidence and because of the

overwhelming weight of cure testimonials presented by the defense. But

unfortunately, the sheer weight of ongoing litigations can take its toll in the

end.

The emotive term " quack " , coined by the AMA, sticks, and is generally accepted

without question by an unsuspecting public.

However, times 'they ARE a-changing'.....

There is a new type of doctor emerging having sympathies toward alternative

therapies. He or she is a rare but growing breed. Look out for them.

-oOo-

By the way, did you know that almost everyone gets cancer, but the immune system

attacks and destroys it? A disease state develops when the immune system can no

longer contain it. If the immune system is damaged then cancer wins. If the

immune system is strong or strengthened then the immune system wins. The immune

system has many levels of defense and must be properly nourished to function

properly. When I say 'nourish' I am not talking about just proteins or

carbohydrates as have been popularized in adverts. What I am talking about are

the missing ingredients in modern food: vitamins, enzymes, minerals, fatty

acids, amino acids, and herbs etc.

The established medical community claims cancer is a localized disease. However,

when the main body of a cancer is removed, what inevitably happens is some

cancer cells remain that are promoted to grow dramatically by the same mechanism

that repairs the surgical wound. Further, the effects of chemotherapy and

radiation stresses the body more and destroys or weakens the immune system.

Since the root cause of the problem initially was inadequate immune function,

the cancer soon returns and spreads with a vengeance.

You might say: how do you know? Who are you?

I am nobody. I am not doctor, and I do not possess any formal training in

medicine. So please don't take my word for it - find out for yourself what the

truth is - no one is going to hand it to you on a platter. you will have to do

the work yourself - and this is the first step toward real change.

A cancer crusader friend - now retired - put it this way:

" If you keep doing what you did - you will keep getting what you got " .

-oOo-

Let me tell you what motivates me:

Both my parents died of cancer.

When my mother was diagnosed with cancer of the ovaries I was unable to help her

because, like most people, I didn't know there was anything other than

conventional treatment. The oncologist talked to her in terms of " quality of

life " and used other seductive pseudo-meaningful terms. But we all knew what

" quality of life " meant - they thought she was going to die. So I prayed for her

earnestly, and one day she knocked at my door and said the swelling in her neck

was going down. But being naive and not understanding prayer I stopped praying

thinking " its done " .

She trusted the local cancer clinic who treated her with an " experimental " drug

in a trial program. She eventually died from a heart attack caused by a known

side effect of that horrible substance - which actually did kill the cancer but

also killed the patient.

This was probably counted as a success in the trial!

Since that time I have been motivated to study alternative treatments for

cancer. It was during this period that I discovered the awful truth: cancer is a

multi-billion dollar industry - and they don't love you. I discovered something

else about the establishment as well but, I don't even want to write about it -

its that bad!

Recently, my father contracted lung cancer (he was 78). Naturally, being on the

committee of a self-help grass-roots alternative cancer society, at that time, I

suggested to my father that he read my cancer survival book. He did read some of

it but he didn't believe it. He said he liked the little cartoons in it though!

He trusted the medical system and believed in it.

Being an ex-serviceman he was treated free at the local repat. He announced

proudly " they know how to look after their own " .

He was x-rayed and they decided to take a biopsy and it was while on the

operating table that he suffered a heart attack while under anesthetic - his

body couldn't cope with the stress.

They allowed him to go home after a few days with a recommendation that he have

a course of radiation treatment even though the doctors felt it would do not

good. He did have it, and soon after deteriorated, developed secondary cancer in

his prostate, and died.

Routine X-rays taken months before diagnosis actually showed a cricket-ball

sized lump in my fathers left lung but his physician either didn't see it, or he

didn't tell my father it was there. This physician later resigned from my

fathers case when it was pointed out to him on the x-ray.

When I was initially informed of my fathers diagnosis of cancer I decided to

build a special machine, a banned device, called a Rife Ray Machine that

produced a plasma ray that kills cancer microbes. I got a manual

(http://www.rt66.com/~rifetech/) I sent away for the parts and built it. I

planned to treat my father with it. There were some teething problems getting it

going - returned faulty parts etc - which wasted precious time. But, eventually,

I got it to work. I arrived at my father's house the day after he died - too

late.

If only he had listened to me! But people do get sick of life and want to go.

That's another factor in the healing equation that many dismiss - He missed my

mother terribly.

I use the machine on myself these days, and I also lend it out to others.

