Dr. Koch's Glyoxylide The Cancer Racket Exposed

[Guest guest]

Thanks for the info. I have an overview of Dr. Koch's

Glyoxylide/Malonide at my website, pasted below.Gavin.

http://www.cancerinform.freewebsites.com/kocha.html

This information was derived from Haley's book,

" Politics In Healing. " All quotes have a bracketed

page

number by them. Thank you. Gavin .

Dr Koch and

Glyoxylide/Malonide

These days polio is a virtually unheard of

disease in America. But there was a time when it was

devastating and

greatly feared. In August 1949, 19-year-old

Lou ’ leg gave way. The next day the leg became

paralyzed

and their doctor, Harold , told them it

was Polio. injected with 2cc of

Glyoxylide. The next day

sensation returned to ’s leg and that

evening she came down to dinner. The news of ’s

startling recovery

immediately made headline news across the

country. This was the first time had used

Glyoxylide and he

asked city hospital authorities if he could try

it on more Polio cases. Permission was denied. The AMA

had

blacklisted the drug. In December 1952 the local

branch of the AMA expelled from membership

thereby

denying him hospital privileges. It didn’t

matter that Dr. had done his job and saved

from at least

severe physical problems, probably paralysis.

What was important to the AMA was that he had done it

using a

drug unapproved by them.

Glyoxylide/Malonide was developed by Dr.

Koch (pronounced “Coke”). Koch (1885-1967) received

his BA,

MA and PhD (Biochemistry) all from the

University of Michigan. In 1914 he became professor of

physiology at the

Detroit College of Medicine where he earned his

MD in 1918. Koch noticed that cancer and other

diseases broke

down the bodies oxidation system; if there was

healthy oxidation in the body there was no disease.

Koch decided

to develop a non-destructive cancer therapy that

would work with the body’s natural chemistry. He found

that heart

and brain tissue was particularly resistant to

oxygen starvation. He identified carbonyl compounds as

being

responsible for producing energy and was vital

to the body’s oxidation process. Now it was time to

test his theory,

and in 1917 he was given his chance. A woman in

late stages of metastasis liver cancer in a Detroit

hospital was

only expected to live a week. Koch gave her a

carbonyl rich extract of heart and brain tissue. When

visiting the

following week Koch found the hospital bed empty

and assumed she had died. The following June however

Koch was astounded to bump into the woman on the

street who gave him a big hug. The woman said she’d

asked after him but the hospital had lied and

told her he went off to work for the U.S. Army.

After Koch wrote an article about this in the

Detroit Medical Journal an AMA representative came to

visit. He asked

for all rights to the treatment as well as all

the research and methodology of creating it. Not

surprisingly, Koch

refused. A couple of months later Koch was

denounced as a quack in the Journal of American

Medicine (JAMA).

Koch soon developed a method of creating oxygen

rich carbonyls synthetically that was far cheaper and

easier

than the complex heart and brain tissue extract.

They were called Glyoxylide and Malonide. A simple

explanation of

Koch’s treatment is that it kick starts the

body’s oxidation system.

In 1919 Koch requested the Wayne County Medical

Society to appoint a committee to test his treatment

in five

terminal cancer cases. The committee chose five

“stretcher” cases, all at deaths door. Koch treated

them and in

three weeks they were all up and about, cheerful

and gaining strength. The committee immediately

ordered them

all home and “forbade them any more care from

Koch.” (p 55). The committee’s final report was no

results.

Koch wrote about one of the patients’ recoveries

in his 1955 book, “Survival Factor.”

“Mrs. Edith Fritts had cancer of the uterus

proven by laporotomy as extending throughout the

abdomen and

perforating the stomach so as to cause severe

bleeding. She lived fifteen years in good health after

the

treatment and died from an accident. The

coroner’s autopsy showed no cancer was present…” Koch

had

given Edith one shot of Glyoxylide. " (p55.)

In 1923 Koch appealed to the committee to change

its false report made in 1919. They refused. Dr. Dewey

M.D., a

professor of homeopathy at the University of

Michigan had observed the Cancer Committee’s official

review and

wrote to Koch on October 25, 1924.

“I have received what is termed the latest

report on your treatment. This claims to be an account

of the

séance held on Nov. 5, 1923, at which I was

present and took notes of each case. For a studied

intent to

falsify, a premeditated determination to condemn

everything, and an unscientific, un-American

assumption to

be judge, jury, and prosecuting witnesses, the

report of this so-called committee outstrips in bias,

unfairness,

and mendacity anything that has ever been my lot

to observe in a medical practice of forty-two years.”(

p56/57.)