Does the Rife Ray Machine work? See

http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/1251/page2.html

http://www.kalamark.com/batyah/

http://www.frii.com/~protech/ptnRife.html

http://home.att.net/~ralph.hartwell/

http://www.mindspring.com/~turf/alt.htm

Since then I have spoken to many people who have been diagnosed with very

serious cancers that are still leading a normal and active life - some are at

the same age as my father. They all seem to have this in common: they reject the

quick-fix option offered by mainstream medicine, and choose some form of

alternative therapies, mostly consisting of: herbs, minerals, juices, natural

food diets, elimination of fluoride/fat/sugar in the diet; embracing suppressed

therapies, psychological counseling, meditation and prayer, and even laughter

therapy - yes laughter is great medicine!

Many had their amalgams removed because of mercury toxicity. and the list goes

on. Each person seemed to have their own chosen program that they believe in and

often experiment on themselves with different things.

-oOo-

Remember this: The medical establishment protect their own interests - they have

to - despite what they say. I do like to think that most doctors are dedicated,

believing in what they are doing, but how can they be effective if they receive

inadequate training and are denied correct advice from those who claim to know

the truth? A carpenter is only as good as the tools he uses. Right? Can a

plumber tighten a nut with a screwdriver? Or can a housewife cook tea with a

nuclear reactor? No. The right tools are required for the right job.

So, anyone wishing to receive the best possible treatment has first to free

themselves from the mindset of the establishment and then embark on a new

journey: reading books, and searching the internet - its all there - including

establishment disinformation.

Another thing that most people fail to appreciate is this: there is a 5-10 year

delay from the time that a new drug is discovered until it is actually applied

in practice. And thats assuming that the system supplies the best drug for

evaluation and not the most expedient drug (see AZT). AZT was shelved because it

was too poisonous even for cancer treatment. So what did they do? They released

it for the treatment for AIDS! However, they neglected to tell AIDS sufferers

that the side-affect of AZT IS AIDS itself! Anyone who takes it will die from

AIDS.

Ready supply of effective drugs frustrate the community because of big delays

caused by the millions of dollars required to test drugs - which limits the the

field to the major drug suppliers. The US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA)

adherence to prolonged rigorous testing is the main inhibitor to free supply of

treatment. Most western countries usually follow the FDA's lead and

unfortunately things take a long time to happen.

So the point is: if you want tomorrows medicine today then you will have to go

get it yourself and not rely on a doctor who's hands are tied.

Ask an oncologist what medicine he would take if he was diagnosed with cancer?

His truthful answer will shock you!

-oOo-

Here are some suggested links to begin investigating:

www.essiac.net./breast.htm and http://www.essiac.net

http://www.cancerinformation.org/

www.ralphmoss.com

www.lef.org

http://209.170.56.240/~imo12267/cancer_arlin_therapy.html

http://www.tidslerne.dk/Choice/choice.html

http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/alt/altthrpy.htm

http://home.sol.no/~dusan/cancer_dr_budwig.html

http://greenmini.mrbean.net.au/~wlast/cancer2.htm

www.peg.apc.org/~nexus/chachoua.html

www.artbell.com/waynebooks.html

http://greenmini.mrbeam.net.au/~wlast/cancer2.htm

http://drwhitaker.com/wit_food3

Search the web using a search engine such as www.altavista.com

Some excellent keywords to use are:

rife essiac hoxsey minerals oxygen ozone peroxide " aloe vera " urea

hydrazine budwig flaxseed cancell herbs pawpaw " green tea " Laetrile

parasite " Hulda " " alternative medicine " ginko vitamins magnesium

" Linus ing " bromolain " colloidal Silver " Homeopathic diet cleansing

Kombucha magnet magnetic breathing zapper 714X " Gaston Naessan "

" Ray " " body electronics " garlic turmeric crucifers cabbage

Magnesium Hyperthermia mercury amalgams

Use the advanced boolean search feature and search on <keyword> AND cancer to

narrow the search down.

-oOo-

For those who live by the word of God I must mention here what is truly

'Biblical' and what is not. Herbs, water, vegetables, and oils ARE mentioned in

the Bible in connection with health. Nowhere in the Bible have I seen mention of

using poisons and radiation to cure disease. The book of Acts refers to

being bitten by the snake and surviving due to the power of the spirit of God -

but nowhere have I seen mention of the use of poisonous substances being used to

promote healing.

Certain quarters of the Christian Community are saying that herbs are the " work

of the devil " because they were used by witches long ago and have been falsely

associated with the occult. This could not be further from the truth. The early

Christians clearly made use of herbs - even the names of some herbs were

christianized to make them 'acceptable' - e.g.: " St Marý's Thistle and St 's

Wort " (the first is for liver repair, the second is an anti-depressant)

Make no mistake: herbs are Gods medicine and cost almost nothing compared to the

inflated prices of orthodox medical treatment. That's why the pharmaceutical

companies don't like herbs - they've tested herbs - but they wont promote them

because there is no money in herbs. There have been books written about

anticancer herbs. But have you heard about it? Anyone can grow their own herbs

- why should they do it? However, they will try to genetically modify herbs and

there is also a push on to patent herbs so as to control them - but that's

another story.

-oOo-

Now, the Pawpaw leaf is possibly the most potent anticancer herb in the

world(www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/9709.McLaughlin.pawpaw.html). This is not

opinion but is the result of laboratory testing. Most herbs have been tested for

anti-cancer effects. The other most potent herb would have to be Aloe Vera.

One source I know for Pawpaw Leaf Extract is S.A.F.E in Australia (PO box 2233

Burleigh Junction QLD 4220, 56 Junction Rd Burleigh Junction QLD 4220. Ph 067

55934566 fax 5593 4877). Also, check out their colloidal minerals, Green Barley

powder, and proanthogen mixture - this a great combination - I take it myself!

They also have a naturopath on staff to offer advice.

Some things you can get now out of the supermarket are: GREEN tea (not brown tea

http://www.bodyatlas.com/infobytes/1998/19981214i2p1.shtml), kiwi fruit (Chinese

gooseberry), juice WHOLE pineapples (the center throwaway part contains

bromelain - which attacks the surface of cancer cells).

Also see http://www.mindspring.com/~turf/alt/misc/kitchen.txt

Vitamin C powder IN LARGE DOSES (forget anything less than a gram - more like

8-20 grams. There are protocols available from most self-help cancer societies)

- get it from the health food store but it can also can be purchased in bulk

from chemical suppliers (as we do).

Much research has been conducted on the effects of intravenous and megadose

vitamin C on cancer with positive results, and yet the pharmaceutical companies

are trying to get rid of it by reducing the pill strength available in health

food stores. They are trying to do this through the CODEX:

http://acupuncture.com/News/CODEX.htm

http://www.all-natural.com/codex-1.html

http://arxc.com/politics.htm

http://www.citizensvoice.org/berlintribu.htm

http://www.fao.org/catalog/new/products/codex.htm

It seems to me that almost anything BUT chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery has

a positive effect on cancer! Maybe this is because the published side affect of

chemotherapy IS cancer, and I personally would not stand in front of a high

energy radiation machine for anything. " Doesn't radiation cause cancer doctor? "

(see http://greenmini.mrbean.net.au/~wlast/cancer2.htm), and, as discussed

previously, surgery also promotes the growth of cancer. But, sometimes surgery

is necessary, and If this is the case then one can take megadoses of vitamin C

(powder by the teaspoon), Ginko Biloba (to reduce inflammation), and drink the

whole Pineapple (try with apples and mint - yum!) every day to help healing and

prevent regrowth of the remaining cancer cells.

This is but a small fraction of what can be done.

-oOo-

JOIN AN ACTIVE CANCER SUPPORT GROUP. Mix with others and share - its great

therapy. Find a group that actively supports the promotion of alternative health

and is willing to accept new ideas. If a society is chaired by a doctor attached

to the local hospital and sells wigs then it might not be the best one to join -

even if it does call itself a charity.

-oOo-

And, finally, the prayer made in faith can heal the sick.

Jesus was a healer. He healed the sick. He had faith to heal but it also

required faith on the part of the one being healed for it to work (why couldn't

he heal in his home town?). Further, I have been astounded in the past to hear

normal human beings who profess the name of Christ claim - almost in the same

breath - that it is actually WRONG to heal someone. It is never wrong to heal!

Isaiah says: take the yoke of oppression off the backs of my people. Jesus

asked: Is it wrong to heal on the Sabbath? (let alone any other day!). He said:

" YOU can do this and MORE! "

Do you have to be a Christian to be healed by faith?

In our experience, and in the experience of the qualified and famous healer,

Canon Jim Glennan, the answer is a resounding " No! " . In fact it has been his

observation that non-Christians seem to respond better to faith healing than do

Christians because they are more accepting of it. Why is this? It seems to have

something to do with certain man-made interpretations of the Bible that poison

the soul. If you live by faith you will be healed by faith; anything else is no

gain at all.

Learn to reject the negative emotions of fear, guilt, shame, humiliation,

powerlessness, rejection, and worry; which have been shown to inhibit immune

function. Choose instead to embrace forgiveness, faith, trust, love, acceptance,

and hope - as Jesus taught in the scriptures.

-oOo-

Find out the truth - get well - and join the good fight.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Please pass this on to anyone having cancer - they deserve to know the

truth.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------