The letter concludes “I hope that some day your

treatment will have an investigation before a body of

seekers

after the truth. These you will not find in

American official medicine, which is a trust to keep

all progress not

coming from it’s own out of the field.”

Incredibly, during 30 some years of Koch’s therapy

being used in the U.S.

the Wayne County Medical Society’s “trial” is

the only official test ever carried out despite

repeated requests from

Koch.

Dr. C. Everett Field of the Radium Institute of

New York reviewed the Institute’s October 1923’s

“Investigation of

Thirty-Four Koch Cases”. Field wrote, “The

exhibit without doubt formed the most remarkable

experience of

my medical career.” (p57) Field spent many years

documenting and publishing the results of many of

Koch’s

cases. Field was also reprimanded by the AMA for

supporting Koch and suffered as a result.

In 1935 Koch went to Belgium at the invitation

of Dr. Maisin who was a world-renowned cancer expert.

Six weeks

later a group of powerful American doctors came

to Belgium and tried to convince Maisin that Koch was

a fraud.

But Maisin was only interested in the truth and

told them, “I am convinced it is scientifically sound

and clinically

efficient.” (p63) The motive for the American’s

visit was that one of them had large investments in

radium and did

not want competition from Koch’s treatment.

Dr. Arnott was acquainted with Maisin and told

the Ontario Cancer Commission (1939) what Maisin had

told him.

(p64)

Dr. Koch’s formula is a new method for treating

disease. The Koch formula should not be called merely

a cure

for cancer. It is a very important step and is

likely to change the whole picture of medicine and

pathology

because of the clinical results. 

In January 1943 Koch was in court fighting the

first of two trials brought by the FDA for supposed

labeling fraud . It

is in large part because of these two trials

that we know how effective and how much evidence there

was to

support Glyoxylide’s effectiveness. Koch

organized a large amount of case histories with

biopsies and patient

testimonials.

The Koch lawyers presented hard evidence of

cures of cancer of the bone, uterus, stomach, liver,

spleen,

pancreas, ….,breast…as well as cures of TB,

polio, asthma, heart thrombosis, leprosy, hyperthropic

arthritis…The government lawyers presented

various experts who admitted they had no experience

with the

Koch therapies. Still, they testified,

Glyoxylide and Malonide could not be effective “in

their opinion.” (p71-72)

One particular case was Wesley Roebuck, who had

surgery in 1926 for cancer of the stomach. The disease

returned so he went to Koch and received a shot

of Glyoxylide. The cancer cleared up and he testified

at Koch’s

trial over 14 years later and cancer free. In

the first trial, two newspapers closely followed the

proceedings, the

“Detroit Times” and the “Detroit Free Press.”

Headlines taken form court testimony read, (p72)

Three Cancer Cures Put in Record at the Koch

Trial…Hospital Executive gives Case Histories as

Defense

Witness…Doctor Testifies Koch Formula Aided 16

Cases…Cancer Doctor Says Koch Cure Replaced X-Rays. 

Even though Koch provided vast amounts of

evidence that his treatment worked it was a hung Jury.

The country

was at war. Americans found it difficult to

believe the government would suppress an effective

cancer treatment.

Koch’s second trial in 1946 was declared a

mistrial.

Dr. Albert Wahl of Mt. Vision, NY, is an

interesting example of how people can change dogmatic

opinions when

they investigate, or are forced to face, the

facts   for themselves. For years Wahl dismissed

Koch’s treatment as

worthless, basing his opinion on JAMA

misinformation. His sister became ill with cancer and

his father took her to

Koch, over Wahl’s objections. “She promptly

recovered in characteristic fashion” (p81) Wahl wrote

in his 1947

book “Least Common Denominator,” in which he

documented 150 cures he had observed using the Koch

treatment. Wahl said of the Koch treatment, “The

most startling element is the utter simplicity of the

Koch

treatments… After using them, I felt I’d never

practiced medicine before.”(p81/82)

Fearing further government harassment and

possible further trials that he could not afford to

defend against, Koch

left the U.S. in 1948 never to return. He died

in 1967 and with him went Glyoxylide.

--- D G <rc_glider@...> wrote:

>

> If I'm not mistaken, The Burzynski Clinic can now

> take patients directly,

> on a clinical trial basis. This, after 20+ years of

> persecution by the

> orthydox Gestapo. I believe this decision came about

> because of the handling

> by the FDA of Navarro www.cancerbusters.com .

> What is most disturbing about this scenario is

> that antineoplastins, even

> after failed chemo/rad/surgery, was still 700% more

> effective with no life

> threatening side effects. Even though he had

> thousands of case histories, he

> was never allowed to go into any trials, until now.

> There is no doubt the cancer industry is being

> protected by the powers

> that be. I don't know if you are familiar with him,

> but Dr. F. Koch

> had a cure for cancer in the 20's, and many hundreds

> of doctors and vets

> were using his SSR successfully. Go to

> http://www.williamfkoch.com and read.

> Note: it still exists.....

>

> >From: Barry Jakes <freee81@...>

> >Reply-

> >

> >Subject: [ ] The Cancer Racket Exposed

> >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:07:01 -0700 (PDT)

> >

> >Hello,

> >There are times in our lives when we must stand up

> forcertain issues,

> >rights or just pass on informationthat we believe

> is crucial. For me, this

> >is one ofthose times. After about 14 months and

> 1500 some hoursof research,

> >I know that at least a dozen veryeffective cancer

> treatments have and are

> >beingsuppressed by the pharmaceutical/medical

> complex. Myanswer as to

> >Why?is fairly long and is answered at my newly

> creatednon-profit website.

> >My article, " TheCancer Racket " was published in

> " Clamor " magazinesFeb/Mar

> >(re-titled, " Can You Trust Your Doctor " ?)issue this

> year. Feel free to

> >email and circulate iton the Internet, unchanged,

> non-commercially and

> >withattribute please.

> >Over ten thousand Americans die every week

> fromcancer, a medical vietnam

> >every 6 weeks. Yet here weare in the 21st century

> still being prescribed

> >thesame three treatments that have failed for over

> 50years; surgery,

> >chemotherapy and radiation treatment.Surgery is the

> most effective of the

> >three but haslimitations and other disadvantages.

> Chemotherapy andradiation

> >are toxic, cause cancer, and wreck theimmune

> system. They cause very

> >serious side-effectsand do far more harm than good

> for the vast majorityof

> >cancer patients. But those are our main options,

> sothe oncologists say.

> >Please read this next story and try to put yourself

> inthe shoes of Ric and

> >a Schiff. In 1993 their 4year old daughter,

> Crystin, became ill with

> >themost deadly form of brain cancer. Crystin

> underwentsurgery at the

> >University of California at SanFrancisco Medical

> Center (UCSF). Crystin's

> >prognosiswas bleak, she would be dead in a few

> months.Chemotherapy and

> >radiation treatment may extend herlife further, but

> the side-effects were

> >appalling. Ricand a were told there were no

> other treatmentoptions.

> >Crystin went through six months of hell. During

> thistime Ric and a

> >found out about Dr. Burzynski'snon-toxic

> antineoplastons that have very few

> >shortterm side effects and are very effective

> against braincancer. The

> >doctors at UCSF told them it wasworthless. Ric and

> a decided to go

> >ahead anyway.

> >Incredibly, antineoplastons put Crystin

> intoremission. Although Crystin

> >died in 1995, it was notfrom cancer, but from brain

> damage as a result

> >ofchemotherapy and radiation treatment.

> >Later Ric and a found out that a doctor at

> UCSFhad taken a close

> >interest in a previous patientssuccess using

> antineoplastons . From

> >1989/1993 Dr.Prados had sent Burzynski 14 lettters

> documenting thecase of

> >Jeff Keller's brain cancer remission

> usingBurzynski's treatment. Yet this

> >doctor told Ric anda Schiff that

> antineoplastons were useless. See

> >mysection " ThreeChildren Denied The Best Treatment "

> for moreinformation.

> >Children with brain cancer in America must first

> betreated with

> >chemotherapy/radiation treatment. Afterthe

> pharmaceutical companies have

> >extracted theirblooddollars the child may be

> allowed access to

> >antineoplastons. But it is usually too late

> becausethe

> >chemotherapy/radiation has destroyed the

> childsimmune system. Parents who

> >try refusing orthodoxcancer treatments for their

> children will probably

> >befacing a court order and their child made a ward

> ofthe State.

> >Please help spread the word about the most

> egregiousscandal in the history

> >of medicine. Thepharmaceutical/medical complex ban

> natural/cheapcancer

> >treatments so they can keep peddling theirhighly

> lucrative chemotherapy

> >andradiation treatments. Meanwhile, our

> children,grandparents, wives,

> >husbands, family and friends keepdying.

> >Thank you for your time.

> >Gavin

> >If you have a website, please post a link to

> mywebsite

> >Exposingthe Cancer Indu$try

> >http://www.cancerinform.freewebsites.com/

> >

> >

> >

> >---------------------------------

> >